Table shows the average number of occupied hospital beds in each quarter from March 19 to June 2021 and what percentage it was of the available beds.
See post above for available bed numbers.
Link to related post: https://news.1rj.ru/str/robinmg/7919
Link to data: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/bed-availability-and-occupancy/bed-data-overnight/
See post above for available bed numbers.
Link to related post: https://news.1rj.ru/str/robinmg/7919
Link to data: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/bed-availability-and-occupancy/bed-data-overnight/
❤1
Some good information above to share with those who still believe that the govt has been supporting the health of the nation and doing their very best to save lives since April and May 2020
The tables above show how the govt took a deliberate step to reduce the supply of available hospital beds in the quarter to the end of June 2020 and even with this reduced level of supply hospitals were still only at 65% occupancy levels.
This we were told was to prepare hospitals to support an influx of sick people with Covid-19. Hospitals were deliberately emptied of sick people, particularly the elderly (25k per NAO) in order we are told to prepare to help the sick and vulnerable!
Why empty hospitals of the most vulnerable in order to make them more vulnerable in care homes with inadequate facilities, equipment and space and then not even utilise the hospital space to help save the lives of these very same people?
Is there any coincidence that “out of hospital” prenoscriptions of end of life drugs sky rocketed , wide spread DNR orders were put in place and the most vulnerable in care homes were denied medical care and the oversight and attention of family members?
The govts plans were indeed just what were needed if you wanted to cause a huge spike in deaths and create panic in order to usher in all sorts of controls over the population.
The suffering of course continues with extended NHS waiting lists for all sorts of treatment which will result in the early deaths and suffering of many more.
These waiting lists will not of course be eased through govt spending in the way billions and billions has been spent on testing, masking, furlough etc
The reason for this –because it was never about the govt supporting the nation’s health
Links to tables and posts:https://news.1rj.ru/str/robinmg/7919 and also https://news.1rj.ru/str/robinmg/7920
The tables above show how the govt took a deliberate step to reduce the supply of available hospital beds in the quarter to the end of June 2020 and even with this reduced level of supply hospitals were still only at 65% occupancy levels.
This we were told was to prepare hospitals to support an influx of sick people with Covid-19. Hospitals were deliberately emptied of sick people, particularly the elderly (25k per NAO) in order we are told to prepare to help the sick and vulnerable!
Why empty hospitals of the most vulnerable in order to make them more vulnerable in care homes with inadequate facilities, equipment and space and then not even utilise the hospital space to help save the lives of these very same people?
Is there any coincidence that “out of hospital” prenoscriptions of end of life drugs sky rocketed , wide spread DNR orders were put in place and the most vulnerable in care homes were denied medical care and the oversight and attention of family members?
The govts plans were indeed just what were needed if you wanted to cause a huge spike in deaths and create panic in order to usher in all sorts of controls over the population.
The suffering of course continues with extended NHS waiting lists for all sorts of treatment which will result in the early deaths and suffering of many more.
These waiting lists will not of course be eased through govt spending in the way billions and billions has been spent on testing, masking, furlough etc
The reason for this –because it was never about the govt supporting the nation’s health
Links to tables and posts:https://news.1rj.ru/str/robinmg/7919 and also https://news.1rj.ru/str/robinmg/7920
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar Channel
Table shows the average available and occupied hospital beds (NHS England) in the quarters from March 19 to June 2021, also see post below with the percentage occupancy levels.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/robinmg/7920
The govt reduced the supply of NHS hospital beds by…
https://news.1rj.ru/str/robinmg/7920
The govt reduced the supply of NHS hospital beds by…
Please share with children and parents who may not be on Telegram (a euphemism for referring to people who don't understand what is going on and will not be receptive to the truth yet)
https://youtu.be/t1RGylLVG5c
http://safertowait.com
https://youtu.be/t1RGylLVG5c
http://safertowait.com
YouTube
Safer to Wait
Children account for less than 5% of COVID-19 cases.
More than 99.99% make a full recovery.
The COVID vaccines have no long term safety data and are already showing record levels of Adverse Drug Reactions.
Visit safertowait.com to learn more and download…
More than 99.99% make a full recovery.
The COVID vaccines have no long term safety data and are already showing record levels of Adverse Drug Reactions.
Visit safertowait.com to learn more and download…
The "vaccines" are SAFE. I repeat: the "vaccines" are SAFE..
EXCLUSIVE: Emergency Response Says Department of Defense Has Taken Over Vaccine Shipment Crash That Shuttered Airspace | TIMCAST IRL
https://timcast.com/news/exclusive-emergency-response-says-department-of-defense-has-taken-over-vaccine-shipment-crash-that-shut-down-air-space/
EXCLUSIVE: Emergency Response Says Department of Defense Has Taken Over Vaccine Shipment Crash That Shuttered Airspace | TIMCAST IRL
https://timcast.com/news/exclusive-emergency-response-says-department-of-defense-has-taken-over-vaccine-shipment-crash-that-shut-down-air-space/
TIMCAST
EXCLUSIVE: Emergency Response Says Department of Defense Has Taken Over Vaccine Shipment Crash That Shuttered Airspace | TIMCAST
UPDATE: HHS said in a statement to Timcast that all of the vaccines are accounted for. Read the full update here.The West Virginia Center for...
Forwarded from Pat M
https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download August 23rd 2021 Updated
FACT SHEET FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS ADMINISTERING VACCINE (VACCINATION PROVIDERS) EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) OF THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE TO PREVENT CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19)
Warnings
Myocarditis and Pericarditis Postmarketing data demonstrate increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly within 7 days following the second dose. The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age than among females and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age. Although some cases required intensive care support, available data from short-term follow-up suggest that most individuals have had resolution of symptoms with conservative management. Information is not yet available about potential long-term sequelae. The CDC has published considerations related to myocarditis and pericarditis after vaccination, including for vaccination of individuals with a history of myocarditis or pericarditis (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinicalconsiderations/myocarditis.html).
FACT SHEET FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS ADMINISTERING VACCINE (VACCINATION PROVIDERS) EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) OF THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE TO PREVENT CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19)
Warnings
Myocarditis and Pericarditis Postmarketing data demonstrate increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly within 7 days following the second dose. The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age than among females and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age. Although some cases required intensive care support, available data from short-term follow-up suggest that most individuals have had resolution of symptoms with conservative management. Information is not yet available about potential long-term sequelae. The CDC has published considerations related to myocarditis and pericarditis after vaccination, including for vaccination of individuals with a history of myocarditis or pericarditis (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinicalconsiderations/myocarditis.html).
Watch "John Lennon on Government" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/DDf3vcvaRw4
https://youtu.be/DDf3vcvaRw4
YouTube
John Lennon on Government
John Lennon speaks of governments.
Watch "John Lennon: "Overpopulation is a Myth by the Government"" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/VJCvNNx-62U
https://youtu.be/VJCvNNx-62U
YouTube
John Lennon: "Overpopulation is a Myth by the Government"
In this September 11th, 1971 interview on The Dick Cavett Show, John Lennon and Yoko Ono share their views on overpopulation. John and Yoko make the argument that there is enough food, money and space on earth, but that the problem lies in the distribution…
If you’ve not heard Dr Stefan Lanka describe the fraud that was the “isolation of HIV”, especially if you are a scientist or have a basic knowledge of the scientific method & the central role played by controls, you will find this interview very interesting.
Having heard him describe in detail how the unquestioned absence of controls permitted bad actors to “get away with murder”, scientifically, it does make you wonder what else is faked.
Lanka isn’t happy about it. See 16min 20sec.
https://youtu.be/rz5SylkU9gE
Having heard him describe in detail how the unquestioned absence of controls permitted bad actors to “get away with murder”, scientifically, it does make you wonder what else is faked.
Lanka isn’t happy about it. See 16min 20sec.
https://youtu.be/rz5SylkU9gE
This report & analysis implies 100X more deaths from "Covid vaccination" in children than deaths from Covid19 in the same location.
"Implications for Vaccine Debate"
Although study authors do not offer a firm and unambiguous opinion on the topic, it seems clear they do not support mandatory vaccines for an age cohort that their study proves has almost zero risks of dying from COVID. Harmful health effects possibly caused by vaccination in young people were not a subject of analysis; however, myriad concerns exist and have been documented in various domestic and international reports.
For example, several credible reports strongly suggest a correlation between vaccination and cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in the age cohort teenager to early 20s. This apparent “elevated risk” is particularly striking among young males.
Indeed, it seems possible the incidence of myocarditis among fully-vaccinated young males might be as high as 1 in 3,000 (0.033 percent). Even if the incidence of myocarditis is much rarer than these early findings indicate, this risk would still be orders of magnitude greater than the 1-in-2-million (0.0001) risk of death that COVID poses to healthy young people."
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/07/30/for-majority-of-uk-children-covid-mortality-is-0-000/
"Implications for Vaccine Debate"
Although study authors do not offer a firm and unambiguous opinion on the topic, it seems clear they do not support mandatory vaccines for an age cohort that their study proves has almost zero risks of dying from COVID. Harmful health effects possibly caused by vaccination in young people were not a subject of analysis; however, myriad concerns exist and have been documented in various domestic and international reports.
For example, several credible reports strongly suggest a correlation between vaccination and cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in the age cohort teenager to early 20s. This apparent “elevated risk” is particularly striking among young males.
Indeed, it seems possible the incidence of myocarditis among fully-vaccinated young males might be as high as 1 in 3,000 (0.033 percent). Even if the incidence of myocarditis is much rarer than these early findings indicate, this risk would still be orders of magnitude greater than the 1-in-2-million (0.0001) risk of death that COVID poses to healthy young people."
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/07/30/for-majority-of-uk-children-covid-mortality-is-0-000/
UncoverDC
For Majority of UK children, COVID Mortality is 0.000
The most comprehensive and perhaps important COVID-19 study to date was released in the U.K on July 7th. Although largely ignored by the mainstream press, the study is of great importance because it actually quantifies the health risks of COVID among children…
Governments are claiming they are doing all this "to protect the health of the citizens".
The above study shows that the injection of children poses them a much greater risk of heart damage or even death than Covid19. The magnitude of greater risk of heart damage or even death has been estimated to be between 50 & 100 times greater for injection of children than Covid19 by Dr Mike Yeadon.
These below are videos from the peaceful pro human rights demonstration in Newcastle against the Johnson Regime's abuse of human rights, namely the Johnson Regime's violation of article 6 of the UNESCO Universal Declaration of Bioethics & Human Rights 2005, on Informed Consent.
Please make sure these videos are distributed widely as they show without doubt that the health of the citizens is the last thing of concern to the Johnson Regime.
The above study shows that the injection of children poses them a much greater risk of heart damage or even death than Covid19. The magnitude of greater risk of heart damage or even death has been estimated to be between 50 & 100 times greater for injection of children than Covid19 by Dr Mike Yeadon.
These below are videos from the peaceful pro human rights demonstration in Newcastle against the Johnson Regime's abuse of human rights, namely the Johnson Regime's violation of article 6 of the UNESCO Universal Declaration of Bioethics & Human Rights 2005, on Informed Consent.
Please make sure these videos are distributed widely as they show without doubt that the health of the citizens is the last thing of concern to the Johnson Regime.
Forwarded from Stephen B
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Stephen B
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Stephen B
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
BRIGHTON, UK 🇬🇧
The law on experimental medical interventions on children in the UK explained clearly by Anna de Buisseret to the NHS, who have now clearly crossed all thresholds of illegality.
The law on experimental medical interventions on children in the UK explained clearly by Anna de Buisseret to the NHS, who have now clearly crossed all thresholds of illegality.
Forwarded from RT News
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“The Nooses are Ready!” Vaccine Protest Crowd Targets BBC Journalist in UK
Reporter Philip Norton was covering the demonstration in Scarborough when things turned and the crowd hurled abuse, “You’re lying to the people, there’s no truth in what you say,” says one man via a megaphone.
“This is what we were subjected to in our roles as journalists today. Ambushed and cornered by protesters, death threats, labelled as pedophiles and murderers,” Norton later responded.
Subscribe to RT t.me/rtintl
Reporter Philip Norton was covering the demonstration in Scarborough when things turned and the crowd hurled abuse, “You’re lying to the people, there’s no truth in what you say,” says one man via a megaphone.
“This is what we were subjected to in our roles as journalists today. Ambushed and cornered by protesters, death threats, labelled as pedophiles and murderers,” Norton later responded.
Subscribe to RT t.me/rtintl
Forwarded from RT News
Telegram Chief Lays Down Gauntlet: Censorship's Taken Over in 20 Years - So, What's Our Legacy?
Pavel Durov has pointed out how the advancement of tech has shrunk our freedoms over the past two decades... to be replaced with AI and control over privacy like a Black Mirror-esque hellscape:
“Will we go down in history as those who let free societies turn into dystopian nightmares? Or will we be remembered as those who defended the freedoms that previous generations fought so hard to win?”
So… where do we go from here?
Subscribe to RT t.me/rtintl
Pavel Durov has pointed out how the advancement of tech has shrunk our freedoms over the past two decades... to be replaced with AI and control over privacy like a Black Mirror-esque hellscape:
“Will we go down in history as those who let free societies turn into dystopian nightmares? Or will we be remembered as those who defended the freedoms that previous generations fought so hard to win?”
So… where do we go from here?
Subscribe to RT t.me/rtintl
Forwarded from DISASTER X (Maximilian Forte)
If you have not already seen this—it came out just today—you simply must. Please share the video. It is by far the clearest, most comprehensive, compelling and urgent explanation and presentation you can find online concerning the proven and demonstrated dangers of vaccination, not just for some but for all who have been injected. The Highwire with Del Bigtree deserves monumental thanks for this work; this is real journalism, at its finest.
To support the video further, all papers cited in the presentation follow in order below—see the messages that follow.
https://rumble.com/vlve7n-are-we-starting-to-see-a.d.e..html?mref=p1i5w&mc=8pz1j
#covid19 #ADE #vaccine_failure #HighWire
To support the video further, all papers cited in the presentation follow in order below—see the messages that follow.
https://rumble.com/vlve7n-are-we-starting-to-see-a.d.e..html?mref=p1i5w&mc=8pz1j
#covid19 #ADE #vaccine_failure #HighWire
Rumble
ARE WE STARTING TO SEE A.D.E.?
ARE WE STARTING TO SEE A.D.E.? For over a year, The Highwire has been sounding the alarm on #Covid19 vaccines & their possible association with Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE). Now thousands of e
Forwarded from DISASTER X (Maximilian Forte)
ARE WE STARTING TO SEE A.D.E.? Supporting source #1:
Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus
Chien-Te Tseng,Elena Sbrana,Naoko Iwata-Yoshikawa,Patrick C. Newman,Tania Garron,Robert L. Atmar,Clarence J. Peters,Robert B. Couch
Published: April 20, 2012
Results
All vaccines induced serum neutralizing antibody with increasing dosages and/or alum significantly increasing responses. Significant reductions of SARS-CoV two days after challenge was seen for all vaccines and prior live SARS-CoV. All mice exhibited histopathologic changes in lungs two days after challenge including all animals vaccinated (Balb/C and C57BL/6) or given live virus, influenza vaccine, or PBS suggesting infection occurred in all. Histopathology seen in animals given one of the SARS-CoV vaccines was uniformly a Th2-type immunopathology with prominent eosinophil infiltration, confirmed with special eosinophil stains. The pathologic changes seen in all control groups lacked the eosinophil prominence.
Conclusions
These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421
#covid19 #ADE #vaccine_failure #HighWire
Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus
Chien-Te Tseng,Elena Sbrana,Naoko Iwata-Yoshikawa,Patrick C. Newman,Tania Garron,Robert L. Atmar,Clarence J. Peters,Robert B. Couch
Published: April 20, 2012
Results
All vaccines induced serum neutralizing antibody with increasing dosages and/or alum significantly increasing responses. Significant reductions of SARS-CoV two days after challenge was seen for all vaccines and prior live SARS-CoV. All mice exhibited histopathologic changes in lungs two days after challenge including all animals vaccinated (Balb/C and C57BL/6) or given live virus, influenza vaccine, or PBS suggesting infection occurred in all. Histopathology seen in animals given one of the SARS-CoV vaccines was uniformly a Th2-type immunopathology with prominent eosinophil infiltration, confirmed with special eosinophil stains. The pathologic changes seen in all control groups lacked the eosinophil prominence.
Conclusions
These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421
#covid19 #ADE #vaccine_failure #HighWire
journals.plos.org
Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus
Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) emerged in China in 2002 and spread to other countries before brought under control. Because of a concern for reemergence or a deliberate release of the SARS coronavirus, vaccine development was initiated.…
Forwarded from DISASTER X (Maximilian Forte)
ARE WE STARTING TO SEE A.D.E.? Supporting source #2:
Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID‐19 vaccines worsening clinical disease
Timothy Cardozo and Ronald Veazey
Results of the study
COVID‐19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID‐19 disease via antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID‐19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications
The specific and significant COVID‐19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645850/
#covid19 #ADE #vaccine_failure #HighWire
Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID‐19 vaccines worsening clinical disease
Timothy Cardozo and Ronald Veazey
Results of the study
COVID‐19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID‐19 disease via antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID‐19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications
The specific and significant COVID‐19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645850/
#covid19 #ADE #vaccine_failure #HighWire
PubMed Central (PMC)
Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID‐19 vaccines worsening clinical disease
Patient comprehension is a critical part of meeting medical ethics standards of informed consent in study designs. The aim of the study was to determine if sufficient literature exists to require clinicians to disclose the specific risk that COVID‐19 ...
Forwarded from DISASTER X (Maximilian Forte)
ARE WE STARTING TO SEE A.D.E.? Supporting source #3:
Pfizer says immunity can drop to 83% within four months in people who got its COVID-19 shot, further bolstering the company case for a booster
Last Updated: Aug. 5, 2021
The effectiveness of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot can drop to 83.7% within four to six months after getting the second dose of its vaccine. This is the latest indication that vaccine-induced immunity to the virus can wane and some kind of boost may be necessary in the future.
New research published Wednesday as a preprint indicates that the Pfizer Inc. PFE, +0.34% shot provides 96.2% protection for the first two months, 90.1% effectiveness between the second and fourth months, and 83.7% of protection for the fourth, fifth, and six months.
“We will need a booster eight to 12 months from the second dose,” Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said Wednesday, according to a FactSet trannoscript of the company’s second-quarter earnings call.
The drug maker has been making the case for booster shots, citing limited data from its own clinical research and real-world data out of Israel, where Pfizer’s vaccine is the predominant shot in circulation....
www.marketwatch.com/story/pfizer-says-immunity-drops-to-83-within-six-months-in-people-who-got-its-covid-19-shot-further-bolstering-the-company-case-for-a-booster-11627579817
#covid19 #ADE #vaccine_failure #HighWire
Pfizer says immunity can drop to 83% within four months in people who got its COVID-19 shot, further bolstering the company case for a booster
Last Updated: Aug. 5, 2021
The effectiveness of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot can drop to 83.7% within four to six months after getting the second dose of its vaccine. This is the latest indication that vaccine-induced immunity to the virus can wane and some kind of boost may be necessary in the future.
New research published Wednesday as a preprint indicates that the Pfizer Inc. PFE, +0.34% shot provides 96.2% protection for the first two months, 90.1% effectiveness between the second and fourth months, and 83.7% of protection for the fourth, fifth, and six months.
“We will need a booster eight to 12 months from the second dose,” Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said Wednesday, according to a FactSet trannoscript of the company’s second-quarter earnings call.
The drug maker has been making the case for booster shots, citing limited data from its own clinical research and real-world data out of Israel, where Pfizer’s vaccine is the predominant shot in circulation....
www.marketwatch.com/story/pfizer-says-immunity-drops-to-83-within-six-months-in-people-who-got-its-covid-19-shot-further-bolstering-the-company-case-for-a-booster-11627579817
#covid19 #ADE #vaccine_failure #HighWire
MarketWatch
Pfizer says immunity can drop to 83% within four months in people who got its COVID-19 shot, further bolstering the company case…
The effectiveness of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot can drop to 83.7% within four to six months after getting the second dose of its vaccine. This is the latest...