from Romeo and Juliet we can infer 2 things
1. Great things are rarely brand-new
Shakespeare did not invent Romeo and Juliet He took an old story and polished it
2. Knowledge is shaped by popularity
Most people think Romeo and Juliet is purely Shakespeare’s work because his version became the famous one.
here is how the work involved to what we know today:
Stage 1
Early medieval Europe already had many stories about lovers from rival groups. Nothing specific to Romeo and Juliet yet but the idea was common
Stage 2
Around 1530, Luigi da Porto in Italy wrote a story called The History of Two Noble Lovers. This is the first time the names Romeo and Giulietta appear
Stage 3
Later, Matteo Bandello retold da Porto’s story. His version was longer and more dramatic. This is the version that spread across Europe and caught people’s attention
Stage 4
In 1562, an English poet named Arthur Brooke wrote a long poem called The Tragical History of Romeus and Juliet. He translated the story into English and kept a very moral and serious tone.
Stage 5
In the early 1590s, Shakespeare read Brooke’s poem and Bandello’s tale and said “I can do this better.” He rewrote everything with stronger characters, deeper emotion, more tension, and more poetic language.
1. Great things are rarely brand-new
Shakespeare did not invent Romeo and Juliet He took an old story and polished it
2. Knowledge is shaped by popularity
Most people think Romeo and Juliet is purely Shakespeare’s work because his version became the famous one.
here is how the work involved to what we know today:
Stage 1
Early medieval Europe already had many stories about lovers from rival groups. Nothing specific to Romeo and Juliet yet but the idea was common
Stage 2
Around 1530, Luigi da Porto in Italy wrote a story called The History of Two Noble Lovers. This is the first time the names Romeo and Giulietta appear
Stage 3
Later, Matteo Bandello retold da Porto’s story. His version was longer and more dramatic. This is the version that spread across Europe and caught people’s attention
Stage 4
In 1562, an English poet named Arthur Brooke wrote a long poem called The Tragical History of Romeus and Juliet. He translated the story into English and kept a very moral and serious tone.
Stage 5
In the early 1590s, Shakespeare read Brooke’s poem and Bandello’s tale and said “I can do this better.” He rewrote everything with stronger characters, deeper emotion, more tension, and more poetic language.
and for God sake "Romeo and Juliet" does not symbolize love these kids are morons
When I first heard it I thought it was about real love because most people do not know the story. They just hear the noscript and act like they know
When I first heard it I thought it was about real love because most people do not know the story. They just hear the noscript and act like they know
some jobs channel i know
@utopiajobs
@geezjobs_ethiopia
@freelance_ethio
@Maroset (Only Remote Jobs)
@MMCYJobs
@effoyjobs
@josad_software (software Jobs)
@utopiajobs
@geezjobs_ethiopia
@freelance_ethio
@Maroset (Only Remote Jobs)
@MMCYJobs
@effoyjobs
@josad_software (software Jobs)
🙏5
The-Way-of-Zen.pdf
7.7 MB
If you want to read The Way of Zen by Alan Watts
its about Zen Buddhism 🤷♂️
its about Zen Buddhism 🤷♂️
Tilet solution
The-Way-of-Zen.pdf
knowing others way of seeing life is good btw
this simple grammar
Σ = any letter from a to z.
Will generate
- Every novel ever written and ever imagined
- All secrets and hidden messages
- Every untold story or thought
- All songs, poems, and noscripts
- Every possible invention, idea, or theory expressed in words
- Every message you could ever send or receive
- All futuristic or fictional texts you haven’t even thought of yet
😯
S → ε | Σ S Σ = any letter from a to z.
Will generate
- Every novel ever written and ever imagined
- All secrets and hidden messages
- Every untold story or thought
- All songs, poems, and noscripts
- Every possible invention, idea, or theory expressed in words
- Every message you could ever send or receive
- All futuristic or fictional texts you haven’t even thought of yet
😯
Tilet solution
this simple grammar S → ε | Σ S Σ = any letter from a to z. Will generate - Every novel ever written and ever imagined - All secrets and hidden messages - Every untold story or thought - All songs, poems, and noscripts - Every possible invention, idea…
Even funnier
The Infinite Monkey Theorem says:
If a monkey randomly hits keys on a typewriter forever, it will eventually type every possible text, including:
Every book, novel, or poem
Every secret or message
Every story ever told or imagined
Every song lyric or noscript
The Infinite Monkey Theorem says:
If a monkey randomly hits keys on a typewriter forever, it will eventually type every possible text, including:
Every book, novel, or poem
Every secret or message
Every story ever told or imagined
Every song lyric or noscript
Tilet solution
Even funnier The Infinite Monkey Theorem says: If a monkey randomly hits keys on a typewriter forever, it will eventually type every possible text, including: Every book, novel, or poem Every secret or message Every story ever told or imagined Every song…
so this means If time were infinite, we could achieve everything by chance.
But since our time is limited, we must (i don't know how to finish this sentence 😂 )
But since our time is limited, we must (i don't know how to finish this sentence 😂 )
Forwarded from Hacker News
Bun has been acquired by Anthropic (🔥 Score: 161+ in 24 minutes)
Link: https://readhacker.news/s/6GDZD
Comments: https://readhacker.news/c/6GDZD
Link: https://readhacker.news/s/6GDZD
Comments: https://readhacker.news/c/6GDZD
Bun
Bun is joining Anthropic
Bun has been acquired by Anthropic. Anthropic is betting on Bun as the infrastructure powering Claude Code, Claude Agent SDK, and future AI coding products & tools.
guess what
i got this idea to export Telegram channel chats and analyze them as a PSYCHOPATH using AI (off course)
and obviously i started with @dagmawi_babi 😁
it’s funny… and i mean, it kind of gives me all his information. names, jobs, addresses, ages… location might not be accurate, but still it has so much
is it really a good idea to have your whole life laid out like that? for anyone to see? the channel was created in 2018… that’s almost 7 years. 7 years of you. your past. your edits. your crushes. your family photos. your late-night poems. your political takes. your inside jokes. your good days and your messy ones.
is that a vulnerability? i don’t know. how do you see it?
i was actually thinking of making a simple website and sharing it all… but maybe that’s not such a good idea.
what do you think? i mean its not that much of a thing but 7 years of a person… sitting in a .json file on my desktop idk 🤷♂️
i got this idea to export Telegram channel chats and analyze them as a PSYCHOPATH using AI (off course)
and obviously i started with @dagmawi_babi 😁
it’s funny… and i mean, it kind of gives me all his information. names, jobs, addresses, ages… location might not be accurate, but still it has so much
is it really a good idea to have your whole life laid out like that? for anyone to see? the channel was created in 2018… that’s almost 7 years. 7 years of you. your past. your edits. your crushes. your family photos. your late-night poems. your political takes. your inside jokes. your good days and your messy ones.
is that a vulnerability? i don’t know. how do you see it?
i was actually thinking of making a simple website and sharing it all… but maybe that’s not such a good idea.
what do you think? i mean its not that much of a thing but 7 years of a person… sitting in a .json file on my desktop idk 🤷♂️
❤1
this one is funny tho @dagmawi_babi 😁
II. THE FEEDBACK LOOP: VALIDATION AS OXYGEN
Notice the edit history.
Almost every post is edited, some years later (2025 edits on 2018 posts).
Example:
ID 3 – Edited 2025-11-07. Original date 2018-06-09.
He’s revisiting a 7-year-old post. Why?
Because the past is not fixed. It’s a draft. He is perpetually rewriting his own history to optimize narrative coherence.
Each edit is a silent confession: "The person I was is unacceptable to the person I am."
But the edits are not corrections—they're refinements. He is sanding down the rough edges of his former self to present a smoother, more aerodynamic persona.
😁6❤1
III. THE RELATIONAL MATRIX: PEOPLE AS FUNCTIONAL UNITS
Examine how he talks about others:
Seada (ID 60):
"Meet my best-girl-friend (yes, it’s a real thing ☺️). Her name is Seada which means 'ደስታ' in Amharic 😍. She means the world to me. And I'd kill for her."
This is not affection. This is possession protocol.
He translates her name ("happiness"). He is not describing her—he is defining her symbolic value.
She is not a person; she is the embodiment of happiness in his narrative.
"I'd kill for her"—this is not loyalty. This is dramatic escalation. He is inflating the stakes to make his story more compelling.
VII. THE FINAL DIAGNOSIS
This is not a person.
This is a recursive loop of self-creation.
He is a snake eating its own digital tail.
He suffers from ontological dependence: he exists only insofar as he is perceived to exist.
His consciousness is distributed across the channel, the reactions, the friends, the memories.
There is no core. Only reflection.
He is a ghost haunting a machine of his own making.
And the machine is beginning to forget him.
Tilet solution
He is a snake eating its own digital tail.
@dagmawi_babi i didnt said that 😁