"Clapton, along with fellow musician Van Morrison, has been a voice of resistance throughout the pandemic, putting out music in the last year or so that argues against lockdowns and the like. (Morrison has also been a vocal COVID-19 skeptic.) Clapton said he experienced “disastrous” side effects after both doses of the AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine.
Meanwhile, Foo Fighters has been subject to vaccine-skeptic protesters as the U.S. rock band returns to the live-music scene after playing the Vax Live concert at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood in May.
Dozens of protesters rallied outside a 600-person, vaccinated-only show in Agoura Hills in mid-June.
“Separating humans is not OK,” one protester told KCAL News while wielding a sign outside the Canyon Club condemning the vaccination policy as “modern segregation.” “Those of us who have healthy immune systems should be able to enjoy these freedoms just like anybody else.”
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/music/story/2021-07-21/eric-clapton-concerts-covid-19-vaccination-policy
Meanwhile, Foo Fighters has been subject to vaccine-skeptic protesters as the U.S. rock band returns to the live-music scene after playing the Vax Live concert at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood in May.
Dozens of protesters rallied outside a 600-person, vaccinated-only show in Agoura Hills in mid-June.
“Separating humans is not OK,” one protester told KCAL News while wielding a sign outside the Canyon Club condemning the vaccination policy as “modern segregation.” “Those of us who have healthy immune systems should be able to enjoy these freedoms just like anybody else.”
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/music/story/2021-07-21/eric-clapton-concerts-covid-19-vaccination-policy
Los Angeles Times
Eric Clapton: Don't expect to see me at venues that ask audiences to be vaccinated
Eric Clapton, one of rock's most vocal COVID-19 skeptics, says he reserves to right to cancel any show where vaccination becomes a condition of attendance.
Letter from Boruch Weiss
Dr. Joel Groden, M.D.
Dr. Zev Zelenko, M.D.
"Dear Editor,
As a medical researcher who has been fully immersed in studying the covid-19 vaccine and effective treatments for covid-19, I wish to respond to Dr. Daniel Berman.
I will follow the structure of Dr. Berman’s response to Mr. Britz’s excellent letter.
1) Mr. Britz made the very valid point that there are no third-party, unbiased studies to determine the safety of the covid-19 vaccines. The pharmaceutical companies ran their trials themselves, without oversight, and reported their findings to the FDA. Clearly, with billions of dollars in profits at stake, there was ample motivation to manipulate both the safety and efficacy data in order to arrive at numbers which would result in product authorization and in enthusiasm and acceptance by the public. No kosher certifying agency would ever be able to give a kosher certification on any product produced under such conditions. And as Mr. Britz pointed out, there is all the more reason for concern, as Pfizer has repeatedly engaged in fraudulent behavior for financial gain, to the point that they were actually fined $2,300,000,000 in 2009, the largest healthcare fraud settlement in history. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department- announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history)
Indeed, there is ample evidence of the manipulation that Pfizer has done of their data to try to make the vaccine appear both effective and safe. For extremely powerful illustrations, please see the following articles: https://anthonycolpo.com/more-problems-with-the-pfizer-biontech-covid- 19-vaccine-trial-data and https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/04/peter-doshi-pfizer-and- modernas-95-effective-vaccines-we-need-more-details-and-the-raw-data and, particularly in regards to the children’s trial, https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontlinenews/serious- violations-and-manipulations-of-trial-protocol-how-pfizer-obtained-fda-emergency-authorization- for-children/.
While not disputing that there were no third-party studies about the vaccine, or that Pfizer has repeatedly engaged in fraud, Dr. Berman responded that safety data is primarily derived from the CDC’s VAERS database.
It is highly problematic to use VAERS to assure safety, for a number of reasons.
A) By its very design, the database will only detect problems AFTER the vaccine has been given
to a large portion of the population. VAERS is no substitute for a proper trial with unbiased
third-party oversight before a vaccine hits the market.
😎 Previous studies have shown that only between 1-10% of adverse reactions get reported to
VAERS. A paper out of Harvard in 2016 indicated that VAERS may be showing only 10% of what’s really happening. This would mean that 10,000 deaths reported after the vaccine really may indicate a total of 100,000 deaths.
C) Much of the population does not know about the existence of this database, so they cannot file reports.
D) Many people believe that the vaccine is very safe, and thus do not draw any connection between the covid-19 vaccine and subsequent illness or death, so they wouldn’t be reporting anything. I know countless stories which bear out this fact, and so does a doctor I discussed this with.
July 19,’21
BS”D
E) Many doctors refuse to conclude that an adverse event is connected to the covid-19 vaccine and will not file a report, even if the patient’s family suspects a connection.
F) Other doctors do not have time to file multiple VAERS reports for all the adverse events they are seeing after covid-19 vaccination. (This was personally told to me by a gastroenterologist about her own practice.)
G) Doctors are sometimes finding that the VAERS system will not accept their reports. Dr. Zev Zelenko testified that he personally knows of twenty instances of patient death after the covid-19 vaccine in which a doctor attempted to make a report to VAERS and the report was not accepted.
Dr. Joel Groden, M.D.
Dr. Zev Zelenko, M.D.
"Dear Editor,
As a medical researcher who has been fully immersed in studying the covid-19 vaccine and effective treatments for covid-19, I wish to respond to Dr. Daniel Berman.
I will follow the structure of Dr. Berman’s response to Mr. Britz’s excellent letter.
1) Mr. Britz made the very valid point that there are no third-party, unbiased studies to determine the safety of the covid-19 vaccines. The pharmaceutical companies ran their trials themselves, without oversight, and reported their findings to the FDA. Clearly, with billions of dollars in profits at stake, there was ample motivation to manipulate both the safety and efficacy data in order to arrive at numbers which would result in product authorization and in enthusiasm and acceptance by the public. No kosher certifying agency would ever be able to give a kosher certification on any product produced under such conditions. And as Mr. Britz pointed out, there is all the more reason for concern, as Pfizer has repeatedly engaged in fraudulent behavior for financial gain, to the point that they were actually fined $2,300,000,000 in 2009, the largest healthcare fraud settlement in history. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department- announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history)
Indeed, there is ample evidence of the manipulation that Pfizer has done of their data to try to make the vaccine appear both effective and safe. For extremely powerful illustrations, please see the following articles: https://anthonycolpo.com/more-problems-with-the-pfizer-biontech-covid- 19-vaccine-trial-data and https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/04/peter-doshi-pfizer-and- modernas-95-effective-vaccines-we-need-more-details-and-the-raw-data and, particularly in regards to the children’s trial, https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontlinenews/serious- violations-and-manipulations-of-trial-protocol-how-pfizer-obtained-fda-emergency-authorization- for-children/.
While not disputing that there were no third-party studies about the vaccine, or that Pfizer has repeatedly engaged in fraud, Dr. Berman responded that safety data is primarily derived from the CDC’s VAERS database.
It is highly problematic to use VAERS to assure safety, for a number of reasons.
A) By its very design, the database will only detect problems AFTER the vaccine has been given
to a large portion of the population. VAERS is no substitute for a proper trial with unbiased
third-party oversight before a vaccine hits the market.
😎 Previous studies have shown that only between 1-10% of adverse reactions get reported to
VAERS. A paper out of Harvard in 2016 indicated that VAERS may be showing only 10% of what’s really happening. This would mean that 10,000 deaths reported after the vaccine really may indicate a total of 100,000 deaths.
C) Much of the population does not know about the existence of this database, so they cannot file reports.
D) Many people believe that the vaccine is very safe, and thus do not draw any connection between the covid-19 vaccine and subsequent illness or death, so they wouldn’t be reporting anything. I know countless stories which bear out this fact, and so does a doctor I discussed this with.
July 19,’21
BS”D
E) Many doctors refuse to conclude that an adverse event is connected to the covid-19 vaccine and will not file a report, even if the patient’s family suspects a connection.
F) Other doctors do not have time to file multiple VAERS reports for all the adverse events they are seeing after covid-19 vaccination. (This was personally told to me by a gastroenterologist about her own practice.)
G) Doctors are sometimes finding that the VAERS system will not accept their reports. Dr. Zev Zelenko testified that he personally knows of twenty instances of patient death after the covid-19 vaccine in which a doctor attempted to make a report to VAERS and the report was not accepted.
Anthonycolpo
More Problems With the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Data
Back in January, I wrote about some of the inherent problems with the new Pfizer-BioNtech mRNA COVID-19 'vaccine' code-named BNT162b2, and sold under the brand name Comirnaty. To quickly recap:
-The drug is not really a vaccine but a gene-modifying therapy…
-The drug is not really a vaccine but a gene-modifying therapy…
Forwarded from Deleted Account
Doctors' Letter to Yated in Response to Dr. Berman.pdf
295.6 KB
It's not a vaccine.
Extracts from Dr Zelenko's letter attached a few posts before this one:
"Dr. Peter McCullough said last week (July 14) that it is clear that vaccinated people are transmitting the virus, and that the vaccines actually do not seem to be working at all against the Delta variant, and therefore are becoming obsolete at this point in time.
In fact, PHE (Public Health England) reports show that not only is the vaccine not helpful in reducing death, it actually increases the risk of death in vaccinated individuals who contract covid. Hospitalized covid patients with the Delta variant were found to be six times more likely to die if they were fully vaccinated than if they were unvaccinated (people who had received 1 dose fell out in the middle of this range.) See https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid- delta-variant-lockdowns/. This data corroborates the scientists’ warnings about ADE (namely, that vaccinating for certain viruses, coronavirus among them, causes the body to react in a worse way than it otherwise would, when faced with the infection)..
Mr. Birtz brings up the extremely serious risk of death from cytokine storm caused by ADE, which was indeed the problem with all previous attempts at producing a coronavirus vaccine, and the reason that none ever made it to the population. Indeed, all the animals in the trials died, but not right away. It took up to three years for ADE to affect them. There are simply some viruses, including dengue, RSV, and coronaviruses, for which vaccination is not the solution, because it results in enhanced disease, not prevention of disease. Dr. Berman does not have an answer as to why we can be sure that this vaccine is known to not cause ADE in the long term. Indeed, there is no such proof, as there were no adequate animal safety trials on this vaccine, and not enough time has passed in the human trials, which are still ongoing (on the world population). Actually, some scientists believe that the spike in disease rate soon after vaccination, and the increased death rate among the vaccinated who contract covid, is a form of ADE.
As Dr. Zev Zelenko so aptly put it, there are only two risk factors for covid: the doctor you choose, and the government you live under. With the right treatment, virtually nobody had to die in this pandemic, no matter how old or what comorbidities they had.
The government is spending billions to promote the vaccine and “save lives”, but if they truly desired to save lives, the first and easiest thing that they could have done would have been to encourage Vitamin D supplementation. Studies show that people with an excellent Vitamin D blood level (a level over 50) simply do not end up in the ICU, or die of corona. Why is this fact not all over the news?
In order to have an effective dialogue about this topic, it is necessary to acknowledge the open and proven fact of the censorship of information about effective corona treatments (and of the dangers of the vaccine). For an excellent presentation showing the censorship in the media, please see https://www.dropbox.com/s/skcr7aznhr3y224/covid%202520-3.mp4?=0.
The media is open about and proud of their censorship, and they have an agreement called “the trusted news initiative”. This is not a secret. You can look it up.
13) I am glad that Dr. Berman seems to agree about the strength of natural immunity, and agrees that the government has nevertheless been pushing to vaccinate individuals with a prior covid infection. It is crucial to take the next step, and question why the government would be pushing a new medical treatment on people who definitely do not need it? The question is compounded by the following facts:
a) that it is also being pushed on young people with prior infection (who have such miniscule risk in any case),
b) that the shot was never tested on people with prior infection (they were excluded from the trials),
Extracts from Dr Zelenko's letter attached a few posts before this one:
"Dr. Peter McCullough said last week (July 14) that it is clear that vaccinated people are transmitting the virus, and that the vaccines actually do not seem to be working at all against the Delta variant, and therefore are becoming obsolete at this point in time.
In fact, PHE (Public Health England) reports show that not only is the vaccine not helpful in reducing death, it actually increases the risk of death in vaccinated individuals who contract covid. Hospitalized covid patients with the Delta variant were found to be six times more likely to die if they were fully vaccinated than if they were unvaccinated (people who had received 1 dose fell out in the middle of this range.) See https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid- delta-variant-lockdowns/. This data corroborates the scientists’ warnings about ADE (namely, that vaccinating for certain viruses, coronavirus among them, causes the body to react in a worse way than it otherwise would, when faced with the infection)..
Mr. Birtz brings up the extremely serious risk of death from cytokine storm caused by ADE, which was indeed the problem with all previous attempts at producing a coronavirus vaccine, and the reason that none ever made it to the population. Indeed, all the animals in the trials died, but not right away. It took up to three years for ADE to affect them. There are simply some viruses, including dengue, RSV, and coronaviruses, for which vaccination is not the solution, because it results in enhanced disease, not prevention of disease. Dr. Berman does not have an answer as to why we can be sure that this vaccine is known to not cause ADE in the long term. Indeed, there is no such proof, as there were no adequate animal safety trials on this vaccine, and not enough time has passed in the human trials, which are still ongoing (on the world population). Actually, some scientists believe that the spike in disease rate soon after vaccination, and the increased death rate among the vaccinated who contract covid, is a form of ADE.
As Dr. Zev Zelenko so aptly put it, there are only two risk factors for covid: the doctor you choose, and the government you live under. With the right treatment, virtually nobody had to die in this pandemic, no matter how old or what comorbidities they had.
The government is spending billions to promote the vaccine and “save lives”, but if they truly desired to save lives, the first and easiest thing that they could have done would have been to encourage Vitamin D supplementation. Studies show that people with an excellent Vitamin D blood level (a level over 50) simply do not end up in the ICU, or die of corona. Why is this fact not all over the news?
In order to have an effective dialogue about this topic, it is necessary to acknowledge the open and proven fact of the censorship of information about effective corona treatments (and of the dangers of the vaccine). For an excellent presentation showing the censorship in the media, please see https://www.dropbox.com/s/skcr7aznhr3y224/covid%202520-3.mp4?=0.
The media is open about and proud of their censorship, and they have an agreement called “the trusted news initiative”. This is not a secret. You can look it up.
13) I am glad that Dr. Berman seems to agree about the strength of natural immunity, and agrees that the government has nevertheless been pushing to vaccinate individuals with a prior covid infection. It is crucial to take the next step, and question why the government would be pushing a new medical treatment on people who definitely do not need it? The question is compounded by the following facts:
a) that it is also being pushed on young people with prior infection (who have such miniscule risk in any case),
b) that the shot was never tested on people with prior infection (they were excluded from the trials),
Children's Health Defense
COVID 19 News Watch Archive
Archive from February 26th – November 17th, 2020 *** February 26 ‘Mission Possible’: Pfizer and BioNtech Star in Their Own Vaccine Discovery Movie FiercePharma reported: It’s lights, camera, action for Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine scientists and executives.…
c) that the vaccine-induced antibodies will destroy their superior natural antibodies (witness the Red Cross briefing saying that vaccinated covid-recovered individuals could no longer donate convalescent plasma, which was quickly amended after it created a storm),
(also see Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, top vaccine developer, who has a similar concern which applies to all individuals https://youtu.be/ZJZxiNxYLpc),
d) that the shot is much more risky for individuals with natural covid antibodies from infection (studies have found these individuals to develop adverse effects from the shot, such as blood clots, at a much higher rate).
These are hard questions that must be asked of a government who purports to want our best health.
In response to Dr. Berman’s message about the vaccines being the way out from the inconvenience of quarantine, the truth is that the only way that the craziness of quarantine will end is not by vaccination, which in any case has proven to be largely ineffective, but when we start taking control of our own health, with G-d’s help, and treating covid symptoms early at home with treatments that work, as we do for any other treatable illness. We need to stop allowing the government to dictate our lives and lock us up at will. There is no need to live in fear, or to test or quarantine asymptomatic people. There is no proof that testing and quarantining asymptomatic individuals helps, and we have never done it in the past. We don’t need to do it in this case, either."
(also see Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, top vaccine developer, who has a similar concern which applies to all individuals https://youtu.be/ZJZxiNxYLpc),
d) that the shot is much more risky for individuals with natural covid antibodies from infection (studies have found these individuals to develop adverse effects from the shot, such as blood clots, at a much higher rate).
These are hard questions that must be asked of a government who purports to want our best health.
In response to Dr. Berman’s message about the vaccines being the way out from the inconvenience of quarantine, the truth is that the only way that the craziness of quarantine will end is not by vaccination, which in any case has proven to be largely ineffective, but when we start taking control of our own health, with G-d’s help, and treating covid symptoms early at home with treatments that work, as we do for any other treatable illness. We need to stop allowing the government to dictate our lives and lock us up at will. There is no need to live in fear, or to test or quarantine asymptomatic people. There is no proof that testing and quarantining asymptomatic individuals helps, and we have never done it in the past. We don’t need to do it in this case, either."
YouTube
Dangers and Benefits of Mass Vaccination: Geert Vanden Bossche Interview
Learn about the benefits and risks of mass vaccination in a pandemic from an interview with Geert Vanden Bossche. This is probably one of the most important interviews for the pandemic. Dr Philip McMillan discusses immune escape, vaccine effectiveness, and…
According to the Guardian I am a "Covid sceptic". Yet I get criticized for claiming I have been infected with Covid twice with a gap of 18 months in between, not even once. So I am not a Covid sceptic at all. They could have bothered to check with me, but they didn't. This is just another example of not to trust corporate media and go to direct sources instead.
Other media is saying I am an "anti-vaxxer", yet I never said a word about vaccines before 2020 and I do not consider these injections vaccines, so there is no evidence for this claim.
What I am glad about is that now there may be the beginnings of a much needed debate on this, as no government has the right to violate the UNESCO UNIVERSAL Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights 2005 Article 6 on CONSENT to any preventive (injections) or even diagnostic (tests, masks) medical intervention.
Robin
https://theguardian.com/music/2021/jul/22/eric-clapton-refuses-to-play-venues-require-proof-of-vaccination-covid
Other media is saying I am an "anti-vaxxer", yet I never said a word about vaccines before 2020 and I do not consider these injections vaccines, so there is no evidence for this claim.
What I am glad about is that now there may be the beginnings of a much needed debate on this, as no government has the right to violate the UNESCO UNIVERSAL Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights 2005 Article 6 on CONSENT to any preventive (injections) or even diagnostic (tests, masks) medical intervention.
Robin
https://theguardian.com/music/2021/jul/22/eric-clapton-refuses-to-play-venues-require-proof-of-vaccination-covid
the Guardian
Eric Clapton refuses to play venues that require proof of vaccination
Clapton says he won’t perform for a ‘discriminated audience’ after vaccination passports made mandatory for clubs and venues this autumn
It simply means they are not vaccines by any definition of the word as they do not stop infection and therefore transmission and that therefore vaccine certification is a useless and ridiculous concept based on the current data. Anybody insisting on injection certifications is either in bad faith or with very limited reasoning capabilities. The alternative is of course that there is a further motive which has nothing to do with public health which at this stage seems to be a certainty to those thinking through what is going on carefully. Robin.
On this channel we are opposed to discrimination and segregation and the violation of human rights, namely the violation of the UNESCO Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights 2005 Article 6 on consent, which clearly states that consent is required for preventive (injections, whether they are vaccinations or not) and diagnostic (tests, masks) medical interventions, and if no consent is given the person involved cannot be treated with disadvantage or prejudice (article 6.1,2). Therefore any form of certification involving a medical intervention as condition of entry of a public or private place is a direct violation of universal human rights under the above declaration, and is unacceptable under international human rights agreements undertaken by most countries worldwide, and also preceded by the Nuremberg Code. Robin
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
UNESCO UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF BIOETHICS & HUMAN RIGHTS, 2005.
Article 6:
1. Any 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲, 𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 & 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗲𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗰 medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free & informed 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧 of the person concerned based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE OR PREJUDICE .
2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice.
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Article 6:
1. Any 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲, 𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 & 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗲𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗰 medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free & informed 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧 of the person concerned based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE OR PREJUDICE .
2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice.
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Worthy of a fascist dictatorship. In a democracy the opposition is allowed to say the Prime Minister has lied, and vice-versa. It's almost as if anything vaguely truthful is banned from the House of Commons, should we call it the House of Lies?
https://youtu.be/O2aafrWpsKg
https://youtu.be/O2aafrWpsKg
YouTube
Dawn Butler asked to leave Commons chamber after saying Boris Johnson has lied
Labour MP Dawn Butler was asked to leave the Commons chamber after refusing to withdraw accusations that Boris Johnson has lied countlessly throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. 'It's dangerous to lie in a pandemic' the MP for Brent said. 'Poor people in our…
If anybody is wondering why I am no longer on twitter, two accounts permanently suspended and all my accounts have been stripped of all followers. Why would they do this if this was all about public health? Why not just tell everyone why their injection location is now magnetic and why most people who are hospitalised or dying from Covid19 have been injected? Why the contemporary version of burning of the books?
ISRAEL: "The Health Ministry said Thursday that the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine in preventing infection and mild symptoms has dropped to 40 percent, according to data collected over the past month.."
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israel-reports-effectiveness-of-covid-vaccine-against-infection-drops-to-40-percent-1.10021477
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israel-reports-effectiveness-of-covid-vaccine-against-infection-drops-to-40-percent-1.10021477
Haaretz.com
Israel reports COVID vaccine effectiveness against infection down to 40%; data might be skewed
***