NEW - Philip Zelikow, Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission to chair the COVID Commission Planning Group.

https://www.disclose.tv/t/executive-director-of-the-9-11-commission-to-chair-the-covid-commission-planning-group/30080

@disclosetv @disclosetv_chat

Beags reached normie MAGA Twitter with a hall of fame Frogwave tweet https://twitter.com/HarmlessYardDog/status/1385935233762140163

Build Back Better is an old phrase/policy invented by the United Nations.

As far as I know, it was first used by organizations like GFDRR (founded by the UN's World Bank) and UNICEF after a tsunami in 2004, but it was probably invented by one of UN's scheming marketer suits.

In brief, "Build Back Better" is a strategy for Globalist elites to use disasters (natural or otherwise) as an excuse to expand their influence over societies by building and controlling infrastructure, while passing it off as harmless no-strings-attached rebuilds to add extra Resilience™.

The BBB strategies also include the stereotypical Globalist bullshit about promoting "fairness" and "equality."

People greatly underestimate the influence and power of the United Nations. It's literally *the* world government. Their policy "recommendations" have defined the political landscape of the Postwar West.

I like TF and this is not a personal attack on him -- I know his rhetoric is influenced by people like Keith Woods and Eric Striker, both of whom are open socialists that continually run cover for the crimes and influence of Communists/Socialists.

The most immediate problem with labeling Globalism "(Neo)-Liberal Capitalism" is that Globalism is, fundamentally, not a Liberal endeavor.

The aim of globalists is to establish a totalitarian world government that overtly supplants nation-states, abolishes private property, and micromanages every human down to the biological level, in order to design a new form of man -- as they have openly stated on numerous occasions via schemes like Agenda 21, Digital Identity (ID2020), and so on.

Globalists have already established a highly centralized, all-encompassing, technocratic world-system by way of corporate monopolization, and the World Economic Forum had the following to say regarding the life of the masses within the next decade:

"Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my city - or should I say, "our city". I don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or any clothes. It might seem odd to you, but it makes perfect sense for us in this city. Everything you considered a product, has now become a service. We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much."
- World Economic Forum (https://archive.vn/UZwnr)

Does this sound like Liberalism in practice or Communism/Socialism in practice? I would argue that 'Technocratic Global Communism' or 'Cyber-Communism' are far more accurate denoscriptors than "Neo-Liberal Capitalism."

Neo-Liberalism (the economic theory in practice, not the meaningless "everything I dislike is Neo-Liberalism" definition) was a passing phase in the Globalist scheme. The end game of Globalism is not and has never been the creation of a "Neo-Liberal" world. Even the highly influential 'Silicon Valley Ideology' -- radical, Ayn-Rand-inspired Libertarianism, combined with techno-utopianism that aimed to transcend capitalism -- was a dialectical step towards Cyber-Communism. Marx himself believed that Communism would emerge via technological advances in the means of production.

Aside from "Democracy" (a corrupt scam that allows international criminals to plunder nations and control them from the shadows), Globalist elites rarely promote values that align with Liberal states of the past; freedom (incl. of speech), limited government, equality before the law, individual rights, free enterprise, property rights, and so on. Whenever these values are promoted, they are selectively applied to the various "oppressed classes" of the West (i.e. everyone who is not a straight White male).

However, Globalists constantly promote anti-White/anti-family Western Marxism (branded as "Critical Theory"), Fabian-Socialist-inspired utopian transhumanism (especially true of the UN with Agenda 21, etc.), the degenerate antinomianism as pioneered by Kabbalists like Shabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank, among other things. All of this garbage was pioneered in Socialist/Communist societies of the past, while contemporary Liberal Western societies were heinously "bigoted" and "regressive." Don't forget that Weimar Germany was a Socialist state and that the SPD were founding members of the Second International.

It should also be noted that Socialism is not simply "when the government does stuff" but an ideology that was borne of the same circles as 1800s occultism. Socialism aims for the total restructuring of the human race on a biological and metaphysical level, manifesting the World To Come and creating a "Heaven on Earth." Dugin, of whom I am not a fan, has very correctly identified Socialism/Communism as a form of Kabbalistic mysticism.

Early Socialism was near inseparable from occultism. The French Kabbalist, Éliphas Lévi, renowned for his illustration of Baphomet and regarded as the founder of occultism, was one of the most influential socialists in France. Stanislas de Guaïta, who drew the original goat pentagram and founded the Kabbalistic Order of the Rosicrucian (Order of the Rose and Cross), was heavily inspired by Lévi. In turn, Hegel, ideological the father of Marx, was greatly influenced by Kabbalistic occultism, particularly Rosicrucianism (https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/en/magee.htm, https://archive.vn/Nhscy). Marx himself was descended from a long lineage of Rabbis, on both sides of his family, and a direct descended of the Biblical House of David. Occultists, such as the Theosophists, pioneered Fabian Socialism via the Fellowship of the New Life and gave birth to UNESCO's theories on "education" via the New Educational Fellowship. Julian Huxley, a Fabian Socialist and the founder of UNESCO, invented the term 'transhumanism,' while "Human Development" is a core ideology of the United Nations.

This is not to defend the useless ideology of Liberalism, which leaves societies wide open and vulnerable to subversion from Leftists and foreign fifth columns, but to clarify the nature of Globalism. Larry McDonald was close when he said:

"the drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control."

This is also not to say that Liberalism itself was not heavily influenced by the same occult forces (https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/01/23/george-washington-on-the-illuminatis-infiltration-of-european-freemasonry/).

Nevertheless, the influence of Socialism/Communism (and thus Semitic, Kabbalistic messianism) on modern Globalism simply cannot be denied. The fact that the elite does not fly the hammers and sickle or that they do not brand the United Nations as an overtly Communist organization is completely irrelevant.

Perhaps you could call the ideology of Globalism 'global social democracy' but I would argue that obfuscates their end goal of establishing global technocratic Communism/Socialism, which in turn is a mask for an occult global oligarchy, dominated by one ethnic group in particular.

P.S. Regarding Freemasons: They were instrumental in establishing the New World Order (e.g. Churchill & Roosevelt), with the upper ranks of Masonry functioning as a covert Council on Foreign Relations type organization. They are Kabbalistic Noahides and their order is focused on reconstructing the Temple of Solomon, which will be the future throne room of the New World Order (or 'United Nations').

Retarded “muh Communists” conspiracy theories make nationalists look as dumb as the “it’s the Masons” types. There are no Communists, there is no Communist conspiracy, Communism lost because it was too open in its exercise of power. What you’re mad at and what actually exists is Liberal Capitalism. It’s the extreme of left wing liberal social values and by the nature of it’s plutocratic structure “right wing” economic doctrine in the most rapacious form of capitalism and worker exploitation the world has ever known.

Who rises to the top in this anti-nationalist, extreme socially liberal society? It is a plutocratic class that’s essentially Jewish. This is why their power seems to magically cross borders and be everywhere and nowhere at once.

Only a strong state that can put the kibosh on the unchecked power of international finance and media can challenge it, hence why the Italians and Germans came up with Fascism, and the most unlikely alliance in history of Liberal capitalism and Bolshevik Communism joined forces to destroy them for it.

Smh It divided my response into two posts. It begins after the Guardian article I linked.

Vaccine Passports:
How people think they will work vs how they will actually work

10/10 short vid to download and share with normies

(not my OC btw - https://www.instagram.com/p/CNz8h53ndf4/)

>3k subs
Nice. As usual TY to everyone who shares my posts

“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
― C. S. Lewis

Pure coincidence

Pornhub owner's $19mil mansion was burned down in an arson attack. Terrible, awful, can't believe it happened.

"In much of the Western world, in stark contrast, barbarism has been normalized. It is considered simply obvious that cities have ‘bad areas’ that are not merely impoverished, but lethally menacing to outsiders and residents alike. Visitors are warned to stay away, whilst locals do their best to transform their homes into fortresses, avoid venturing onto the streets after dark, and – especially if young and male — turn to criminal gangs for protection, which further degrades the security of everybody else. Predators control public space, parks are death traps, aggressive menace is celebrated as ‘attitude’, property acquisition is for mugs (or muggers), educational aspiration is ridiculed, and non-criminal business activity is despised as a violation of cultural norms. Every significant mechanism of socio-cultural pressure, from interpreted heritage and peer influences to political rhetoric and economic incentives, is aligned to the deepening of complacent depravity and the ruthless extirpation of every impulse to self-improvement. Quite clearly, these are places where civilization has fundamentally collapsed, and a society that includes them has to some substantial extent failed.

"Within the most influential countries of the English-speaking world, the disintegration of urban civilization has profoundly shaped the structure and development of cities. In many cases, the ‘natural’ (one might now say ‘Asian’) pattern, in which intensive urbanization and corresponding real estate values are greatest in the downtown core, has been shattered, or at least deeply deformed. Social disintegration of the urban center has driven an exodus of the (even moderately) prosperous to suburban and exurban refuges, producing a grotesque and historically unprecedented pattern of ‘donut’-style development, with cities tolerating – or merely accommodating themselves to – ruined and rotting interiors, where sane people fear to tread. ‘Inner city’ has come to mean almost exactly the opposite of what an undistorted course of urban development would produce. This is the geographical expression of a Western – and especially American – social problem that is at once basically unmentionable and visible from outer space."

— Nick Land

Conservatives suck

@thewurzelroot