"Currently, quarantining adds exponentially to the masses of healthcare workers who have already contracted Covid and had to go into isolation, a burden that threatens the integrity of the very healthcare system that these measures were designed to protect. Entire primary healthcare clinics have ground to a halt, and these policies have impaired almost every essential service, from police to government offices, to say nothing of the economic costs to individuals and to the country as a whole. Quarantining is always a drastic public health measure that incurs massive social, financial, psychological, and societal costs. While it can be a valid strategy for certain diseases, Covid-19 simply isn’t one of them. Ironically, we’d be better placed to tackle Covid without it. Current quarantine and contact tracing policies need to be abandoned — urgently."

Shabir A Madhi is the Dean, Faculty of Health Sciences and Professor of Vaccinology at University of the Witwatersrand, Jeremy Nel is an infectious diseases expert, University the Witwatersrand, Francois Venter is Professor of Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand.

https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2021-12-15-covid-19-in-south-africa-its-time-to-ditch-quarantining-and-contact-tracing/

LL (h/t / thank you) writes: "The South African Gov is being advised to stop quarantine, asymptomatic testing, contact tracing and much more. The attached letter is from the MAC (Ministerial Advisory Committee) it’s like SAGE in the UK the twitter thread is by a South African Doctor."

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1472603623704207364.html

The spectacle serves those that create it.

The spectacle serves those that own it.

The march in London on Saturday has gone mainstream. The Upday News App in the UK is using it as its opening picture. Upday is Europe's most popular news app with a reach of more than 25 million monthly users. The Spectacle has decided we now serve a purpose. The goal is probably to remove Boris and replace him with someone who is more believable after the next lockdown, which Boris will be the fall guy for.

The Spectacle is indicating who the next Prime Minister of the UK should be. Once in power, it will be the same narrative but from a less compromised leader.

"Covid: Impact of restrictions on hospitality is 'atrocious' says CEO of Night Time Industries"
https://youtu.be/tHJjGloIcFI

About that twitter ban.. Robin

Not believing in God is OK, but not believing in the almighty Vaccine makes you an infidel.

How times have changed..

Robin.

Attached is a letter that can be sent / handed to / emailed to CHEMISTS / PHARMACISTS, alerting them to the personal risk they may face for a failure to obtain fully informed consent before administering the Covid-19 experimental injections to members of the public.

In addition, it highlights the serious harm being reported after the Covid-19 injections and the vital role they can play in raising awareness of the risks and harm being done by the injections.

Please share and send to as many as possible.

Note: this can be sent to high street chemists but also to pharmacists inside supermarkets and other places. Also send to their head offices; details for Boots and Lloyds Pharmacies below:

Link to Boots The Chemist Head Office“Contact Us Page”: Boots HQ

Link to Lloyds Pharmacy Head Office “Contact us Page”: Lloyds HQ

Find all chemists involved in Covid-19 injections in your area here: NHS Post Code Checker

With minimal adaption this letter could also be sent to GP's / Doctors/ clinics etc

INFORMED CONSENT WEBSITE IS NOW LIVE

Further to Senior Employment Lawyer Anna De Buisseret’s recent update.

The Informed Consent website is now live.

The site contains lots of information and ways to get involved and more material will be added in time.

Link to the website: https://www.informed-consent-campaign.co.uk

Please also DONATE what you can to help the work of Anna De Buisseret and others as they help the people to fight this tyranny. There is a Donate button on the website.

Related Posts:
Standing up for our children! : https://news.1rj.ru/str/robinmg/12830
Anna De Buisseret’s recent update : https://news.1rj.ru/str/robinmg/12825

Open letter from The BMJ to Mark Zuckerberg

Dear Mark Zuckerberg,
We are Fiona Godlee and Kamran Abbasi, editors of The BMJ, one of the world’s oldest and most influential general medical journals. We are writing to raise serious concerns about the “fact checking” being undertaken by third party providers on behalf of Facebook/Meta.
In September, a former employee of Ventavia, a contract research company helping carry out the main Pfizer covid-19 vaccine trial, began providing The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails. These materials revealed a host of poor clinical trial research practices occurring at Ventavia that could impact data integrity and patient safety. We also discovered that, despite receiving a direct complaint about these problems over a year ago, the FDA did not inspect Ventavia’s trial sites.
The BMJ commissioned an investigative reporter to write up the story for our journal. The article was published on 2 November, following legal review, external peer review and subject to The BMJ’s usual high level editorial oversight and review.[1]
But from November 10, readers began reporting a variety of problems when trying to share our article. Some reported being unable to share it. Many others reported having their posts flagged with a warning about “Missing context ... Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people.” Those trying to post the article were informed by Facebook that people who repeatedly share “false information” might have their posts moved lower in Facebook’s News Feed. Group administrators where the article was shared received messages from Facebook informing them that such posts were “partly false.”
Readers were directed to a “fact check” performed by a Facebook contractor named Lead Stories.[2]
We find the “fact check” performed by Lead Stories to be inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible.
-- It fails to provide any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong
-- It has a nonsensical noscript: “Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials”
-- The first paragraph inaccurately labels The BMJ a “news blog”
-- It contains a screenshot of our article with a stamp over it stating “Flaws Reviewed,” despite the Lead Stories article not identifying anything false or untrue in The BMJ article
-- It published the story on its website under a URL that contains the phrase “hoax-alert”
We have contacted Lead Stories, but they refuse to change anything about their article or actions that have led to Facebook flagging our article.
We have also contacted Facebook directly, requesting immediate removal of the “fact checking” label and any link to the Lead Stories article, thereby allowing our readers to freely share the article on your platform.
There is also a wider concern that we wish to raise. We are aware that The BMJ is not the only high quality information provider to have been affected by the incompetence of Meta’s fact checking regime. To give one other example, we would highlight the treatment by Instagram (also owned by Meta) of Cochrane, the international provider of high quality systematic reviews of the medical evidence.[3] Rather than investing a proportion of Meta’s substantial profits to help ensure the accuracy of medical information shared through social media, you have apparently delegated responsibility to people incompetent in carrying out this crucial task. Fact checking has been a staple of good journalism for decades. What has happened in this instance should be of concern to anyone who values and relies on sources such as The BMJ.
We hope you will act swiftly: specifically to correct the error relating to The BMJ’s article and to review the processes that led to the error; and generally to reconsider your investment in and approach to fact checking overall.
Best wishes,
Fiona Godlee, editor in chief
Kamran Abbasi, incoming editor in chief
The BMJ

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80

COVID-19 Outbreak Reported on Royal Caribbean Cruise Despite Fully Vaccinated Adult Passengers

"Forty-eight people who were onboard the Royal Caribbean Symphony of the Seas cruise ship tested positive for COVID-19, although Royal Caribbean requires everyone aged 12 and older to show proof of vaccination in order to board their ships."

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/covid-19-outbreak-reported-on-royal-caribbean-cruise-despite-fully-vaccinated-adult-passengers_4166411.html

Why so many have willingly been hypnotised

"MATTIAS Desmet is a lecturer in psychoanalytic psychotherapy at Ghent University. He has come to public attention with his explanation of that most curious of phenomena that we have witnessed this year: why people have given up their freedoms so willingly; and what the conditions are in any society that will cause a people to sacrifice them?

It’s a question Kate Dunlop raised in these pages last Friday. Wondering about people’s gullibility, she asked: ‘Is their willingness to be experimented on a question of trust, fear, or a resigned acceptance of the inevitable?’

Daniel Miller offered a brief explanation last Thursday in his article Time to bring this madness to end. He observed that ‘people have come to enjoy being humiliated and humiliating’ which, as an addiction, ‘overrides ethical and intellectual considerations’.

Compliance and active cooperation are part of an overriding theory articulated by Desmet in a number of interviews and podcasts he has given this year which you can find on YouTube. I have selected just one of these, an excellently presented interview conducted by Dr Chris Martensen which explores Desmet’s theory of ‘mass formation’, psychological distress and hypnosis. It is compelling.

You can watch it here."

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/why-so-many-have-willingly-been-hypnotised/

If only Brian May would have read the Monotti Protocol..

MONOTTI PROTOCOL PART 3: TREATMENTS

Vitamin D has already been mentioned above in point 2. The recommended minimum dose during early treatment is 5,000 IUs per day as per the American Association of Physician’s guide to early treatment. Ideally this should be in calcifediol form if available, as it is more quickly circulated in the body than cholecalciferol or vitamin D3.
[I took 20,000 IUs of vitamin D3 daily during my "Delta variant" infection, @robinmg]

Lysine interrupts the replication of viruses, including COVID-19 coronavirus, by countering arginine, an amino acid that fosters the eruption of dormant viruses. 

Vitamin C is always a good idea for the treatment of all respiratory infections. Many doctors recommend 1g twice a day during treatment.

Zinc sulfate, gluconate or citrate is known to limit viral replication in human cells when aided in its entry into cells by a zinc ionophore, such as 
hydroxychloroquine the most effective option, 
quercetin, or
epigallocatechin gallate or EGCG.

Omega-3 supplementation improved the levels of several parameters of respiratory and renal function in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Ivermectin prevents clinical deterioration, reduces olfactory deficit, and limits the inflammation of the upper and lower respiratory tracts.

Early administration of 
inhaled budesonide reduced the likelihood of needing urgent medical care and reduced time to recovery after early COVID-19.

NAC administration in combination with other antiviral agents may dramatically reduce hospital admission rate, mechanical ventilation and mortality.

Aspirin use is associated with decreased mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, and mortality.

Azithromycin is known to reduce the length of the disease and the time required to test negative. Please note that azithromycin is considered as a bacteriostatic: it stops bacteria, and as antiviral at the same time. Alternatively use doxycycline.

https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/

The Scheming of Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci

By Joseph Mercola

Mercola.com

December 18, 2021


Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci have become household names in the U.S., their largely sterling reputations protected by a heavily biased press. Less known is the deep partnership between the two — the culmination of which has created a formidable public-private partnership that wields incredible power over the American public, along with global health and food policies.

You can read all of the details in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s bestselling book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” which contains more than 2,200 footnotes backing up its data. It exposes the connection between Gates and Fauci, as well as how Gates patterned his rise to control after John Rockefeller’s empire.

In 1913, Rockefeller created the Rockefeller Foundation, which is largely responsible for creating the Big Pharma-controlled medical paradigm that exists today. The foundation imbued its philosophy, precepts and ideologies into the League of Nations Health Organization, which turned into the World Health Organization.

Now, Gates contributes to WHO via multiple avenues, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) as well as GAVI, which was founded by the Gates Foundation in partnership with WHO, the World Bank and various vaccine manufacturers. Together, this makes Gates WHO’s No. 1 funder.

How Gates Used Rockefeller’s Business Model

Inspired by Rockefeller’s business model, Bill and Melinda Gates donated $36 billion worth of Microsoft stock to the BMGF between 1994 and 2018. Gates also created a separate entity, Bill Gates Investments (BGI), which manages his personal wealth and his foundation’s corpus.

BGI predominantly invests in multinational food, agriculture, pharmaceutical, energy, telecom and tech companies with global operations. Federal tax laws require the BMGF to give away a portion of its foundation assets annually to qualify for tax exemption.

Gates strategically targets BMGF’s charitable gifts to give him control of the international health and agricultural agencies and the media, allowing him to dictate global health and food policies so as to increase profitability of the large multinationals in which he and his foundation hold large investment positions.

As was the case with Rockefeller, whose wealth only grew after his Standard Oil Company was forced to split into 34 different companies, Gates’ strategic gifts have only magnified his wealth. Gates’ personal net worth grew from $63 billion in 2000 to $129.6 billion in 2021,1 his wealth expanding by $23 billion during the 2020 lockdowns alone.2

How Gates Controls the WHO

How does a private citizen, not an elected official, gain so much control over a global health agency like WHO? When it was founded, WHO could decide how to distribute its contributions. Now, 70% of its budget is tied to specific projects, countries or regions, which are dictated by the funders.3 As such, Gates’ priorities are the backbone of WHO, and it wasn’t a coincidence when he said of WHO, “Our priorities, are your priorities.”4

As of 2018, the cumulative contributions from the Gates Foundation and GAVI made “Gates the unofficial top sponsor of the WHO, even before the Trump administration’s 2020 move to cut all his support to the organization,” according to Kennedy. “Plus, Gates also routes funding to WHO through SAGE [Strategic Advisory Group of Experts] and UNICEF and Rotary International bringing his total contributions to over $1 billion.”

These tax-deductible donations give Gates both leverage and control over international health policy, “which he largely directs to serve the profit interest of his pharma partners.”

Further, “Gate’s vaccine obsession has diverted WHO’s program contributions from poverty alleviation, nutrition and clean water to make vaccine uptake its preeminent public health metric. And Gates is not afraid to throw his weight around,” according to Kennedy. “… The sheer magnitude of his foundation’s financial contributions has made Bill Gates an unofficial — albeit unelected — leade

r of the WHO.” Gates’ power has grown further due to his decadeslong partnership with Fauci.

Fauci’s Immense Power

Alone, both Gates and Fauci wield immense power in their fields. Together, they’re a formidable, if unfortunately nefarious, force.

As the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) — “Fauci has a $6.1 billion budget that he distributes to colleges and universities to do drug research for various diseases,” Kennedy says. “He has another $1.7 billion that comes from the military to do bioweapons research.”5

This is where Fauci’s power lies: in his capacity to fund, arm, pay, maintain and effectively deploy a large and sprawling standing army. The NIH alone controls an annual $37 billion budget distributed in over 50,000 grants supporting over 300,000 positions globally in medical research.6

The thousands of doctors, hospital administrators, health officials and research virologists whose positions, careers and salaries depend on AIDS dollars flowing from Dr. Fauci, Gates and the Wellcome Trust (Great Britain’s version of the Gates Foundation) are the officers and soldiers in a mercenary army that functions to defend all vaccines and Dr. Fauci’s HIV/AIDS doxologies.

Along with Gates, Fauci had the power to influence funding of U.S. foreign aid to Africa for AIDS, prioritizing that for vaccines and drugs instead of nutrition, sanitation and economic development. Yet, Fauci and his team, funded by Gates, have never created a vaccine for AIDS, despite squandering billions of dollars, and causing uncounted human carnage. In 2020, many of the Gates/Fauci HIV vaccine trials in Africa suddenly became COVID-19 vaccine trials.7

As explained in Kennedy’s book, HIV provided Gates and Fauci a beachhead in Africa for their new brand of medical colonialism and a vehicle for the partners to build and maintain a powerful global network that came to include heads of state, health ministers, international health regulators, the WHO, the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, key leaders from the financial industry and military officials who served as command center of the burgeoning Biosecurity Apparatus.

Their foot soldiers were the army of frontline virologists, vaccinologists, clinicians and hospital administrators who relied on their largesse and acted as the community-based ideological commissars of this crusade.

Fauci ‘Enthusiastic’ About Gates COVID Partnership

April 1, 2020, Fauci spoke with Gates on the phone, according to emails released in 2021. Fauci referred to the phone call in an email to Emilio Emini, the director of the Gates Foundation’s tuberculosis and HIV program, stating, “As I had mentioned to Bill yesterday evening, I am enthusiastic about moving towards a collaborative and hopefully synergistic approach to COVID-19.”8

The email was part of 3,000 emails obtained via a FOIA public records request by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN). Despite having no medical degree, Gates has been granted direct access to top government health officials, who regard him as a public health authority. In June 2021, Daily Mail reported:9

    “The Gates Foundation has committed at least $1.75 billion toward the global effort to fight the pandemic — a sum that opened doors at the highest levels of government. Following Fauci’s phone call with Gates, the Gates Foundation executive Emini emailed him to follow up and ask ‘how we can coordinate and cross inform each other’s activities.’

    ‘There’s an obvious need for coordination among the various primary funders or the focus we need to have given the state of the pandemic will become lost through uncoordinated activities,’ Emini wrote.”

Fauci also said he would facilitate a call between Emini and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA),10 which provides funding for vaccine and drug development, promoting “the advanced development of medical countermeasures to protect Americans and respond to 21st century health security threats.”11 Daily Mai

l continued:12

    “The Gates Foundation’s partnership with BARDA resulted in at least one joint funding project. In June 2020, Evidation Health announced that BARDA and the Gates Foundation were financing an effort to ‘develop an early warning algorithm to detect symptoms of COVID-19.’

    It’s unclear whether the warning system was ever launched, and Evidation issued no further statements on the project after the initial announcement. Other emails released … make it clear that the Gates Foundation remained actively involved in the NIH’s pandemic response.”

The Fauci-Gates partnership led to $1 billion in increased funding to Gates’ global vaccine programs, even as the NIH budget itself experienced little growth.13 Long before the April 2021 phone call, however, Kennedy’s book reveals that Fauci and Gates met in person, shaking hands in 2000 in an agreement to control and expand the global vaccine enterprise.

Why Haven’t You Heard About This Before?

When you’re one of the richest people in the world, you can buy virtually anything you want — including control of the media so that it only prints favorable press. If you have enough money — and Gates certainly does — you can even get major media companies like ViacomCBS, which runs MTV, VH1, Nickelodeon and BET, among others, to insert your approved PSAs into their programming — and BMGF has.14

Via more than 30,000 grants, Gates has contributed at least $319 million to the media, Alan MacLeod, a senior staff writer for MintPress News, revealed.15 From press and journalism associations to journalistic training, Gates is an overarching keeper of the press, which makes true objective reporting pertaining to Gates himself — or his many initiatives — virtually impossible.16

Speaking with MintPress News, Linsey McGoey, a professor of sociology at the University of Essex, U.K., explained that Gates’ philanthropy comes with a price:17

    “Philanthropy can and is being used deliberately to divert attention away from different forms of economic exploitation that underpin global inequality today.The new ‘philanthrocapitalism’ threatens democracy by increasing the power of the corporate sector at the expense of the public sector organizations, which increasingly face budget squeezes, in part by excessively remunerating for-profit organizations to deliver public services that could be delivered more cheaply without private sector involvement.”

It’s a sentiment Kennedy, who believes Fauci and Gates should be investigated for criminal wrongdoing, has echoed. In an interview, he stated that billionaires are in collusion with media, corporations and politicians in order to increase their tremendous wealth:18

    “The most important productive strategy or the big talk around the oligarchs and the intelligence agencies and the pharmaceutical companies who are trying to impoverish us and obliterate democracy, their strategy is to create fear and division.So orchestrate fear, divide Republicans from Democrats and blacks from whites and get a lot of infighting so nobody notices that they are making themselves billions and billions, while they impoverish the rest of us and execute the controlled demolition of American constitutional democracy.”

For more details on how the Fauci-Gates-Pharma alliance is furthering the agenda of totalitarian control, using unfathomable power and greed — all under the guise of a pandemic — read “The Real Anthony Fauci.”

Sources and References

·        1 Daily Sabah August 9, 2021

·        2, 6, 7, 13 BitChute, The Scheming of Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci November 9, 2021

·        3, 4 BitChute, TrustWHO

·        5 The Corbett Report, The Real Anthony Fauci November 19, 2021, 13:00

·        8, 9, 10, 12 Daily Mail June 4, 2021

·        11 Public Health Emergency, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, About BARDA

·        14, 15, 16 MintPress News November 15, 2021

·        17 MintPress News December 6, 2019

·        18 Daily Mail November 23, 2021