8.到2020年，有关系的演员要求删除推文是例行公事。一位主管会给另一位主管写信。 "拜登团队有更多内容需要审查"。回复会回来。"已处理。"

9. Celebrities and unknowns alike could be removed or reviewed at the behest of a political party:

9.名人和不知名的人都可以在一个政党的要求下被删除或审查。

10. Both parties had access to these tools. For instance, in 2020, requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were received and honored. However:

10.两党都有机会使用这些工具。例如，在2020年，特朗普白宫和拜登竞选团队的请求都被收到并兑现了。然而。

11. This system wasn't balanced. It was based on contacts. Because Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed by people of one political orientation, there were more channels, more ways to complain, open to the left (well, Democrats) than the right.

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/twitter/summary?id=D000067113

11.这个系统并不平衡。它是基于联系人的。由于推特过去和现在都是由一个政治取向的人组成的，所以左派（好吧，民主党人）比右派有更多的渠道，更多的投诉方式。

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/twitter/summary?id=D000067113

12. The resulting slant in content moderation decisions is visible in the documents you’re about to read. However, it’s also the assessment of multiple current and former high-level executives.

Added ** Okay, there was more throat-clearing about the process, but screw it, let's jump forward

12.在你即将阅读的文件中，可以看到由此产生的内容审核决定的倾斜度。然而，这也是多位现任和前任高层管理人员的评价。

补充** 好吧，关于这个过程有更多的清嗓子，但去它的，让我们向前跳吧

He skipped 13-15 👀

16. The Twitter Files, Part One: How and Why Twitter Blocked the Hunter Biden Laptop Story

他跳过了13-15👀。

16.推特档案，第一部分：推特如何以及为何阻止亨特-拜登笔记本电脑的故事

17. On October 14, 2020, the New York Post published BIDEN SECRET EMAILS, an expose based on the contents of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop:

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/

17.2020年10月14日，《纽约邮报》发表了《拜登的秘密邮件》，这是根据亨特-拜登被遗弃的笔记本电脑的内容所做的揭露。

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/

18. Twitter took extraordinary steps to suppress the story, removing links and posting warnings that it may be “unsafe.” They even blocked its transmission via direct message, a tool hitherto reserved for extreme cases, e.g. child pornography.

18.推特采取了特别的措施来压制这个故事，删除了链接，并发布警告说它可能是 "不安全的"。他们甚至阻止其通过直接信息传播，这种工具迄今只用于极端情况，如儿童色情。

19. White House spokeswoman Kaleigh McEnany was locked out of her account for tweeting about the story, prompting a furious letter from Trump campaign staffer Mike Hahn, who seethed: “At least pretend to care for the next 20 days.”

19.白宫发言人Kaleigh McEnany因在推特上发表有关报道而被锁定账户，引发了特朗普竞选团队工作人员Mike Hahn的愤怒信，他怒斥道。"至少在接下来的20天里假装关心一下吧。"

20.This led public policy executive Caroline Strom to send out a polite WTF query. Several employees noted that there was tension between the comms/policy teams, who had little/less control over moderation, and the safety/trust teams:

20.这导致公共政策执行官Caroline Strom发出了一个礼貌的WTF询问。几位员工指出，在通信/政策团队和安全/信任团队之间存在紧张关系，后者对节制的控制很少/不多。

21. Strom’s note returned the answer that the laptop story had been removed for violation of the company’s “hacked materials” policy: https://web.archive.org/web/20190717143909/https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hacked-materials

21.斯特罗姆的说明返回的答案是，笔记本的故事因违反公司的 "黑客材料 "政策而被删除：https://web.archive.org/web/20190717143909/https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hacked-materials