The Traditionalist viewpoint as described by Julius Evola is, in a nutshell:

1) Accept that the downward trajectory cannot be stopped or reversed. It must play out.

2) Build yourself up spiritually, become a master of yourself, cultivate non-attachment. Do not allow the happenings of the world to destabilize you.

3) Work to serve Justice and Truth, regardless of whether you win or lose. Fight because it's the right thing to do, because you are the kind of person who cannot do any less, no matter the cost or reward.

This question about what do we DO, practically, always seems to assume a change to be made, an outcome to be achieved. How do we force the external world to shift from point A to point B?

Traditional man doesn't try to figure out how to get to a certain outcome. Traditional man focuses on what he must do to live with honour and integrity, regardless of circumstances. Traditional man is focused on creating the Golden Age within himself because he knows that people with Kali Yuga souls can never manifest a Golden Age.

The only real prenoscription for the malaise is the transcendent quest. But this is not the answer that people attached to outcomes like to hear. First, break the attachment.

This doesn't mean you withdraw from action and let the world burn. But it does mean that your actions are motivated by doing what's right, not because you hope to get what you want.

It means you work to secure dharma in the world, to be an instrument of God's will.

Sometimes it means losing on the material plane in order to gain a Victory on a higher plane. This is often a bitter pill to swallow and those who are still attached to outcomes will choke on it.

But this is what allows you to take on the most black-pilled situations, the most hopeless causes, and still fight with everything you have. And when people can do that, then we have a real chance for a miracle. Why?

Because that's when people will have created Golden Ages within their souls and then we will have the Menschenmaterial from which a better world can be born.

That is the ONLY path to lasting Victory. If you are content to win ground only to lose it and fight for it again with each generation, then continue focusing on material outcomes, but know that you are only passing the fight on to your children.

"Esoteric Lifting?"

very bad book

Gnostic Intel hits 1,000 subscribers!

Thank you all for following the channel and for the ongoing support and encouragement.

Music Credit: Dynoro & Gigi D’Agostino - In My Mind

Franz Bardon's initiation into hermetics for practical, actionable approach

The supporters of the Promethean Right need only think about the myth of Prometheus itself to realise the fallacy of their worldview. What is meant by Promethean Right is the futurist faction of the Right Wing, which is convinced that we should steal the fire of modernity, that the modern man with its morals and dogmas is unfit to handle, to bring us to a future that is ultimately little different from the one prefigured by globalists. Maybe with a different conception of hierarchy or ethnicity, but the distinction isn't always clear cut, because Prometheanism can't really escape the fundamental problems posed by modernity.

The myth of Prometheus is a prototypical titanic arc, the titan being a character that fails his quest, thus not attaining the status of hero, and who is thereafter punished by the gods for his húbris. This suggests a will to power that is resolved into nothing, because there isn't an authentic power to begin with. The Promethean man, in his worship of techné as the highest pursuit of mankind, fails to realise the inadequacy of it when it's not properly centred in a spiritual pole (hence the Olympian punishment), making it at best a distraction and at worst outright damaging.

This is not a convoluted way to say "technology is bad", it's bad if pursued for its own sake. That's why you have people on the Right calling for transhumanism, not questioning in the same way as the globalists whether it actually makes life qualitatively better, calling for robotisation, likewise not questioning if rendering millions of people useless is a good idea, or calling for space colonisation, dreaming of living in a pod, only it isn't in an Earth megalopolis. But at least we beat the globalists to it, didn't we? If the pursuit of techné lacks the wisdom bestowed by spiritual attainment, it doesn't matter where you position yourself in the political sphere, it will be nonetheless an effort guided by a cynical ambition, by a lower intention.

Here is where Faye's concept of Archaeofuturism can come to help, beyond the meaning that he himself gave to it, having a limited comprehension of authentic spiritual Tradition. Technology is good in the measure that it serves the basic purpose of civilisation, which is, having the commoners support the aristocrats in their transcendent pursuits, while in their service and devotion they can be brought higher in turn by the aristocrats. Every other aspect of civilisation should be in function to or an extention of this. In the end, Prometheus can be unbound, but not until the Olympian Herakles comes over to free him.

Phenomenology Iceberg?

Definitely not posting on fb due to the "Friendship Windmill" and "Austrian Painter" on tier 3.