The British royals are fully on board with the globalist agenda and their legacy will be one of accelerating the total destruction of the UK and the ethnic genocide of its native inhabitants through mass migration, rape, murder, terrorism, etc.

Paradoxically, Leftists — who agree with all of the royals' politics — despise them as vestiges of the Old World Order and European tradition, while Right-Wingers — who the royals have monumentally betrayed — adore them simply because they occupy (and defile) the most longstanding position of traditional political leadership in Britain.

Honestly, I don't think anyone should try to preserve the honor of these traitors but, for Anglos, it's definitely worth defending the institution of monarchy in principle as a part of British tradition, and explaining that Leftists and brown people only hate the royals for what they represent, not what they do. Bad kings should be remembered as such.

You can literally genocide your own people as penance and browns still won't forgive you for being a "racist colonizer"

Tucker: "To this day, Britain claims to have 'won' both of the 20th Century's world wars, but together they destroyed that nation forever. After 'victory' came humiliation."

This whole video is the best possible take any mainstream public figure could have given. 10/10.

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1568034996622970880

The Irish and Scottish have been granted honorary POC status — but only when they can be weaponized to attack another White ethnic group.

They will return to being "oppressive White supremacists" next week when all of the brown people colonizing Ireland and Scotland forget about the Queen.

The problem with the British monarchy is that it does the exact opposite to everything that brown people and libtards think it does.

I guess this is the problem with every governing institution in every Western country, since they're all accused of propagating "systemic Whiteness" when what they really propagate is Gay Third World Communism.

Turns out the problem behind Jackson's water crisis is Brazil-tier corruption, with government officials seemingly trying to embezzle a billion dollars.

https://www.wjtv.com/news/jacksons-water-crisis/jacksons-water-crisis-the-latest-updates/

Edit: lol that photo.... physiognomy check

Edit 2: Some seething about this post, claiming it to be "fake news" because it implies that problems in Jackson are monocausal (corruption rather than incompetence).

Click here for an update with the full Jackson "water crisis" story.

Some seething about this post, claiming it to be "fake news" because it implies that problems in Jackson are monocausal (corruption rather than incompetence).

Here is an update with the full Jackson "water crisis" story:

Late August 2022: Flooding caused Jackson's biggest water plant to break "indefinitely" - the plant was already working on backup pumps and in a state of disrepair.

9/1/2022: Jackson mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba (a Black nationalist Communist) claimed it would take $1B to fix the water plant by fully replacing it (Newsweek).

9/6/2022: Mississippi governor Tate Reeves said it would actually take tens of thousands of dollars to fix, not billions (WAPT).

4/21/2022: Mayor Lumumba blamed the water crisis on "racism" (Mississippi Today).

9/2/2022: Mainstream media also blames Jackson water crisis on "racist white flight" and systemic White supremacy and so on (e.g. MSNBC, WaPo).

7/22/2021: It turns out that Jackson officials did nothing to fix water problems for years, despite explicit warnings from Environmental Protection Agency officials (Clarion Ledger).

8/30/2022: EPA officials said that they "did not see evidence of any efforts to recruit" qualified water operators by Jackson city (Mississippi Free Press).

9/1/2022: EPA and army engineers, who were sent to Jackson after the flood, got the plant up & running "overnight" (JacksonMS.gov).

9/5/2022: Normal water pressure was restored to most of Jackson (CBS).

Looks like opportunist corruption to me. Officials did nothing to fix a problem for years until it reached crisis point, then they cried "racism" and tried to grift an inordinate amount of free money from the government.

As demonstrated by the entire Third World (and places like Flint Michigan), corruption and incompetency usually go hand-in-hand.

Anyway, I guess you could say that the "fake news" part of my OP is that the plant was working fine (it was working but not fine, since it was neglected) and that the corruption is all because of that one ugly woman in the picture. I got it from this Tweet that was RT'd by some of my friends (usually I post source to Tweet but forgot this time).

It's ironic that BAP said "This conflict is the rock on which much of the Euro right broke itself. Just total confusion and identification with the enemy," since that describes him perfectly.

Russia is also controlled by our enemies, wants the Africanization of Europe, and is implementing the same Agenda 21 technocracy as our countries. So, what's the point of picking sides in this ZOGwar?

His rhetoric is identical to Commie Third Worldists and retarded accelerationists. It makes no sense at all.

>NATO countries lose control of random a geostrategic country halfway across the world.
> ???
>Total Aryan victory in the West.

How does it work? People said this shit about Afghanistan too. What difference did that make to our domestic situation? None whatsoever.

It's just thinly veiled Xenophilia and anti-Westernism. Supporting our enemies abroad, like Putin or Xi Jinping, is no better than supporting our enemies at home. May as well swear allegiance to Soros or Kissinger.

I warned about this rhetoric years ago, long before the Russian invasion of Ukraine. I said that framing Globalism as an agenda of "The West" or "America" (see e.g. "Globalist American Empire"), rather than the rootless transnational conspiracy that it is, would simply lead to mass confusion among Western nationalists, with people cheering for the destruction of their own lands by foreign nations that are fundamentally advancing the same technocratic, Globalist agenda.

It's the most retarded false dichotomy I've ever seen: "Your government is ruled by hostile foreigners, therefore you must support equally hostile foreigners invading, overthrowing, and replacing your government." How about no hostile foreigners, period?

https://news.1rj.ru/str/thuletide/3635

Rootless cosmopolitan Bronze Age Pervert having another Third Worldist meltdown demanding that Putin nukes Europe.

https://twitter.com/KhalkeionGenos/status/1568560845692583939

https://news.1rj.ru/str/PaxTube/3865

Disregarding the reheated NRx nonsense and the fact that I could make near-identical points about Russia:

It doesn't matter if America is currently ZOG prime when there are countless secondary ZOGs dotted around the world and the NWO is a giant sprawling transnational web that would continue to exist even if America disappeared into thin air right now.

What is your point anyway? My only points were that shilling for hostile foreigners is bad and that Globalism is not a uniquely American or Western thing. So, which of those do you disagree with?

9/11 seems like a good day to remind everyone about the Clean Break Memo, written in 1996 for Benjamin Netanyahu by a group of Jewish Neocons led by Richard Perle.

The memo addressed Israel’s national security issues and laid out a new strategy for their Middle Eastern geopolitics, focused on "the principle of preemption" i.e. declaring preemptive war.

They decided that because they couldn’t make peace with their neighbors, they would have to destroy them. To do this, they would cooperate with Jordan and Turkey to "destabilize" their mutual enemies in the Middle East.

Their biggest problems were Syria, Iraq, and Iran.

Syria and Iraq were both Baathist states that could be described as "unfriendly allies," while Iran supported and basically created the military/political organization Hezbollah in Lebanon. Hezbollah was specifically founded to fight against Israel and it’s also supported by Syria.

First, they would take out Iraq to cause geopolitical instability throughout the Middle East and weaken/destabilize Syria to their north. Then they would take out or destabilize Iran to get rid of Hezbollah.

They planned to use propaganda about "weapons of mass destruction" to drum up international fear of their enemies and would attempt to win over Americans with claims of "shared Western values," which would allow them to weaponize the US when necessary.

If this sounds familiar, that’s because the people who wrote the Clean Break memo ended up working for the Bush administration in the Department of Defense. Immediately after 9/11, it was these Jewish Neocons who were pushing for the invasion of Iraq — which had no connection to 9/11.

To resolve that problem, they founded an organization Office of Special Plans in 2002. It was so corrupt even the CIA called it a "threat to world peace and American national security." According to a Pentagon advisor, the OSP was specifically created to "find” (fabricate) evidence that these Jewish Neocons "wanted to be true" — evidence that Saddam Hussein was linked to Al Qaeda and that Iraq had a giant horde of "weapons of mass destruction" that threatened the entire region and the United States.

None of this is a secret or an "anti-Semitic conspiracy theory." Even the Israeli newspaper Haaretz wrote in 2003 that "The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history."

Then, after Iraq was taken out, suddenly there's a civil war in Syria — just as planned! And guess who we find there? None other than the US State Department and British Foreign Office bankrolling the initial anti-government rebels back in 2011/2012.

Again, our greatest ally, Haaretz, published a slew of excellent articles, including:
- "U.S. Jewish Groups Call on Congress to Approve Use of Force Against Syrias Assad"
- "AIPAC to Deploy Hundreds of Lobbyists to Push for Syria Action"
- "Donald Trump Wants Out of Syria. Israel Thinks That’s a Problem"

A couple of years later, ISIS appears and starts attacking all of Israel's enemies in the region, but suspiciously ignores Israel itself — they even apologized for accidentally attacking the IDF!

It's incredible how closely American foreign policy and Middle Eastern geopolitics have followed the Clean Break Memo since it was published in 1996.

Remember this self-naming redpill video that AIPAC made?

"For 60 years we've advanced the US-Israel relationship by lobbying every American leader no matter the political party — It's the policy, not the party"

https://twitter.com/AIPAC/status/1187721114983849990

Blackwashing intensifies

Days apart in London UK, ~40% White city

https://twitter.com/NigeNationalism/status/1568626025658982400

BLM protesting because a rapper was shot dead by UK cops (apparently they do shoot people sometimes). Info here:

https://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1568997868375101440