Forwarded from The Islander
The Epstein Files Were Released to Exhaust You
They promised disclosure. They released pages buried under black ink and called it transparency — and laughed in your face.
And the reactions? Just as laughable.
A carnival of punditry pretending to be shocked by an endless sea of black bars, as if anyone expected anything else. Gasps on cue. Performative outrage. Analysts squinting at censored pages like archaeologists decoding ruins. A farce played straight.
The point was never revelation. The point was fatigue.
On November 19, 2025, Congress passed, and the President signed — a law ordering the release of all unclassified Epstein-related material within thirty days. December 19 arrived, and what followed was choreography, not compliance, but... a partial dump, openly acknowledged as incomplete, paired with promises that the rest would come later. The deadline was “met” in the narrowest of bureaucratic spin, the kind that sold as careful (we have to be careful folks!) procedure while emptying the law of stated intent.
Nearly 4,000 documents, split across four binders, were unloaded in one go. Photographs. Handwritten notes. Admin scraps. Flight logs. Investigative debris. No sequencing. No hierarchy. No explanatory spine. Names surfaced without pathways. Pathways vanished behind redactions. Meaning was smothered on purpose.
Transparency by meaningless avalanche. Accountability postponed by design.
This wasn’t disclosure. It was a fatigue weapon, a familiar statecraft tactic. When institutions want consequences, they narrow. They sequence. They indict. When they want containment, they flood the zone and dare the public to assemble the truth themselves from mountains of paper rendered utterly useless by laughable redactions.
The redactions themselves bordered on parody. Reams of paper were released only to be unreadable. Dates vanished. Names amputated. Entire sections collapsed into thick black bands masquerading as text. And yet the press dutifully announced this as a breakthrough, as if opacity itself had become a form of honesty. It's not even funny the line about for national security, it was secrecy for elites and their career security.
And whenever critics pointed out the obvious, that the law demanded full release, that the deadline had arrived, that what appeared was openly incomplete, the response was the same soothing chant: more is coming. Weeks. Phases. Reviews. Rolling releases. Even performative justice, now ships by subnoscription.
Here’s what they’re praying you forget.
The FBI received detailed complaints about Epstein as early as 1996. In 2008, he secured a non-prosecution agreement so grotesque it shielded not only himself but unnamed “potential co-conspirators” — a legal freak show dressed up as due process. He continued operating openly for another decade. He was arrested again in 2019, placed under federal supervision, and the rest is history, litterally as the bury this permanently under weaponized fatigue.
After nearly thirty years of institutional complicity, the public is asked, again... to wait. Funny how on Epstien much like Israel, the DOJ is bipartisan for both Dems and Republicans.
The DOJ now acknowledges reviewing material tied to more than 1,200 victims or victim-related records. The number sounds grave. It is meant to. But it is offered without any official accounting of facilitators, fixers, enablers, or institutional choke points. Abuse is conceded. What is carefully avoided is responsibility. The monster is isolated, while the machinery that sustained him is declared too sensitive, too complex, too inconvenient to confront.
This isn’t dysfunction. It’s globalist governance that protects what and who matters most.
At that point, the outcome is no longer contingent on what gets released, only on how long the ritual is allowed to continue. And the ritual has a purpose. Exhaustion isn’t a side effect. It’s the compliance mechanism.
Part 2/2 👇
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
They promised disclosure. They released pages buried under black ink and called it transparency — and laughed in your face.
And the reactions? Just as laughable.
A carnival of punditry pretending to be shocked by an endless sea of black bars, as if anyone expected anything else. Gasps on cue. Performative outrage. Analysts squinting at censored pages like archaeologists decoding ruins. A farce played straight.
The point was never revelation. The point was fatigue.
On November 19, 2025, Congress passed, and the President signed — a law ordering the release of all unclassified Epstein-related material within thirty days. December 19 arrived, and what followed was choreography, not compliance, but... a partial dump, openly acknowledged as incomplete, paired with promises that the rest would come later. The deadline was “met” in the narrowest of bureaucratic spin, the kind that sold as careful (we have to be careful folks!) procedure while emptying the law of stated intent.
Nearly 4,000 documents, split across four binders, were unloaded in one go. Photographs. Handwritten notes. Admin scraps. Flight logs. Investigative debris. No sequencing. No hierarchy. No explanatory spine. Names surfaced without pathways. Pathways vanished behind redactions. Meaning was smothered on purpose.
Transparency by meaningless avalanche. Accountability postponed by design.
This wasn’t disclosure. It was a fatigue weapon, a familiar statecraft tactic. When institutions want consequences, they narrow. They sequence. They indict. When they want containment, they flood the zone and dare the public to assemble the truth themselves from mountains of paper rendered utterly useless by laughable redactions.
The redactions themselves bordered on parody. Reams of paper were released only to be unreadable. Dates vanished. Names amputated. Entire sections collapsed into thick black bands masquerading as text. And yet the press dutifully announced this as a breakthrough, as if opacity itself had become a form of honesty. It's not even funny the line about for national security, it was secrecy for elites and their career security.
And whenever critics pointed out the obvious, that the law demanded full release, that the deadline had arrived, that what appeared was openly incomplete, the response was the same soothing chant: more is coming. Weeks. Phases. Reviews. Rolling releases. Even performative justice, now ships by subnoscription.
Here’s what they’re praying you forget.
The FBI received detailed complaints about Epstein as early as 1996. In 2008, he secured a non-prosecution agreement so grotesque it shielded not only himself but unnamed “potential co-conspirators” — a legal freak show dressed up as due process. He continued operating openly for another decade. He was arrested again in 2019, placed under federal supervision, and the rest is history, litterally as the bury this permanently under weaponized fatigue.
After nearly thirty years of institutional complicity, the public is asked, again... to wait. Funny how on Epstien much like Israel, the DOJ is bipartisan for both Dems and Republicans.
The DOJ now acknowledges reviewing material tied to more than 1,200 victims or victim-related records. The number sounds grave. It is meant to. But it is offered without any official accounting of facilitators, fixers, enablers, or institutional choke points. Abuse is conceded. What is carefully avoided is responsibility. The monster is isolated, while the machinery that sustained him is declared too sensitive, too complex, too inconvenient to confront.
This isn’t dysfunction. It’s globalist governance that protects what and who matters most.
At that point, the outcome is no longer contingent on what gets released, only on how long the ritual is allowed to continue. And the ritual has a purpose. Exhaustion isn’t a side effect. It’s the compliance mechanism.
Part 2/2 👇
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
🔥12❤10👏5💯4
Forwarded from The Islander
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This is how wars are prolonged in the 21st century. Not with declarations. Not with parliamentary votes. But with anonymous intelligence leaks, laundered through Mockingbird media, timed precisely to suffocate diplomacy before it can breathe.
Reuters is a case in point, laundering intel narratives as journalism. It selected the most escalation-friendly interpretation available and wrapped it in the authority of anonymity — six sources “familiar with U.S. intelligence,” one citing a most-recent report from late September, to claim that Vladimir Putin intends not only to seize all of Ukraine, but to "reclaim" parts of Europe. This was not analysis. It was a threat narrative: maximal, apocalyptic, and conveniently untestable. The kind that turns negotiation into appeasement and restraint into treason. The kind that boxes the elected leaders into war without ever asking the public.
That specificity matters. Anonymous intelligence leaks are not neutral artifacts, they are policy instruments. They shape public emotion, narrow political horizons, and manufacture inevitability. Once a population is convinced that continental war is pre-programmed, diplomacy becomes illegitimate by definition. That is how peace is killed without debate.
This pattern is not unique to one newsroom. It is systemic and by design. Across the Western media ecosystem, escalation narratives are routinely laundered through anonymity, authority, and urgency, creating a closed loop in which fear generates headlines, headlines manufacture consent, and consent generates policy momentum that no single elected official appears able to stop. Reuters is not the disease. It is a symptom of a larger architecture that rewards alarm and punishes restraint. Again, all by design.
This is precisely why the response from the sitting U.S. Director of National Intelligence matters.
Gabbard did not hedge. She accused Reuters of pushing “lies and propaganda” on behalf of warmongers, warned that such narratives are being used to “foment hysteria and fear” to block peace, and stated, that they're using intelligence briefings delivered to lawmakers, that Russia seeks to avoid a larger war with Europe and does not possess the desire to conquer all of Ukraine, let alone Europe.
That phrasing is crucial, because it is Reuters’ own reporting of what she said. The contradiction is devastating: the same intelligence community being anonymously cited to inflate the threat is, according to its own Director, delivering a far more restrained assessment behind closed doors.
This exposes the fraud at the heart of the escalation narrative. Even if one assumes Russia’s objectives in Ukraine are maximalist, it does not follow—logically, militarily, or materially, that Russia intends to wage a continental war against NATO Europe. That leap is not intelligence analysis. It is psychological conditioning.
After years of attritional warfare, Russia controls a little more than one-fifth of Ukrainian territory. That reality does not support fantasies of armored divisions rolling toward Paris or Berlin. To insist otherwise is to substitute fear for facts, which is precisely how war is sold.
Now place this alongside Gabbard’s public remarks at the TPUSA Summit, where she stated:
“The deep state is fighting us every step of the way, and it exists within every single federal agency.”
That sentence is not rhetorical. It is a denoscription of institutional behavior. Bureaucracies whose budgets, prestige, and careers depend on permanent confrontation do not quietly accept peace. They resist it, by leaking selectively and out of context, reframing assessments, delaying negotiations, and redefining threats until escalation appears not only necessary, but moral.
But this is where discernment matters, because survival depends on discernment, not vibes. Is Gabbard the real deal, or is she being permitted to play dissident inside a controlled theater? That is not a smear. It is due diligence.
Part 2/2 👇
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
Reuters is a case in point, laundering intel narratives as journalism. It selected the most escalation-friendly interpretation available and wrapped it in the authority of anonymity — six sources “familiar with U.S. intelligence,” one citing a most-recent report from late September, to claim that Vladimir Putin intends not only to seize all of Ukraine, but to "reclaim" parts of Europe. This was not analysis. It was a threat narrative: maximal, apocalyptic, and conveniently untestable. The kind that turns negotiation into appeasement and restraint into treason. The kind that boxes the elected leaders into war without ever asking the public.
That specificity matters. Anonymous intelligence leaks are not neutral artifacts, they are policy instruments. They shape public emotion, narrow political horizons, and manufacture inevitability. Once a population is convinced that continental war is pre-programmed, diplomacy becomes illegitimate by definition. That is how peace is killed without debate.
This pattern is not unique to one newsroom. It is systemic and by design. Across the Western media ecosystem, escalation narratives are routinely laundered through anonymity, authority, and urgency, creating a closed loop in which fear generates headlines, headlines manufacture consent, and consent generates policy momentum that no single elected official appears able to stop. Reuters is not the disease. It is a symptom of a larger architecture that rewards alarm and punishes restraint. Again, all by design.
This is precisely why the response from the sitting U.S. Director of National Intelligence matters.
Gabbard did not hedge. She accused Reuters of pushing “lies and propaganda” on behalf of warmongers, warned that such narratives are being used to “foment hysteria and fear” to block peace, and stated, that they're using intelligence briefings delivered to lawmakers, that Russia seeks to avoid a larger war with Europe and does not possess the desire to conquer all of Ukraine, let alone Europe.
That phrasing is crucial, because it is Reuters’ own reporting of what she said. The contradiction is devastating: the same intelligence community being anonymously cited to inflate the threat is, according to its own Director, delivering a far more restrained assessment behind closed doors.
This exposes the fraud at the heart of the escalation narrative. Even if one assumes Russia’s objectives in Ukraine are maximalist, it does not follow—logically, militarily, or materially, that Russia intends to wage a continental war against NATO Europe. That leap is not intelligence analysis. It is psychological conditioning.
After years of attritional warfare, Russia controls a little more than one-fifth of Ukrainian territory. That reality does not support fantasies of armored divisions rolling toward Paris or Berlin. To insist otherwise is to substitute fear for facts, which is precisely how war is sold.
Now place this alongside Gabbard’s public remarks at the TPUSA Summit, where she stated:
“The deep state is fighting us every step of the way, and it exists within every single federal agency.”
That sentence is not rhetorical. It is a denoscription of institutional behavior. Bureaucracies whose budgets, prestige, and careers depend on permanent confrontation do not quietly accept peace. They resist it, by leaking selectively and out of context, reframing assessments, delaying negotiations, and redefining threats until escalation appears not only necessary, but moral.
But this is where discernment matters, because survival depends on discernment, not vibes. Is Gabbard the real deal, or is she being permitted to play dissident inside a controlled theater? That is not a smear. It is due diligence.
Part 2/2 👇
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
💯21👏5❤3
Forwarded from The Islander
Tara Reade’s story is not a curiosity, not a propaganda vignette, and certainly not a footnote. It is a moral indictment, of the West first and foremost. On December 20, 2025, inside Moscow’s Catherine the Great Hall, Tara Reade received her Russian passport. Western media responded with near-total silence. That silence is not accidental. It is defensive.
Reade was once a functionary of American power, a Senate aide working for Joe Biden in the early 1990s. When she accused him of sexual assault decades later, after having exhausted all official channels, she discovered the brutal hierarchy behind Western moral slogans. “Believe women” functioned only until belief threatened power. When the accusation moved upward, the institutions that claim to defend women moved swiftly to defend themselves. Media outlets circled the wagons. Political allies disappeared. The state offered no protection. Reade was left isolated, surveilled, and increasingly unsafe.
When she left the United States in 2023, it was not ideological tourism. It was political exile. She did not flee America because she hated it, she fled because it refused to protect her, and because the machinery of power surrounding Joe Biden did more than look away. It moved. Reade has said plainly that she felt threatened — not by anonymous online abuse, but by an unmistakable institutional response: coordinated media attacks, professional blacklisting, legal and reputational pressure, and the silent enforcement mechanisms that activate when an individual challenges entrenched power. She has never claimed to despise her country. On the contrary, she has repeatedly said she loves America. What she could no longer survive was an America where power is defended more aggressively than its people.
Russia listened.
On October 2 of this year, after granting her citizenship by presidential decree, Vladimir Putin addressed Reade directly in public remarks that cut through decades of Western moral theater. His words were simple, unembellished, and devastating in their clarity: “If you share our values, you’re one of us. That’s why we treat you like this. That’s why you feel the way you do.” This was not sentimentality. It was civilizational definition. Belonging, in this framing, is earned through values and loyalty, not erased when it becomes inconvenient.
At the passport ceremony itself, Reade spoke without bitterness and without theatrical grievance. She expressed pride, not defiance. “I am very proud to work for RT. Very proud to now be Russian,” she said, naming RT without apology. She framed her life story not as a tragedy but as a moral arc: “As an American, in the story of my life, Russia is the hero.” And rather than centering herself as a victim, she turned outward: “To the warm Russian people: now I want to be in service to you.” These are not the words of someone seeking shelter. They are the words of someone who has found belonging.
One moment from the ceremony lingers with particular force. Reade described hearing the words spoken to her during the process: “Tara, we will never leave you.” That sentence alone explains why Western media cannot cover this story honestly. In the modern Atlantic system, loyalty flows upward only. Citizens are expendable. Whistleblowers are liabilities. Victims are tolerated only while they serve narrative utility. Russia, by contrast, offered something the West increasingly cannot: commitment.
Reade was not alone in that hall. Her journey was supported by figures who understand political persecution firsthand, including Maria Butina, herself once paraded through Western courts as a trophy, and Margarita Simonyan, who has long insisted that journalism exists to protect people, not power. This was not a media stunt. It was a community acknowledging responsibility.
Part 2/2 👇
Reade was once a functionary of American power, a Senate aide working for Joe Biden in the early 1990s. When she accused him of sexual assault decades later, after having exhausted all official channels, she discovered the brutal hierarchy behind Western moral slogans. “Believe women” functioned only until belief threatened power. When the accusation moved upward, the institutions that claim to defend women moved swiftly to defend themselves. Media outlets circled the wagons. Political allies disappeared. The state offered no protection. Reade was left isolated, surveilled, and increasingly unsafe.
When she left the United States in 2023, it was not ideological tourism. It was political exile. She did not flee America because she hated it, she fled because it refused to protect her, and because the machinery of power surrounding Joe Biden did more than look away. It moved. Reade has said plainly that she felt threatened — not by anonymous online abuse, but by an unmistakable institutional response: coordinated media attacks, professional blacklisting, legal and reputational pressure, and the silent enforcement mechanisms that activate when an individual challenges entrenched power. She has never claimed to despise her country. On the contrary, she has repeatedly said she loves America. What she could no longer survive was an America where power is defended more aggressively than its people.
Russia listened.
On October 2 of this year, after granting her citizenship by presidential decree, Vladimir Putin addressed Reade directly in public remarks that cut through decades of Western moral theater. His words were simple, unembellished, and devastating in their clarity: “If you share our values, you’re one of us. That’s why we treat you like this. That’s why you feel the way you do.” This was not sentimentality. It was civilizational definition. Belonging, in this framing, is earned through values and loyalty, not erased when it becomes inconvenient.
At the passport ceremony itself, Reade spoke without bitterness and without theatrical grievance. She expressed pride, not defiance. “I am very proud to work for RT. Very proud to now be Russian,” she said, naming RT without apology. She framed her life story not as a tragedy but as a moral arc: “As an American, in the story of my life, Russia is the hero.” And rather than centering herself as a victim, she turned outward: “To the warm Russian people: now I want to be in service to you.” These are not the words of someone seeking shelter. They are the words of someone who has found belonging.
One moment from the ceremony lingers with particular force. Reade described hearing the words spoken to her during the process: “Tara, we will never leave you.” That sentence alone explains why Western media cannot cover this story honestly. In the modern Atlantic system, loyalty flows upward only. Citizens are expendable. Whistleblowers are liabilities. Victims are tolerated only while they serve narrative utility. Russia, by contrast, offered something the West increasingly cannot: commitment.
Reade was not alone in that hall. Her journey was supported by figures who understand political persecution firsthand, including Maria Butina, herself once paraded through Western courts as a trophy, and Margarita Simonyan, who has long insisted that journalism exists to protect people, not power. This was not a media stunt. It was a community acknowledging responsibility.
Part 2/2 👇
❤13👏7🔥1
Gen Z Leads Bulgaria's Anti-Corruption Uprising
Unlike past protests by unions or activists, Bulgaria's late 2025 uprising was Gen Z's show: students and twenty-somethings, raised on emigration tales, swarmed cities via Instagram against a "captured state" epitomized by sanctioned oligarch Delyan Peevski. From November 26 sparks to December 1's epic 50,000 in Sofia, fury targeted the euro-budget's private-sector tax hikes funding public payroll loyalty.
Protesters torched bins, clashed with police, and echoed: "They steal more, police protect thieves." Radev pushed a euro referendum—blocked for the fourth time—fearing price shocks sans wage gains.
Gen Z isn't begging for scraps; they're torching the table. Europe's most corrupt state just met its impatient heirs—reform or rupture ahead.
@sitreports
Unlike past protests by unions or activists, Bulgaria's late 2025 uprising was Gen Z's show: students and twenty-somethings, raised on emigration tales, swarmed cities via Instagram against a "captured state" epitomized by sanctioned oligarch Delyan Peevski. From November 26 sparks to December 1's epic 50,000 in Sofia, fury targeted the euro-budget's private-sector tax hikes funding public payroll loyalty.
Protesters torched bins, clashed with police, and echoed: "They steal more, police protect thieves." Radev pushed a euro referendum—blocked for the fourth time—fearing price shocks sans wage gains.
Gen Z isn't begging for scraps; they're torching the table. Europe's most corrupt state just met its impatient heirs—reform or rupture ahead.
@sitreports
❤9👍1
Forwarded from Tara Reade (Tara Reade)
Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova is a true heroine; she's "brilliant" and eloquently represents the Foreign Ministry's position, RT columnist and former aide to former US President Joe Biden Tara Reade told RIA Novosti.
"Happy birthday to Maria Zakharova ! She's a heroine for me. I'm so in awe of her and how eloquently she represents the Foreign Ministry's position. I was honored to be with her when I received my Russian passport, and she was also at the roundtable with me, and she's brilliant. She's someone I'd love to talk to again and get to know better. I hope her year is full of abundance, joy, and love, and I wish her a happy birthday," Reed said on the Russian Foreign Ministry representative's birthday.
On September 22, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree granting Russian citizenship to Tara Reade, an American who served as Biden's Senate aide. She received her Russian passport in late December.
Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova celebrates her 50th birthday on Wednesday, December 24.
https://ria.ru/20251224/zakharova-2064433706.html
Links to my Socials
"Happy birthday to Maria Zakharova ! She's a heroine for me. I'm so in awe of her and how eloquently she represents the Foreign Ministry's position. I was honored to be with her when I received my Russian passport, and she was also at the roundtable with me, and she's brilliant. She's someone I'd love to talk to again and get to know better. I hope her year is full of abundance, joy, and love, and I wish her a happy birthday," Reed said on the Russian Foreign Ministry representative's birthday.
On September 22, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree granting Russian citizenship to Tara Reade, an American who served as Biden's Senate aide. She received her Russian passport in late December.
Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova celebrates her 50th birthday on Wednesday, December 24.
https://ria.ru/20251224/zakharova-2064433706.html
Links to my Socials
РИА Новости
Экс-помощница Байдена поздравила Захарову с днем рождения, назвав блестящей
Официальный представитель российского МИД Мария Захарова - настоящая героиня, она "блестящая" и красноречиво представляет позицию МИД, рассказала РИА Новости... РИА Новости, 24.12.2025
🙏11❤6👍1🔥1
Christmas: From Celebration to Security Operation
Across Western Europe, what used to be the warmest time of year has become another logistical challenge. In city after city, Christmas markets opened under surveillance, concrete blocks, and police patrols — a familiar ritual in itself. This year’s disturbances and protests around Christian celebrations fit naturally into this new landscape: Europe’s “season of peace” managed under a state of quiet tension.
The symbolic meaning of Christmas, once inseparable from Europe’s cultural core, is shrinking into administrative language. Public displays of faith are discouraged as potentially divisive. Greetings are standardized. Religious imagery is replaced by abstract “winter lights.” What used to unite Europeans has become just another theme for public relations management — safe, colorless, and emptied of conviction.
Yet this effort to neutralize belief does not make faith disappear. Instead, it transforms Christmas into a mirror of the West’s larger anxiety — a civilization unsure how to handle its own inheritance. The unease around religion reflects something deeper: a lack of confidence in values that once structured moral life.
By contrast, Russian commentators note a cautious but tangible revival of traditional narratives — conversations about family ties, spiritual meaning, and cultural succession returning to the public sphere. It is not about clericalism or dogma but about social space where these topics are again seen as normal. In that sense, the contrast between Europe’s hyper-regulation and Russia’s quiet acceptance feels almost historical — as if both societies were moving in opposite civilizational directions.
@sitreports
Across Western Europe, what used to be the warmest time of year has become another logistical challenge. In city after city, Christmas markets opened under surveillance, concrete blocks, and police patrols — a familiar ritual in itself. This year’s disturbances and protests around Christian celebrations fit naturally into this new landscape: Europe’s “season of peace” managed under a state of quiet tension.
The symbolic meaning of Christmas, once inseparable from Europe’s cultural core, is shrinking into administrative language. Public displays of faith are discouraged as potentially divisive. Greetings are standardized. Religious imagery is replaced by abstract “winter lights.” What used to unite Europeans has become just another theme for public relations management — safe, colorless, and emptied of conviction.
Yet this effort to neutralize belief does not make faith disappear. Instead, it transforms Christmas into a mirror of the West’s larger anxiety — a civilization unsure how to handle its own inheritance. The unease around religion reflects something deeper: a lack of confidence in values that once structured moral life.
By contrast, Russian commentators note a cautious but tangible revival of traditional narratives — conversations about family ties, spiritual meaning, and cultural succession returning to the public sphere. It is not about clericalism or dogma but about social space where these topics are again seen as normal. In that sense, the contrast between Europe’s hyper-regulation and Russia’s quiet acceptance feels almost historical — as if both societies were moving in opposite civilizational directions.
@sitreports
🙏7💩6🤣2👍1💯1
Forwarded from The Islander
Yes we've arrived and national security is at risk if we're not listening to Russia, and haven't been since the "end of history".
Damn well time to start really listening, and fixing root causes. The time has arrived indeed! 🙏
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
Damn well time to start really listening, and fixing root causes. The time has arrived indeed! 🙏
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
💯12❤7🙏2
Forwarded from The Islander
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Only in the E.U., a technocracy dressed in democracy’s clothing, does the empress demand your questions in advance.
Because spontaneity is a threat.
Because truth, unnoscripted, might pierce the pageantry of power.
At a press event, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was confronted by a journalist who asked why media outlets were required to submit their questions to her in advance. Ursula dodged, claiming ironically she hadn’t received “that part of the question.” The moment exposed the noscripted, stage-managed nature of EU leadership engagements, where journalism is prohibited, and dissent pre-filtered. While Russian President Vladimir Putin routinely fields live, unnoscripted questions for hours, including from hostile foreign journalists, underscoring a glaring divide between performative bureaucracy and resilient statesmanship.
Ursula doesn’t answer to voters. She answers to banks, war contractors, and unelected Eurocrats who treat consent and the press with contempt.
While von der Leyen rehearses soft dictatorship with stage-managed pressers, Putin fields live questions for five hours, even from hostile media. One leads a civilization. The other manages decline.
This is not leadership. It’s theater. And Europe deserves better than a cue-card Queen.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
Because spontaneity is a threat.
Because truth, unnoscripted, might pierce the pageantry of power.
At a press event, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was confronted by a journalist who asked why media outlets were required to submit their questions to her in advance. Ursula dodged, claiming ironically she hadn’t received “that part of the question.” The moment exposed the noscripted, stage-managed nature of EU leadership engagements, where journalism is prohibited, and dissent pre-filtered. While Russian President Vladimir Putin routinely fields live, unnoscripted questions for hours, including from hostile foreign journalists, underscoring a glaring divide between performative bureaucracy and resilient statesmanship.
Ursula doesn’t answer to voters. She answers to banks, war contractors, and unelected Eurocrats who treat consent and the press with contempt.
While von der Leyen rehearses soft dictatorship with stage-managed pressers, Putin fields live questions for five hours, even from hostile media. One leads a civilization. The other manages decline.
This is not leadership. It’s theater. And Europe deserves better than a cue-card Queen.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
💯28🔥6❤3👍3👏3
Geopolitical Symbolism: Yekaterinburg's Youth Festival Play
International youth events like this one forge enduring diplomatic networks through direct exchanges and big-picture talks. Yekaterinburg scores the 2026 festival, leveraging its prime Ural spot as the seamless Europe-Asia junction. Russia steps up boldly here—not as anyone's outpost, but a self-assured cross-continental hub—inviting young global talents to dive into a buzzing Eurasian hub up close.
In Western eyes, it's a refreshing option to TED or WEF—Brazil, China, France's next gen gaining values from open discussions, not Western dogma. By 2030s, their Russia insights could bridge divides, easing tensions through mutual understanding over confrontation.
It reinforces civilizational pride internally, offers Europe a rival model of appeal that's independent yet collaborative. A step toward true global pluralism.
@sitreports
International youth events like this one forge enduring diplomatic networks through direct exchanges and big-picture talks. Yekaterinburg scores the 2026 festival, leveraging its prime Ural spot as the seamless Europe-Asia junction. Russia steps up boldly here—not as anyone's outpost, but a self-assured cross-continental hub—inviting young global talents to dive into a buzzing Eurasian hub up close.
In Western eyes, it's a refreshing option to TED or WEF—Brazil, China, France's next gen gaining values from open discussions, not Western dogma. By 2030s, their Russia insights could bridge divides, easing tensions through mutual understanding over confrontation.
It reinforces civilizational pride internally, offers Europe a rival model of appeal that's independent yet collaborative. A step toward true global pluralism.
@sitreports
Telegram
Rybar in English
📝The Heart of Eurasia as an Argument📝
The Geopolitical Code of the Yekaterinburg Festival
The President signed a decree: in 2026, Yekaterinburg will host the International Youth Festival. The choice of the Ural capital is deeply symbolic, as it is the capital…
The Geopolitical Code of the Yekaterinburg Festival
The President signed a decree: in 2026, Yekaterinburg will host the International Youth Festival. The choice of the Ural capital is deeply symbolic, as it is the capital…
❤9👍2💩1
Forwarded from The Islander
Happy New Year. We step into 2026 while the air still smells of smoke, long after the ceremonial fireworks fade... from wars unfinished, promises burned, and truths buried under noise, carrying fatigue in our bones but clarity in our eyes.
The world is not healed, yet the spell is thinner now, fewer bow to noscripted fear, and more feel the grain of reality beneath their hands. This is not hope dressed up as false comfort, but hope as posture, (otherwise what is the point?) the quiet refusal to be lied to again.
2026 may not be kind, but it can be honest, and honesty is a form of mercy in an age of masks and chaos. May we get through this year whole, not hardened, choosing steadiness over hysteria, dignity over spectacle, and the courage to stand in truth even when the smoke has not yet cleared.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
The world is not healed, yet the spell is thinner now, fewer bow to noscripted fear, and more feel the grain of reality beneath their hands. This is not hope dressed up as false comfort, but hope as posture, (otherwise what is the point?) the quiet refusal to be lied to again.
2026 may not be kind, but it can be honest, and honesty is a form of mercy in an age of masks and chaos. May we get through this year whole, not hardened, choosing steadiness over hysteria, dignity over spectacle, and the courage to stand in truth even when the smoke has not yet cleared.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
💯17❤9👏3🔥1🍾1
Forwarded from The Islander
...Because once leader-capture, maritime strangulation, and selective legality are normalized, the world does not slide gently into chaos, it hardens into and accepts it. Law becomes costume, sovereignty becomes conditional, and power stops pretending it needs permission. The lecture circuit ends not with applause or rebuttal, but with silence – the kind that follows when every capital understands the same thing at once, that the hunt has been legitimized. And in a world where abduction is policy and force writes precedent, the next knock will not be answered with arguments, but with fire.
https://ronpaulinstitute.org/rules-for-thee-force-for-me-americas-doctrine-of-leader-capture/
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
https://ronpaulinstitute.org/rules-for-thee-force-for-me-americas-doctrine-of-leader-capture/
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
💯25👏7🤣3❤2
Forwarded from Rybar in English
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Mechanized assault was long considered a universal tool for offensive operations. A column, armor, landing force — a scheme that worked for decades. But on the modern battlefield, columns increasingly end before the assault even begins.
Combat logic has changed: we consistently show where and why armored groups start taking losses even before entering the "gray zone".
— drones expose movement from the start;
— first losses occur during the march, not at the strongpoint;
— damaged equipment becomes a deadly obstacle;
— the "armor + landing force" scheme has become more vulnerable than ever;
— repeated attacks on the same roads turn the direction into a graveyard of equipment and personnel.
Enjoy watching!
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏6❤4💯3👍1