Global Holodomor?
John Kerry, Biden's "Climate Czar":
"Wait until you see 100 million people for whom the entire food production capacity has collapsed."
- Russia and Ukraine export 30% of the world's grain and 19% of the world's corn.
- Russia is the second biggest fertilizer producer worldwide and exports 13% of the world's potash.
- Russia also exports 10% of the world's oil.
Just how many psyop narratives are being wrapped into Russia v Ukraine war? There's the Eurasia vs Oceania "multipolarity" bullshit, biological weapons (more pandemics?), global famines and food chain collapse, energy collapse, and replacement migration. Not to mention both countries are on board with Agenda 21/2030 and dominated by le tribe. It all seems a little too coincidental to me.
John Kerry, Biden's "Climate Czar":
"Wait until you see 100 million people for whom the entire food production capacity has collapsed."
- Russia and Ukraine export 30% of the world's grain and 19% of the world's corn.
- Russia is the second biggest fertilizer producer worldwide and exports 13% of the world's potash.
- Russia also exports 10% of the world's oil.
Just how many psyop narratives are being wrapped into Russia v Ukraine war? There's the Eurasia vs Oceania "multipolarity" bullshit, biological weapons (more pandemics?), global famines and food chain collapse, energy collapse, and replacement migration. Not to mention both countries are on board with Agenda 21/2030 and dominated by le tribe. It all seems a little too coincidental to me.
"Food Chain Reaction crisis simulation ends with global carbon tax":
In 2015, the WWF (founded by UNESCO's Julian Huxley) and the Center for American Progress (founded by John Podesta) created an Event 201 or Operation Lockstep simulation but for a global "food chain crisis," noscriptd Food Chain Reaction.
They worked with Cargill, one of the world's biggest food corporations (would be #15 on Fortune 500), who summarized the operation here.
>Climate, hunger, civil unrest and spiking food prices came together at the Food Chain Reaction game in Washington DC this week. Cooperation mostly won the day.
>The game took the players from the year 2020 to 2030. As it was projected, the decade brought two major food crises, with prices approaching 400 percent of the long term average; a raft of climate-related extreme weather events; governments toppling in Pakistan and Ukraine; and famine and refugee crises in Bangladesh, Myanmar, Chad and Sudan.
>Cooperation mostly won the day over the short term individual advantage. Teams pledged to build international information networks and early warning systems on hunger and crops together, invest jointly in smart agricultural technology and build up global food stocks as a buffer against climate shocks.
>In the face of a steep price spike with looming global food shortages in 2022, the EU at one point suspended its environmental rules for agriculture and introduced a tax on meat.
>The most eye-catching result, however, was a deal between the U.S., the EU, India and China, standing in for the top 20 greenhouse gas emitters, to institute a global carbon tax and cap CO2 emissions in 2030.
>“Take the meat tax Europe wanted to impose, and think through that. What meat are you going to tax – does that mean poultry and beef or aquaculture as well? Where do you levy the tax, where does the money go, what are the unintended consequences?”
>The game was built over the course of months, with maximal realism in mind. The scenario was extrapolated from events that have actually occurred in the real world, such as the food crisis of 2008-2009 or the recent string of hottest years and months on record.
>“Most people started out with a short-term perspective, but transitioned to long-term measure pretty quickly – they started working to strengthen resiliency instead of just putting out fires.”
>The realism of the exercise exceeded expectations, said former U.S. Senate majority leader Tom Daschle, who acted as a mentor to the players. “It’s much closer to the real world than you’d think. The people who play here are very committed and serious.”
The whitepaper is available here:
Food Chain Reaction — A Global Food Security Game
>Round 2 Narrative: 2022–2024
>While 2022 starts without crop problems, food is still expensive, and normal crop harvests are only large enough to slow the continuing rise in food prices. Public dissent continues and migration within and from food-importing Africa persists, in spite of progress on regional free trade agreements, exerting pressure on the African continent and Europe.
>Russia and Ukraine experience heat stress that reduces grain supplies
>In 2024, crop yields approach normal across the globe, except in the European Union, Russia, and the Ukraine, where heat and drought negatively impact production
In 2015, the WWF (founded by UNESCO's Julian Huxley) and the Center for American Progress (founded by John Podesta) created an Event 201 or Operation Lockstep simulation but for a global "food chain crisis," noscriptd Food Chain Reaction.
They worked with Cargill, one of the world's biggest food corporations (would be #15 on Fortune 500), who summarized the operation here.
>Climate, hunger, civil unrest and spiking food prices came together at the Food Chain Reaction game in Washington DC this week. Cooperation mostly won the day.
>The game took the players from the year 2020 to 2030. As it was projected, the decade brought two major food crises, with prices approaching 400 percent of the long term average; a raft of climate-related extreme weather events; governments toppling in Pakistan and Ukraine; and famine and refugee crises in Bangladesh, Myanmar, Chad and Sudan.
>Cooperation mostly won the day over the short term individual advantage. Teams pledged to build international information networks and early warning systems on hunger and crops together, invest jointly in smart agricultural technology and build up global food stocks as a buffer against climate shocks.
>In the face of a steep price spike with looming global food shortages in 2022, the EU at one point suspended its environmental rules for agriculture and introduced a tax on meat.
>The most eye-catching result, however, was a deal between the U.S., the EU, India and China, standing in for the top 20 greenhouse gas emitters, to institute a global carbon tax and cap CO2 emissions in 2030.
>“Take the meat tax Europe wanted to impose, and think through that. What meat are you going to tax – does that mean poultry and beef or aquaculture as well? Where do you levy the tax, where does the money go, what are the unintended consequences?”
>The game was built over the course of months, with maximal realism in mind. The scenario was extrapolated from events that have actually occurred in the real world, such as the food crisis of 2008-2009 or the recent string of hottest years and months on record.
>“Most people started out with a short-term perspective, but transitioned to long-term measure pretty quickly – they started working to strengthen resiliency instead of just putting out fires.”
>The realism of the exercise exceeded expectations, said former U.S. Senate majority leader Tom Daschle, who acted as a mentor to the players. “It’s much closer to the real world than you’d think. The people who play here are very committed and serious.”
The whitepaper is available here:
Food Chain Reaction — A Global Food Security Game
>Round 2 Narrative: 2022–2024
>While 2022 starts without crop problems, food is still expensive, and normal crop harvests are only large enough to slow the continuing rise in food prices. Public dissent continues and migration within and from food-importing Africa persists, in spite of progress on regional free trade agreements, exerting pressure on the African continent and Europe.
>Russia and Ukraine experience heat stress that reduces grain supplies
>In 2024, crop yields approach normal across the globe, except in the European Union, Russia, and the Ukraine, where heat and drought negatively impact production
New article:
>Great Reset = Neo-Holodomor? 'Food Chain Reaction': A simulation like Operation Lockstep but for a global famine caused by food chain collapse
In 2015, the WWF and Center for American Progress created an Event 201 or Operation Lockstep style simulation for a global "food chain crisis," noscriptd Food Chain Reaction. This article covers how their seven-year-old "simulation" relates to current political events.
If the COVID simulations (Event 201 and Operation Lockstep) are anything to go by, then it would be pretty safe to assume that globalists are planning a worldwide Neo-Holodomor. Old dogs, new tricks.
>Great Reset = Neo-Holodomor? 'Food Chain Reaction': A simulation like Operation Lockstep but for a global famine caused by food chain collapse
In 2015, the WWF and Center for American Progress created an Event 201 or Operation Lockstep style simulation for a global "food chain crisis," noscriptd Food Chain Reaction. This article covers how their seven-year-old "simulation" relates to current political events.
If the COVID simulations (Event 201 and Operation Lockstep) are anything to go by, then it would be pretty safe to assume that globalists are planning a worldwide Neo-Holodomor. Old dogs, new tricks.
Thuletide
Great Reset = Neo-Holodomor? ‘Food Chain Reaction’: A simulation like Operation Lockstep but for a global famine caused by food…
In 2015, the WWF and Center for American Progress created an Event 201 or Operation Lockstep style simulation for a global “food chain crisis,” noscriptd Food Chain Reaction.
Since I posted this 2 weeks ago, the WEF has officially cut ties with Russia. I suspect this is for optics purposes but it does make me wonder if the extreme anti-Russian hysteria in the West is setting the stage for an eventual Oceania vs Eurasia conflict.
IMO, until Putin rescinds Agenda 21/2030, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and transhumanism, bans LGBT stuff, implements a closed-borders immigration policy and stops replacing ethnic Russians with Islamic Central Asians and Caucasians, stops kissing Chabad ass, etc., then he is clearly still on team globalism. You can't really be anti-globalism if you support all of the main globalist agendas, as Putin does.
IMO, until Putin rescinds Agenda 21/2030, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and transhumanism, bans LGBT stuff, implements a closed-borders immigration policy and stops replacing ethnic Russians with Islamic Central Asians and Caucasians, stops kissing Chabad ass, etc., then he is clearly still on team globalism. You can't really be anti-globalism if you support all of the main globalist agendas, as Putin does.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/keith_woods/2442
Curious that you cropped out the second paragraph:
"IMO, until Putin rescinds Agenda 21/2030, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and transhumanism, bans LGBT stuff, implements a closed-borders immigration policy and stops replacing ethnic Russians with Islamic Central Asians and Caucasians, stops kissing Chabad ass, etc., then he is clearly still on team globalism. You can't really be anti-globalism if you support all of the main globalist agendas, as Putin does."
Also funny that you turned off your dislikes because your attempted dunks on me kept getting ratioed. Cope and seethe you Communist faggot.
Curious that you cropped out the second paragraph:
"IMO, until Putin rescinds Agenda 21/2030, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and transhumanism, bans LGBT stuff, implements a closed-borders immigration policy and stops replacing ethnic Russians with Islamic Central Asians and Caucasians, stops kissing Chabad ass, etc., then he is clearly still on team globalism. You can't really be anti-globalism if you support all of the main globalist agendas, as Putin does."
Also funny that you turned off your dislikes because your attempted dunks on me kept getting ratioed. Cope and seethe you Communist faggot.
Telegram
Keith Woods
POV: your model of political analysis doesn't explain, predict, or elucidate anything and you are watching it being proven wrong in real time
https://news.1rj.ru/str/mpeinovich/1669
I don't know why a holocaust denier like you is using "conspiracy theorist" as a pejorative — maybe your brain is clogged up with visceral fat? —- but the standard "conspiracy theorist" argument is that Freemasonry, CFR, UN, etc. are all front organizations for international finance and other globalist oligarchs and swindlers.
Correct, CFR etc. are powerful because they are used by powerful people. Is this the power of actual material political analysis and investigation?
What shocking truth bomb will you drop next? That Amazon is simply a tool for Jeff Bezos? You fat retard.
I don't know why a holocaust denier like you is using "conspiracy theorist" as a pejorative — maybe your brain is clogged up with visceral fat? —- but the standard "conspiracy theorist" argument is that Freemasonry, CFR, UN, etc. are all front organizations for international finance and other globalist oligarchs and swindlers.
Correct, CFR etc. are powerful because they are used by powerful people. Is this the power of actual material political analysis and investigation?
What shocking truth bomb will you drop next? That Amazon is simply a tool for Jeff Bezos? You fat retard.
Telegram
Mike Peinovich
The idea the World Economic Forum or the UN Agenda 21 are running anything is even dumber than "based Putin" which is mainly a straw guy to describe people that have an actual comprehensive analysis of world affairs.
Davos is a place where Jewish finance…
Davos is a place where Jewish finance…
I agree with the following quotes from the following posts:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/hvitgardr3/2774
"I see no signs that Putin is walking back on the Agenda 21 path, nor than he has abandoned Dugin's Eurasianism either. Both paths are models of centralised globalism, not nationalism."
"The problem here is that [...] most nationalists [...] see globalism as a single power [that] all else is subject to. Furthermore the most significant shift between global power in the past to now is that it was physically or locally centralised (Morgoth's 'Elephant'), but now global power exists everywhere and nowhere (Morgoth's 'Whale'), it is both global and centralised but also decentralised in physicality, members can leave and join but the power remains centralised"
"We are living in an era which has thoroughly rejected nationalism, an age of competing power-blocs, each vying for their own globalism [...] one bloc may hold global dominance (America and the West for a while), but if this should shift, then a new globalism may take the stage."
https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/1007
"Globalism isn’t a movement, it’s an ideology. Multiple groups can hold it, even if they’re opposed to each other. Globohomo is one disposition, Eurasianism another, Make Cheap Knockoff Shit and Whine About Muh Nanking (it’s more elegant in the original Mandarin) a third."
https://news.1rj.ru/str/pox_populi/1170, https://news.1rj.ru/str/pox_populi/1171
"I’ve explained this before using the metaphor of the “elites” all jockeying for a higher position on the pyramid of power."
"A look into the history of the 20th century should be enough to show that the “elites” often compete amongst themselves while using the common folk as cannon fodder. There are examples stretching beyond the last century too."
"The “elites” play on all sides. The same investors back two adversarial forces. We’ve seen this time and again whether it’s American intelligence agencies or Rothschild bankers."
"Another example is how BlackRock and Vanguard are primary stakeholders in a plethora of companies, many of which would appear to be competitors at first glance. Ultimately however, there is an “elite”, in this case BlackRock and/or Vanguard, who profits and benefits, and whose objectives are reached, no matter what side “wins”."
"the problem remains that the dissident right is bored out of its mind and totally impotent in the real world, so we’re left with various groups of fart sniffers taking potshots at each other, all the while we continue to forget our own values"
https://news.1rj.ru/str/hvitgardr3/2774
"I see no signs that Putin is walking back on the Agenda 21 path, nor than he has abandoned Dugin's Eurasianism either. Both paths are models of centralised globalism, not nationalism."
"The problem here is that [...] most nationalists [...] see globalism as a single power [that] all else is subject to. Furthermore the most significant shift between global power in the past to now is that it was physically or locally centralised (Morgoth's 'Elephant'), but now global power exists everywhere and nowhere (Morgoth's 'Whale'), it is both global and centralised but also decentralised in physicality, members can leave and join but the power remains centralised"
"We are living in an era which has thoroughly rejected nationalism, an age of competing power-blocs, each vying for their own globalism [...] one bloc may hold global dominance (America and the West for a while), but if this should shift, then a new globalism may take the stage."
https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/1007
"Globalism isn’t a movement, it’s an ideology. Multiple groups can hold it, even if they’re opposed to each other. Globohomo is one disposition, Eurasianism another, Make Cheap Knockoff Shit and Whine About Muh Nanking (it’s more elegant in the original Mandarin) a third."
https://news.1rj.ru/str/pox_populi/1170, https://news.1rj.ru/str/pox_populi/1171
"I’ve explained this before using the metaphor of the “elites” all jockeying for a higher position on the pyramid of power."
"A look into the history of the 20th century should be enough to show that the “elites” often compete amongst themselves while using the common folk as cannon fodder. There are examples stretching beyond the last century too."
"The “elites” play on all sides. The same investors back two adversarial forces. We’ve seen this time and again whether it’s American intelligence agencies or Rothschild bankers."
"Another example is how BlackRock and Vanguard are primary stakeholders in a plethora of companies, many of which would appear to be competitors at first glance. Ultimately however, there is an “elite”, in this case BlackRock and/or Vanguard, who profits and benefits, and whose objectives are reached, no matter what side “wins”."
"the problem remains that the dissident right is bored out of its mind and totally impotent in the real world, so we’re left with various groups of fart sniffers taking potshots at each other, all the while we continue to forget our own values"
Telegram
Hwitgeard
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BertieBassett4Life/2414
I'm with Thuletide on this matter. We have seen a lot of political theatre in the past two years, even more in the past two weeks, and a 'break up' between Putin and the WEF is definitely peak theatre. It even sounds…
I'm with Thuletide on this matter. We have seen a lot of political theatre in the past two years, even more in the past two weeks, and a 'break up' between Putin and the WEF is definitely peak theatre. It even sounds…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0Iay1Kp9Vk
Btw, this post: https://news.1rj.ru/str/hvitgardr3/2774 is referencing Morgoth's video, The Elephant And The Whale (And Technocracy).
Not trying to rope him into this argument because I know he generally tries to avoid infighting etc but it really is an excellent video. Essential viewing. Probably one the of the best DR videos I've watched in years tbh.
He uses great analogies to explain how globalist power actually operates and how the political battlefield has shifted since the end of WW2, with globalists creating a massive transnational network of NGOs that somehow worm their way into the politics of every country on earth.
Btw, this post: https://news.1rj.ru/str/hvitgardr3/2774 is referencing Morgoth's video, The Elephant And The Whale (And Technocracy).
Not trying to rope him into this argument because I know he generally tries to avoid infighting etc but it really is an excellent video. Essential viewing. Probably one the of the best DR videos I've watched in years tbh.
He uses great analogies to explain how globalist power actually operates and how the political battlefield has shifted since the end of WW2, with globalists creating a massive transnational network of NGOs that somehow worm their way into the politics of every country on earth.
YouTube
The Elephant And The Whale (And Technocracy)
The inspiration for this video
https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/parsing_the_contest_of_elites
Buy me a pint here:
https://www.subscribestar.com/morgoth-s-review
https://www.patreon.com/Morgoth
Buy me a coffee
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/morgoth…
https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/parsing_the_contest_of_elites
Buy me a pint here:
https://www.subscribestar.com/morgoth-s-review
https://www.patreon.com/Morgoth
Buy me a coffee
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/morgoth…
Globalists aren't the only people using the Russian invasion of Ukraine to wipe everyone's memory of COVID tyranny — this war has been a godsend for the dissident right retards who shilled for lockdowns, vaccines, claimed that the Great Reset is a "hoax," and so on.
Now they're all back on familiar turf: Playing armchair generals while praying that everyone forgets they endorsed the biggest psyop in human history, DNA-mangling "vaccines" and all.
Now they're all back on familiar turf: Playing armchair generals while praying that everyone forgets they endorsed the biggest psyop in human history, DNA-mangling "vaccines" and all.
The UK's Race Relations Act of 1965 enforced multiracialism and integration by banning racial discrimination. As mentioned in my recent article on Anglosphere immigration and "civil rights" laws, it is the British equivalent of the US 1964 Civil Rights Act. The Canadian, Australian, and New Zealand equivalents were passed in 1977, '74, and '71, respectively.
The British act was drafted by Frank Soskice, the son of a Jewish merchant from Russia who took part in the Russian revolution. They worked for an organization that was bank rolled by Jacob Schiff, a Rothschild employee and leading figure in the banking cartel behind the Federal Reserve. Schiff was described as “the foremost Jewish leader from 1880 to 1920” (aka the 'Schiff Era').
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree: Frank Soskice was a leading member of the UK's Labour Party, serving as Home Secretary. Likewise, Frank's son, David, is a professor at the Fabian Society's London School of Economics and an advisor to the Labour Party.
The UK's Race Relations Act was based on various bills drawn up by leading Labour politician Fenner Brockway, who had tried and failed to pass anti-"racism" (anti-White) laws through British parliament every year from 1956 to 1964.
Brockway was a vegetarian and the son of missionaries, born in India. He was also involved with the Fabian Society and a member the communist League against Imperialism (a ComIntern front organization), the British Humanist Association, and the Ethical Society. I covered the Ethical Culture Movement and its links to communism/socialism, occultism, and globalism in this article here.
I don't know why, but it seems that most Anglos don't really understand that the Labour Party are a bunch of Communists. And it also seems like most people (outside of America) don't understand that Communism is synonymous with Socialism. The differences between the two are superficial and mostly just intra-Leftist squabbling about strategy. It's like Right-Wing people debating the merits of forced deportation vs paying people to leave your country: The end results are identical.
The British act was drafted by Frank Soskice, the son of a Jewish merchant from Russia who took part in the Russian revolution. They worked for an organization that was bank rolled by Jacob Schiff, a Rothschild employee and leading figure in the banking cartel behind the Federal Reserve. Schiff was described as “the foremost Jewish leader from 1880 to 1920” (aka the 'Schiff Era').
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree: Frank Soskice was a leading member of the UK's Labour Party, serving as Home Secretary. Likewise, Frank's son, David, is a professor at the Fabian Society's London School of Economics and an advisor to the Labour Party.
The UK's Race Relations Act was based on various bills drawn up by leading Labour politician Fenner Brockway, who had tried and failed to pass anti-"racism" (anti-White) laws through British parliament every year from 1956 to 1964.
Brockway was a vegetarian and the son of missionaries, born in India. He was also involved with the Fabian Society and a member the communist League against Imperialism (a ComIntern front organization), the British Humanist Association, and the Ethical Society. I covered the Ethical Culture Movement and its links to communism/socialism, occultism, and globalism in this article here.
I don't know why, but it seems that most Anglos don't really understand that the Labour Party are a bunch of Communists. And it also seems like most people (outside of America) don't understand that Communism is synonymous with Socialism. The differences between the two are superficial and mostly just intra-Leftist squabbling about strategy. It's like Right-Wing people debating the merits of forced deportation vs paying people to leave your country: The end results are identical.
Thuletide
Non-White immigration was banned throughout the Anglosphere before the Second World War [Replacement Migration, laws, etc.]
How did the Anglosphere go from 90-99% White to 50% White in less than a century? Let’s find out!
New article:
>Who was behind the UK’s Race Relations Act of 1965?
Expanding on my previous post.
Civil Rights laws were passed throughout the West during the 60s and 70s. Many people in this sphere are familiar with the history of American Civil Rights, but other Anglosphere countries tend to get overlooked.
I don't have time to provide an in-depth history for every country, so this article provides two short biographies of the major architects behind the UK's 1965 Race Relations Act, both of whom were quintessential "civil rights" activists.
>Who was behind the UK’s Race Relations Act of 1965?
Expanding on my previous post.
Civil Rights laws were passed throughout the West during the 60s and 70s. Many people in this sphere are familiar with the history of American Civil Rights, but other Anglosphere countries tend to get overlooked.
I don't have time to provide an in-depth history for every country, so this article provides two short biographies of the major architects behind the UK's 1965 Race Relations Act, both of whom were quintessential "civil rights" activists.
Thuletide
Who was behind the UK’s Race Relations Act of 1965?
I imagine that most people in this sphere are pretty familiar with the origins of the US Civil Rights Act of 1964. If not, you should look into the Warren Court, lobbyists like Leadership Conferenc…
Klaus Schwab: CIA?
This article claims that the World Economic Forum was born out of a CIA-funded Harvard program headed by Henry Kissinger. Schwab himself has admitted that Kissinger was his mentor for 40 years (see timestamp 28:15), so this is very plausible.
MIT and UC Berkeley both have links to CIA (see here and here) and were central to the development of the "Internet of Things" (IoT), which is central to the WEF's Fourth Industrial Revolution (transhumanism or the "Internet of Bodies").
IoT popularity skyrocketed after Bill Joy delivered a lecture to the WEF on IoT in 1999. One year later, he wrote his infamous Why The Future Doesn’t Need Us article.
I don't think the CIA are the evil puppet masters behind WEF but I don't doubt that they were involved.
This article claims that the World Economic Forum was born out of a CIA-funded Harvard program headed by Henry Kissinger. Schwab himself has admitted that Kissinger was his mentor for 40 years (see timestamp 28:15), so this is very plausible.
MIT and UC Berkeley both have links to CIA (see here and here) and were central to the development of the "Internet of Things" (IoT), which is central to the WEF's Fourth Industrial Revolution (transhumanism or the "Internet of Bodies").
IoT popularity skyrocketed after Bill Joy delivered a lecture to the WEF on IoT in 1999. One year later, he wrote his infamous Why The Future Doesn’t Need Us article.
I don't think the CIA are the evil puppet masters behind WEF but I don't doubt that they were involved.
James Lindsay is correct that "wokeness" is Neo-Marxism, but too cowardly to admit that it is explicitly anti-White and anti-straight.
Dissident Righters are correct that "wokeness" is anti-White and anti-straight, but too contrarian to admit that it was invented by Marxists.
Dissident Righters are correct that "wokeness" is anti-White and anti-straight, but too contrarian to admit that it was invented by Marxists.
Keith "triplevaxxer" Woods has said numerous times that my "model of political analysis" doesn't "predict" anything, but I've never posited any "model." I just look at what elites are saying and then make logical conclusions as to where they may be taking society in the future. That's served me pretty well so far.
Not to be egotistical, but my "predictions" have been more accurate than the vast majority of Dissident Right commentators (again, 90% of the time I'm just repeating what globalists have already said and taking things to their logical conclusion). I'm still being vindicated on stuff I wrote years ago even during my retarded "AnPrim" phase.
Keith Woods, on the other hand, dedicates countless hours to formulating pseudointellectual abstract "models" and vomiting philosophical gibberish, but has posted clanger after clanger for years and years — consistently abysmal takes. Sad!
Not to be egotistical, but my "predictions" have been more accurate than the vast majority of Dissident Right commentators (again, 90% of the time I'm just repeating what globalists have already said and taking things to their logical conclusion). I'm still being vindicated on stuff I wrote years ago even during my retarded "AnPrim" phase.
Keith Woods, on the other hand, dedicates countless hours to formulating pseudointellectual abstract "models" and vomiting philosophical gibberish, but has posted clanger after clanger for years and years — consistently abysmal takes. Sad!