Globalist elite used the astroturfed Civil Rights Revolution to legally enshrine their ideology and abolish nationalism throughout the West. Every problem today is enforced by laws that were enacted near-simultaneously in every White country during the 60s and 70s.
The American Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canadian Human Rights Act of 1977, Australian Racial Discrimination Act of 1975, New Zealand Race Relations Act of 1971, and British Race Relations Act of 1965 all legally enforce multiracialism and the integration of immigrants by banning racial "discrimination."
If a nationalist party took power in any White country, abolishing these laws should be the first priority. They only exist to facilitate anti-White discrimination and ethnic cleansing under the guise of "equality."
(See also: This related short article).
The American Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canadian Human Rights Act of 1977, Australian Racial Discrimination Act of 1975, New Zealand Race Relations Act of 1971, and British Race Relations Act of 1965 all legally enforce multiracialism and the integration of immigrants by banning racial "discrimination."
If a nationalist party took power in any White country, abolishing these laws should be the first priority. They only exist to facilitate anti-White discrimination and ethnic cleansing under the guise of "equality."
(See also: This related short article).
People called me a schizo for pointing out that the "Dissident Right" was infested with this KGB spook's ideological subversion, but now even Kevin MacDonald is sucking his dick!
This anti-White Soviet goblin openly announced that he was going to subvert the West to advance Eurasianism decades ago, and Western nationalists just welcomed him with open arms. Frankly, "Our guys" are so retarded that we deserve to lose to ZOG.
This anti-White Soviet goblin openly announced that he was going to subvert the West to advance Eurasianism decades ago, and Western nationalists just welcomed him with open arms. Frankly, "Our guys" are so retarded that we deserve to lose to ZOG.
Every single time.
https://www.weforum.org/search?query=anika+molesworth
The climate "crisis" is as fake and gay as the refugee "crisis" or the food shortage "crisis"
https://www.weforum.org/search?query=anika+molesworth
The climate "crisis" is as fake and gay as the refugee "crisis" or the food shortage "crisis"
The UK prime minister race is a good example of how globalists control the Overton Window: The Left plays offense while the controlled opposition pseudo-Right plays defense.
Leftists propose some insane policy, like teaching gender ideology to toddlers. Then, the pseudo-Right declares that "the Left has gone too far this time!" and swoops in to save the day by proposing a diluted version of the exact same policy: Teaching gender ideology to kids is fine as long as they are over ten-years-old.
Both sides embrace the core tenants of globalism that were legally enshrined during the Civil Rights Revolution (immigration, multiracialism, equality, LGBT, feminism, etc). They only disagree on how forcefully these ideals should be imposed, so the "progress" never ends.
In this case, the "anti-woke" trojan horse is used to trick Right-Wing Britons into embracing their own ethnic displacement and humiliation by foreign minority rule.
Leftists propose some insane policy, like teaching gender ideology to toddlers. Then, the pseudo-Right declares that "the Left has gone too far this time!" and swoops in to save the day by proposing a diluted version of the exact same policy: Teaching gender ideology to kids is fine as long as they are over ten-years-old.
Both sides embrace the core tenants of globalism that were legally enshrined during the Civil Rights Revolution (immigration, multiracialism, equality, LGBT, feminism, etc). They only disagree on how forcefully these ideals should be imposed, so the "progress" never ends.
In this case, the "anti-woke" trojan horse is used to trick Right-Wing Britons into embracing their own ethnic displacement and humiliation by foreign minority rule.
There's still hope for European countries to stop the decline before they reach terminal Brazilification, like the United States.
But the only way that Europe will survive is through zero immigration and mass deportation. If this does not happen soon, European countries will collapse under the weight of inter-ethnic conflict, crime, anti-White terrorism, and severe IQ decline.
The IQ decline alone will inevitably cause civilizational collapse. The West's complex technological, governmental, and economic systems cannot be maintained by people who are so unintelligent that they would have been legally classified as "mentally retarded" before the Civil Rights Revolution.
But the only way that Europe will survive is through zero immigration and mass deportation. If this does not happen soon, European countries will collapse under the weight of inter-ethnic conflict, crime, anti-White terrorism, and severe IQ decline.
The IQ decline alone will inevitably cause civilizational collapse. The West's complex technological, governmental, and economic systems cannot be maintained by people who are so unintelligent that they would have been legally classified as "mentally retarded" before the Civil Rights Revolution.
Forwarded from Endeavour
COVID is (mostly) over in the same sense that WWII was over by 1946. The war had ended, but the world that emerged in the aftermath had profoundly changed.
The post-COVID world is ruled by a far more aggressive form of globalist governance. COVID shifted the Overton Window to such a degree that almost anything in the name of "sustainable development" is now possible including deliberately distrupting global food supplies.
Afterall, if it's been established that locking people in their homes for a year is worth it to stop a virus with less than a 1% fatality rate, what can't be done to stop the supposed world-ending threat of climate change?
The Dutch government's attack on their country's farming sector is one of many examples of this to emerge recently. I fear it's a sign of worse things to come.
The post-COVID world is ruled by a far more aggressive form of globalist governance. COVID shifted the Overton Window to such a degree that almost anything in the name of "sustainable development" is now possible including deliberately distrupting global food supplies.
Afterall, if it's been established that locking people in their homes for a year is worth it to stop a virus with less than a 1% fatality rate, what can't be done to stop the supposed world-ending threat of climate change?
The Dutch government's attack on their country's farming sector is one of many examples of this to emerge recently. I fear it's a sign of worse things to come.
"The United States" (FDR's Communist government) planned to declare war on Japan long before Pearl Harbor because they needed to protect the USSR's eastern flank. However, due to the calamity of WW1, Americans strongly supported US neutrality in WW2.
To provoke war, the FDR regime cut off trade with the Japanese, who were almost entirely reliant on US oil, while supplying China and the USSR (two of Japan's main enemies).
This intentionally forced the Japanese to expand into Southeast Asia and take oil from American and European colonial territories (particularly the Dutch East Indies).
The FDR regime decoded Japanese messages stating that an attack would take place on the 6th-7th December but, for "some reason," they didn't tell the US military about it. Then they acted all surprised when Pearl Harbor happened.
Also, during 1940-1941, the FDR regime planned to firebomb Japan from China. This was approved July 1941, months before Pearl Harbor.
The Japanese had two plans for WW2: Hokushin-ron and Nanshin-ron, northward expansion and southward expansion. Attack the USSR via Manchuria or European territories in Southeast Asia.
Northward expansion had most support within the Japanese army, as many leaders believed that Communism was Japan's main enemy. Southward expansion had more support within the Japanese navy, who saw America as their primary threat. This plan was more risky, as it would result in conflict with major European powers.
Check out the book by Back Door to War by Charles Tansill for a more in depth explanation, with sources and stuff.
To provoke war, the FDR regime cut off trade with the Japanese, who were almost entirely reliant on US oil, while supplying China and the USSR (two of Japan's main enemies).
This intentionally forced the Japanese to expand into Southeast Asia and take oil from American and European colonial territories (particularly the Dutch East Indies).
The FDR regime decoded Japanese messages stating that an attack would take place on the 6th-7th December but, for "some reason," they didn't tell the US military about it. Then they acted all surprised when Pearl Harbor happened.
Also, during 1940-1941, the FDR regime planned to firebomb Japan from China. This was approved July 1941, months before Pearl Harbor.
The Japanese had two plans for WW2: Hokushin-ron and Nanshin-ron, northward expansion and southward expansion. Attack the USSR via Manchuria or European territories in Southeast Asia.
Northward expansion had most support within the Japanese army, as many leaders believed that Communism was Japan's main enemy. Southward expansion had more support within the Japanese navy, who saw America as their primary threat. This plan was more risky, as it would result in conflict with major European powers.
Check out the book by Back Door to War by Charles Tansill for a more in depth explanation, with sources and stuff.
Forwarded from Millennial Woes
The Dutch government want to reduce the NL farming sector by 30%. The UK government is paying farmers to retire. Sanctions against Russia are going to deprive us of their food exports as well. Meantime, due to being actively encouraged, mass immigration continues apace.
There is going to be a massive food shortage in the West, entirely avoidable but created by deliberate policy. "They" clearly want to redesign society. This is now obvious. If you find it outlandish and unlikely, just look at the policies being enacted and I think you will conclude there is only one interpretation: they are consciously destroying our food supply.
The only question is what they intend to replace it with.
Clearly they want to streamline the economy. This means eliminating small producers and small retailers. The covid lockdowns got rid of a great number of small businesses, clearing the way for global corporations to expand into those nooks and crannies.
Farmers are small producers. Like the Canadian truckers, they are freelance workers and therefore a hazard to the system, because they can act independently of "the power" and even outright oppose it. In the future to come, they might be replaced by workers who maintain farmland owned and operated by global corporations - workers who have no autonomy and can easily be replaced if they defy "policy" in even the tiniest way.
Or, maybe "they" don't intend to replace the production of food as we know it, and instead want to do exactly what they've been signalling: force us to eat bugs and synthetic meat.
Bill Gates paid $600m and redesigned the economy of an entire country. Of course he isn't operating alone. Of course he is acting in concert with other powers (the WEF, the WHO, etc.). But we have to accept that the billionaire oligarch is not an absurd archetype of fiction, but an absurd archetype of the real world.
There comes a point when you also have to accept that 2020 was not a chaotic accident, but deliberate, orchestrated theatre. It was not a blip, but a foreshadowing.
There is going to be a massive food shortage in the West, entirely avoidable but created by deliberate policy. "They" clearly want to redesign society. This is now obvious. If you find it outlandish and unlikely, just look at the policies being enacted and I think you will conclude there is only one interpretation: they are consciously destroying our food supply.
The only question is what they intend to replace it with.
Clearly they want to streamline the economy. This means eliminating small producers and small retailers. The covid lockdowns got rid of a great number of small businesses, clearing the way for global corporations to expand into those nooks and crannies.
Farmers are small producers. Like the Canadian truckers, they are freelance workers and therefore a hazard to the system, because they can act independently of "the power" and even outright oppose it. In the future to come, they might be replaced by workers who maintain farmland owned and operated by global corporations - workers who have no autonomy and can easily be replaced if they defy "policy" in even the tiniest way.
Or, maybe "they" don't intend to replace the production of food as we know it, and instead want to do exactly what they've been signalling: force us to eat bugs and synthetic meat.
Bill Gates paid $600m and redesigned the economy of an entire country. Of course he isn't operating alone. Of course he is acting in concert with other powers (the WEF, the WHO, etc.). But we have to accept that the billionaire oligarch is not an absurd archetype of fiction, but an absurd archetype of the real world.
There comes a point when you also have to accept that 2020 was not a chaotic accident, but deliberate, orchestrated theatre. It was not a blip, but a foreshadowing.
Hungary sued by the EU for passing anti-grooming laws:
>In June 2021, Hungary’s parliament passed a law banning content that could be considered to “promote homosexuality and gender change”.
>The law applies to any content seen by people under 18.
>The content in question includes: School materials, Children's books, Television shows
>Only groups officially approved by the Government would be able to teach sex education.
>The EU Commission says the law infringes many EU rules, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
https://twitter.com/Openly/status/1547901844801724416
>In June 2021, Hungary’s parliament passed a law banning content that could be considered to “promote homosexuality and gender change”.
>The law applies to any content seen by people under 18.
>The content in question includes: School materials, Children's books, Television shows
>Only groups officially approved by the Government would be able to teach sex education.
>The EU Commission says the law infringes many EU rules, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
https://twitter.com/Openly/status/1547901844801724416
"FDR wasn't a real Communist because didn't abolish private property. He just filled his administration with masses of Communists, enacted Communist policies via the New Deal, dragged America into WW2 specifically to defend the USSR, and wanted to create a one-world government. Read Das Kapital you ignorant pleb."
btw the post above (https://news.1rj.ru/str/thuletide/3192) is in response to this message (https://news.1rj.ru/str/c/1289624618/236911) someone sent me. Usually, I just ignore these things but I see this dumb shit pretty often from Right-Wingers, so thought it was worth responding to.
Firstly, Orthodox Marxists are so retarded that they think an ideology from 150+ years ago (which was already completely retarded in its own era) is applicable today. They claim that all post-Marx Communists who updated the ideology for the 20th and 21st Centuries (Marxist-Leninists, Maoists, Western Marxists, etc.) are "not REAL Communists" because they deviated from the teachings of Prophet Marx (PBUH). Orthodox Marxists call them all "fascist revisionists" and so on.
Secondly, if you're letting a Communist tell you what Communism is, you've already lost the game. Communism is, first and foremost, a strategy for social outcasts and pariahs to overthrow an existing order and establish an oppressive dictatorship in its place so they can take power and resources from normal people. All of the ideological gibberish is just window dressing used to justify this revolt of the freaks.
If you're getting bogged down debating their ideological bullshit or letting retarded Communists tell you that peepeepoopoo wasn't REAL Communism, then you're even dumber than they are.
Firstly, Orthodox Marxists are so retarded that they think an ideology from 150+ years ago (which was already completely retarded in its own era) is applicable today. They claim that all post-Marx Communists who updated the ideology for the 20th and 21st Centuries (Marxist-Leninists, Maoists, Western Marxists, etc.) are "not REAL Communists" because they deviated from the teachings of Prophet Marx (PBUH). Orthodox Marxists call them all "fascist revisionists" and so on.
Secondly, if you're letting a Communist tell you what Communism is, you've already lost the game. Communism is, first and foremost, a strategy for social outcasts and pariahs to overthrow an existing order and establish an oppressive dictatorship in its place so they can take power and resources from normal people. All of the ideological gibberish is just window dressing used to justify this revolt of the freaks.
If you're getting bogged down debating their ideological bullshit or letting retarded Communists tell you that peepeepoopoo wasn't REAL Communism, then you're even dumber than they are.
Telegram
Thuletide
"FDR wasn't a real Communist because didn't abolish private property. He just filled his administration with masses of Communists, enacted Communist policies via the New Deal, dragged America into WW2 specifically to defend the USSR, and wanted to create…
Forwarded from Endeavour
A year after the "mass graves" hoax was created, there is still zero evidence that such graves even exist (let alone any context explaining what allegedly happened).
https://thepostmillennial.com/claims-of-unmarked-graves-at-residential-school-challenged-by-archaeological-evidence
https://thepostmillennial.com/claims-of-unmarked-graves-at-residential-school-challenged-by-archaeological-evidence
The Post Millennial
Claims of unmarked graves at residential school challenged by archaeological evidence
Digs in 1998 and 2002 conducted by Simon Fraser University archaeologists also failed to uncover any remains.
The idea that globalists are motivated by "profit" when flooding White countries with Third World immigrants is ridiculous. Most Third World immigrants are a huge net deficit just by welfare usage alone. It costs White countries (i.e. White taxpayers) billions of dollars per year just to keep them afloat.
Brainwashed mid-level bureaucrats might sincerely believe in the globalist vision ("save the browns" and so on), but the people orchestrating the Replacement Migration agenda are transparently motivated by causing as much harm to White people as possible. There's no other explanation as to why someone would intentionally destroy the world's most advanced multicontinental civilization in this way.
Brainwashed mid-level bureaucrats might sincerely believe in the globalist vision ("save the browns" and so on), but the people orchestrating the Replacement Migration agenda are transparently motivated by causing as much harm to White people as possible. There's no other explanation as to why someone would intentionally destroy the world's most advanced multicontinental civilization in this way.