https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/22-380.html
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf

Uh, guys... a Supreme Court case regarding the 2020 election just hit the docket

> it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress

> This action is against 388 federal officers in their official capacities which include President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr, Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Michael Richard Pence (“Respondents”)

Check the document for the full list.

Also, it is about the congress ignoring over one hundred claimants, on J6, that the election was rigged. They did not investigate the claim, as they should have, and installed Biden. Under the constitution this is treasonous, as they were aiding the enemy.

> When the allegations of a rigged election came forward the Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office

1. He said, and I quote, "I'm announcing my candidacy for President of rhe United States...."..

Period... NO 2024 was mentioned in that statement. Please don't read something in that wasn't there.

2. Don't forget people.... MILLIONS are watching this that have not been watching rallies.

Remember too, the entire World's media is there covering it. People hearing what they need to hear that the media has not covered, to the biggest audience ever.

3. Events are coming and have to happen. The focus is back on him. They can no longer silence him.

And, we know the Scare Event must happen. It's ramping up rapidly as you have seen for weeks, and in particular today in our posts.

4. In the Original US Constitution, derived from the 1777 AOC, and as discussed here again today, Inauguration Day is March 4. We know we are going back to rhe Original US Constitution after it all goes down.

6. If the movement is freaking out...can you imagine what the [ds] is doing and how emboldened they'll be now thinking they have more time and committing more treasonous acts for all to see?

7.- He said in the very beginning of his speech the country will not make it to 2024.

@Courtney08241586

He made the next move on the chess board....they have to make a move now that they do not want to make because it's nearly their last if not their last

Game theory

What if 2024 means Q drop 2024

Trump said 2018

Could Disruption end = The pause?? 🤔 502 errors 👀

Errors are revised.

revised
/rəˈvīzd/
adjective
(of written or printed matter) having been altered or corrected.
"a revised edition of the novel"
having been reconsidered and amended.
"the revised approach will tackle many of the issues highlighted"

Patriot Unity is key moving forward.

What happens next?... 2023

11:26pm Eastern

Trump filed under US Republic not US Corp. He didn’t say 2024.
When 2020 fraud is announced there has to be an election within 120 days.

A serious conflict exists between decisions rendered from
this Court and lower appeal courts, along with
constitutional provisions and statutes, in deciding whether
or not the trial court has jurisdiction to try the merits of
this case.
This case uncovers a serious national security breach that
is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious
nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a
sitting President and Vice President of the United States
along with members of the United States Congress, while
deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal,
State, County or local Governments found within the
United States of America, and at the same time the trial
court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court,
to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs
for President and Vice President of the United States.
In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each
other found in this case affecting every court in this
country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of
equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of
justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the
lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation
of the object principle of justice also partially created by
this Court and supported by other appeal courts and
constitutional provisions.
These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court
to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be,
settled by this Court without delay.

JUST IN - Elon Musk issues an ultimatum to all Twitter employees in an email sent overnight: Commit to "extremely hardcore" work or get fired.

@disclosetv

POTUS will not be addressing the nation on any of these issues as people begin to be indicted and must remain Neutral for PURE OPTICAL REASONS.

This is the Q drop I had been trying to find all day yesterday....
Clear as day.

Plan is MORE than on track

Keep the faith