LiveLeak is a horrible crystal ball that lets you preview the West when it's 25% White and the average IQ is around 75
2020: "The Great Replacement is a White nationalist conspiracy theory."
2022: "Actually, we've already replaced you, so just get over it!"
https://twitter.com/AyoCaesar/status/1559096019115294720
Note the abuse of language too:
Biological diversification is when one homogeneous group splits into multiple subgroups that become distinct via divergent evolution. Multiple distinct groups merging into one homogeneous group is the destruction of diversity. In Leftist newspeak, "increasing diversity" just means "decreasing Whiteness."
2022: "Actually, we've already replaced you, so just get over it!"
https://twitter.com/AyoCaesar/status/1559096019115294720
Note the abuse of language too:
Biological diversification is when one homogeneous group splits into multiple subgroups that become distinct via divergent evolution. Multiple distinct groups merging into one homogeneous group is the destruction of diversity. In Leftist newspeak, "increasing diversity" just means "decreasing Whiteness."
btw Ash Sarkar works for George Soros by proxy via Novara Media https://archive.vn/wy947
Made a new Twitter account: "@th_letide"
You can send questions, abuse, etc here: https://twitter.com/th_letide/
Will probably just post the same stuff as telegram/gab tbh
You can send questions, abuse, etc here: https://twitter.com/th_letide/
Will probably just post the same stuff as telegram/gab tbh
Study: Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats
TL;DR:
- Weakly affiliated Democrats had higher natural testosterone levels than strongly affiliated democrats (lower testosterone = more Left-Wing).
- Receiving testosterone treatment made weakly affiliated Democrats more supportive of Republicans (higher testosterone = more Right-Wing).
- The treatment also improved their overall mood.
- "No effects" were found for testosterone treatment in strongly affiliated Democrats (not sure what the study meant by this tbh - maybe that treatment didn't alter political alignment).
Study concludes: "Our findings provide evidence that neuroactive hormones affect political preferences."
Source: https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view
TL;DR:
- Weakly affiliated Democrats had higher natural testosterone levels than strongly affiliated democrats (lower testosterone = more Left-Wing).
- Receiving testosterone treatment made weakly affiliated Democrats more supportive of Republicans (higher testosterone = more Right-Wing).
- The treatment also improved their overall mood.
- "No effects" were found for testosterone treatment in strongly affiliated Democrats (not sure what the study meant by this tbh - maybe that treatment didn't alter political alignment).
Study concludes: "Our findings provide evidence that neuroactive hormones affect political preferences."
Source: https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view
People on telegram often complain that I haven't enabled comments and claim that it's because I'm "scared of getting owned" or deb00nked or whatever.
That's obviously not the case. If you really want to seethe at me then you can easily do it via Twitter, Gab, my blog comment section, etc.
I haven't enabled comments because telegram has a lot of feds, fedposters, and anti-social lunatics (due to its lack of moderation) who would ruin the chat for all of the normal people. Edit: And also potentially get normal people in trouble, some countries e.g. Germany have very harsh laws.
I've seen the state of other comment sections and I don't want to waste my time herding cats. At least Twitter etc does the moderating for me, keeping fedposters at bay.
That's obviously not the case. If you really want to seethe at me then you can easily do it via Twitter, Gab, my blog comment section, etc.
I haven't enabled comments because telegram has a lot of feds, fedposters, and anti-social lunatics (due to its lack of moderation) who would ruin the chat for all of the normal people. Edit: And also potentially get normal people in trouble, some countries e.g. Germany have very harsh laws.
I've seen the state of other comment sections and I don't want to waste my time herding cats. At least Twitter etc does the moderating for me, keeping fedposters at bay.
I would enable telegram comments if it wouldn't become a cesspit because I like talking to people and debating / exchanging ideas.
I especially like reading/answering thoughtful comments that people leave on my blog. So big thanks to anyone who's done that.
(Painting unrelated, found it on my desktop)
I especially like reading/answering thoughtful comments that people leave on my blog. So big thanks to anyone who's done that.
(Painting unrelated, found it on my desktop)
Study: Global food insecurity and famine from reduced crop, marine fishery and livestock production due to climate disruption from nuclear war soot injection
"Atmospheric soot loadings from nuclear weapon detonation would cause disruptions to the Earth’s climate, limiting terrestrial and aquatic food production."
"We estimate more than 2 billion people could die from nuclear war between India and Pakistan, and more than 5 billion could die from a war between the United States and Russia—underlining the importance of global cooperation in preventing nuclear war."
Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-022-00573-0
"Atmospheric soot loadings from nuclear weapon detonation would cause disruptions to the Earth’s climate, limiting terrestrial and aquatic food production."
"We estimate more than 2 billion people could die from nuclear war between India and Pakistan, and more than 5 billion could die from a war between the United States and Russia—underlining the importance of global cooperation in preventing nuclear war."
Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-022-00573-0
Nature
Global food insecurity and famine from reduced crop, marine fishery and livestock production due to climate disruption from nuclear…
Nature Food - Calorie availability and extent of food shortages for each nation are estimated following regional or global nuclear war, including impacts on major crops, livestock and fishery...
Forwarded from Thuletide
The problem with blaming everything on "Liberalism" (e.g. inaccurately calling the New World Order the "Liberal World Order") is that "Liberal" just becomes synonymous with "Western," which makes no sense at all when countries like China are key players in said world order. It's not like they're out here defending property rights, free trade, and freedom of association. It conveniently absolves all of the other countries that are on board with globalist machinations and the push for world government (or "world governance").
Plus, most of the Western elite really don't care about Liberalism all that much, as demonstrated by their responses to COVID, "Climate Change," and so on. They're basically technocratic Socialists, kinda like H. G. Wells and some other Fabians. It's quite obvious that their end goal isn't to create a "Liberal" world but some sort of one world Communist government, modeled on China, combined with transhumanism and weird New Age religion bullshit. They've said this many times. See for example this paper by Robert Muller, "the philosopher of the United Nations" and ex UN Assistant Secretary-General:
Proper Earth Government: A Framework and Ways to Create It (2005)
https://archive.ph/l4RYW
Plus, most of the Western elite really don't care about Liberalism all that much, as demonstrated by their responses to COVID, "Climate Change," and so on. They're basically technocratic Socialists, kinda like H. G. Wells and some other Fabians. It's quite obvious that their end goal isn't to create a "Liberal" world but some sort of one world Communist government, modeled on China, combined with transhumanism and weird New Age religion bullshit. They've said this many times. See for example this paper by Robert Muller, "the philosopher of the United Nations" and ex UN Assistant Secretary-General:
Proper Earth Government: A Framework and Ways to Create It (2005)
https://archive.ph/l4RYW
archive.ph
https://search.archives.un.org/uploads/r/united-nations-archives/5/9/…
archived 4 Apr 2022 18:31:58 UTC
What exactly has your "model" predicted? What even is your "model" anyway? Complaining about the Jews while blaming all of our problems on "Liberal Capitalism" and claiming Xi Jinping, Putin, and their Third World allies will end Globalism?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/keith_woods/3008
https://news.1rj.ru/str/keith_woods/3008
Telegram
Keith Woods
A model is only as good as what you can do with it. When there are competing models for how the world works derived from the same facts the relative predictive power of each system is a reasonable way to evaluate them. I don't see how whether predictions…
The scamdemic was a wake-up call for many on the DR that their previous "model" (worldview) was not entirely accurate — but not entirely wrong, of course.
Multilateral organizations (UN etc.) are clearly more powerful than previously believed, while global leaders are more synchronized, in terms of following a broad agenda (steered by organizations like the WEF). Elites obviously have a more comprehensive plan than orchestrating White genocide just to rule over a mocha-colored serfdom while they do "Neo-Liberal consumerism" ad infinitum.
Many people on the DR have adjusted their worldviews in response to this new information. They have their eyes on the horizon, speculating on elites' long-term plans, how they might impact us in the future, and how we can prepare for potential crises or even exploit them to our advantage.
And then we have the small but vocal minority who dismiss all of the above as schizo conspiritard nonsense. The World Economic Forum is just a PR organization, the United Nations is powerless, Agenda 21 is irrelevant, The Great Reset isn't real, lockdowns were necessary to defeat a deadly virus, vaccines are perfectly safe and saved many lives, digital identities are just "proof of recovery apps," the elite are innocently trying to fix climate change and pollution — the same trustworthy and benevolent elites who are genociding White people worldwide.
Better to speculate and prepare for the worst than to get caught with your pants down. Consider the Great Replacement, for example. Western countries may not turn into South Africa, but we should be prepared for that possibility nonetheless.
Multilateral organizations (UN etc.) are clearly more powerful than previously believed, while global leaders are more synchronized, in terms of following a broad agenda (steered by organizations like the WEF). Elites obviously have a more comprehensive plan than orchestrating White genocide just to rule over a mocha-colored serfdom while they do "Neo-Liberal consumerism" ad infinitum.
Many people on the DR have adjusted their worldviews in response to this new information. They have their eyes on the horizon, speculating on elites' long-term plans, how they might impact us in the future, and how we can prepare for potential crises or even exploit them to our advantage.
And then we have the small but vocal minority who dismiss all of the above as schizo conspiritard nonsense. The World Economic Forum is just a PR organization, the United Nations is powerless, Agenda 21 is irrelevant, The Great Reset isn't real, lockdowns were necessary to defeat a deadly virus, vaccines are perfectly safe and saved many lives, digital identities are just "proof of recovery apps," the elite are innocently trying to fix climate change and pollution — the same trustworthy and benevolent elites who are genociding White people worldwide.
Better to speculate and prepare for the worst than to get caught with your pants down. Consider the Great Replacement, for example. Western countries may not turn into South Africa, but we should be prepared for that possibility nonetheless.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Video: Anglo women tie themselves in knots while attempting to define "woman."
The most telling part of this video is when the girl in the second clip gives a crude but correct answer, implying that "woman" means "biologically female adult human," and then instantly corrects herself by claiming that she is "only joking" and didn't mean to "exclude" anyone (i.e. transgender people).
The girls in this video clearly don't understand or sincerely believe what they're saying but are too scared and confused to admit it. They're walking on eggshells.
The issue here isn't that they're dumb, but that they've been psychologically abused into embracing this insane worldview.
They've been gaslit by the media and educational institutions and are clearly terrified to disagree because they know that they would face potentially life ruining social and legal repercussions. The UK has incredibly harsh and ill-defined "hate speech" laws (much like the USSR).
The most telling part of this video is when the girl in the second clip gives a crude but correct answer, implying that "woman" means "biologically female adult human," and then instantly corrects herself by claiming that she is "only joking" and didn't mean to "exclude" anyone (i.e. transgender people).
The girls in this video clearly don't understand or sincerely believe what they're saying but are too scared and confused to admit it. They're walking on eggshells.
The issue here isn't that they're dumb, but that they've been psychologically abused into embracing this insane worldview.
They've been gaslit by the media and educational institutions and are clearly terrified to disagree because they know that they would face potentially life ruining social and legal repercussions. The UK has incredibly harsh and ill-defined "hate speech" laws (much like the USSR).
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Just saw a video that reminded me of this post from last year: https://news.1rj.ru/str/thuletide/1297
Edit: vid from: https://twitter.com/CCPBotSlayer
Edit: vid from: https://twitter.com/CCPBotSlayer
Left versus right hemispheres: How humans' divided brains impact our worldviews
This is a fascinating interview with Iain McGilchrist, author of the book The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World.
https://youtu.be/f6Vkhov_qx8?t=191
Long video, so here is a summary of the basic concepts:
- All brains dating back to evolutionary prehistory have a divided structure. Each half of the brain produces a different version of the experiential world.
- The left brain provides a detailed theoretical perspective on specific situations, while the right brain allows us to perceive the broad complexity of the world as a whole — the "part versus whole" distinction.
- Simple example: When a bird swoops down from a tree to pluck food from the sidewalk, its left brain targets the food, while its right brain provides situational awareness to protect it from predators.
- The left brain carves reality up into parts and sees a world that is made up of tiny, atomistic fragments that are fixed, decontextualized, and abstract.
- The right brain sees a world that is rich, coherent, interconnected, and constantly evolving and moving. It perceives things that are implicit and between the lines, and acts as our "anchor in reality."
- The left brain perceives animate things as inanimate ("the human body is just a machine"), while the right brain perceives inanimate things as animate ("the sun is a living god").
- Although the right hemisphere is more important for understanding the world as a whole, we need both hemispheres to perceive the world accurately.
- McGilchrist points out that while a complete lack of reason (left brain) can easily lead people to false conclusions, excessive reason leads to abstract thinking with no basis in reality, which produces the same results.
This is a fascinating interview with Iain McGilchrist, author of the book The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World.
https://youtu.be/f6Vkhov_qx8?t=191
Long video, so here is a summary of the basic concepts:
- All brains dating back to evolutionary prehistory have a divided structure. Each half of the brain produces a different version of the experiential world.
- The left brain provides a detailed theoretical perspective on specific situations, while the right brain allows us to perceive the broad complexity of the world as a whole — the "part versus whole" distinction.
- Simple example: When a bird swoops down from a tree to pluck food from the sidewalk, its left brain targets the food, while its right brain provides situational awareness to protect it from predators.
- The left brain carves reality up into parts and sees a world that is made up of tiny, atomistic fragments that are fixed, decontextualized, and abstract.
- The right brain sees a world that is rich, coherent, interconnected, and constantly evolving and moving. It perceives things that are implicit and between the lines, and acts as our "anchor in reality."
- The left brain perceives animate things as inanimate ("the human body is just a machine"), while the right brain perceives inanimate things as animate ("the sun is a living god").
- Although the right hemisphere is more important for understanding the world as a whole, we need both hemispheres to perceive the world accurately.
- McGilchrist points out that while a complete lack of reason (left brain) can easily lead people to false conclusions, excessive reason leads to abstract thinking with no basis in reality, which produces the same results.
YouTube
The Matter with Things | Iain McGilchrist | EP 278
The two hemispheres of the human brain are explicitly different and both incredibly complex. Dr. Iain McGilchrist joins to discuss and explore the science of philosophy, covering everything from our ability to reason to how art can cross cultures.
Dr Iain…
Dr Iain…
Started to use telegram like a blog because I've been too lazy to write and finish articles lately.
Should I post less textwalls on telegram?
Should I post less textwalls on telegram?
Anonymous Poll
34%
Yes
66%
No
Not a fan of "neo-Feudalism" as name for the unfolding global order. We already have the term "Socialism" and what is unfolding today is almost exactly what Socialists from the 1800s to the 20th century have described as their ideal system, especially the Fabians, who were one of the leading forces behind creating the UN and so on.
"Neo-Feudalism" is also another classic New Left term, like "post-colonialism" or "neo-liberalism," which immediately makes it gay. It also does the stereotypical Left-Wing thing of taking problems caused by Leftism (Globalism and Leftism are the same thing) and blaming them on the Right-Wing — "Globalists are evil right-wing reactionaries, they're just like medieval lords and kings!"
Bad rhetoric. People need to think of another term (or just stick to calling it "Globalism").
"Neo-Feudalism" is also another classic New Left term, like "post-colonialism" or "neo-liberalism," which immediately makes it gay. It also does the stereotypical Left-Wing thing of taking problems caused by Leftism (Globalism and Leftism are the same thing) and blaming them on the Right-Wing — "Globalists are evil right-wing reactionaries, they're just like medieval lords and kings!"
Bad rhetoric. People need to think of another term (or just stick to calling it "Globalism").