Globalists are desperate to "vaccinate" the youth.
They're foaming at the mouth like rabid dogs because young people don't want to take the experimental gene-modification injection. Psychotic people.
The so-called "vaccines" are far more likely to kill young people or leave them permanently crippled than "COVID19" is.
Healthy people under the age of 60 are more likely to die from radiation poisoning than "COVID19" (seasonal flu) — a 0.007% chance.
They're foaming at the mouth like rabid dogs because young people don't want to take the experimental gene-modification injection. Psychotic people.
The so-called "vaccines" are far more likely to kill young people or leave them permanently crippled than "COVID19" is.
Healthy people under the age of 60 are more likely to die from radiation poisoning than "COVID19" (seasonal flu) — a 0.007% chance.
Forwarded from Nicholas J. Fuentes
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Thank you for the shoutout Tucker!
Foundations of the Temple of Jupiter at Heliopolis, largest megalith in the world.
Pfizer's experimental gene-editing mystery potion is causing heart failure (via myocarditis), specifically in young people, and specifically after the second dose.
Remember: You aren't allowed to sue Pfizer if their experimental injections fuck you up
"You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe Covid vaccine side effects. The government likely won’t compensate you for damages either" - https://archive.vn/sQs4R
Remember: You aren't allowed to sue Pfizer if their experimental injections fuck you up
"You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe Covid vaccine side effects. The government likely won’t compensate you for damages either" - https://archive.vn/sQs4R
Poll for subscribers (#1):
Do I post too many telegrams? Would you prefer less posts, but with more effort? (Plz also see poll #2)
Do I post too many telegrams? Would you prefer less posts, but with more effort? (Plz also see poll #2)
Anonymous Poll
8%
Yes, post less (same content)
20%
Yes, post less (more effort content)
21%
No, post more
51%
No, this amount of posts is ok
Poll for subscribers (#2):
What content would you like to see me post more frequently? (Plz also see poll #1)
What content would you like to see me post more frequently? (Plz also see poll #1)
Anonymous Poll
34%
News commentary and general politics stuff
49%
History
58%
Race and genetics
37%
New World Order stuff (past and present)
32%
COVID / Great Reset / Agenda 21 specific stuff
29%
Environmentalism / technology related stuff
22%
Art and nature posts
20%
Quotes from smart people
Telegram OPSEC: Privacy settings should look like image related.
Contacts automatically share phone numbers with each other, even if you set your phone number sharing to 'Nobody.' Be aware of that before you go adding people to your Contacts list.
Also, people who have your phone number IRL can find your telegram account that way. So, if you don't want to be spooked by IRLs popping up out of the blue, then use a fake number (e.g. Google voice).
This app is absolutely retarded when it comes to privacy.
Contacts automatically share phone numbers with each other, even if you set your phone number sharing to 'Nobody.' Be aware of that before you go adding people to your Contacts list.
Also, people who have your phone number IRL can find your telegram account that way. So, if you don't want to be spooked by IRLs popping up out of the blue, then use a fake number (e.g. Google voice).
This app is absolutely retarded when it comes to privacy.
Internet socialist Magi claims that "woke capital" — i.e. corporations being infested with Western Marxist ideology — is a good thing for the Left.
Internet socialist Elizabeth claims that "woke capital" is a bad thing, because corporate elites who tell five year old kids to cut their dicks off aren't actually sincere in their beliefs that five year old kids should cut their dicks off.
One of these women understands politics and the other is Elizabeth Bruenig.
Internet socialist Elizabeth claims that "woke capital" is a bad thing, because corporate elites who tell five year old kids to cut their dicks off aren't actually sincere in their beliefs that five year old kids should cut their dicks off.
One of these women understands politics and the other is Elizabeth Bruenig.
Forwarded from Nicholas J. Fuentes
Wurzelroot is on Good Morning Groyper tomorrow at 12pm cst
Fun fact: The Chinese Communist Party was founded by a Jewish Bolshevik Comintern official named Grigori Naumovich Voitinsky (born Zarkhin)
https://archive.vn/FIupT
https://archive.vn/FIupT
If defending pedophilia and satanism is the hill you want to die on, be my guest.
If you reach a point of political radicalization (retardation) where you think that "DON'T be a satanic nazbol pedophile terrorist" sounds unreasonable, then you are mentally ill. Drop out of politics permanently and spare everyone from your nonsense. Go join a Buddhist commune or something.
The arguments laid out in my article are (https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/04/14/thoughts-on-radicalization-and-deradicalization/):
1. 99.999% of what the Left describes as "Far-Right radicalization" is actually people de-radicalizing from globalist indoctrination, and holding political opinions that everyone regarded as completely sane, normal, and healthy, less than 50 years ago.
2. Leftism/Globalism is objectively the most insane form of radicalization in history; they went from "we just want equality" to "we should be able to forcibly abduct and castrate your kids against your will" in the space of 5 years.
3. A lot of Right-Wing radicalization (actual radicalization) is the work of spooks and feds, and often results in entrapment.
Where is the lie?
Some people on the Right just get a kick out of being labeled as "radical political dissidents." I guess it lives up to their self-image as a misunderstood social pariah or whatever. Either way, it's a very bad anti-social trend in RW politics (though it has now mostly disappeared). It can also be easy for people who would otherwise be quite normal to get sucked into that bullshit.
The arguments laid out in my article are (https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/04/14/thoughts-on-radicalization-and-deradicalization/):
1. 99.999% of what the Left describes as "Far-Right radicalization" is actually people de-radicalizing from globalist indoctrination, and holding political opinions that everyone regarded as completely sane, normal, and healthy, less than 50 years ago.
2. Leftism/Globalism is objectively the most insane form of radicalization in history; they went from "we just want equality" to "we should be able to forcibly abduct and castrate your kids against your will" in the space of 5 years.
3. A lot of Right-Wing radicalization (actual radicalization) is the work of spooks and feds, and often results in entrapment.
Where is the lie?
Some people on the Right just get a kick out of being labeled as "radical political dissidents." I guess it lives up to their self-image as a misunderstood social pariah or whatever. Either way, it's a very bad anti-social trend in RW politics (though it has now mostly disappeared). It can also be easy for people who would otherwise be quite normal to get sucked into that bullshit.
Thuletide
Thoughts on “Radicalization” and “Deradicalization”
~1000 words Deradicalizing the so-called “Far-Right” Leftists are obsessed with the idea of “deradicalizing” the “Far-Right.” They market this operation as a hol…
British government still busy hunting down the 60 UK-based Nazis (yes, sixty), while doing nothing about grooming gangs and the ~25,000 Islamic extremists in the country.
Friendly reminder to any UK followers or anyone who lives under a similarly totalitarian, anti-White regime:
If you have ANYTHING on your hardware or within your residence that could be construed as being "useful for doing terrorism" (or whatever the legal phrasing is) then get rid of it immediately.
This also goes for any satire (memes, articles, whatever) that could be interpreted by pigs or retards in court as non-satirical. See this case from Australia: https://archive.vn/raBZM
The guy in the BBC article was jailed for having a knife fighting manual and Breivik's manifesto.
Possessing such materials is completely pointless. There is no reward and a huge risk. Anything that is actually USEFUL in those books -- practical skills (e.g. fighting), or knowledge and redpills -- can be learned LEGALLY by other means.
Friendly reminder to any UK followers or anyone who lives under a similarly totalitarian, anti-White regime:
If you have ANYTHING on your hardware or within your residence that could be construed as being "useful for doing terrorism" (or whatever the legal phrasing is) then get rid of it immediately.
This also goes for any satire (memes, articles, whatever) that could be interpreted by pigs or retards in court as non-satirical. See this case from Australia: https://archive.vn/raBZM
The guy in the BBC article was jailed for having a knife fighting manual and Breivik's manifesto.
Possessing such materials is completely pointless. There is no reward and a huge risk. Anything that is actually USEFUL in those books -- practical skills (e.g. fighting), or knowledge and redpills -- can be learned LEGALLY by other means.