Russia's Unfriendly Countries List

AKA bucket list on the countries that Putin has wet dreams about invading and assimilating into the Neo-USSR

The 1917 Russian Revolution, culminating in the overthrow of Tsar Nicholas II, and the subsequent creation of the Soviet Union, undeniably shaped global history. However, contemplating the "what if" scenarios of history, one cannot help but wonder: Would Russia have fared better had the Revolution never taken place?

Tsarist Russia, despite its autocratic nature and social inequalities, was on a cusp of a transformative era. The late 19th and early 20th centuries heralded the arrival of modernization and reform. Sergei Witte, the finance minister, and others were leading efforts to stimulate Russia's economy and industry. Rapid industrial growth was observed, with the Trans-Siberian railway as a symbol of this progress. While far from perfect, social changes were becoming evident as well. The Duma, although lacking substantial power, hinted at the emergence of parliamentary democracy, representing a significant departure from centuries-old absolutist rule.

The ideology of the Soviet Union promised equality and shared prosperity. It aimed to dismantle the class hierarchy and create a classless society. However, these lofty ideals often fell short in practice. The Soviet economic model, characterized by rigid centralized planning and control over production, led to significant economic inefficiencies. Chronic shortages, low quality of goods, and the stifling of innovation were all indicative of these inherent systemic issues. Moreover, political freedoms were severely curtailed. The Communist Party's single-party rule led to widespread suppression of dissent and numerous human rights abuses, tarnishing the promise of a worker's paradise.

While it is impossible to predict with certainty, there is a case to be made that Tsarist Russia could have gradually evolved into a modernized and more equitable society. The nascent democratic structures could have been strengthened over time, possibly leading to a more representative government. The momentum of economic growth might have allowed for gradual social reforms addressing the stark social inequalities. However, substantial challenges would still have remained. The autocratic nature of Tsarist rule, the deep-seated social disparities, and the simmering unrest among the peasantry would have posed significant hurdles to such a progression.

Understanding the evolution of any nation involves scrutinizing the ideological factions that shaped its history. In the context of Russia, contrasting the ideas advocated by the Russian Liberation Army (RLA) with those of the Soviet regime offers intriguing insights. The RLA, also known as the Vlasov Army after its leader, General Andrey Vlasov, was a collaborationist force during World War II.

The RLA advocated for a vision of Russia free from Stalin's tyranny, emphasizing freedom and nationalism. It proposed to dismantle the collectivized farming system, restore private property, and establish a multiparty system. Vlasov's manifesto, the "Smolensk Declaration," elucidated these objectives, with a vision of Russia that stood in stark contrast to the autocratic Soviet regime.

The Soviet Union, under Stalin's leadership, was characterized by a totalitarian regime with no tolerance for political dissent. While it achieved industrialization and military power, these came at enormous human costs, including mass purges, forced labor, and widespread famines. The collectivized farming system proved inefficient, leading to food shortages and stifling individual initiative.

Comparing these two ideological paths, the RLA's vision appears as a more appealing alternative to the Soviet regime's repressive rule. A Russia free from Stalin, as envisioned by the RLA, would have prioritized individual freedoms, economic opportunity, and political pluralism. These values align more closely with broadly accepted ideals.

In retrospect, the RLA's ideological framework seems to offer a promising alternative to the path Russia took under Soviet rule. It presented a vision of a free and prosperous Russia that stood in stark contrast to the repressive and autocratic Soviet regime.

The flag of the Forward Observations Group is not satanic, it is based on pirate imagery (Blackbeard's flag)

Communist cocksucker making my country look bad with schizo takes

Fuck you Texas. You will never live up to the awesome state you're named after.

What he forwarded next is literally just a Russian journalist talking about things she "saw" in Ukraine so obviously she talked about labs and shit

Of course, if this was true and she had any balls as a journalist she'd steal some documents or something but nope

Just the word of the Russian media which we're expected to trust after everything that they have done in the past with slander, misinformation, etc

Here's the thing he forwarded
There's literally nothing of a semblance of evidence at all it is all just Russian media trust me broing

I could say that Putin wipes dog shit in his mouth to brush his teeth in the morning and then just start trust me broing and emulate Russian media tactics perfectly that way

Inb4 they start beating confessions out of Ukrainians just like the old USSR days

It's undeniable that Maksim Tesak was a controversial figure, given his views and violent actions towards pedophiles. Yet, no matter what one thinks of his actions, his murder, executed by the Russian government, raises important questions about the rule of law, human rights, and the value of life.

In any democratic society that respects human rights, the most fundamental principle is that every individual has the right to life. This right extends to all human beings, regardless of their deeds or beliefs. If the government intentionally took Tesak's life without proper legal justification, this would violate this core principle.

Furthermore, each individual has the right to a fair and unbiased trial, regardless of the severity of their alleged crimes. If the government bypassed the judicial process to enact a form of extrajudicial punishment, this would contradict the essence of justice itself, which demands due process.

Moreover, it's crucial to consider the right to humane treatment, even when imprisoned. Tesak's death was a murder, which represents a gross violation of this right, which prohibits cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment.

In essence, even though Tesak's actions and beliefs were deeply troubling to many people, he was murdered by the Russian government and this represents a disturbing disregard for the principles of justice, human rights, and the rule of law, thus making it an unjust act.

Rest in peace, Tesak.

Average Russian Moscow Resident