My friend Jawn offers reasonable criticisms to my post here that I think others may also have. Here are my responses.
Someone on Twitter asked me if foreigners were responsible for the Hart-Celler 1965 Immigration Act.
The answer is: Yes, specifically Jews. This is not an "anti-Semitic conspiracy theory," Jews themselves regularly admit this, as do a plethora of Left-Wing academics and journalists.
The "Celler" in 'Hart-Celler' refers to Emanuel Celler, a descendant of Jewish immigrants who was educated at Columbia University, home of the Frankfurt School: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanuel_Celler#Early_life
The ADL, a Jewish nationalist organization, has gloated that Kennedy wrote his famous "Nation of Immigrants" essay on their behalf (source).
The Jewish Daily Forward admitted in 1965 that the act was a "triumph" of "Jewish groups [fighting] for the reform of immigration policies tenaciously" (source).
A Left-Wing Canadian professor of the University of British Columbia wrote that "lobbying efforts against [race-based immigration acts] was led by a host of Jewish organizations" (source).
The answer is: Yes, specifically Jews. This is not an "anti-Semitic conspiracy theory," Jews themselves regularly admit this, as do a plethora of Left-Wing academics and journalists.
The "Celler" in 'Hart-Celler' refers to Emanuel Celler, a descendant of Jewish immigrants who was educated at Columbia University, home of the Frankfurt School: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanuel_Celler#Early_life
The ADL, a Jewish nationalist organization, has gloated that Kennedy wrote his famous "Nation of Immigrants" essay on their behalf (source).
The Jewish Daily Forward admitted in 1965 that the act was a "triumph" of "Jewish groups [fighting] for the reform of immigration policies tenaciously" (source).
A Left-Wing Canadian professor of the University of British Columbia wrote that "lobbying efforts against [race-based immigration acts] was led by a host of Jewish organizations" (source).
Emil Kirkegaard recently conducted a public poll for "IQ estimates of public intellectuals and personas," which apparently included me.
"The Public" (people on Twitter) estimated that my IQ is 125. It's actually around 132, according to various tests I've done.
I scored 139 on this test that is currently popular on Twitter but I don't think it's very accurate. (Anagrams are impossible to solve when you have dyslexia, it's a miracle I even got 15).
Anyway, "the public" also estimated Richard Spencer and Nick Fuentes as sub-120 IQ (which I find very hard to believe) and Isaac Newton 162.
Conclusion: Most people are bad at estimating IQ.
"The Public" (people on Twitter) estimated that my IQ is 125. It's actually around 132, according to various tests I've done.
I scored 139 on this test that is currently popular on Twitter but I don't think it's very accurate. (Anagrams are impossible to solve when you have dyslexia, it's a miracle I even got 15).
Anyway, "the public" also estimated Richard Spencer and Nick Fuentes as sub-120 IQ (which I find very hard to believe) and Isaac Newton 162.
Conclusion: Most people are bad at estimating IQ.