Forwarded from Gnostic Intel
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Gnostic Intel hits 1,000 subscribers!
Thank you all for following the channel and for the ongoing support and encouragement.
Music Credit: Dynoro & Gigi D’Agostino - In My Mind
Thank you all for following the channel and for the ongoing support and encouragement.
Music Credit: Dynoro & Gigi D’Agostino - In My Mind
🔥2
Forwarded from Pyszny Paweł
Franz Bardon's initiation into hermetics for practical, actionable approach
Forwarded from [BASED] - 2016 2 - Nothing Happens Again 🍎 🔄 (Fra' Bortolo)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥13⚡2
Forwarded from Filius Luminis
The supporters of the Promethean Right need only think about the myth of Prometheus itself to realise the fallacy of their worldview. What is meant by Promethean Right is the futurist faction of the Right Wing, which is convinced that we should steal the fire of modernity, that the modern man with its morals and dogmas is unfit to handle, to bring us to a future that is ultimately little different from the one prefigured by globalists. Maybe with a different conception of hierarchy or ethnicity, but the distinction isn't always clear cut, because Prometheanism can't really escape the fundamental problems posed by modernity.
The myth of Prometheus is a prototypical titanic arc, the titan being a character that fails his quest, thus not attaining the status of hero, and who is thereafter punished by the gods for his húbris. This suggests a will to power that is resolved into nothing, because there isn't an authentic power to begin with. The Promethean man, in his worship of techné as the highest pursuit of mankind, fails to realise the inadequacy of it when it's not properly centred in a spiritual pole (hence the Olympian punishment), making it at best a distraction and at worst outright damaging.
This is not a convoluted way to say "technology is bad", it's bad if pursued for its own sake. That's why you have people on the Right calling for transhumanism, not questioning in the same way as the globalists whether it actually makes life qualitatively better, calling for robotisation, likewise not questioning if rendering millions of people useless is a good idea, or calling for space colonisation, dreaming of living in a pod, only it isn't in an Earth megalopolis. But at least we beat the globalists to it, didn't we? If the pursuit of techné lacks the wisdom bestowed by spiritual attainment, it doesn't matter where you position yourself in the political sphere, it will be nonetheless an effort guided by a cynical ambition, by a lower intention.
Here is where Faye's concept of Archaeofuturism can come to help, beyond the meaning that he himself gave to it, having a limited comprehension of authentic spiritual Tradition. Technology is good in the measure that it serves the basic purpose of civilisation, which is, having the commoners support the aristocrats in their transcendent pursuits, while in their service and devotion they can be brought higher in turn by the aristocrats. Every other aspect of civilisation should be in function to or an extention of this. In the end, Prometheus can be unbound, but not until the Olympian Herakles comes over to free him.
The myth of Prometheus is a prototypical titanic arc, the titan being a character that fails his quest, thus not attaining the status of hero, and who is thereafter punished by the gods for his húbris. This suggests a will to power that is resolved into nothing, because there isn't an authentic power to begin with. The Promethean man, in his worship of techné as the highest pursuit of mankind, fails to realise the inadequacy of it when it's not properly centred in a spiritual pole (hence the Olympian punishment), making it at best a distraction and at worst outright damaging.
This is not a convoluted way to say "technology is bad", it's bad if pursued for its own sake. That's why you have people on the Right calling for transhumanism, not questioning in the same way as the globalists whether it actually makes life qualitatively better, calling for robotisation, likewise not questioning if rendering millions of people useless is a good idea, or calling for space colonisation, dreaming of living in a pod, only it isn't in an Earth megalopolis. But at least we beat the globalists to it, didn't we? If the pursuit of techné lacks the wisdom bestowed by spiritual attainment, it doesn't matter where you position yourself in the political sphere, it will be nonetheless an effort guided by a cynical ambition, by a lower intention.
Here is where Faye's concept of Archaeofuturism can come to help, beyond the meaning that he himself gave to it, having a limited comprehension of authentic spiritual Tradition. Technology is good in the measure that it serves the basic purpose of civilisation, which is, having the commoners support the aristocrats in their transcendent pursuits, while in their service and devotion they can be brought higher in turn by the aristocrats. Every other aspect of civilisation should be in function to or an extention of this. In the end, Prometheus can be unbound, but not until the Olympian Herakles comes over to free him.
❤🔥4
Richard Ruach's Research Center
Phenomenology Iceberg?
Definitely not posting on fb due to the "Friendship Windmill" and "Austrian Painter" on tier 3.
Forwarded from AntiBird Brain Inc.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Modern Science Redpill
💯12