WHERE THE SCIENCE-FOCUSED RESISTANCE HAS GONE WRONG:
"There are four main pathways to the truth, science, reason, intuition, and imagination. Any worldview that tries to get by without paying respect to ALL FOUR of these is bound to fail."
Dr. Ian McGilchrist
"There are four main pathways to the truth, science, reason, intuition, and imagination. Any worldview that tries to get by without paying respect to ALL FOUR of these is bound to fail."
Dr. Ian McGilchrist
👍52❤16👏8
The message of The Book of Vision is that we lost the doctor patient relationship when we began seeing the body as an assemblage of parts rather than a whole human being, body and soul.
"The body becomes an assemblage of parts through the left hemisphere of the brain."
Dr Ian McGilchrist
https://youtu.be/dFs9WO2B8uI
"The body becomes an assemblage of parts through the left hemisphere of the brain."
Dr Ian McGilchrist
https://youtu.be/dFs9WO2B8uI
❤48👍20🤔5👏3💯2🔥1
Maybe Our Culture Is Literally Crazy
"Iain McGilchrist's work indicates that the various insanities manifesting in contemporary cultural life are paralleled in mental illness"
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/maybe-our-culture-is-literally-crazy/
"Iain McGilchrist's work indicates that the various insanities manifesting in contemporary cultural life are paralleled in mental illness"
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/maybe-our-culture-is-literally-crazy/
The American Conservative
Maybe Our Culture Is Literally Crazy
Iain McGilchrist's work indicates that the various insanities manifesting in contemporary cultural life are paralleled in mental illness
👍61💔7❤6
I believe in the power of meditation to tame the monkey-mind.
Buddhism also teaches meditation.
The Dalai Lama is NOT Buddhism.
The Dalai Lama is a symbol of a patriarchal theocratic feudal system of government, which justified itself through Buddhism.
The Dalai Lama, agrees, he in fact stated "the institution of the Dalai Lama has served its purpose", and that "We had a Dalai Lama for almost five centuries. The 14th Dalai Lama now is very popular. Let us then finish with a popular Dalai Lama."
@RobinMG
Buddhism also teaches meditation.
The Dalai Lama is NOT Buddhism.
The Dalai Lama is a symbol of a patriarchal theocratic feudal system of government, which justified itself through Buddhism.
The Dalai Lama, agrees, he in fact stated "the institution of the Dalai Lama has served its purpose", and that "We had a Dalai Lama for almost five centuries. The 14th Dalai Lama now is very popular. Let us then finish with a popular Dalai Lama."
@RobinMG
👍70❤13🤬13👏6🙈2😁1
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
I'm aware... climate change is an agenda ... real science does not support its claims
Part 1 - the technocratic plan
"Net zero needed to save the planet"
C40 cities
What you will eat, items of clothes you can buy yearly, reduction on travel
C40 report
C40 cities "must undertake unprecedented increase in scale of climate action, doing 125% more"
UK 100 org
Councils committed to delivering "net zero"
UK Government absolute zero
all airports to close between 2020 & 2029 except Heathrow, Glasgow & Belfast
Climate and ecology bill
making its way through Parliament
Energy security bill
transitioning to net zero
Government "nudging"
to change behaviours
Chris Skidmore
UK review of net zero delivery by 2050 - legally binding goals
Promoters
gfanz - UN backed global financial alliance pushing net zero
Soros - donates £1billion
Schwab - 4th industrial revolution
Gates
Blackrock - preparing for net zero world
Agenda 21 - renamed agenda 2030
Behind the green mask
Part 2
I'm aware details
Part 1 - the technocratic plan
"Net zero needed to save the planet"
C40 cities
What you will eat, items of clothes you can buy yearly, reduction on travel
C40 report
C40 cities "must undertake unprecedented increase in scale of climate action, doing 125% more"
UK 100 org
Councils committed to delivering "net zero"
UK Government absolute zero
all airports to close between 2020 & 2029 except Heathrow, Glasgow & Belfast
Climate and ecology bill
making its way through Parliament
Energy security bill
transitioning to net zero
Government "nudging"
to change behaviours
Chris Skidmore
UK review of net zero delivery by 2050 - legally binding goals
Promoters
gfanz - UN backed global financial alliance pushing net zero
Soros - donates £1billion
Schwab - 4th industrial revolution
Gates
Blackrock - preparing for net zero world
Agenda 21 - renamed agenda 2030
Behind the green mask
Part 2
I'm aware details
🤬63❤9👍9🔥1
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
I'm aware.... climate change is an agenda .... real science does not support its claims
Part 2 - the REAL science
Man made climate change a fraud
top climate scientists 'cover up' fact that Earth's temperature hasn't risen for last 15 years
1501 scientists and professionals sign declaration
there is NO climate emergency
NASA satellites show no CO2 warming
No reliable scientific evidence that Sea level rises accelerating
Humans do not contribute to global warming
2018 report
Flawed climate models
lack of understanding of Earth’s climate system - cannot determine reliably the magnitude of climate change caused by anthropogenic CO2 emissions
Net Zero Will Impoverish Britain
Commentators & news around world
David Bellamy deceased
Steve Koonin
EU net zero plan in tatters
93 percent oppose 2030 petrol and diesel car ban
Berliners vote down referendum on tighter climate goals
Mark Steyn
Ron Barmby
Jordan Peterson
Part 1
I'm aware details
Part 2 - the REAL science
Man made climate change a fraud
top climate scientists 'cover up' fact that Earth's temperature hasn't risen for last 15 years
1501 scientists and professionals sign declaration
there is NO climate emergency
NASA satellites show no CO2 warming
No reliable scientific evidence that Sea level rises accelerating
Humans do not contribute to global warming
2018 report
Flawed climate models
lack of understanding of Earth’s climate system - cannot determine reliably the magnitude of climate change caused by anthropogenic CO2 emissions
Net Zero Will Impoverish Britain
Commentators & news around world
David Bellamy deceased
Steve Koonin
EU net zero plan in tatters
93 percent oppose 2030 petrol and diesel car ban
Berliners vote down referendum on tighter climate goals
Mark Steyn
Ron Barmby
Jordan Peterson
Part 1
I'm aware details
👍75🔥18❤11
Epistemic Injustice in "Evidence Based" Medicine
Why We Need to be the Experts in Ourselves
"Often, patient groups face epistemic injustice when they find things that work but which have not as yet been tested in clinical trials. The sum total of their real world findings are often dismissed as “anecdotal”. On the contrary, I have long believed that the evidential real world, lived experiences and cumulative wisdom of groups of people with a given diagnosis should count just as highly, or more so, than data collected in unrealistic, academic, or clinical settings.
The experiences of real people which don’t match the textbook understandings are often derided and dismissed using terms like “its all in your head”, or “psychosomatic” [which is a double injustice, both the use of this word to denigrate, but also the high-jacking of a term which encompasses the vital concept that the mind-body is unified].
There is another form of epistemic injustice: injustice towards science synthesis and autodidacts, in favour of specialism and expertise. When we find and discover for ourselves new connections by synthesizing the scientific literature, in which some parts of the big picture do not arise from the speciality journals directly related to a given medical condition, these new insights are often ignored by the specialists. This is because they tend to have little or no knowledge of the vast sea of the wider literature which is on the face of it is peripheral, but where relevant findings and important pieces of the jigsaw can still be found."
https://garysharpe.substack.com/p/epistemic-injustice-in-evidence-based?s=09
Why We Need to be the Experts in Ourselves
"Often, patient groups face epistemic injustice when they find things that work but which have not as yet been tested in clinical trials. The sum total of their real world findings are often dismissed as “anecdotal”. On the contrary, I have long believed that the evidential real world, lived experiences and cumulative wisdom of groups of people with a given diagnosis should count just as highly, or more so, than data collected in unrealistic, academic, or clinical settings.
The experiences of real people which don’t match the textbook understandings are often derided and dismissed using terms like “its all in your head”, or “psychosomatic” [which is a double injustice, both the use of this word to denigrate, but also the high-jacking of a term which encompasses the vital concept that the mind-body is unified].
There is another form of epistemic injustice: injustice towards science synthesis and autodidacts, in favour of specialism and expertise. When we find and discover for ourselves new connections by synthesizing the scientific literature, in which some parts of the big picture do not arise from the speciality journals directly related to a given medical condition, these new insights are often ignored by the specialists. This is because they tend to have little or no knowledge of the vast sea of the wider literature which is on the face of it is peripheral, but where relevant findings and important pieces of the jigsaw can still be found."
https://garysharpe.substack.com/p/epistemic-injustice-in-evidence-based?s=09
Gary Sharpe's Articles
Epistemic Injustice in "Evidence Based" Medicine
Why We Need to be the Experts in Ourselves
👍44❤11👏4
The illusion of evidence based medicine
"Medicine is largely dominated by a small number of very large pharmaceutical companies, that compete for market share, but are effectively united in their efforts to expanding that market.”
“Scientific progress is thwarted by the ownership of data and knowledge because industry suppresses negative trial results, fails to report adverse events, and does not share raw data with the academic research community.”
“Patients die because of the adverse impact of commercial interests on the research agenda, universities, and regulators. Hierarchical power structures, product loyalty, and public relations propaganda over scientific integrity.”
https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o702
"Medicine is largely dominated by a small number of very large pharmaceutical companies, that compete for market share, but are effectively united in their efforts to expanding that market.”
“Scientific progress is thwarted by the ownership of data and knowledge because industry suppresses negative trial results, fails to report adverse events, and does not share raw data with the academic research community.”
“Patients die because of the adverse impact of commercial interests on the research agenda, universities, and regulators. Hierarchical power structures, product loyalty, and public relations propaganda over scientific integrity.”
https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o702
The BMJ
The illusion of evidence based medicine
Evidence based medicine has been corrupted by corporate interests, failed regulation, and commercialisation of academia, argue these authors
The advent of evidence based medicine was a paradigm shift intended to provide a solid scientific foundation for…
The advent of evidence based medicine was a paradigm shift intended to provide a solid scientific foundation for…
👍69❤16💯2
In Master And His Emissary, McGilchrist writes:
"The left hemisphere prefers the impersonal to the personal, and that tendency would in any case be instantiated in the fabric of a technologically driven and bureaucratically administered society. The impersonal would come to replace the personal. There would be a focus on material things at the expense of the living. Social cohesion, and the bonds between person and person, and just as importantly between person and place, the context in which each person belongs, would be neglected, perhaps actively disrupted, as both inconvenient and incomprehensible to the left hemisphere acting on its own. There would be a depersonalisation of the relationships between members of society, and in society’s relationship with its members. Exploitation rather than co-operation would be, explicitly or not, the default relationship between human individuals, and between humanity and the rest of the world."
"The left hemisphere prefers the impersonal to the personal, and that tendency would in any case be instantiated in the fabric of a technologically driven and bureaucratically administered society. The impersonal would come to replace the personal. There would be a focus on material things at the expense of the living. Social cohesion, and the bonds between person and person, and just as importantly between person and place, the context in which each person belongs, would be neglected, perhaps actively disrupted, as both inconvenient and incomprehensible to the left hemisphere acting on its own. There would be a depersonalisation of the relationships between members of society, and in society’s relationship with its members. Exploitation rather than co-operation would be, explicitly or not, the default relationship between human individuals, and between humanity and the rest of the world."
👍32😢11❤5😐1
"Resentment would lead to an emphasis on uniformity and equality, not as just one desirable to be balanced with others, but as the ultimate desirable, transcending all others. As a result individualities would be ironed out, and identification would be by categories: socioeconomic groups, races, sexes, and so on, which would also feel themselves to be implicitly or explicitly in competition with, resentful of, one another. Paranoia and lack of trust would come to be the pervading stance within society both between individuals, and between such groups, and would be the stance of government towards its people."
👍19❤7😢3
"Such a government would seek total control – it is an essential feature of the left hemisphere’s take on the world that it can grasp it and control it. Talk of liberty, which is an abstract ideal for the left hemisphere, would increase for Machiavellian reasons, but individual liberty would be curtailed. Panoptical control would become an end in itself, and constant CCTV monitoring, interception of private information and communication, the norm."
🤬32👍7❤5😢2🤨2🔥1
"Measures such as a DNA database would be introduced apparently in response to exceptional threats and exceptional circumstances, against which they would in reality be ineffective, their aim being to increase the power of the state and diminish the status of the individual. The concept of the individual depends on uniqueness; but according to the left hemisphere’s take on reality, individuals are simply interchangeable (‘equal’) parts of a mechanistic system, a system it needs to control in the interests of efficiency. Thus it would be expected that the state would not only take greater power directly, but play down individual responsibility, and the sense of individual responsibility would accordingly decline."
👍20🤬13❤2😁1
"... Anger and aggressive behaviour would become more evident in our social interactions, since of all emotional states these are the most highly characteristic of the left hemisphere, and would no longer be counterbalanced by the empathic skills of the right hemisphere. One would expect a loss of insight, coupled with an unwillingness to take responsibility, and this would reinforce the left hemisphere’s tendency to a perhaps dangerously unwarranted optimism. There would be a rise in intolerance and inflexibility, an unwillingness to change track or change one’s mind."
👍25😢8👏2😱1
"... We would expect there to be a resentment of, and a deliberate undercutting of the sense of awe or wonder: Weber’s ‘disenchanted’ world. Religion would seem to be mere fantasy. The right hemisphere is drawn forward by exemplars of the qualities it values, where the left hemisphere is driven forward by a desire for power and control: one would expect, therefore, that there would develop an intolerance of, and a constant undercutting, ironising, or deconstructing of such exemplars, in both life and in art."
👍21❤5🤬5👏1
"... Above all, the word and the idea would come to dominate. Cultural history and tradition, and what can be learnt from the past, would be confidently dismissed in preparation for the systematic society of the future, put together by human will.
The body would come to be viewed as a machine, and the natural world as a heap of resource to be exploited."
The body would come to be viewed as a machine, and the natural world as a heap of resource to be exploited."
🤬33👍14❤8👏5💔2
'Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 [Pfizer] mRNA COVID-19 vaccine'
"The observed variation in SAE [suspected adverse effects] & seriousness between BTN162b2 vaccine batches in this nationwide study was contrary to the expected homogenous rate & distribution of SAEs between batches.. the results suggest the existence of a batch-dependent safety signal for the BNT162b2 vaccine"
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13998
"The observed variation in SAE [suspected adverse effects] & seriousness between BTN162b2 vaccine batches in this nationwide study was contrary to the expected homogenous rate & distribution of SAEs between batches.. the results suggest the existence of a batch-dependent safety signal for the BNT162b2 vaccine"
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13998
👍54😱22❤4
Forwarded from CACUK Support (Mina Dew)
Vax Injury Test Case
Class Action Covid UK is now inviting those who have been harmed by any of the Covid vaccines to contact us at: hello@cacuk.uk
Please let people know about this.
We can only consider cases in England or Wales currently. Claimants should email us with the following details:
1. Date of vaccination/s (include a copy of your vaccination record, if you have it)
2. Details of your injury and when the symptoms started
3. What medical attention you’ve received and whether the cause is confirmed
4. How your injury has impacted your life / lifestyle
5. Your name, age and a telephone number for us to contact you.
A test case is a single case where the outcome would have significance not only for the person bringing it, but for many others too. It tests an area of law to get clarity and establish legal rights or principles.
Please note that we will try to contact everyone, but we will of seeking to identify one case that will be most likely to win and set a precedent for everyone else, so please know that while we’re sympathetic to everyone who is suffering, we will need to be selective when deciding which case to proceed with.
See more: https://cacuk.uk/green-light-for-vax-injury-test-case/
Telegram: t.me/CACUKsupport
Website: https://cacuk.uk/
Subscribe: https://cacuk.uk/join-us
Class Action Covid UK is now inviting those who have been harmed by any of the Covid vaccines to contact us at: hello@cacuk.uk
Please let people know about this.
We can only consider cases in England or Wales currently. Claimants should email us with the following details:
1. Date of vaccination/s (include a copy of your vaccination record, if you have it)
2. Details of your injury and when the symptoms started
3. What medical attention you’ve received and whether the cause is confirmed
4. How your injury has impacted your life / lifestyle
5. Your name, age and a telephone number for us to contact you.
A test case is a single case where the outcome would have significance not only for the person bringing it, but for many others too. It tests an area of law to get clarity and establish legal rights or principles.
Please note that we will try to contact everyone, but we will of seeking to identify one case that will be most likely to win and set a precedent for everyone else, so please know that while we’re sympathetic to everyone who is suffering, we will need to be selective when deciding which case to proceed with.
See more: https://cacuk.uk/green-light-for-vax-injury-test-case/
Telegram: t.me/CACUKsupport
Website: https://cacuk.uk/
Subscribe: https://cacuk.uk/join-us
👍87👏19❤14😁1🤡1
Forwarded from World Council for Health
📍WCH Issues Policy Brief to Counter the WHO's Monopolization of Global Health
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/news-releases/monopolization-of-global-health-policy-brief/
The World Council for Health (WCH) works with different expert groups in the development of policy briefs to present research and recommendations to specialized and non-specialized audiences on a variety of essential issues. These documents serve to provide evidence-based policy advice to help readers make informed decisions.
An expert group in political science and law has prepared for release today an in-depth policy brief on the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) and the WHO pandemic treaty/accord (WHO CA+).
These two complementary instruments of international law are currently being negotiated by the WHO, its member states and private stakeholders in relations with the supranational body for adoption by the World Health Assembly in May 2024. Some introduced IHR amendments could already be voted on in May 2023.
The newly released, in-depth policy brief showcases – with original references – the most important IHR amendments that have been proposed as well as central parts of the pandemic treaty (WHO CA+) draft. It explains why they differ from previous approaches to global public health in a significant way and require a swift, effective and robust response.
At the same time, legislative and educational measures are recommended via the policy brief to strengthen public health and to achieve better preparedness, efficient international collaboration and sharing with regards to global health emergencies while avoiding monopolization and ensuring the robustness of democratic ideals in times of crisis.
Rejecting Monopoly Power Over Global Public Health
— Download as PDF 📂
Please read and share our full statement:
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/news-releases/monopolization-of-global-health-policy-brief/
🌐 SOURCE | 🌳 LINKTREE
Follow:➡️ @WCH_org
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/news-releases/monopolization-of-global-health-policy-brief/
The World Council for Health (WCH) works with different expert groups in the development of policy briefs to present research and recommendations to specialized and non-specialized audiences on a variety of essential issues. These documents serve to provide evidence-based policy advice to help readers make informed decisions.
An expert group in political science and law has prepared for release today an in-depth policy brief on the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) and the WHO pandemic treaty/accord (WHO CA+).
These two complementary instruments of international law are currently being negotiated by the WHO, its member states and private stakeholders in relations with the supranational body for adoption by the World Health Assembly in May 2024. Some introduced IHR amendments could already be voted on in May 2023.
The newly released, in-depth policy brief showcases – with original references – the most important IHR amendments that have been proposed as well as central parts of the pandemic treaty (WHO CA+) draft. It explains why they differ from previous approaches to global public health in a significant way and require a swift, effective and robust response.
At the same time, legislative and educational measures are recommended via the policy brief to strengthen public health and to achieve better preparedness, efficient international collaboration and sharing with regards to global health emergencies while avoiding monopolization and ensuring the robustness of democratic ideals in times of crisis.
Rejecting Monopoly Power Over Global Public Health
— Download as PDF 📂
Please read and share our full statement:
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/news-releases/monopolization-of-global-health-policy-brief/
Follow:
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥33👍19👏9❤6