I still see the fake "Thuletide" dox posted sometimes, so I will remind everyone:
In 2022 I made a throwaway post calling "muscle mommies" (gym girls who take steroids to attain male physiques) a form of proto-transgenderism.
A mentally ill Indian was so offended by this that he spent months joining random RW group chats to spread the rumor that I'm transgender/female and post fake doxes.
In his words: "He called me a homosexual, so I thought I'd prove him a tranny."
I don't even voice dox, why would I post my face?
In 2022 I made a throwaway post calling "muscle mommies" (gym girls who take steroids to attain male physiques) a form of proto-transgenderism.
A mentally ill Indian was so offended by this that he spent months joining random RW group chats to spread the rumor that I'm transgender/female and post fake doxes.
In his words: "He called me a homosexual, so I thought I'd prove him a tranny."
I don't even voice dox, why would I post my face?
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
A new study on Mesolithic France used HIrisPlex-S to predict the skin pigmentation of five WHGs. Two were surprisingly classified as having "pale" to "intermediate" skin (tones common among Europeans today), rather than the usual "dark" to "black" prediction. The infamous Chedder Man study also predicted that Loschbour Man had intermediate (i.e. olive/tanned) skin.
HIrisPlex-S is a flawed model. It doesn't feature MFSD12 alleles, which are the second strongest influence on dark/black skin in modern populations, causing black skin when combined with other skin-darkening alleles. It also misclassifies people with intermediate skin 74% of the time.
Evidence indicates that intermediate-skinned individuals who lack the SLC24A5 and SLC45A2 "pale skin" alleles are always misclassified as dark or black, rather than pale. This can be seen with HIrisPlex-S' predictions for modern Asian populations: Oroqens, Uyghurs, and Southern Chinese are misclassified as ~50% black.
HIrisPlex-S is a flawed model. It doesn't feature MFSD12 alleles, which are the second strongest influence on dark/black skin in modern populations, causing black skin when combined with other skin-darkening alleles. It also misclassifies people with intermediate skin 74% of the time.
Evidence indicates that intermediate-skinned individuals who lack the SLC24A5 and SLC45A2 "pale skin" alleles are always misclassified as dark or black, rather than pale. This can be seen with HIrisPlex-S' predictions for modern Asian populations: Oroqens, Uyghurs, and Southern Chinese are misclassified as ~50% black.
The myth that women in hunter-gatherer societies do as much hunting as men has been debunked.
Source: Woman the Hunter? Female foragers sometimes hunt, yet gendered divisions of labor are real (2024)
Source: Woman the Hunter? Female foragers sometimes hunt, yet gendered divisions of labor are real (2024)
Forwarded from Thuletide
Migration costs the West billions of dollars every year:
Thanks to huge longitudinal studies conducted by the Danish government (2021), Amsterdam University (2023), and Migration Watch UK (2014), we now know the financial damage of importing and supporting non-Western migrants.
The Danish government found that Third World migrants collectively make a net-negative lifetime financial contribution.
All migrants who entered the Netherlands between 1995 and 2019 cost the country €400 billion, mainly due to "redistribution through the welfare state." Only Israel, India, Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan provided an "unequivocal" net-positive contribution via labor migration, but the net benefit of one labor migrant is outweighed by the cost of one family migrant.
Similarly, all migrants who entered the UK between 1995 and 2011 cost the country £148 billion, with migrants from outside the European Economic Area making a significant net-negative financial contribution.
Thanks to huge longitudinal studies conducted by the Danish government (2021), Amsterdam University (2023), and Migration Watch UK (2014), we now know the financial damage of importing and supporting non-Western migrants.
The Danish government found that Third World migrants collectively make a net-negative lifetime financial contribution.
All migrants who entered the Netherlands between 1995 and 2019 cost the country €400 billion, mainly due to "redistribution through the welfare state." Only Israel, India, Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan provided an "unequivocal" net-positive contribution via labor migration, but the net benefit of one labor migrant is outweighed by the cost of one family migrant.
Similarly, all migrants who entered the UK between 1995 and 2011 cost the country £148 billion, with migrants from outside the European Economic Area making a significant net-negative financial contribution.
Forwarded from Thuletide
I've been reading about British hate speech laws:
Communication can be classified as a "hate crime" if it is interpreted to be "intentionally alarming or distressing" and if the victim or anybody else believes that it was motivated by hostility or prejudice based on race, religion, disability, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
The UK has no legal definition of "hostility," so the government uses "the everyday understanding of the word which includes ill-will, spite, contempt, prejudice, unfriendliness, antagonism, resentment and dislike." They also provide no legal definition of "prejudice."
So, it seems the law is intentionally ill-defined and primarily based on the interpretations of the state and feelings of the "victim(s)."
"We interpret [don't have to prove?] that you intended to cause alarm and/or distress with your unfriendly communication, and Victim believes [doesn't have to prove?] that you were motivated by hostility and/or prejudice, therefore you are a hate criminal."
I know the UK is corrupt but this is ridiculous.
People should pay attention to Britain because this is what Leftists want for America. They've been pushing federal "hate speech" laws for decades to no avail. They've had little success in colleges, with "speech codes" getting shot down in court, but some success in work environments by classifying speech as "harassment" and weaponizing the Civil Rights Act.
Communication can be classified as a "hate crime" if it is interpreted to be "intentionally alarming or distressing" and if the victim or anybody else believes that it was motivated by hostility or prejudice based on race, religion, disability, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
The UK has no legal definition of "hostility," so the government uses "the everyday understanding of the word which includes ill-will, spite, contempt, prejudice, unfriendliness, antagonism, resentment and dislike." They also provide no legal definition of "prejudice."
So, it seems the law is intentionally ill-defined and primarily based on the interpretations of the state and feelings of the "victim(s)."
"We interpret [don't have to prove?] that you intended to cause alarm and/or distress with your unfriendly communication, and Victim believes [doesn't have to prove?] that you were motivated by hostility and/or prejudice, therefore you are a hate criminal."
I know the UK is corrupt but this is ridiculous.
People should pay attention to Britain because this is what Leftists want for America. They've been pushing federal "hate speech" laws for decades to no avail. They've had little success in colleges, with "speech codes" getting shot down in court, but some success in work environments by classifying speech as "harassment" and weaponizing the Civil Rights Act.