https://professordavidclements.substack.com/p/bombshell-tarrant-county-hart-intercivic?r=47p0pl&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true


They didnt take any of this to Clint for an investigation like I asked them to, and they didn't find what they think they found. The ballot numbers aren't unique for hand marked ballots, they use the same ballot numbers for each ballot style rather than generating a unique ballot serial number for each requestor.

The county does the test ballots with undervotes as well. The undervote image likely has an undervote ballot matching, and it's likely the same ballot style as the test where they ran all votes for Rehmet.

The reason the count came to 71 which prompted them to look thru ballot images of all the test kits was bc one ballot didnt scan and they ran it thru on its own after the scanner rejected it. The ballot images were missing that one and they looked for it by "serial number" (ballot style number) and saw an image recorded for an undervote ballot from when they tested the same kit (all relevant ballot styles) for undervoting. They do these to make sure it is consistently counting each ballot styles selections properly, they do it with every candidate on the ballot for every race.

Clint is looking more into it, he remembers the issue but nobody took anything to him to look into so he's reading that article too, its the first day of early voting, and he's asked his team to pull those test ballots and images to confirm that the totals do match.

He said they did when the test was done and nobody said anything was wrong bc the numbers were good.

This is why it's hard to get anything taken seriously, there is a lack of interest in the details, and a ravenous thirst for cultural relevance... and headlines make it possible.

Everyone has been told over and over that I should be contacted about Tarrant County, but the Old Guard won't give up the keys to the kingdom yet.

Also, Heider has been gone for a while LOL but he's still catching strays 😂😂🙏🇺🇸✝️🫡✨️

People can be mad all they want.

But the facts are strong, we do not need to make things up to secure the elections.

BTW, the same people who sabotaged our primary election security efforts are the same "sources" for the Clements.

And anyways, I have always believed the following:

We need to take our COMPLETE FINDINGS to the LEGISLATURE. Not partial stories to the media.

Do we agree on that or nah?

Their sources did 0 investigation into this, and they have no idea that the absentee ballots (which is what they were testing) could share the same ballot numbers, meaning that they could be easily mixed up as part of the testing.

I know everyone wants to believe the first thing they hear. But there's a lot more to this that the Clements just dont know, because their source just didnt know.

Rick Jimmink, shame on you all.

To everyone who leaves yhe channel bc I have more facts, don't come back.

Move on to another part time hobby and never speak my name again unless you mean to summon me to lay out the facts and legislation necessary to stop another 2020 from happening.

Every single one of the sources who keeps going to the media has worked against actually securing the upcoming primaries.

They dont want to fix it. They had the perfect chance, they trashed it. I have the evidence. Shall I post it?

Someone host a forum, a neutral host.

Bring me and bring Clements and his sources.

Bet nobody will. There are VERY few people who actually do this work. I can count them on one hand.

Because of the absentee ballots (which is what was being scanned) having ballot numbering nuances not factored in to the logic of the 10m investigation which didn't include the EA, more information has to be collected for a reasonable understanding of what occurred. If it "didnt scan" or *removed* a vote (not flipped from one to the other - big difference in a few ways) then we need that proven and a statement made by Clint.

If it was an issue with the ballot numbering, we also need that statement from Clint so we can get the reps to force him to number the ballots properly.

Either way, this needed WAY more investigation before it was made into a headline. I am disappointed in everyone involved. Today I will have more information for everyone, as Clint is not hard to contact and is open to records examinations, has already offered to pull all of this information when requested.

Thanks. The same people who reported this out were behind the killing of primary election security in Tarrant County, just for some perspective.

I really do not care if I lose subs for being accurate in election security investigations, when the trend is to be wildly exploitative of unvetted claims made by people who actually sabotage election security efforts at the local level.

I don't care who you think is cool, only a few of us actually do this work, and you don't tend to see our findings in the headlines. You see them in legislation. Like what the Founding Fathers intended.

Everyone can eat my shorts if they'd rather have a moment on social media rather than make meaningful and lasting changes to secure future elections for ourselves and our posterity.

https://youtu.be/_QwGo0LyZ3I?si=7rn3h_uJZzefbTO-

Ballot Harvesting was always a wicked game to play. Thats why I never got behind it.

To everyone who backed that, just remember that you cannot do election integrity if you have no integrity.

The above video and those represented in it are a perfect example of what happens when a populist movement is hijacked by fake MAGA influencers who trash the people who actually do this work.

Those influencers have 0 loyalty - and why do they all gravitate towards AZ??

They want control of the narrative, and its easy to do once you get national recognition.

Yall remember the ballot harvesting being pushed by conservatives out of AZ and few years back?

Here is the source. Tyler Boyer.

https://youtu.be/_QwGo0LyZ3I?si=MnTFLkYKQu2Id_hK

https://youtu.be/dOSIZzcV2ks?si=JInCStpgYXk8DlBf

The only thing I can assume is that Bondi and Patel didn't have this when they told us "You have what we have. You know what we know."

And this is a prime example of why acts of congress are more powerful than executive action.

This was compelled to come forward, beyond an act of congress this latest set wouldn't have come out.

Tbh I am shocked any incriminating footage still exists, and I'd like to see the Chain of Custody on these files. That'll show us who has been holding them, and that should also be available.

I have spent 0 time looking thru the latest file dump.

Let me formally congratulate the Tarrant GOP EC for having a plan to immediately secure elections by adhering to state and federal law for a change, and dismally failing to even CARE to implement a single security feature, then proceeding to lose SD9 to a Democrat by again totally ignoring the help from people who have insight into historically Democrat voters and what motivates them, what they want to hear.

You did it. You let Tarrant fall because you spent more time on podcasts and in ballrooms than on the street. ​

And let me thank all of the do-nothing talking heads who use their only skill to self-promote rather than helping more Americans learn how they can secure elections.

Several 501c3s have claimed to be working towards that, but of course they are just pocketing your donations and trashing people with real plans.

See, if this gets solved in a practical way, some of these people won't be able to market it as an evergreen issue for their social media content and political campaigns.

They'd rather risk losing the country than fix the elections if the solution turns out to cost $0 after they raised and spend millions knowing they had no intentions to follow thru.

Okay I may be a little bitter about a few things, but I guess it's once again time to get over a major setback and keep trying to secure proper representation in Texas.

https://youtube.com/shorts/qxdWhxWKfP0?si=aU5yYEVdBMh6BGjQ

"There's no evidence that the names we have already know about had kids trafficked to them"

And then

"They aren't releasing it all bc its Child Pron, you morons."

Which is it, Ben?