Forwarded from Red Ice TV (app banned)
Dutch farmers very angry after politicians' decision to closes dozens of farms and cattle ranches to reduce nitrogen by 30%.
Protests in Holland TL;DR:
The state are reportedly attempting to seize land from farmers so that they can transform the entire Benelux into a giant ChiCom-style urban sprawl "Smart City."
This is explicitly being carried out to meet the United Nations Agenda 21 / 2030 "Sustainable Development Goals" and seems to be part of something called the Tristate City Network. Here's some Tristate guy talking about transforming Netherlands into a megalopolis: https://youtu.be/2m_A9llIVO4
Related: You may want to check out my article called NWO Agenda Explained: COVID, Digital Identity, The Great Reset, Fourth Industrial Revolution, Transhumanism, Agenda 21, etc.
The state are reportedly attempting to seize land from farmers so that they can transform the entire Benelux into a giant ChiCom-style urban sprawl "Smart City."
This is explicitly being carried out to meet the United Nations Agenda 21 / 2030 "Sustainable Development Goals" and seems to be part of something called the Tristate City Network. Here's some Tristate guy talking about transforming Netherlands into a megalopolis: https://youtu.be/2m_A9llIVO4
Related: You may want to check out my article called NWO Agenda Explained: COVID, Digital Identity, The Great Reset, Fourth Industrial Revolution, Transhumanism, Agenda 21, etc.
I've never understood why European women are obsessed with promoting Islamic immigration, since even "moderate" Muslims have socially conservative political opinions that are on par with those of the most "radical" right-wing Whites. (Disregarding gibs and more immigration, that is).
This insane contradiction has gone on for almost a decade now and it's still incomprehensible to me. It can't be as simple as "they're just that self-loathing and anti-White", can it?
This insane contradiction has gone on for almost a decade now and it's still incomprehensible to me. It can't be as simple as "they're just that self-loathing and anti-White", can it?
Forwarded from FM-88 with DJ Rich👾🖤
Some interesting facts about the USA on July 4th:
-states could, and often did, ban whites from marrying blacks until a Supreme Court case in 1967 called Loving v. Virginia. However, it was legal for other mixed race couples to marry, as long as a white was not involved.
-segregation was legal and practiced in housing, businesses, and schools until a series of Supreme Court decisions and federal laws were passed from 1948-1968.
-Madison Grant, an influential attorney who wrote about the biological reality of race, fought for “sanguine purity laws,” which were the bans of whites marrying other races. He was also a driving force behind the 1921 immigration act or the “Emergency Quota Act” that sought to keep the racial makeup of the country a supermajority white.
In 1875, the Supreme Court held that African Americans could NOT be considered citizens of the United States.
In 1896, a Supreme Court case held that a 1/8 black man was too black to be allowed to ride on the white railway cars, suggesting a “one drop” rule be applied to matters of racial segregation.
- two Supreme Court cases in 1901 referred to people from Guam and Puerto Rico as “savages tribes” and “alien races.”
-prior to 1948, racially restrictive Covenants were often in property deeds, allowing only a white person to buy the property. they were so common in a city like Philadelphia in 1900, over 4,000 of the parcels had deeds that limited ownership to whites only.
-the first Congress of the USA passed a law limiting citizenship to whites only, one year BEFORE the bill of rights was passed.
-the very first sentence of the US Constitution, in the preamble, before anything else states the purpose of the country was “to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.”
Posterity means your future descendants.
Taken as a whole, one gets the idea that the USA, from its founding and through most of its legal history, was purposefully exclusionary and limited. That is of course no longer the case. I consider what was accomplished in the first 190 years compared to the last 55 or so, perhaps there was a connection to the legal regime of old and American exceptionalism, and the modern legal regime and America’s increasingly unlivable conditions.
-states could, and often did, ban whites from marrying blacks until a Supreme Court case in 1967 called Loving v. Virginia. However, it was legal for other mixed race couples to marry, as long as a white was not involved.
-segregation was legal and practiced in housing, businesses, and schools until a series of Supreme Court decisions and federal laws were passed from 1948-1968.
-Madison Grant, an influential attorney who wrote about the biological reality of race, fought for “sanguine purity laws,” which were the bans of whites marrying other races. He was also a driving force behind the 1921 immigration act or the “Emergency Quota Act” that sought to keep the racial makeup of the country a supermajority white.
In 1875, the Supreme Court held that African Americans could NOT be considered citizens of the United States.
In 1896, a Supreme Court case held that a 1/8 black man was too black to be allowed to ride on the white railway cars, suggesting a “one drop” rule be applied to matters of racial segregation.
- two Supreme Court cases in 1901 referred to people from Guam and Puerto Rico as “savages tribes” and “alien races.”
-prior to 1948, racially restrictive Covenants were often in property deeds, allowing only a white person to buy the property. they were so common in a city like Philadelphia in 1900, over 4,000 of the parcels had deeds that limited ownership to whites only.
-the first Congress of the USA passed a law limiting citizenship to whites only, one year BEFORE the bill of rights was passed.
-the very first sentence of the US Constitution, in the preamble, before anything else states the purpose of the country was “to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.”
Posterity means your future descendants.
Taken as a whole, one gets the idea that the USA, from its founding and through most of its legal history, was purposefully exclusionary and limited. That is of course no longer the case. I consider what was accomplished in the first 190 years compared to the last 55 or so, perhaps there was a connection to the legal regime of old and American exceptionalism, and the modern legal regime and America’s increasingly unlivable conditions.
The recent United Nations article about world hunger being a good thing is satire btw.
"Ending world hunger" — by which they mean taking lots of resources from the "First World" (White countries) and giving them to the "Third World" (brown countries) — is one of their main objectives.
"Ending world hunger" — by which they mean taking lots of resources from the "First World" (White countries) and giving them to the "Third World" (brown countries) — is one of their main objectives.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dutch farmers spraying shit on government buildings in protest of Agenda 21 bullshit (see here: https://news.1rj.ru/str/thuletide/3151)
Sad to hear about the assassination of Shinzo Abe. He was one of the few contemporary heads of state that I respected. He helped repair the Japanese birth rate, refused to accept "refugees" and immigrants, tried to make Japan less reliant on the United States, wanted to revise the cucked Japanese constitution (which written by a Jewish feminist communist after WW2), was a "historical revisionist" and part of the traditionalist nationalist organization Nippon Kaigi.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Shinzo Abe with his supporters shortly before the shooting.