https://news.1rj.ru/str/+PUg0rQrZdiw4YWFh
Russian chat found.
Please don't raid them, if you decide to go in there just try to have civil debates on them and maybe try to change their minds about things.
We're not fucking animals that spam shit into chats, that helps nobody. Helping people who are at their core good men (mostly) who have been brainwashed by bullshit will.
Russian chat found.
Please don't raid them, if you decide to go in there just try to have civil debates on them and maybe try to change their minds about things.
We're not fucking animals that spam shit into chats, that helps nobody. Helping people who are at their core good men (mostly) who have been brainwashed by bullshit will.
In recent years, the United States has been actively engaged in counterterrorism operations against Al-Shabaab, an extremist group operating in Somalia. Unfortunately, various sources, including Russia, have propagated misinformation regarding these US airstrikes, creating misconceptions and misrepresentations. I aim to refute such misinformation, shed light on the reasons for US involvement in Somalia, clarify the beneficiaries of their assistance, and highlight the importance of combating terrorism in the region.
The United States' involvement in Somalia is primarily driven by the objective of combating terrorism and ensuring regional stability. Al-Shabaab, an Al-Qaeda-affiliated extremist group, poses a significant threat to the security and well-being of the Somali people and the broader East African region. Their actions include attacks on civilians, the Somali government, and peacekeeping forces, as well as engaging in piracy and smuggling.
Al-Shabaab's extremist ideology and history of terrorist activities make it a significant concern for US national security. By combating this group, the US aims to prevent the export of terrorism and the potential for attacks against its interests and allies.
Al-Shabaab's presence destabilizes Somalia and the surrounding countries. The group perpetuates violence, hinders economic development, and exacerbates humanitarian crises. The United States recognizes the importance of a stable Somalia to the overall stability of the region, making it crucial to address the threat posed by Al-Shabaab.
The United States is committed to supporting the Federal Government of Somalia in its efforts to establish effective governance, provide security, and address the needs of its citizens. By targeting Al-Shabaab, the US aids the Somali government in reclaiming control over its territory and establishing law and order.
Contrary to Russian misinformation, the US airstrikes in Somalia are conducted in close cooperation with the Somali government, as well as regional partners such as the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM). The goal is to enhance the capacity of Somali security forces, facilitate intelligence sharing, and enable targeted strikes against high-value targets within Al-Shabaab's ranks.
The primary beneficiaries of US involvement in Somalia are the Somali people themselves. By targeting Al-Shabaab, the United States seeks to create a safe and secure environment, promoting stability, development, and humanitarian aid access. Moreover, US assistance supports the training and equipping of Somali security forces, empowering them to protect their citizens and enforce the rule of law.
US engagement in Somalia extends beyond national borders. It supports AMISOM, a regional peacekeeping mission authorized by the United Nations, in its efforts to stabilize the country. The United States works collaboratively with AMISOM to enhance their capacity to counter Al-Shabaab and create a conducive environment for long-term peace and security.
The US airstrikes in Somalia against Al-Shabaab are part of a broader counterterrorism strategy aimed at protecting national security, promoting regional stability, and supporting the Somali government and its people. Russian misinformation attempts to distort the motives and actions of the United States, disregarding the genuine efforts being made to combat terrorism and create a secure environment in Somalia. It is essential to rely on accurate and reliable sources of information to avoid falling victim to such disinformation and to understand the realities and complexities of the situation in Somalia.
The United States' involvement in Somalia is primarily driven by the objective of combating terrorism and ensuring regional stability. Al-Shabaab, an Al-Qaeda-affiliated extremist group, poses a significant threat to the security and well-being of the Somali people and the broader East African region. Their actions include attacks on civilians, the Somali government, and peacekeeping forces, as well as engaging in piracy and smuggling.
Al-Shabaab's extremist ideology and history of terrorist activities make it a significant concern for US national security. By combating this group, the US aims to prevent the export of terrorism and the potential for attacks against its interests and allies.
Al-Shabaab's presence destabilizes Somalia and the surrounding countries. The group perpetuates violence, hinders economic development, and exacerbates humanitarian crises. The United States recognizes the importance of a stable Somalia to the overall stability of the region, making it crucial to address the threat posed by Al-Shabaab.
The United States is committed to supporting the Federal Government of Somalia in its efforts to establish effective governance, provide security, and address the needs of its citizens. By targeting Al-Shabaab, the US aids the Somali government in reclaiming control over its territory and establishing law and order.
Contrary to Russian misinformation, the US airstrikes in Somalia are conducted in close cooperation with the Somali government, as well as regional partners such as the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM). The goal is to enhance the capacity of Somali security forces, facilitate intelligence sharing, and enable targeted strikes against high-value targets within Al-Shabaab's ranks.
The primary beneficiaries of US involvement in Somalia are the Somali people themselves. By targeting Al-Shabaab, the United States seeks to create a safe and secure environment, promoting stability, development, and humanitarian aid access. Moreover, US assistance supports the training and equipping of Somali security forces, empowering them to protect their citizens and enforce the rule of law.
US engagement in Somalia extends beyond national borders. It supports AMISOM, a regional peacekeeping mission authorized by the United Nations, in its efforts to stabilize the country. The United States works collaboratively with AMISOM to enhance their capacity to counter Al-Shabaab and create a conducive environment for long-term peace and security.
The US airstrikes in Somalia against Al-Shabaab are part of a broader counterterrorism strategy aimed at protecting national security, promoting regional stability, and supporting the Somali government and its people. Russian misinformation attempts to distort the motives and actions of the United States, disregarding the genuine efforts being made to combat terrorism and create a secure environment in Somalia. It is essential to rely on accurate and reliable sources of information to avoid falling victim to such disinformation and to understand the realities and complexities of the situation in Somalia.
Ukraine is reportedly planning to attack occupied Crimea with Himars and British Storm Shadow missile, Russia has claimed in a warning to Kyiv and the West.
Sergei Shoigu, the Russian defence minister, said that Russia would retaliate if Ukraine started hitting the territory that Vladimir Putin annexed in 2014
“The use of these missiles outside the zone of our special military operation would mean that the United States and Britain would be fully dragged into the conflict and would entail immediate strikes on decision-making centres in Ukraine,” warned Mr Shoigu.
Crimea may become within target of Ukraine’s arsenal of missiles and artillery as its counter offensive pushes further south. Ukraine says it has recaptured 113 square km (44 square miles) of land from Russian forces.
Last week, Russian sources said that more than a hundred Russian soldiers may have been killed by a Ukrainian Himars strike after they were ordered to wait in large numbers to listen to a general’s speech.
Source: Telegraph
Sergei Shoigu, the Russian defence minister, said that Russia would retaliate if Ukraine started hitting the territory that Vladimir Putin annexed in 2014
“The use of these missiles outside the zone of our special military operation would mean that the United States and Britain would be fully dragged into the conflict and would entail immediate strikes on decision-making centres in Ukraine,” warned Mr Shoigu.
Crimea may become within target of Ukraine’s arsenal of missiles and artillery as its counter offensive pushes further south. Ukraine says it has recaptured 113 square km (44 square miles) of land from Russian forces.
Last week, Russian sources said that more than a hundred Russian soldiers may have been killed by a Ukrainian Himars strike after they were ordered to wait in large numbers to listen to a general’s speech.
Source: Telegraph
Forwarded from ♥
RDK celebrating summer solstice with German volunteers in eastern Ukraine. (Credits to my friend for giving me this information @biggaaadeneevvaaaa
Ukrainian spies believe Russia is planning a “terrorist” attack at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant involving a release of radiation, Volodymr Zelensky has said, after his intelligence chief warned Russian troops had mined the cooling systems.
“Intelligence has received information that Russia is considering the scenario of a terrorist act at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant - a terrorist act with the release of radiation,” the Ukrainian president said. “They have prepared everything for this.”
The Kremlin dismissed the allegation as “another lie”, and said a team of UN nuclear inspectors had visited the plant and rated everything highly.
It comes after Kyrylo Budanov, Ukraine’s military intelligence chief, on Tuesday accused Russia of “mining” the cooling pond used to keep the reactors cool at the Russian-occupied nuclear plant in southern Ukraine.
“Most terrifying is that the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant was additionally mined during that time... namely the cooling pond was mined,” Major General Budanov said on television.
“Intelligence has received information that Russia is considering the scenario of a terrorist act at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant - a terrorist act with the release of radiation,” the Ukrainian president said. “They have prepared everything for this.”
The Kremlin dismissed the allegation as “another lie”, and said a team of UN nuclear inspectors had visited the plant and rated everything highly.
It comes after Kyrylo Budanov, Ukraine’s military intelligence chief, on Tuesday accused Russia of “mining” the cooling pond used to keep the reactors cool at the Russian-occupied nuclear plant in southern Ukraine.
“Most terrifying is that the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant was additionally mined during that time... namely the cooling pond was mined,” Major General Budanov said on television.
H.G. Wells' novel, The Island of Dr. Moreau, presents a cautionary tale about the ethical implications of tampering with the natural order of life. While the novel's concept predates the modern phenomenon of gender reassignment surgery, parallels can be drawn between Dr. Moreau's disturbing experiments and the controversial practice of altering one's gender through surgery. I aim to explore the potential dangers associated with manipulating the human body in such a way and the ethical concerns raised by these practices.
In The Island of Dr. Moreau, Dr. Moreau's relentless pursuit of scientific advancement leads him to engage in grotesque experiments, blurring the line between human and animal. Similarly, the field of gender reassignment surgery seeks to address the psychological distress experienced by individuals with gender dysphoria. However, the ethical debate arises when considering the potential risks and long-term consequences of altering the human body in such a profound manner.
Both Dr. Moreau's experiments and gender reassignment surgery raise ethical concerns regarding the boundaries of scientific intervention. The novel highlights the importance of respecting the natural order of life and the potential consequences of disregarding it. Similarly, gender reassignment surgery involves irreversible changes to the body, raising questions about the long-term physical and psychological effects, as well as the autonomy and informed consent of the individuals involved.
The Island of Dr. Moreau emphasizes the potential dangers of unleashing creations that disrupt the social fabric. Similarly, the discussion around gender reassignment surgery raises concerns about the impact on societal norms and the perception of gender. Critics argue that such interventions challenge traditional understandings of biological sex and gender, potentially leading to societal confusion and upheaval.
In the novel, the failed experiments of Dr. Moreau result in grotesque and deformed creatures. Similarly, gender reassignment surgery carries inherent risks, including surgical complications, hormonal imbalances, and potential psychological distress post-surgery. Long-term consequences and the possibility of regret must be carefully considered, as irreversible changes to one's physical appearance can have a profound impact on an individual's well-being.
The Island of Dr. Moreau highlights the importance of acknowledging and respecting the inherent qualities and limitations of human nature. Similarly, critics of gender reassignment surgery argue that it may undermine the acceptance of one's biological self and perpetuate the notion that one's identity is solely based on physical appearance. They advocate for approaches that prioritize self-acceptance and mental well-being, without resorting to irreversible physical alterations.
In The Island of Dr. Moreau, Dr. Moreau's relentless pursuit of scientific advancement leads him to engage in grotesque experiments, blurring the line between human and animal. Similarly, the field of gender reassignment surgery seeks to address the psychological distress experienced by individuals with gender dysphoria. However, the ethical debate arises when considering the potential risks and long-term consequences of altering the human body in such a profound manner.
Both Dr. Moreau's experiments and gender reassignment surgery raise ethical concerns regarding the boundaries of scientific intervention. The novel highlights the importance of respecting the natural order of life and the potential consequences of disregarding it. Similarly, gender reassignment surgery involves irreversible changes to the body, raising questions about the long-term physical and psychological effects, as well as the autonomy and informed consent of the individuals involved.
The Island of Dr. Moreau emphasizes the potential dangers of unleashing creations that disrupt the social fabric. Similarly, the discussion around gender reassignment surgery raises concerns about the impact on societal norms and the perception of gender. Critics argue that such interventions challenge traditional understandings of biological sex and gender, potentially leading to societal confusion and upheaval.
In the novel, the failed experiments of Dr. Moreau result in grotesque and deformed creatures. Similarly, gender reassignment surgery carries inherent risks, including surgical complications, hormonal imbalances, and potential psychological distress post-surgery. Long-term consequences and the possibility of regret must be carefully considered, as irreversible changes to one's physical appearance can have a profound impact on an individual's well-being.
The Island of Dr. Moreau highlights the importance of acknowledging and respecting the inherent qualities and limitations of human nature. Similarly, critics of gender reassignment surgery argue that it may undermine the acceptance of one's biological self and perpetuate the notion that one's identity is solely based on physical appearance. They advocate for approaches that prioritize self-acceptance and mental well-being, without resorting to irreversible physical alterations.
What do you think the outcome of the coup (if Wagner wins) will be
Anonymous Poll
31%
Wagner realizes the error in invading Ukraine, truly restores justice via not forcing troops to go
39%
Stubbornly claim that the error was only with the govt, things stay the same
12%
Continue invasion but no more shooting people if they desert, mass desertions by connoscripts
18%
Other
A message to Russian people: Your government does not care about you. Your media is currently attempting to call Prighozin's statement staged to make THEMSELVES look good. You can see for yourself. Your government now openly lies to you and jeopardizes your safety.
Послание русским людям: ваше правительство не заботится о вас. Ваши СМИ в настоящее время пытаются назвать заявление Пригозина постановочным, чтобы САМИ выставить себя в выгодном свете. Вы можете убедиться сами. Теперь ваше правительство открыто лжет вам и ставит под угрозу вашу безопасность.
Послание русским людям: ваше правительство не заботится о вас. Ваши СМИ в настоящее время пытаются назвать заявление Пригозина постановочным, чтобы САМИ выставить себя в выгодном свете. Вы можете убедиться сами. Теперь ваше правительство открыто лжет вам и ставит под угрозу вашу безопасность.
Prighozin has said they will not fight with 18 year old children that are forced to go to Ukraine, only with professionals
It is likely in my view they will be forced to pull out of Ukraine if Prighozin is victorious since a lot of their soldiers they have there are these 18-year-old children
It is likely in my view they will be forced to pull out of Ukraine if Prighozin is victorious since a lot of their soldiers they have there are these 18-year-old children
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
PMC Wagner captured the headquarters of the Southern Military District, the building of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Rostov, FSB and the administration of Rostov.