⚠️ UK's Chief Medical Officers Give Green Light To Covid "Vaccines" For All 12 To 15-Year-Olds

Why don't they name them? Hiding them behind their noscripts? If they really believe in this they should put their names to this. And photos at the top of all the articles. Why is the media protecting them from public scrutiny? Who pays their salaries, the public or Big Pharma?

Let's name them:

CHRIS WHITTY
GREGOR SMITH
FRANK ATHERTON
MICHAEL MCBRIDE

https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/uks-chief-medical-officers-give-greenlight-to-covid-vaccines-for-all-12-to-15yearolds

UK's Chief Medical Officers Give Green Light to Covid Vaccines for All 12 To 15-Year-Olds.
https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/uks-chief-medical-officers-give-greenlight-to-covid-vaccines-for-all-12-to-15yearolds

If you wish to contact them here are their details:

England
Chris Whitty
Telephone: 020 3447 9645
Email: c.whitty@nhs.net
Twitter: @CMO_England

Scotland
Gregor Smith
Email: cmo@gov.scot
PA: Rebekah.carton@gov.scot

Wales
Frank Atherton
Tel: 0300 0257 028
Email: PSChiefMedicalOfficer@wales.gsi.gov.uk

Northern Ireland
Michael McBride
Tel: 028 9052 0563
Email Michael.McBride@health-ni.gov.uk

Masking Schoolchildren is Institutional Child Abuse | The BMJ

"Not only is physical health harmed but also the psychological and emotional development of the child is inevitably affected by inhibiting normal communication via speech and facial expression, risking mental health problems and underdeveloped social skills, including empathy.

Those individuals who mandate or enforce such irrational and harmful policies are guilty of nothing less than Institutional Child Abuse.

Anyone in a position of responsibility is legally obliged to prevent harm to those in their care and failure to do so represents a dereliction of duty.

So, when is the Medical Profession going to speak out and take action to prevent harm to child patients?

In the absence of medical ethics, let us hope that parents can find the courage to protect their offspring from those who continue to undermine the younger generation by means of reckless and unjustifiable policies."

Janet Menage
GP (retired)
None
Wales, UK

https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1730/rr-2

Dear Head Teacher,

I am the parent/guardian/advocate for …………………………(child at your school).

I have sought expert advice and established that my child named above is at unacceptable risk of suffering a life threatening adverse event following the Covid-19 vaccination.

As a result of this I demand you do not allow anyone to vaccinate my child at any time.

The JCVI advice upon which the decision to proceed with the vaccine rollout is generalised for all children, and has NOT BEEN INDIVIDUALISED FOR MY PARTICULAR CHILD and I will not permit you to risk ENDANGERING his/her health, or even his/her life in the interests of society at large. You should be aware that there is an injunction application currently under way to the courts https://www.laworfiction.com/2021/09/injunction-application-made-to-court-to-pause-roll-out/.

With the help of our advisors, we have investigated the various risk factors that pertain to this injection including excipient allergens, and other components. The detailed assessment has been made on an individual basis for my child and his/her health history, medication history and diet, as well as predisposition to health issues within our family .

As the parent/guardian for my child I am ultimately responsible for their safety and wellbeing and do not delegate this to you in this regard as you cannot possibly be expected to have the time to explore to this level of detail for each and every individual child in your care.

Based on the detailed findings of this risk assessment, I expressly forbid this vaccination to be given to my child and will hold you PERSONALLY both civilly and criminally responsible for any harm that arises in either the short term (anaphylactic shock) medium term or long term, including myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clotting abnormalities, neurological injury such as transverse myelitis, Bell’s palsy, damage to fertility, ovarian damage(delete if male) and impact on puberty, physical maturation etc.
Information about the uneven distribution of this novel medicine within the bodies of children has not been sufficiently considered in the decision to extend to their age group, as per Pfizer’s own pharmacokinetics data, the risk of puberty blocking and the high rates of heart inflammation in young people especially boys, as reflected in the MHRA yellow card system all of which I consider negligent, so to proceed is failing YOUR DUTY OF CARE TO MY CHILD. The concept of using ‘Gillick competency’ which was established for fully reversible contraception, has been superseded by the 2020 case Bell v. Tavistock NHS Trust, which ruled that children DO NOT HAVE CAPACITY to decide about any experimental medical treatment that has permanent life altering impact. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bell-v-Tavistock-Clinic-and-ors-Summary.pdf

An individual’s rights cannot be set aside for the benefit of society, and the welfare of the child is PARAMOUNT; yet this seems to be the intention here. Children seldom experience severe illness if they catch the infection; injecting them with a medicine that has to date killed over 1600 and caused in excess of a million injuries in the UK alone, for minimal benefit to them personally is indefensible.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

Where there are conflicting human rights; the welfare of the child is paramount and enshrined in law.

My child is not deemed mature enough to purchase alcohol or cigarettes, yet you expect him/her to decide about a medical treatment that could irreversibly damage his/her health.
I will be taking civil action against YOU personally if you FAIL TO protect my child from this medical procedure which has now been clearly identified as dangerous to MY CHILD.

Date:………….. …….………………………….. signed Parent of ……………………………..

Is your child’s school promoting Covid-19 vaccination for children aged 12 years and over? 

Are you concerned that your child could receive the jab without your consent while at school?

Lawyers for Liberty can send a formal email to the headteacher advising them of the legal risks of their policy.

https://lawyersforliberty.uk/schooljabs/

BREAKING – Chris Whitty approves roll-out of Covid-19 vaccine to kids despite a mountain of evidence they are killing children

Authorities in the United Kingdom are so desperate to vaccinate children that they decided to disregard the decision made by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation to not recommend children are given the jab and tasked the Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty with making the decision instead, and he has now decided that the experimental treatment should be rolled out to kids with immediate effect…

https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/13/evidence-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-killing-children/

Follow The Exposé
Join The Exposé Chat Group

This is a very important & comprehensive denoscription of the harms caused by the gene based "vaccines".

Many people had prior or cross-immunity to SARS-CoV-2, because of exposure in the past to related viruses. This happens even if the degree of commonality isn’t huge, because certain components of each type of virus tend to be conserved across the range of them. This is the 7th known coronavirus which can infect humans.
Those with prior immunity experienced predictably adverse events upon vaccination. Normal immunity protects you against serious illness when encountering the same virus. But these vaccines work so differently that they distribute parts of the virus around the body to locations not normally accomplished by natural infection.
This set up immune attack on the inside of our blood vessels, initiating blood clots & bleeding. Killer T-cells, immune complement & antibody mediated attack on our own tissues is all but inevitable.
The worst of it is that BOOSTER injections have not been subject to ANY clinical safety trials.
I cannot believe that medicines regulators & senior physicians as well as clinical & academic immunologists haven’t been warning loudly that this is an unsafe & potentially catastrophic course of action.
Not mentioned in this letter, I have separately seen strong evidence of a dose-effect relationship, where all manner of adverse events are 5-10x more common after the second dose than the first dose.
I strongly recommend that NO ONE exposes themselves to the risk of augmented autoimmune attack on their body by receiving a booster.

Please share widely,

Thanks

Dr Mike Yeadon

Ps: though I’ve been a member of D4CE, I’m not a coauthor of this excellent document.

https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Vaccine-immune-interactions-and-booster-shots_Sep-2021.pdf

This is shocking. It looks like none of the main medicines regulators so far approached for information under FOI rules actually examined patient level data.
In other words, they relied on the owner (in this case Pfizer) to have accurately represented all findings in summary texts & tables.
I’ve long held suspicions that something was seriously awry with this data, for numerous reasons. Dr Peter Doshi of BMJ first alerted us to the marked asymmetry of removal of “suspected infected” patients, six times as many from the Pfizer arm as the comparator arm.
See what you think. Do you trust them with tens of billions of dollars at stake?
Best wishes
Mike


Further discrepancies have been noted numerically, with different analyses of the same data by Pfizer containing inconsistent numbers which “cannot possibly be reconciled; one must be false. Since, as discussed, the sudden onset of immunity implied by [the results] lacks any biological plausibility, it is most likely that it is this data set which was fabricated.”

With anomalies this stark, against Pfizer’s history of setting records in the billions for criminal fines and settlements over fraud and unsafe medical products, including conducting unauthorized clinical trials, and in light of the lack of regulatory transparency and failures of regulatory oversight documented here, COVID vaccine recipients are ennoscriptd to ask: Did Pfizer fabricate their data for the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine?

https://doctors4covidethics.org/regulation-or-racket-uk-drug-regulator-never-inspected-the-pfizer-vaccine-study-data/

"Vaccines Are Pushing Pathogens to Evolve: Just as antibiotics breed resistance in bacteria, vaccines can incite changes that enable diseases to escape their control." (2018)

"A vaccine is a novel selection pressure placed on a pathogen, and if the vaccine does not eradicate its target completely, then the remaining pathogens with the greatest fitness — those able to survive, somehow, in an immunized world — will become more common. “If you don’t have these pathogens evolving in response to vaccines,” said Paul Ewald, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Louisville, “then we really don’t understand natural selection.

The problem with leaky vaccines, Read says, is that they enable pathogens to replicate unchecked while also protecting hosts from illness and death, thereby removing the costs associated with increased virulence. Over time, then, in a world of leaky vaccinations, a pathogen might evolve to become deadlier to unvaccinated hosts because it can reap the benefits of virulence without the costs — much as Marek’s disease has slowly become more lethal to unvaccinated chickens. This virulence can also cause the vaccine to start failing by causing illness in vaccinated hosts.

One overarching recommendation is that vaccines should induce immune responses against multiple targets." [i.e. NOT JUST THE SPIKE PROTEIN!]

https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-vaccines-can-drive-pathogens-to-evolve-20180510

MASS VACCINATIONS DURING AN EPIDEMIC IS NOT FOLLOWING THE SCIENCE, IT'S GOING AGANIST IT

"Their simplistic reasoning make them conclude that vaccinating the unvaccinated (i.e., younger age groups and children) is going to solve the problem, whereas each and every independent (!) knowledgeable expert understands that this is only going to further raise the population-level immune pressure on viral infectiousness and, therefore, promote the adaptation of additional mutations that will eventually enable full neutralization escape of circulating, highly infectious variants (Vanden Bossche, June 2021)."

https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/the-last-post

'MASS VACCINATION CAMPAIGNS CONDUCTED IN THE MIDDLE OF A PANDEMIC WILL ONLY CAUSE MORE DISEASE AND CLAIM MORE HUMAN LIVES.'

GEERT VANDEN BOSSCHE, VACCINOLOGIST.

https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/the-last-post

This “60 minutes” TV show is about the 1976 swine flu pandemic & governments recommendation that every American should take the shot.
The vaccine was pulled after a few dozen deaths.
Rather different standards & motives today.
Best wishes
Mike

https://youtu.be/IG6I5dn0b3k

If you are on Instagram please give this a like. Let's sound the alarm bell for some people there 🔔
https://www.instagram.com/p/CTxSWUZtthA/?utm_medium=copy_link

Table above shows the ONS numbers on all cause mortality deaths in children in England and Wales and also the deaths of children “with Covid”.

The definition of Covid deaths in the ONS analysis which provides this detail is where Covid was mentioned on a child’s death certificate, whether as an underlying cause or not. This is an even wider definition than the govt uses in its official numbers.

The table above shows a comparison between deaths using this wider definition of a “Covid death”, regardless of whether a child had any pre-existing conditions or suffered a serious acute issue which lead to them being hospitalised and then test positive for Covid-19

It covers deaths from 13th March 2020 (the point at which the first Covid death was recorded to the 27th August 2021 (latest data available)

Link to Data: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/weeklyprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales

Table shows ONS numbers for all cause mortality deaths in children in England and Wales and also deaths in children with Covid .

This includes all deaths in children whether a child was suffering with a pre-existing condition or not and also includes any child suffering with a serious acute issue where Covid-19 was mentioned on their death certificate.

It shows that deaths in children from Covid-19 injections, based on the currently reported UK adverse reaction rates, would be many, many times higher than the deaths in children with Covid even with this wide definition of a “Covid death”.

Link to Data: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/weeklyprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales

The table above shows the ONS numbers for all cause mortality deaths in England and Wales and also deaths with Covid. This includes all deaths where Covid was mentioned on a death certificate.

This is a wider definition for Covid deaths in comparison to other official govt figures. Under this “tighter” definition there were about 122k Covid deaths for England and Wales compared with 146k under the definition used in the table above (as of 27th August)

What is striking as we move down the age groups is just how many deaths have been included as Covid related almost 1 in 5 deaths in England and Wales are labelled as "Covid deaths" over the period from 13th March 2020 to 27th August 2021. Under the govts tighter definition it would still be one in 6-7 deaths being labelled as Covid.

Link to Data: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/weeklyprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales

The spike protein found on the surface of Covid-19 virus cells [AND IN THE "VACCINES"] causes changes to cells in the small blood vessels of the heart.

"Researchers from the University of Bristol have found that the spike protein binds to cells called pericytes which line the small vessels of the heart. This binding triggers a cascade of changes which disrupt normal cell function, and lead to the release of chemicals that cause inflammation.

This happened even when the protein was no-longer attached to the virus [i.e. IN THE "VACCINES"]

https://www.bhf.org.uk/what-we-do/news-from-the-bhf/news-archive/2021/august/covid-19-spike-protein-binds-to-and-changes-cells-in-the-heart

"A healthy mum-of-two died from complications caused by taking the AstraZeneca coronavirus jab, a coroner has ruled.

Alpa Tailor, 35, fell ill a week after taking the vaccine to "protect her family" in March 2021"

Link: https://www.mylondon.news/news/zone-1-news/healthy-mum-2-35-killed-21548121

"As the European Parliament resumed on Monday September 13 2021, with their first order of business a debate over health and disease prevention to be followed by a vote on Tuesday, a letter of Notice of Liability for harm and death from COVID-19 vaccines was served on all members of the European Parliament, and sent to the Executive Director of the European Medicines Agency.

The notice was a accompanied by a summary of the latest scientific evidence regarding vaccine-immune interactions, and a letter from Holocaust survivors demanding a halt to the vaccination program and an end to unlawful medical coercion.

The notice read:

“The rush to vaccinate first and research later has left you in a position whereby COVID-19 vaccination policy is now entirely divorced from the relevant evidence-base.” "

Link: https://doctors4covidethics.org/as/