💭Just sharing some thoughts.
Although many of those who are in power may seem extraordinary, they are really just ordinary people. Many of them are a) stupid b) lazy c) manipulative d) ignorant e) arrogant f) childishly irresponsible (playing with the nuclear war idea like a toy), or combined. Their conversations are not based on facts and logic. They also get emotional. They don't seem to learn from history, no matter how many times it's repeated.
Russia, may end up in Europe after destroying the bandera nazi viper nest. Not because it wants to, but because the Western politicians keep on provoking Russia with their aggressive actions and rhetoric. History proves it.
What is the best course of actions? More guns, more troops, more missiles, getting closer and closer to Russia, developing hysterical Russophobia, and seeding fear of the Russian invasion to their own people? Is this really the best way to handle the situation?
By their own actions, they are provoking Russia to invade and put an end to this madness. How foolish and short-sighted can they be?
I will give them free advice, even though I could charge millions for it since it could save lives, economies, etc.
JUST LEAVE RUSSIA ALONE. STOP POKING THE BEAR.
However, the ruling Western elite will not leave Russia alone because they feel their parasitic rule is about to end. They have already robbed every country so they could maintain their "high standards" lifestyle. To them, the rest of the world is like a bunch of peasants. They are protecting "their democracy", and their "freedom" to do whatever they want. They will go as far as to sacrifice their own people to protect their "ideals", no matter the cost.
Stupid. Lazy. Manipulative. Ignorant. Arrogant. Irresponsible.

💭 Sharing a few more thoughts...
Zelensky screams about the genocide because Russia hit the Ukrainian power grid.
A few things to point out.
1. Energy grid is a legitimate military target. However, in contrast to the US/NATO war tactics that completely destroy all enemy infrastructure within a week, Russia doesn't destroy the stations. Russian precision strikes desynchronize and overload the power grid, splitting it into independent enclaves.
This is as humane as it can possibly be.
2. You can call it a life boomerang, or say Karma is a bitch. Since 2014, Ukrainian society has been poking fun at Donbass and Crimea for not having access to water and electricity, from comedy shows (with Zelensky's participation) to the leading politicians' statements. The problem still exists btw.
So, on one hand, you can feel bad for Ukrainians, but on the other hand, they've deserved it as a collective boomerang.
And you, Mr. Zelensky, just shut up. There is no more humanity left in you. You're fake.

Screw NATO

No comments 😂

Regarding the Ukrainian power grid...
When some cause pain to others, it may feel alright to them in the moment, but as soon as the same pain is inflicted upon them, they start screaming.
❓So, causing x10 pain to others for the last 7 years is Okay, but it is not Okay when it hurts them

This was recently brought up, so I decided to find the original trannoscript.

🔻NATO HQ, Brussels - May 25, 1999

NNA Question (Norwegian News Agency): I am sorry Jamie but if you say that the Army has a lot of back-up generators, why are you depriving 70% of the country of not only electricity, but also water supply, if he has so much back-up electricity that he can use because you say you are only targeting military targets?

Jamie Shea (NATO Spokesman): Yes, I'm afraid electricity also drives command and control systems. If President Milosevic really wants all of his population to have water and electricity all he has to do is accept NATO's five conditions and we will stop this campaign. But as long as he doesn't do so we will continue to attack those targets which provide the electricity for his armed forces. If that has civilian consequences, it's for him to deal with but that water, that electricity is turned back on for the people of Serbia.

🔺A rare glimpse into The Wagner Group. Great documentary. Touching.

💥 If you are a Twitter user. That is crazy. Despite the many criticisms Elon Musk receives, he stands by his views and should be respected for it. I can't believe I am reading all this. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1598825403182874625?s=20&t=5deUpUtOMXG8bV8H7XjO4Q

💡I was having a conversation with ChatGPT, and then decided to ask "Why do people become biased?" I bring this up on the channel because it is vital to remember before we rush to judge others. People are susceptible to prejudice. The war will end. Russia will win. And then a social rewiring will take place.

🔻This is the outskirts of Bakhmut. The "Grinder".

💡I decided to share more from my conversation with AI. It is worth reading. - Part 1

Me: Do you know that it was him (Edward Barnays) who introduced the PR term?

AI: Yes, it is widely believed that Edward Bernays was the person who introduced the term "public relations" to refer to the practice of managing the communication between an organization and the public. Bernays is often credited with being the first person to use the term in this way, and he is considered one of the pioneers of the public relations industry. In his work as a public relations practitioner, Bernays developed many of the techniques and strategies that are still used in the field today, such as the use of psychology and social science to influence public opinion, the creation of third-party endorsements, and the use of propaganda and other tactics to shape public perceptions. Bernays is also known for his innovative use of the media, including the use of news releases and other forms of communication to reach and influence the public.

Part 2
Me: Most people can't defend themselves from such a massive manipulation. They will never become aware that they are being ruled by marketers.

AI: It is true that many people are not aware of the extent to which they are influenced by marketing and public relations. The field of public relations is designed to shape public perceptions and attitudes in a way that is favorable to the interests of the organizations or individuals employing public relations tactics. This can involve a wide range of tactics, including the use of propaganda, the creation of third-party endorsements, and the use of psychological principles to influence people's beliefs and behaviors. Because these tactics are often designed to be subtle and covert, many people are not aware of the extent to which they are being influenced by them. As a result, they may be more susceptible to manipulation and may not be able to effectively defend themselves against it.

Part 3
Me: What would be a remedy for us as a society?

AI: There are many potential remedies that could be implemented to address the issue of manipulation and influence through marketing and public relations. One possible solution would be to increase public awareness and understanding of the tactics and techniques used in these fields, so that people are better able to recognize and resist them. This could be done through education and public campaigns that provide information about the ways in which people are influenced by marketing and public relations, and how to evaluate the credibility and reliability of the information they encounter. Another possible solution would be to implement stricter regulations and oversight of the public relations and marketing industries, to ensure that they are not engaging in unethical or manipulative practices. This could include measures such as requiring greater transparency and disclosure of the tactics and techniques used by these industries, and imposing penalties for those who engage in unethical or manipulative practices.

Part 4
Me: Do you have more suggestions?

AI: There are many other potential solutions that could be implemented to address the issue of manipulation and influence through marketing and public relations. Here are a few additional ideas:
Implementing stronger consumer protection laws and regulations to prevent companies and organizations from engaging in deceptive or manipulative marketing practices.
Supporting independent media and journalism, to provide the public with access to diverse and reliable sources of information.
Encouraging critical thinking and media literacy skills, to help people evaluate the credibility and reliability of the information they encounter.
Developing more effective algorithms and other technologies to identify and filter out fake news and misinformation.
Encouraging transparency and accountability in the public relations and marketing industries, through measures such as requiring companies and organizations to disclose the tactics and techniques they use to influence public opinion.
These are just a few possible solutions that could be implemented to address the issue of manipulation and influence through marketing and public relations. There may be many other potential approaches that could be effective in addressing this issue.

Part 5:
Me: Can all three (marketing, public relations, and propaganda) be employed to promote, initiate, prolong, and support a war?

AI: It is possible that marketing, public relations, and propaganda could be used to promote, initiate, prolong, and support a war. All three fields involve the use of communication and persuasion to influence people's attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors, and they could potentially be used to convince people to support a war or to maintain support for a war that is already underway. For example, marketing and public relations could be used to promote the idea that a war is necessary or just, by highlighting the reasons for the war and the potential benefits of victory. Propaganda, on the other hand, could be used to manipulate people's emotions and beliefs in order to convince them to support the war, by using fear or other negative emotions to persuade people to take action. Overall, while it is not certain that marketing, public relations, and propaganda would be used in this way, it is possible that they could be employed to promote, initiate, prolong, and support a war.

Part 6:
Me: Can you come up with a few more examples, please?

AI: Sure, here are a few additional examples of how marketing, public relations, and propaganda could be used to promote, initiate, prolong, and support a war:
Marketing could be used to promote the idea that a war is necessary or justified, by highlighting the reasons for the war and the potential benefits of victory. For example, a marketing campaign could focus on the threat posed by a hostile nation or terrorist group, and could use emotional appeals and persuasive language to convince people to support the war.
Public relations could be used to maintain support for the war, by highlighting the progress and successes of the war effort and by portraying the soldiers and other military personnel in a positive light. For example, a public relations campaign could use stories and testimonials from soldiers and their families to create a sense of patriotism and support for the war.
Propaganda could be used to manipulate people's emotions and beliefs in order to convince them to support the war, by using fear or other negative emotions to persuade people to take action. For example, propaganda could be used to portray the enemy as a threat to national security or to the safety and well-being of the population, in order to generate fear and support for the war.
These are just a few examples of how marketing, public relations, and propaganda could potentially be used to promote, initiate, prolong, and support a war. There may be many other ways in which these fields could be employed for this purpose.