Absolute Defiance: [Public Announcements] – Telegram
Absolute Defiance: [Public Announcements]
247 subscribers
711 photos
252 videos
8 files
965 links
🦁 Email: AbsoluteDefiance@protonmail.com

🦁 Contact: @ft_loose
Download Telegram
Premiering tonight at 9pm, Absolute Defiance:

This is 5th Supreme Court Nullification/Audit of their unconstitutional practice of banning filming in public areas and restricting my movements.

This has been an issue all across the state. I've successfully nullified Manchester, Concord, Brentwood and others. There is no force of law behind the court order which is simply legislation from the bench. From what I understand about when it first came about was because of Free Staters who were filming in court, etc.

Regardless whether you like Free Staters or not, filming and taking pictures is a first amendment protected activity and is up to the individual to know this and speak with their feet.

Thankfully the bailiff did not hit the panic alarm, this time. But he did admit that he's under instruction to hold me up and try trespassing me even though it never works. Pretty sure it was Trooper Provenza who showed up. That's the guy that signed all the Noble 9 arrests. He said that things are being discussed on what they are doing.

I suggested that the order be rescinded, but, if I know the state, they will probably be trying to create an actual law, or amend an existing law in order to criminalize it. I hope they do because I'll 110% get arrested over that in order to challenge it in the courts. #FAFO

After that I went to conduct my business at 4 other locations. There were no issues anywhere else. Just at Concord where a new bailiff started to say something but he was swiftly corrected by the other guys. Additionally, the clerks at Concord, Brentwood and the Supreme Court have been great.

To sum up here, the judge that put out this order needs to rescind this thing and all the signs that say no filming need to go. That's the only viable solution that is in line with the Constitutions.

https://youtu.be/8JGJuys0lxg
Premiering tomorrow night at 9pm we have testimony regarding:

HOUSE BILL 164:

"AN ACT relative to prohibiting towns from criminalizing the right to peacefully and orderly assemble."

SPONSORS: Rep. Hynes, Hills. 2; Rep. T. Lekas, Hills. 38; Rep. Janvrin, Rock. 40; Rep. Phinney, Straf. 9; Rep. Noble, Hills. 2

COMMITTEE: Judiciary
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ANALYSIS:

This bill creates an exemption from the criminal code for orderly and peaceful assembly:

1 New Paragraph; Breaches of the Peace and Related Offenses; Disorderly Conduct. Amend RSA 644:2 by inserting after paragraph VI the following new paragraph:

VII. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it shall not be a crime or violation to peacefully assemble, demonstrate, or protest in a public place in an orderly and peaceful manner. Any municipal ordinance that is contrary to this paragraph shall be void and without effect. In this paragraph, "orderly manner" means not engaging in conduct prohibited under paragraph II(c) or paragraph III of this section.

2 Effective Date. This act shall take effect upon its passage."

https://youtu.be/LrR0R6Oanv4
👀
⚔️🫡⚔️
In 2021, several European countries reported cases of unusual, life-threatening blood clots in the brain, known as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), in people who had received the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Many of these people also had thrombocytopenia, a condition that occurs when there are low platelet levels in the blood. Platelets are blood cells that help the body form clots to stop bleeding. In the United States, a number of cases of CVST and thrombocytopenia were also reported in people who had received the Johnson & Johnson/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine.

https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/blooddisorders/features/cvst-and-covid-vaccine.html
One of the causes for concern among the researchers, physicians, and generally the whole community from the onset of vaccination has been the adverse effects (specifically blood clots) that may be observed after the injection of the COVID-19 vaccine. In some countries, such concerns have even resulted in the temporary or permanent discontinuation or abandonment of the application of some vaccines (especially AstraZeneca and Janssen). By evaluating rigorous studies published on this subject, the present article is aimed at identifying the association between blood clot incidence and COVID-19 vaccination. Various methods for producing the COVID-19 vaccines are analyzed, along with their possible pros and cons as well as common and rare side effects, especially VITT and blood clots. Finally, the differences of various vaccines on thrombotic events, WHO recommendations for VITT treatment, and blood clots statics are discussed.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9055170/
The advent of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccines has raised hopes of an end of the COVID-19 pandemic. As of June 2021, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has now authorised four vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes COVID-191. Of these, two are mRNA vaccines: BNT162b2 mRNA (manufactured by Pfizer-BioNtech, approved on 21 December 2020) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna, 6 January 2021); and two are adenovirus-based vaccines: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford–AstraZeneca, 29 January 2021), from now on ChAdOx1, and Ad.26.COV2.S (Janssen, 11 March 2021). These vaccines have shown a high degree of efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19 in randomised trials (70-95%);2,3,4,5 and an increasing body of real-world evidence shows that they are highly effective in reducing infections, hospitalisations, and deaths6,7. However, concerns have been raised regarding their safety.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-34669-9