Medal of Honor recipient CAG SGM Thomas Payne as PSD for GEN Austin Miller in Afghanistan.

John Money, a prominent psychologist and sexologist, is undoubtedly a well known figure whose personal and professional actions have sparked significant outrage and criticism. His defense of pedophilia, along with his fundamentally wrong and flawed beliefs, have had far-reaching consequences, particularly in the field of science.

Firstly, John Money's defense of pedophilia is a reprehensible aspect of his character that cannot be overlooked. In the 1970s, Money supported a case of child abuse involving a boy who had been sexually abused by his parents from infancy under the guise of conducting a gender reassignment experiment. Money repeatedly defended the parents' actions, arguing that the abuse was justified as it served the purpose of allowing the child to be raised as a girl, despite the severe psychological harm caused to the victim. This unfathomable stance on child abuse demonstrates a complete lack of empathy and ethical standards.

Furthermore, Money's studies and beliefs about gender identity and sexual development are fundamentally flawed and have been widely discredited. His support for the concept of "gender neutrality" and the idea that gender identity is solely a result of socialization rather than biological factors is not supported by scientific evidence. His infamous case of David Reimer, where Money raised a boy who had undergone a botched circumcision as a girl, claiming it as a successful gender reassignment, was a tragic failure. David, who later reverted to living as a male, suffered immense psychological distress due to Money's misguided experiment.

John Money's defense of pedophilia and fundamentally wrong and flawed beliefs about gender identity and sexual development make him a terrible person to look up to. His unethical actions and misguided experiments have caused significant harm to vulnerable individuals and perpetuated harm to the same individuals in the modern era. While his early contributions to the discussion on gender identity should not be completely dismissed, it is crucial to recognize the damaging impact of his work and prioritize evidence-based research instead of basing research on emotions.

Vasili Arkhipov was a Soviet naval officer whose crucial actions during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 averted a potential nuclear war between the United States and the Soviet Union. His legacy as "the man who saved the world" is a testament to his courage and level-headedness in the face of an unprecedented crisis.

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, tensions between the USA and the USSR escalated dramatically when the Soviet Union secretly installed nuclear missiles in Cuba, just a stone's throw away from the United States. This move was seen as a direct threat to American security, and the world held its breath as the two superpowers stood on the brink of nuclear conflict.

On October 27, 1962, the crisis reached a boiling point when a United States Navy aircraft carrier, the USS Randolph, along with several destroyers, began dropping depth charges near a Soviet submarine, B-59, off the coast of Cuba. The Soviet submarine was part of a flotilla that was on the receiving end of these aggressive actions, and it had been submerged and cut off from communication for several days.

In the cramped conditions of the submarine, tensions ran high, and the captain of the B-59, Valentin Savitsky, believed that a full-scale war had already broken out. He considered launching a nuclear torpedo at the American ships, not realizing that the depth charges were not meant to cause harm but were warning shots.

Vasili Arkhipov, who held the position of flotilla commander and was the second-in-command on board the B-59, became a pivotal figure during this critical moment. When Savitsky proposed launching the nuclear torpedo, Arkhipov objected, advocating for a different course of action. He insisted on waiting for orders from Moscow before making any drastic decisions.

This decision proved to be a turning point in the crisis. If Arkhipov had sided with the captain, the submarine would have fired the nuclear torpedo, likely triggering a full-scale nuclear war. His level-headedness and refusal to act impulsively saved the world from potential catastrophe.

Eventually, the submarine surfaced, and the Soviet flotilla returned to the USSR without incident. The Cuban Missile Crisis was defused through intense diplomatic negotiations between the United States and the Soviet Union. Both sides agreed to remove the nuclear missiles from Cuba and Turkey, respectively, and the crisis came to a peaceful resolution.

Vasili Arkhipov's legacy as "the man who saved the world" highlights the importance of rational thinking and restraint in moments of crisis. His actions prevented an irreversible escalation of hostilities and the potential annihilation of the planet. Although he remained relatively unknown for decades, his story came to light in later years, and he received recognition for his bravery and composure under pressure.

Crowded Russian position found out what time it is.

What time is it, you may be asking? HIMARS o’ clock, of course.

Rojava, a region in northern Syria, has gained international attention for its unique experiment in governance and self-determination. While often characterized as an anarchist or communist stronghold, I aim to dispel these misconceptions. Rojava's social experiment is not at all related to anarchist or communist ideologies, and its support from some communists and anarchists might be misplaced. Instead, Rojava's governance model centers on democratic values and grassroots empowerment, making it distinct from anarchist or communist systems.

Rojava's governance model is founded on a system known as democratic confederalism, which emphasizes decentralized decision-making and inclusivity. Unlike anarchism or communism, Rojava does not seek to abolish all hierarchies or establish a centralized state. Instead, it advocates for grassroots democracy and the empowerment of local communities to govern themselves.

Rojava has established a system of democratic self-administration at the local level. Communities elect representatives to participate in decision-making councils, allowing citizens to have a direct say in governance.

Unlike communism, which often suppress ethnic and cultural diversity, Rojava values inclusivity and celebrates its diverse ethnic and religious communities. It respects the rights of minorities and promotes social harmony through mutual understanding.

Rojava's approach emphasizes ecological sustainability and aims to create a society that coexists harmoniously with nature. This commitment sets it apart from many traditional communist regimes, which historically prioritized rapid industrialization at the expense of environmental preservation.

While some communists and anarchists have expressed support for Rojava, their endorsement is not an indication of Rojava's adherence to their ideologies. They may misinterpret or oversimplify Rojava's democratic confederalism, mistakenly equating it with traditional anarchist or communist ideology. In reality, Rojava's governance model has unique characteristics that distinguish it from these ideologies.

Rojava's governance model challenges the perception that it is an anarchist or communist entity. Instead, Rojava's focus on democratic confederalism, local autonomy, multiculturalism, equality, and ecological sustainability showcases a distinct and innovative approach to governance.

This channel has been officially handed over to Castle International LLC.
We appreciate any further cooperation. Thank you for your time.
Follow https://news.1rj.ru/str/CastleInternationalLLC

We have added a new bot to be able to contact the admins of the channel.
Feel free to contact us at @cagcontactbot

Content on the channel will not change, and we will continue to provide Ukrainian language translations to any informative essays we post for our Ukrainian subscribers.

Throwback to the freedom fighters who pushed back and saved Ukraine from becoming puppets in 2014.

Повернення до борців за свободу, які відштовхнули та врятували Україну від маріонетки у 2014 році.

Message to all Russians:

Communism is a temporary setback on the road to Freedom.

Freedom is non-negotiable.


Звернення до всіх росіян:

Комунізм — це тимчасова невдача на шляху до Свободи.

Свобода не підлягає обговоренню.