The importance of fully informed consent.
Please share with others
Link to a short video on Informed Consent : https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/08/23/video-everything-you-need-to-know-about-informed-consent-its-your-right/
Link to the study: Lancet Study
ROBERT F KENNEDY JR. JUNIOR also referred to the scale of this lie: https://news.1rj.ru/str/robinmg/6996
Please share with others
Link to a short video on Informed Consent : https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/08/23/video-everything-you-need-to-know-about-informed-consent-its-your-right/
Link to the study: Lancet Study
ROBERT F KENNEDY JR. JUNIOR also referred to the scale of this lie: https://news.1rj.ru/str/robinmg/6996
https://www.the-sun.com/health/3525485/new-virus-variant-covid22-more-deadly-delta/
"Immunologist Professor Doctor Sai Reddy has called the next biggest variant "Covid-22" based on it causing chaos in the year 2022"
War on virus - is a war on people. A war on humanity. A war on us.
"Immunologist Professor Doctor Sai Reddy has called the next biggest variant "Covid-22" based on it causing chaos in the year 2022"
War on virus - is a war on people. A war on humanity. A war on us.
The US Sun
New virus variant 'Covid-22' could be more deadly than Delta, expert warns
A NEW variant dubbed “Covid-22” could be more deadly than the world-dominating Delta, an expert has warned. Immunologist Professor Doctor Sai Reddy said we “have to prepare” for a new emerging vari…
Original Investigation
May 9, 2017
Postmarket Safety Events Among Novel Therapeutics Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 2001 and 2010
"Among 222 novel therapeutics approved by the FDA from 2001 through 2010, 71 (32.0%) were affected by a postmarket safety event."
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2625319
May 9, 2017
Postmarket Safety Events Among Novel Therapeutics Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 2001 and 2010
"Among 222 novel therapeutics approved by the FDA from 2001 through 2010, 71 (32.0%) were affected by a postmarket safety event."
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2625319
As a former member of this industry, this isn’t nice to read.
I was well aware of the nonsense science in “pre-Alzheimer’s Disease” & knew that dozens of experimental therapeutics had repeatedly failed in clinical trials.
We don’t understand the pathobiology of AD. So we don’t know which biochemical pathways or targets to intervene on with the intention of slowing its progression.
I regard AD is a disorder we’re never likely to be able successfully to address.
The end of the road has been reached & yet we’re going right on into the desert.
Caveat emptor.
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://ethics.harvard.edu/blog/risky-drugs-why-fda-cannot-be-trusted
I was well aware of the nonsense science in “pre-Alzheimer’s Disease” & knew that dozens of experimental therapeutics had repeatedly failed in clinical trials.
We don’t understand the pathobiology of AD. So we don’t know which biochemical pathways or targets to intervene on with the intention of slowing its progression.
I regard AD is a disorder we’re never likely to be able successfully to address.
The end of the road has been reached & yet we’re going right on into the desert.
Caveat emptor.
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://ethics.harvard.edu/blog/risky-drugs-why-fda-cannot-be-trusted
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Remember how much Western corporate media and politicians loved the Hong Kong protests? I believe they are about to get a taste of their own medicine. Please note: protestors wore black yet always brought with them a coloured T-shirt to merge back into the crowd afterwards. Note the use of shields: Australians need to use body boards for surfing or equivalent. Masks believe it or not are essential to conceal identity. Umbrellas conceal action. Laser pointers are defensive action against surveillance.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A short from a very interesting & informative interview with veteran banker Catherine Austin Fitts.
Here she explains why VaxPass is necessary for takeover by the central banks & replacement of all cash by electronic credit. Which they control what you can do with it. And where. Without limit, a slave economy.
VaxPass is so obviously a REALLY SEVERELY BAD THING for everyone except it’s advocates.
That’s why I keep banging on about the “human freedoms event horizon”.
There’s no way out if a critical mass of us accept them for access to food, that group destroys freedom permanently for everyone else, who will be coerced or starved into accepting it.
So it’s not a neutral act, when someone you might have influenced gives up & gets jabbed.
In the last, every little helps.
Cheers,
Mike
Here she explains why VaxPass is necessary for takeover by the central banks & replacement of all cash by electronic credit. Which they control what you can do with it. And where. Without limit, a slave economy.
VaxPass is so obviously a REALLY SEVERELY BAD THING for everyone except it’s advocates.
That’s why I keep banging on about the “human freedoms event horizon”.
There’s no way out if a critical mass of us accept them for access to food, that group destroys freedom permanently for everyone else, who will be coerced or starved into accepting it.
So it’s not a neutral act, when someone you might have influenced gives up & gets jabbed.
In the last, every little helps.
Cheers,
Mike
A short but very accurate denoscription of the reason why informed consent matters & what it looks like.
It would be interesting to learn how many vaccinated people feel they gave informed consent.
Mike
https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/08/23/video-everything-you-need-to-know-about-informed-consent-its-your-right/
It would be interesting to learn how many vaccinated people feel they gave informed consent.
Mike
https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/08/23/video-everything-you-need-to-know-about-informed-consent-its-your-right/
21st Century Wire
VIDEO: Everything You Need to Know About Informed Consent – ‘It’s Your Right’
<strong>Canadian Covid Care Alliance</strong> | Informed consent to medical interventions - including vaccines, is the law.
Worth reminding people that there used to be brave, public spirited people at FDA.
Not anymore.
Anyone working there wish to retain self respect?
QUIT.
Staying means you approved it, too.
Know this, we learned something about FDA today. It’s utterly corrupt.
Did you know that pretty much only FDA of the main country regulator agencies refused to pass THALIDOMIDE?
An FDA toxicology reviewer, Dr Frances Kelsey, wasn’t satisfied with the companies dossier or answers to her questions. She recommended it not be licensed & she must have made a good case to a brave department head, because she was supported. Among the best calls ever made by a public servant, I’d say.
Is this what FDA has become? So it seems.
Something else we learned today:
An approval from corrupt officials in a once great medicines regulator changes nothing about the most lethal “vaccines” ever visited on a human population. Or about efficacy, which it looks like it has none of, six months out. And they’re still not necessary because there are good early treatments.
https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(20)30673-2/fulltext
Not anymore.
Anyone working there wish to retain self respect?
QUIT.
Staying means you approved it, too.
Know this, we learned something about FDA today. It’s utterly corrupt.
Did you know that pretty much only FDA of the main country regulator agencies refused to pass THALIDOMIDE?
An FDA toxicology reviewer, Dr Frances Kelsey, wasn’t satisfied with the companies dossier or answers to her questions. She recommended it not be licensed & she must have made a good case to a brave department head, because she was supported. Among the best calls ever made by a public servant, I’d say.
Is this what FDA has become? So it seems.
Something else we learned today:
An approval from corrupt officials in a once great medicines regulator changes nothing about the most lethal “vaccines” ever visited on a human population. Or about efficacy, which it looks like it has none of, six months out. And they’re still not necessary because there are good early treatments.
https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(20)30673-2/fulltext
An important distinction here.
If this reading is right, only vaccine released from today can be considered approved & it must have it’s approved name on the vial.
Appallingly, apparently it’s possible to mandate it. And the manufacturer has product liability.
All distributed stock is still covered by EUA, cannot be mandated & we carry the can.
It may be a long time before bulk licensed product is out there. Tell them to sling their hook meanwhile.
Mike
For the US: Read the FDA approval letter please. This is how they scam you, by making it nearly impenetrable. Below, I identify the two most relevant passages. The rest of the letter is repetitive blather to keep your head spinning. https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
page 2 last line, footnote: here FDA quietly admits that the licened Pfizer vaccine and the authorized Pfizer vaccine are identical w.r.t. safety and efficacy, but they are "legally distinct." That's code for one has manufacturer liability, while the other doesn't. It is also code for "we don't want to impose a mandate on the EUA product 'cause it is illegal, but we can probably get away with a mandate on the licensed product."
page 12 AA. This tells you that yes, we licensed the vaccine, but...there is a lot of the old vaccine out there, actually "a significant amount" and this amount will be considered an EUA vaccine and will continue to be used. Maybe for a very long time.
Now, why would they do that? Why specify that identical versions of the product will be legally different? Because they need the license to impose the mandates. But they need the EUA to evade liability.
Along with the license comes liability for the manufacturer. (But all EUA products were given a liability shield.)
Unfortunately, our federal overlords would prefer us to be without recourse if we are injured, rather than have Pfizer risk defending its product in court.
So, my inference is that the feds want the public to THINK the vaccine they are receiving is licensed, which will make people submit because they believe it can now be mandated, but instead the public is almost certain to receive the EUA vials instead, to save Pfizer's behind.
You will be able to tell the difference when you see the vaccine vial. The letter explains that the COMIRNATY-labelled vials will be the licensed ones, and the others (under EUA) will say something like Pfizer BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine without the brand name COMIRNATY.
Yes, a stingy CICP injury program exists, which I have previously written about, but it has not paid out for a single Covid vaccine injury, last time I checked.
How did I figure this out? Because I have read other FDA approval letters, and this one had significant weasel wording. And I have seen other FDA tricks. So it just took me awhile to identify what was being hidden. I could be wrong. But then we would need another explanation for the language in the approval letter. I'm happy to entertain other interpretations. --Meryl Nass, MD
P.S. Pfizer made $33 billion so far this year on its mRNA vaccine.
If this reading is right, only vaccine released from today can be considered approved & it must have it’s approved name on the vial.
Appallingly, apparently it’s possible to mandate it. And the manufacturer has product liability.
All distributed stock is still covered by EUA, cannot be mandated & we carry the can.
It may be a long time before bulk licensed product is out there. Tell them to sling their hook meanwhile.
Mike
For the US: Read the FDA approval letter please. This is how they scam you, by making it nearly impenetrable. Below, I identify the two most relevant passages. The rest of the letter is repetitive blather to keep your head spinning. https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
page 2 last line, footnote: here FDA quietly admits that the licened Pfizer vaccine and the authorized Pfizer vaccine are identical w.r.t. safety and efficacy, but they are "legally distinct." That's code for one has manufacturer liability, while the other doesn't. It is also code for "we don't want to impose a mandate on the EUA product 'cause it is illegal, but we can probably get away with a mandate on the licensed product."
page 12 AA. This tells you that yes, we licensed the vaccine, but...there is a lot of the old vaccine out there, actually "a significant amount" and this amount will be considered an EUA vaccine and will continue to be used. Maybe for a very long time.
Now, why would they do that? Why specify that identical versions of the product will be legally different? Because they need the license to impose the mandates. But they need the EUA to evade liability.
Along with the license comes liability for the manufacturer. (But all EUA products were given a liability shield.)
Unfortunately, our federal overlords would prefer us to be without recourse if we are injured, rather than have Pfizer risk defending its product in court.
So, my inference is that the feds want the public to THINK the vaccine they are receiving is licensed, which will make people submit because they believe it can now be mandated, but instead the public is almost certain to receive the EUA vials instead, to save Pfizer's behind.
You will be able to tell the difference when you see the vaccine vial. The letter explains that the COMIRNATY-labelled vials will be the licensed ones, and the others (under EUA) will say something like Pfizer BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine without the brand name COMIRNATY.
Yes, a stingy CICP injury program exists, which I have previously written about, but it has not paid out for a single Covid vaccine injury, last time I checked.
How did I figure this out? Because I have read other FDA approval letters, and this one had significant weasel wording. And I have seen other FDA tricks. So it just took me awhile to identify what was being hidden. I could be wrong. But then we would need another explanation for the language in the approval letter. I'm happy to entertain other interpretations. --Meryl Nass, MD
P.S. Pfizer made $33 billion so far this year on its mRNA vaccine.
AUSTRALIA: "When the police are given total freedom to impose injustices on a compliant population for a pandemic that never was it reeks of totalitarianism, and is the modern-day equivalent of Franco’s Spain, Mussolini’s Italy, Stalin’s Russia and Hitler’s Germany. Powers the Australian police have been given include:
forcible entry into buildings
preventing people from moving about
quarantining people
making people take tests and undergo medical treatment
compelling people to give information
While the Australian government releases death statistics (allegedly from Covid) on a day-to-day basis it only releases vaccine-related deaths that are at least 90 days old. Thus we know that from the 6 days 18-23 August there were 17 so-called Covid deaths, those dying after having tested positive for Covid-19.
It could be that every one of those 17 deaths were vaccine victims. "
https://johnplatinumgoss.com/2021/08/24/australia-on-the-brink-of-total-fascism/
forcible entry into buildings
preventing people from moving about
quarantining people
making people take tests and undergo medical treatment
compelling people to give information
While the Australian government releases death statistics (allegedly from Covid) on a day-to-day basis it only releases vaccine-related deaths that are at least 90 days old. Thus we know that from the 6 days 18-23 August there were 17 so-called Covid deaths, those dying after having tested positive for Covid-19.
It could be that every one of those 17 deaths were vaccine victims. "
https://johnplatinumgoss.com/2021/08/24/australia-on-the-brink-of-total-fascism/
All the Goss
Australia – on the brink of total fascism
Right now the Australian people are being cruelly subjugated due to the fake pandemic. The police there have been given extraordinary powers beyond what would be considered rational. These measures…
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
An anonymous letter received today.
I am a physician who has treated many patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in the hospital.
I have also recently resigned my position, because my employer is ethically and morally repugnant.
Current standard of care, when someone is diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 in the outpatient setting, is to send patients home without any treatment, wait for them to become hypoxic, then have them come to the hospital for admission. By this point in the course of their disease, the inflammation and micro-thrombotic damage done to the lungs is severe and often irreversible. The inertia and groupthink I’ve witnessed from my peers is the worst thing I’ve seen in medicine in my career; nothing comes close.
Anyone in medicine who advocates for another way is deemed a lunatic and cast into the fire. Google the names Peter McCullough, Pierre Kory, Paul Marik… once highly respected, reputable, and published names in medicine are now called heretics or worse. These folks have published peer-reviewed studies on early and aggressive treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infections, using medications that are cheap, effective, and safe. Their logic is sound. They have nothing to gain and everything to lose for what they're doing and saying, but they continue to do it anyway. They are also saving lives.
My attempts to pursue others in my field have failed. Any attempts to deviate further from the status quo, at least in the position I currently occupy, would likely result in investigation and my medical license suspension.
I have no voice and no platform to make any difference. Many have died that didn’t need to, sacrificed on the alter of vaccination-or-else.
I send all of this email, in the vain belief that you will read it and be able to do something meaningful with it. If people know that SARS-CoV-2 is treatable and curable before hospitalization, maybe they will start to demand change from their physicians. Physicians are up their own asses on this one, and that is unlikely to change anytime soon. Any meaningful end to this pandemic and how it is managed will likely have to come brave leaders in positions of power.
Introduction and institution of the protocols attached on a world-wide scale could end the pandemic. Institution on a state-wide level would at least save lives in Florida, and potentially break the Narrative that currently exists, similar to what happened with the lab-leak theory earlier this year. Time is running out.
Thank you for listening. God bless,
I am a physician who has treated many patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in the hospital.
I have also recently resigned my position, because my employer is ethically and morally repugnant.
Current standard of care, when someone is diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 in the outpatient setting, is to send patients home without any treatment, wait for them to become hypoxic, then have them come to the hospital for admission. By this point in the course of their disease, the inflammation and micro-thrombotic damage done to the lungs is severe and often irreversible. The inertia and groupthink I’ve witnessed from my peers is the worst thing I’ve seen in medicine in my career; nothing comes close.
Anyone in medicine who advocates for another way is deemed a lunatic and cast into the fire. Google the names Peter McCullough, Pierre Kory, Paul Marik… once highly respected, reputable, and published names in medicine are now called heretics or worse. These folks have published peer-reviewed studies on early and aggressive treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infections, using medications that are cheap, effective, and safe. Their logic is sound. They have nothing to gain and everything to lose for what they're doing and saying, but they continue to do it anyway. They are also saving lives.
My attempts to pursue others in my field have failed. Any attempts to deviate further from the status quo, at least in the position I currently occupy, would likely result in investigation and my medical license suspension.
I have no voice and no platform to make any difference. Many have died that didn’t need to, sacrificed on the alter of vaccination-or-else.
I send all of this email, in the vain belief that you will read it and be able to do something meaningful with it. If people know that SARS-CoV-2 is treatable and curable before hospitalization, maybe they will start to demand change from their physicians. Physicians are up their own asses on this one, and that is unlikely to change anytime soon. Any meaningful end to this pandemic and how it is managed will likely have to come brave leaders in positions of power.
Introduction and institution of the protocols attached on a world-wide scale could end the pandemic. Institution on a state-wide level would at least save lives in Florida, and potentially break the Narrative that currently exists, similar to what happened with the lab-leak theory earlier this year. Time is running out.
Thank you for listening. God bless,
Forwarded from Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
MONOTTI PROTOCOL PART 3: TREATMENTS
Vitamin D has already been mentioned above in point 2. The recommended minimum dose during early treatment is 5,000 IUs per day as per the American Association of Physician’s guide to early treatment. Ideally this should be in calcifediol form if available, as it is more quickly circulated in the body than cholecalciferol or vitamin D3.
[I took 20,000 IUs of vitamin D3 daily during my "Delta variant" infection, @robinmg]
Vitamin C is always a good idea for the treatment of all respiratory infections. Many doctors recommend 1g twice a day during treatment.
Zinc sulfate, gluconate or citrate is known to limit viral replication in human cells when aided in its entry into cells by a zinc ionophore, such as
hydroxychloroquine the most effective option,
quercetin, or
epigallocatechin gallate or EGCG.
Omega-3 supplementation improved the levels of several parameters of respiratory and renal function in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
Ivermectin prevents clinical deterioration, reduces olfactory deficit, and limits the inflammation of the upper and lower respiratory tracts.
Early administration of
inhaled budesonide reduced the likelihood of needing urgent medical care and reduced time to recovery after early COVID-19.
NAC administration in combination with other antiviral agents may dramatically reduce hospital admission rate, mechanical ventilation and mortality.
Aspirin use is associated with decreased mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, and mortality.
Azithromycin is known to reduce the length of the disease and the time required to test negative. Please note that azithromycin is considered as a bacteriostatic: it stops bacteria, and as antiviral at the same time. Alternatively use doxycycline.
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/
Vitamin D has already been mentioned above in point 2. The recommended minimum dose during early treatment is 5,000 IUs per day as per the American Association of Physician’s guide to early treatment. Ideally this should be in calcifediol form if available, as it is more quickly circulated in the body than cholecalciferol or vitamin D3.
[I took 20,000 IUs of vitamin D3 daily during my "Delta variant" infection, @robinmg]
Vitamin C is always a good idea for the treatment of all respiratory infections. Many doctors recommend 1g twice a day during treatment.
Zinc sulfate, gluconate or citrate is known to limit viral replication in human cells when aided in its entry into cells by a zinc ionophore, such as
hydroxychloroquine the most effective option,
quercetin, or
epigallocatechin gallate or EGCG.
Omega-3 supplementation improved the levels of several parameters of respiratory and renal function in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
Ivermectin prevents clinical deterioration, reduces olfactory deficit, and limits the inflammation of the upper and lower respiratory tracts.
Early administration of
inhaled budesonide reduced the likelihood of needing urgent medical care and reduced time to recovery after early COVID-19.
NAC administration in combination with other antiviral agents may dramatically reduce hospital admission rate, mechanical ventilation and mortality.
Aspirin use is associated with decreased mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, and mortality.
Azithromycin is known to reduce the length of the disease and the time required to test negative. Please note that azithromycin is considered as a bacteriostatic: it stops bacteria, and as antiviral at the same time. Alternatively use doxycycline.
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/
No Place Without Spirit
The Monotti Protocol For Keeping Society Open
The Monotti Protocol, 2021 The Monotti Protocol aims to be at the same time extremely simple yet extremely effective. It consists of three main epidemic or pandemic control approaches, to be implem…
"A groundbreaking preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published Aug. 10 in The Lancet, includes alarming findings devastating to the COVID vaccine rollout.
The study found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.
While moderating the symptoms of infection, the jab allows vaccinated individuals to carry unusually high viral loads without becoming ill at first, potentially transforming them into presymptomatic superspreaders.
This phenomenon may be the source of the shocking post-vaccination surges in heavily vaccinated populations globally.
The paper’s authors, Chau et al, demonstrated widespread vaccine failure and transmission under tightly controlled circumstances in a hospital lockdown in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
The scientists studied healthcare workers who were unable to leave the hospital for two weeks. The data showed that fully vaccinated workers — about two months after injection with the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (AZD1222) — acquired, carried and presumably transmitted the Delta variant to their vaccinated colleagues.
They almost certainly also passed the Delta infection to susceptible unvaccinated people, including their patients. Sequencing of strains confirmed the workers transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to one another."
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccinated-healthcare-workers-threat-unvaccinated-patients-co-workers/
The study found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.
While moderating the symptoms of infection, the jab allows vaccinated individuals to carry unusually high viral loads without becoming ill at first, potentially transforming them into presymptomatic superspreaders.
This phenomenon may be the source of the shocking post-vaccination surges in heavily vaccinated populations globally.
The paper’s authors, Chau et al, demonstrated widespread vaccine failure and transmission under tightly controlled circumstances in a hospital lockdown in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
The scientists studied healthcare workers who were unable to leave the hospital for two weeks. The data showed that fully vaccinated workers — about two months after injection with the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (AZD1222) — acquired, carried and presumably transmitted the Delta variant to their vaccinated colleagues.
They almost certainly also passed the Delta infection to susceptible unvaccinated people, including their patients. Sequencing of strains confirmed the workers transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to one another."
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccinated-healthcare-workers-threat-unvaccinated-patients-co-workers/
Children's Health Defense
Study: Fully Vaccinated Healthcare Workers Carry 251 Times Viral Load, Pose Threat to Unvaccinated Patients, Co-Workers
A preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published Aug. 10 in The Lancet, found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.
"Between 11th–25th June 2021 ( week 7–8 after dose 2 [i.e. ALL FULLY "VACCINATED"]), 69 healthcare workers were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. 62 participated in the clinical study. 49 were (pre)symptomatic with one requiring oxygen supplementation. All recovered uneventfully.
23 complete-genome sequences were obtained. They all belonged to the Delta variant, and were phylogenetically distinct from the contemporary Delta variant sequences obtained from community transmission cases, suggestive of ongoing transmission between the workers.
Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant [i.e. "vaccine" failure] infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020 [i.e. before mass "vaccinations"]. Time from diagnosis to PCR negative was 8–33 days (median: 21).
Neutralizing antibody levels after vaccination and at diagnosis of the cases were lower than those in the matched uninfected controls.
➡️There was no correlation between vaccine-induced neutralizing antibody levels and viral loads or the development of symptoms⬅️.
[i.e. the "vaccines" do nothing at all apart from delaying symptoms while viral load builds up therefore increasing the window of pre symptomatic transmission from the "vaccinated"]"
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3897733
23 complete-genome sequences were obtained. They all belonged to the Delta variant, and were phylogenetically distinct from the contemporary Delta variant sequences obtained from community transmission cases, suggestive of ongoing transmission between the workers.
Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant [i.e. "vaccine" failure] infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020 [i.e. before mass "vaccinations"]. Time from diagnosis to PCR negative was 8–33 days (median: 21).
Neutralizing antibody levels after vaccination and at diagnosis of the cases were lower than those in the matched uninfected controls.
➡️There was no correlation between vaccine-induced neutralizing antibody levels and viral loads or the development of symptoms⬅️.
[i.e. the "vaccines" do nothing at all apart from delaying symptoms while viral load builds up therefore increasing the window of pre symptomatic transmission from the "vaccinated"]"
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3897733
Ssrn
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Among Vaccinated Healthcare Workers, Vietnam
Background: Data on breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant infections are limited.
Methods: We studied breakthrough infections among healthcare workers of
Methods: We studied breakthrough infections among healthcare workers of
A critique on USA government policy to covid19 written from the perspective of a non scientist who’s done a lot of reading.
Maybe an example or two here, which you might take to your next “seeding doubt” conversations that I need you all to have, wherever you are, all the time 😎🤗
https://trialsitenews.com/the-growing-rage-of-the-informed/
Maybe an example or two here, which you might take to your next “seeding doubt” conversations that I need you all to have, wherever you are, all the time 😎🤗
https://trialsitenews.com/the-growing-rage-of-the-informed/
TrialSiteNews
The Growing Rage of the Informed
Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite. In a New York Times Op-Ed
Forwarded from Peter
Religious exepmption templates, letters and other resources from Orthodox Ethos: https://orthodoxethos.com/post/religious-exemption-resources-and-collections
Supporting the UK govt Covid Narrative
Since March 2020 the govt has used tax payer’s money to fund the cost of over 263 million Covid-19 Tests in the UK.
2.5% of all of those tests were “positive” and 2% of those “positive” cases lead we are told to a death “with” Covid.
This is on average 4 tests for every man, woman and child in the UK
Without our acquiescence to all of this testing they would never have been able to support the “pandemic”.
There is no sign at the moment that this will stop with over 16.5 million tests, we are told, already performed so far in August 2021.
Note: Data includes Pillar 1 -4 tests as provided by the UK govt
Link to the Covid Deaths and Cases: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
Since March 2020 the govt has used tax payer’s money to fund the cost of over 263 million Covid-19 Tests in the UK.
2.5% of all of those tests were “positive” and 2% of those “positive” cases lead we are told to a death “with” Covid.
This is on average 4 tests for every man, woman and child in the UK
Without our acquiescence to all of this testing they would never have been able to support the “pandemic”.
There is no sign at the moment that this will stop with over 16.5 million tests, we are told, already performed so far in August 2021.
Note: Data includes Pillar 1 -4 tests as provided by the UK govt
Link to the Covid Deaths and Cases: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
The Delta Variant –PHE England
The table above shows the “positive Covid cases” and “Covid deaths” in England from 1st February to 15th August 2021, this is the timescale in which the PHE has been following and reporting on the “Delta variant”.
The worry we are told is that the Covid-19 injections may not protect against the Delta variant and that a booster may be required.
The table shows that six and half months on the “Delta variant” is hardly even on the radar, accounting for just over 6% of all “Covid”deaths in England over this period and less than 17% of all “Covid”cases and is also 15 times “less deadly”.
Why is this story not more convincing, are they relying on people not looking at the data, or is the Delta variant story yet to unfold?
Link to the PHE data: PHE Data
Link to the Covid Deaths and Cases: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
The table above shows the “positive Covid cases” and “Covid deaths” in England from 1st February to 15th August 2021, this is the timescale in which the PHE has been following and reporting on the “Delta variant”.
The worry we are told is that the Covid-19 injections may not protect against the Delta variant and that a booster may be required.
The table shows that six and half months on the “Delta variant” is hardly even on the radar, accounting for just over 6% of all “Covid”deaths in England over this period and less than 17% of all “Covid”cases and is also 15 times “less deadly”.
Why is this story not more convincing, are they relying on people not looking at the data, or is the Delta variant story yet to unfold?
Link to the PHE data: PHE Data
Link to the Covid Deaths and Cases: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
“Excess Deaths” in England and Wales April 2020 to Feb 2021
There were approximately 109k “Excess deaths” in England and Wales from April 2020 to February 2021
These all occurred in a distinct 6 month period, April and May 2020 and then the four months from 1st November 2020 to the end of February 2021.
The UK govt has failed to explain the “excess deaths” of 24k of these people, almost all in April 2020, not included as “Covid deaths”.
Did the excessive use of End of Life Medication, used at record levels in April 2020, result in more deaths than the govt expected?
Did the govt fail to get people up to speed in time with all the Covid testing?
Perhaps there just weren’t enough Covid test kits on the ground to support these “excess deaths” as Covid deaths?
Under 730k Covid tests were performed in April 2020, compared to an average of 15 million tests a month over the last 18 mths.
You can see more analysis on these excess deaths here: https://news.1rj.ru/str/robinmg/7460
Link to ONS numbers: ONS
There were approximately 109k “Excess deaths” in England and Wales from April 2020 to February 2021
These all occurred in a distinct 6 month period, April and May 2020 and then the four months from 1st November 2020 to the end of February 2021.
The UK govt has failed to explain the “excess deaths” of 24k of these people, almost all in April 2020, not included as “Covid deaths”.
Did the excessive use of End of Life Medication, used at record levels in April 2020, result in more deaths than the govt expected?
Did the govt fail to get people up to speed in time with all the Covid testing?
Perhaps there just weren’t enough Covid test kits on the ground to support these “excess deaths” as Covid deaths?
Under 730k Covid tests were performed in April 2020, compared to an average of 15 million tests a month over the last 18 mths.
You can see more analysis on these excess deaths here: https://news.1rj.ru/str/robinmg/7460
Link to ONS numbers: ONS
What was happening in months with “excess deaths” in the UK
The Table above shows how in certain months the number of positive test results was way above “normal”. In theory this should be due to high levels of infections in the community.
So given that the govt stated that 20% of all tests performed in April 2020 were positive should we be suspicious? Well if the incidence rate in the community was very high then this may be expected?
However, according to a study done at the time it showed that the incidence rate in April 2020 was around 0.32%. :Study
So as we can see even more false positive rates were dialled in to those April 2020 test results than any other month.
Was this how the govt, despite such low numbers of tests being performed in April 2020, at least managed to secure 24k deaths in April 2020 as “Covid-deaths”.
This “trick” was also applied in other months using excessive "positive results" as you can see below
The Table above shows how in certain months the number of positive test results was way above “normal”. In theory this should be due to high levels of infections in the community.
So given that the govt stated that 20% of all tests performed in April 2020 were positive should we be suspicious? Well if the incidence rate in the community was very high then this may be expected?
However, according to a study done at the time it showed that the incidence rate in April 2020 was around 0.32%. :Study
So as we can see even more false positive rates were dialled in to those April 2020 test results than any other month.
Was this how the govt, despite such low numbers of tests being performed in April 2020, at least managed to secure 24k deaths in April 2020 as “Covid-deaths”.
This “trick” was also applied in other months using excessive "positive results" as you can see below