A couple of years ago, I saw a dissident right person (forgot who) describe the Weimar Republic as "the first Neo-Liberal state," even though the republic was founded by two Marxist socialist parties (evolutionary, not revolutionary) and Marxist parties collectively averaged the most seats in Weimar parliament until the NSDAP landslide in 1932.
Reminds me of DR people today claiming that we live under "Neo-Liberalism," even though globalists are creating the perfect Fabian technocracy, a managed and planned economy with international government-corporate collusion, are talking about abolishing private property, implementing a one-world currency, etc., and derived all of their social ideologies from Frankfurt School Marxists. It couldn't be more distinct from people like Hayek.
What a retarded movement.
Reminds me of DR people today claiming that we live under "Neo-Liberalism," even though globalists are creating the perfect Fabian technocracy, a managed and planned economy with international government-corporate collusion, are talking about abolishing private property, implementing a one-world currency, etc., and derived all of their social ideologies from Frankfurt School Marxists. It couldn't be more distinct from people like Hayek.
What a retarded movement.
Forwarded from Santa Big Dave 🎄 🎅 (Dave Martel)
I hate the midwit's fetish for accreditation. The illiterates that built that beautiful old building were very likely part of a guild that handed down centuries of transgenerational knowledge.
Knowledge that was demonstrated since childhood and memorized from oral tradition.
Talent and intelligence are hereditary. You can't go to school for a bigger brain despite what quacks like Dr. Leslie Hart have popularized.
Knowledge that was demonstrated since childhood and memorized from oral tradition.
Talent and intelligence are hereditary. You can't go to school for a bigger brain despite what quacks like Dr. Leslie Hart have popularized.
Study: Americans overestimate the size of minority groups and underestimate the size of most majority groups
I wonder why this could be? What a mystery.
https://archive.today/t00ym
Edit, just in case it wasn't immediately obvious: The public's estimations perfectly align with the image of reality that they're presented by the mainstream media. Perfectly natural that people think America is 40% black, 30% Jewish, 20% transgender, etc. because that's what every single media source is telling them every single day.
I wonder why this could be? What a mystery.
https://archive.today/t00ym
Edit, just in case it wasn't immediately obvious: The public's estimations perfectly align with the image of reality that they're presented by the mainstream media. Perfectly natural that people think America is 40% black, 30% Jewish, 20% transgender, etc. because that's what every single media source is telling them every single day.
Facial reconstruction of a Mesolithic European from Serbia, belonging to the Iron Gates Culture (11,000 to 6,000 BC).
Their ancestry was around 75% West European Hunter-Gatherer, 20% East European Hunter-Gatherer, and 5% Early European Farmer.
via: https://twitter.com/nrken19/status/1504545831831191553
Their ancestry was around 75% West European Hunter-Gatherer, 20% East European Hunter-Gatherer, and 5% Early European Farmer.
via: https://twitter.com/nrken19/status/1504545831831191553
Are globalists intentionally causing catabolic collapse in the West?
Step 1:
Artificially inflate African population via unsustainable food "aid" and "charity."
Step 2:
Import millions of Africans into tiny Western countries, causing massive overpopulation.
Step 3:
Discredit naysayers as evil racists who want to starve African children and genocide refugees.
Step 4:
Western civilization is unable to cope with ecologically unsustainable overpopulation and thus collapses.
Step 5:
Massive depopulation is caused by societal collapse, starvation, civil war, etc.
Step 1:
Artificially inflate African population via unsustainable food "aid" and "charity."
Step 2:
Import millions of Africans into tiny Western countries, causing massive overpopulation.
Step 3:
Discredit naysayers as evil racists who want to starve African children and genocide refugees.
Step 4:
Western civilization is unable to cope with ecologically unsustainable overpopulation and thus collapses.
Step 5:
Massive depopulation is caused by societal collapse, starvation, civil war, etc.
lol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Bonding_and_Nurture_Kinship
Translation: Leftist "cultural anthropologists" from Columbia University and Franz Boas' American Anthropological Association have spent decades claiming that genetic relatedness has nothing to do with human kinship; actual scientists (biologists, etc.) do not buy the bullshit.
Edit: Max Holland is a disgusting anti-White Libtard btw
Translation: Leftist "cultural anthropologists" from Columbia University and Franz Boas' American Anthropological Association have spent decades claiming that genetic relatedness has nothing to do with human kinship; actual scientists (biologists, etc.) do not buy the bullshit.
Edit: Max Holland is a disgusting anti-White Libtard btw
"The Leftist Personality"
I wonder if there is a modern equivalent to The Authoritarian Personality (by Frankfurt School's Adorno & co), but for Leftists? The Authoritarian Personality used a minuscule sample size and was based on Freudo-Marxist gibberish, but we have a lot of actual data and real studies on Leftist psychology at this point. It would be good if somebody compiled it all into one single study or literature review — The Authoritarian Personality influences Leftist arguments to this day.
I know there are a few examples of stuff like this already but I don't know any that are contemporary, exclusively dedicated to the subject, and backed up with lots of data:
- Analysis of Leftist psychology features throughout the work of Ted Kaczynski (e.g. Technological Slavery 2010)
- Francisco Franco's military studied the psychology of captured Marxists (Biopsychism of Marxist Fanaticism 1938)
- Nietzsche's analysis of "slave moralists" features throughout his entire bibliography from 1886 onwards
- Rich Houck also makes the case for Leftism-as-mental-illness in Liberalism Unmasked (2018)
Emil Kirkegaard wrote the study Mental illness and the Left in 2020, which did have a big sample size, but it just recorded rates of mental illness vs ideology and didn't have much analysis, other than vaguely suggesting a link between mental illness and attending college.
Maybe something like this hypothetical "The Leftist Personality" already exists but I haven't yet discovered it?
I wonder if there is a modern equivalent to The Authoritarian Personality (by Frankfurt School's Adorno & co), but for Leftists? The Authoritarian Personality used a minuscule sample size and was based on Freudo-Marxist gibberish, but we have a lot of actual data and real studies on Leftist psychology at this point. It would be good if somebody compiled it all into one single study or literature review — The Authoritarian Personality influences Leftist arguments to this day.
I know there are a few examples of stuff like this already but I don't know any that are contemporary, exclusively dedicated to the subject, and backed up with lots of data:
- Analysis of Leftist psychology features throughout the work of Ted Kaczynski (e.g. Technological Slavery 2010)
- Francisco Franco's military studied the psychology of captured Marxists (Biopsychism of Marxist Fanaticism 1938)
- Nietzsche's analysis of "slave moralists" features throughout his entire bibliography from 1886 onwards
- Rich Houck also makes the case for Leftism-as-mental-illness in Liberalism Unmasked (2018)
Emil Kirkegaard wrote the study Mental illness and the Left in 2020, which did have a big sample size, but it just recorded rates of mental illness vs ideology and didn't have much analysis, other than vaguely suggesting a link between mental illness and attending college.
Maybe something like this hypothetical "The Leftist Personality" already exists but I haven't yet discovered it?
Reminder that globalists invented the term "New World Order."
Here are a few examples:
Marx and Engels used the term in their 1845 book The Holy Family, when explaining that Communism is a continuation of French Revolution and that they aimed to overthrow the "old world order" [1].
In 1919, Woodrow Wilson used "new international order" in a speech to congress [2] and "new order of the world" in another speech [3].
H. G. Wells wrote The New World Order in 1940, which became an official doctrinal template for the United Nations [4].
Also in 1940, Arthur Greenwood used the term in an official UK government announcement published via The New York Times [5].
In 1991, the United Nations' James S. Sutterlin used the term in an article published via the Council on Foreign Relation's magazine, Foreign Affairs [6].
Henry Kissinger uses the term constantly, this example is from 1992 [7]. He also wrote a book called World Order in 2014 [8].
Tony Blair used the term in an official government address in 2000 [9].
Here are a few examples:
Marx and Engels used the term in their 1845 book The Holy Family, when explaining that Communism is a continuation of French Revolution and that they aimed to overthrow the "old world order" [1].
In 1919, Woodrow Wilson used "new international order" in a speech to congress [2] and "new order of the world" in another speech [3].
H. G. Wells wrote The New World Order in 1940, which became an official doctrinal template for the United Nations [4].
Also in 1940, Arthur Greenwood used the term in an official UK government announcement published via The New York Times [5].
In 1991, the United Nations' James S. Sutterlin used the term in an article published via the Council on Foreign Relation's magazine, Foreign Affairs [6].
Henry Kissinger uses the term constantly, this example is from 1992 [7]. He also wrote a book called World Order in 2014 [8].
Tony Blair used the term in an official government address in 2000 [9].