Might be time for another AOC photoshoot.

https://bit.ly/3lgLP94

"Hey ladies, what do you think about these giant hands covered in the blood of nursing home victims?"

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cuomo-preoccupation-hand-size-former-aide-charlotte-bennett-tells-investigators

So when will Facebook and Twitter suspend The Washington Post for publishing fake news?

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/543271-wapost-adds-lengthy-correction-to-story-on-trump-georgia-call

These clowns wrote this mere days after publishing a fake story about Trump's call with Georgia's elections investigator.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/16/misinformation-trump-twitter/

She is not "fully" or even partially a man because she is female.

While it's unacceptable on these platforms to say things like "boys can't become girls" or "there may have been some election fraud," it's perfectly acceptable to write and share pieces calling for the extermination of white people.

https://bit.ly/2QjdVVP

"Your child just joined Pedogram."

https://twitter.com/verge/status/1372682783173308421?s=20

The word "male" is, by definition, a reference to biological sex. The qualifier "biological" is unnecessary. So any time someone uses the word "male" to describe someone who isn't biologically male, they're lying.

https://bit.ly/312ifKY

Soon the definitions will be revised to try and falsify what I just said. That's why you need to buy an old print edition of the dictionary that can't be modified. Conservatives need to conserve the true meaning of words and their connection to objective reality.

"The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid." — G.K. Chesterton

Encouraging women to kill their children—or put off having them—is what you do if you care nothing at all about their well-being.

https://twitter.com/prisonplanet/status/1373045507698929666?s=21

Modern English and Latin both have words for male and female. The words themselves are different, obviously, but the meaning is the same because of their attachment to same objective reality. The point is to resist detaching such words from objective reality.

This lady asked people what their "woke breaking point" was. Here are 55 of the best and most eye-opening responses.

Read: https://is.gd/ZjMtQR

In an article about Facebook's difficulty in dealing with satire, the New York Times points to The Babylon Bee as an example of a "far-right misinformation site" that "sometimes trafficked in misinformation under the guise of satire."

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/19/technology/political-cartoonists-facebook-satire-irony.html

Here's the section of the article where they quote Emerson T. Brooking making this claim. Booking is described as "a resident fellow for the Atlantic Council who studies digital platforms."

No other examples of far-right misinformation sites are offered. The Babylon Bee is the only one cited in this piece.

Notably, the words "trafficked in misinformation" are hyperlinked, presumably a supportive source. But the link they point to is another NY Times piece that actually refutes—rather than supports—the claim being made here by accurately describing us as a legitimate satire site.

I'm pretty sure there's a legal term for what's happening here.

Incredibly, the NY Times is publishing deceptive disinformation for the purpose of leading people to falsely believe that we are a source of it. Their dealings with us—and Project Veritas, for example—reveal the truth.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/judge-rules-new-york-times-used-deceptive-disinformation-smear-project-veritas

Here is the link they attached to the words "trafficked in misinformation."

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/11/us/politics/babylon-bee-conservative-satire.html

The New York Times is using deceptive disinformation to smear us as being a source of deceptive disinformation.