Forwarded from Humanley
Mould doesn't cause disease. Even the leaders in this field like Dr. Rosen and Dr. Shoemaker agree. They know there is a problem in this area, because the scientific evidence conflicts with peoples experiences.
Mould has been blamed as the cause, but no one has ever been able to prove it.
They say it's a very difficult and complicated situation to understand.
The answer is actually very simple and straight forward. The answer is obvious once you look at it from a terrain theory perspective.
They attempt to explain this conundrum away by saying mould related illness must be a combination of exposure to mould, bacteria and viruses. It's clear that this isn't the case either.
Here's my hypothesis. When building material gets wet, it breaks down, releasing more than 50 toxic chemicals in to the air. People breathe in these toxic chemicals and get sick.
Mould is helping clean up the problem. It's not causing the problem.
Follow me on telegram: t.me/humanley
Mould has been blamed as the cause, but no one has ever been able to prove it.
They say it's a very difficult and complicated situation to understand.
The answer is actually very simple and straight forward. The answer is obvious once you look at it from a terrain theory perspective.
They attempt to explain this conundrum away by saying mould related illness must be a combination of exposure to mould, bacteria and viruses. It's clear that this isn't the case either.
Here's my hypothesis. When building material gets wet, it breaks down, releasing more than 50 toxic chemicals in to the air. People breathe in these toxic chemicals and get sick.
Mould is helping clean up the problem. It's not causing the problem.
Follow me on telegram: t.me/humanley