How to make youtube cozy and actually usable: a guide
if you are using brave, edge, or opera browsers the chrome link will work for you.
block all ads using ublock origin by raymond hill (gorhill) firefox | chrome
this also works on all other sites. you should always have this
automatically skip sponsored segments, intros, outros, subscribe begging, patreon credits, etc with sponsor block (this will shorten videos by 15-30% on average. time cant be returned) firefox | chrome
block channels from showing up in related videos, sidebar, search, front page with channel blocker firefox | chrome
no more watchmojo spamming your recommends, ever
you can also block video names based on regex filtering, example to block all video names starting with "top ##":
if you are using brave, edge, or opera browsers the chrome link will work for you.
block all ads using ublock origin by raymond hill (gorhill) firefox | chrome
this also works on all other sites. you should always have this
automatically skip sponsored segments, intros, outros, subscribe begging, patreon credits, etc with sponsor block (this will shorten videos by 15-30% on average. time cant be returned) firefox | chrome
block channels from showing up in related videos, sidebar, search, front page with channel blocker firefox | chrome
no more watchmojo spamming your recommends, ever
you can also block video names based on regex filtering, example to block all video names starting with "top ##":
^top \d+
this will block videos that have noscripts matching "top 10" "top 42" "top 666" etcI know youre here
you took a meme i made myself and used it in your analysis report of right wing memes and the spread of right wing ideology through memes.
I want you to know that youre wrong and you can never be right. your analysis could only ever have the chance of coming to a correct conclusion if you were trying to glean the mind of an author through his work and you implied that is what you were doing, but you lied. you took mine and other's art and applied your own expectations to it to make it say something it didnt. you took pictures of a funny dog with funny words on it that had nothing to do with race, religion, or nationality and recontextualized it to fit your narrative. you cherry picked and somehow didnt even pick the ripe healthy cherries. you tought people that benign jokes are actually pro-terrorism and being funny in any capacity is inherantly right wing (thanks for that). next time, either admit that art is in the eye of the beholder and youre just a middle school literature teacher telling us what it means for the curtains to be blue, or maybe actually try to empathize with the author instead of morphing what he believes for your hit piece.
you know what i believe? i believe that Christ is King and you'll either bow the knee in this life or before the judgement throne.
youll write something in the future about how "Christ is King" is a dogwhistle and youll remember that youre a failure or a liar, whichever isnt as bad in your mind i guess.
you took a meme i made myself and used it in your analysis report of right wing memes and the spread of right wing ideology through memes.
I want you to know that youre wrong and you can never be right. your analysis could only ever have the chance of coming to a correct conclusion if you were trying to glean the mind of an author through his work and you implied that is what you were doing, but you lied. you took mine and other's art and applied your own expectations to it to make it say something it didnt. you took pictures of a funny dog with funny words on it that had nothing to do with race, religion, or nationality and recontextualized it to fit your narrative. you cherry picked and somehow didnt even pick the ripe healthy cherries. you tought people that benign jokes are actually pro-terrorism and being funny in any capacity is inherantly right wing (thanks for that). next time, either admit that art is in the eye of the beholder and youre just a middle school literature teacher telling us what it means for the curtains to be blue, or maybe actually try to empathize with the author instead of morphing what he believes for your hit piece.
you know what i believe? i believe that Christ is King and you'll either bow the knee in this life or before the judgement throne.
youll write something in the future about how "Christ is King" is a dogwhistle and youll remember that youre a failure or a liar, whichever isnt as bad in your mind i guess.
I wrote something again.
Unexpected Consequences and the Dangers of Reinterpreting Law
875 words
regarding the likely effect of reinterpreting the second amendment to mean the right to form or join a militia, rather than to own firearms.
Unexpected Consequences and the Dangers of Reinterpreting Law
875 words
regarding the likely effect of reinterpreting the second amendment to mean the right to form or join a militia, rather than to own firearms.
skipper's musings
I wrote something again. Unexpected Consequences and the Dangers of Reinterpreting Law 875 words regarding the likely effect of reinterpreting the second amendment to mean the right to form or join a militia, rather than to own firearms.
oh also https://www.writingtoiq.com/ scores the post at 118
it really surprises me how accurate it is.
it really surprises me how accurate it is.
😐2
i think plane interiors are extremely cyberpunk
think about it. it looks cool and sleek. human flight is a symbol of technology.
in reality you have to stand in like with a bunch of smelly and sick people, be dehumanized by security, then sit around waiting for the plane which is often delayed, then when you get on you are stuck in a cramped uncomfortable seat in a human sardine can where if you dont get sick from someone else's germs you will at least hear a screaming child. the cool screens in front of every person are actually completely worthless- only playing awful hollywood slop if you are even willing to pay for both a headset to listen and the inflated price for a movie.
human flight, despite being a marvel of human ingenuity has been beaten and molded into an entire industry that no one enjoys and everyone avoids as much as possible.
this is a post about trains.
think about it. it looks cool and sleek. human flight is a symbol of technology.
in reality you have to stand in like with a bunch of smelly and sick people, be dehumanized by security, then sit around waiting for the plane which is often delayed, then when you get on you are stuck in a cramped uncomfortable seat in a human sardine can where if you dont get sick from someone else's germs you will at least hear a screaming child. the cool screens in front of every person are actually completely worthless- only playing awful hollywood slop if you are even willing to pay for both a headset to listen and the inflated price for a movie.
human flight, despite being a marvel of human ingenuity has been beaten and molded into an entire industry that no one enjoys and everyone avoids as much as possible.
this is a post about trains.
>update shell on linux
>replaced inline
>breaks nothing
>get a notification in powershell on windows saying im out of date (shouldnt windows update handle this automatically?)
>instead of being able to update automatically or from the shell i have to use my browser to get the update like its 2003
>try to run powershell again
>banner gone
>try to run an noscript that explicitly calls powershell.exe
>breaks
>troubleshoot for a while
>turns out powershell.exe points to powershell 1.0 which despite being called 1.0 was updated by MS in a way that breaks old noscripts
>turns out that when updating powershell it now only aliases
>now i have to go and update all my noscripts
"i dont like using linux because its so buggy and you always have to troubleshoot it." t. mouthbreather
REMINDER THAT WINDOWS IS NOT A PROFESSIONAL OPERATING SYSTEM. IT IS ONLY USED BY PEOPLE DOING WORTHLESS BUSY WORK, NOT REAL PROFESSIONALS
>replaced inline
>breaks nothing
>get a notification in powershell on windows saying im out of date (shouldnt windows update handle this automatically?)
>instead of being able to update automatically or from the shell i have to use my browser to get the update like its 2003
>try to run powershell again
>banner gone
>try to run an noscript that explicitly calls powershell.exe
>breaks
>troubleshoot for a while
>turns out powershell.exe points to powershell 1.0 which despite being called 1.0 was updated by MS in a way that breaks old noscripts
>turns out that when updating powershell it now only aliases
pwsh to powershell 7 and keeps the alias powershell to point to powershell 1.0>now i have to go and update all my noscripts
"i dont like using linux because its so buggy and you always have to troubleshoot it." t. mouthbreather
REMINDER THAT WINDOWS IS NOT A PROFESSIONAL OPERATING SYSTEM. IT IS ONLY USED BY PEOPLE DOING WORTHLESS BUSY WORK, NOT REAL PROFESSIONALS
🔥1
skipper's musings
>update shell on linux >replaced inline >breaks nothing >get a notification in powershell on windows saying im out of date (shouldnt windows update handle this automatically?) >instead of being able to update automatically or from the shell i have to use…
oh even better powershell """1.0""" is actually version 10 and deprecated, but powershell 7 is version 7 but also the newer undeprecated version.
if microsoft is so retarded that they cant even get versioning numbers right why would you ever expect them to be able to create and maintain a working professional OS?
if microsoft is so retarded that they cant even get versioning numbers right why would you ever expect them to be able to create and maintain a working professional OS?
>Regrettably, the -OutFile parameters of PowerShell's Invoke-WebRequest and Invoke-RestMethod cmdlets also do not support passing a directory path, as of PowerShell 7.2.
what retard made this decision
powershell is a joke
what retard made this decision
powershell is a joke
ok im drunk as a skunk and finally getting around to reading the first treasure trove of maxwell/epstein files that got released
props to maxwell's defense attorney for knowing how to prep a witness to royally piss off a lawyer LMAO
Q. Did any of the massage therapists who were at the home perform sexual acts for
Jeffrey Epstein?
A. I don ' t know what you mean by sexual acts.
Q. Did any of the massage therapists who were working at the home perform sexual acts, including touching the breasts, touching the vaginal area , being touched while Jeffrey is masturbating, having intercourse, any of those things?
PAGLIUCA: Objection. Form and foundation. To the extent any of this is asking for to your knowledge any consensual sex act that may or may not have involved you, I'm instructing you not to answer the question.
Q. I'm not asking about consensual sex acts. I ' m asking whether any of the massage therapists performed sexual acts for Mr. Epstein, as I have just described?
A. I have never seen anybody have sexual intercourse with with Jeffrey, ever.
Q. I 'm not asking about sexual intercourse. I 'm asking about any sexual act , touching of the breast -- did you ever see -- can you read back the question?
(Record read. )
A. I'm not addressing any questions about consensual adult sex. If you want to talk about what the subject matter, which is defamation and lying, Virginia Roberts , that you and Virginia Roberts are participating in perpetrating her lies, I ' m happy to address those. I never saw any inappropriate underage activities with Jeffrey ever .
Q. I'm not asking about underage. I 'm asking about whether any of the masseuses that were at the home perform sexual acts for Jeffrey Epstein?
A. I have just answered the question.
Q. No, you haven't.
A. I have.
Q. No, you haven't.
A. Yes , I have.
Q. You are refusing to answer the question.
A. Let ' s move on.
Q. I 'm in charge of the deposition. I say when we move on and when we don't. You are here to respond to my questions. If you are refusing to answer the court will bring you back for another deposition to answer these questions. Do you understand that?
MR. PAGLIUCA: You don ' t need to threaten the witness.
MS. McCAWLEY: I ' m not threatening her. I' m making sure the record is clear.
MR. PAGLIUCA: Certainly can you apply to have someone come back and the court may or may not have her come back again.
MS. McCAWLEY: Again , she is not answering questions that relate to adult consent sex acts. Period. And that ' s the instruction and we can take it up with the court.
props to maxwell's defense attorney for knowing how to prep a witness to royally piss off a lawyer LMAO
Q. Did any of the massage therapists who were at the home perform sexual acts for
Jeffrey Epstein?
A. I don ' t know what you mean by sexual acts.
Q. Did any of the massage therapists who were working at the home perform sexual acts, including touching the breasts, touching the vaginal area , being touched while Jeffrey is masturbating, having intercourse, any of those things?
PAGLIUCA: Objection. Form and foundation. To the extent any of this is asking for to your knowledge any consensual sex act that may or may not have involved you, I'm instructing you not to answer the question.
Q. I'm not asking about consensual sex acts. I ' m asking whether any of the massage therapists performed sexual acts for Mr. Epstein, as I have just described?
A. I have never seen anybody have sexual intercourse with with Jeffrey, ever.
Q. I 'm not asking about sexual intercourse. I 'm asking about any sexual act , touching of the breast -- did you ever see -- can you read back the question?
(Record read. )
A. I'm not addressing any questions about consensual adult sex. If you want to talk about what the subject matter, which is defamation and lying, Virginia Roberts , that you and Virginia Roberts are participating in perpetrating her lies, I ' m happy to address those. I never saw any inappropriate underage activities with Jeffrey ever .
Q. I'm not asking about underage. I 'm asking about whether any of the masseuses that were at the home perform sexual acts for Jeffrey Epstein?
A. I have just answered the question.
Q. No, you haven't.
A. I have.
Q. No, you haven't.
A. Yes , I have.
Q. You are refusing to answer the question.
A. Let ' s move on.
Q. I 'm in charge of the deposition. I say when we move on and when we don't. You are here to respond to my questions. If you are refusing to answer the court will bring you back for another deposition to answer these questions. Do you understand that?
MR. PAGLIUCA: You don ' t need to threaten the witness.
MS. McCAWLEY: I ' m not threatening her. I' m making sure the record is clear.
MR. PAGLIUCA: Certainly can you apply to have someone come back and the court may or may not have her come back again.
MS. McCAWLEY: Again , she is not answering questions that relate to adult consent sex acts. Period. And that ' s the instruction and we can take it up with the court.
>youtube works fine
>brave is desperately begging me to update
>finally update
>youtube is showing me ads now
kill me
>brave is desperately begging me to update
>finally update
>youtube is showing me ads now
kill me
💩1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
in this episode of youtube personalities are retarded: anthony fantano failed highschool geography
OC
OC