I was trying to find this image earlier and I thought I sent it here. It turns out I didn't, but now I have.

The One True God dumping his chosen people because Roman sacrificial vapours smell just too damn good.

"Theurgy" executed ignorantly not only may harm you, but can harm others without your knowing. Iamblichus required initiates to cover theoretics for a reason. Blindly opening yourself up to influence with no discernment will achieve nothing at best, and produce evil at worst.

Neopagans, Wiccans, and others who often speak of "working" with the gods, whereby they're tasked by "gods" to do certain seemingly innocuous rituals or activities to help the supposed "god", do so not for gods but daemons who mobilise their ignorance to actualise ill-intents.

Ignorant to the vital theoretics, these fools are deceived by daemons who present themselves as whoever they entreated. Lacking all discernment, they assume the first they encounter to be truly who they entreated and so they willingly do whatever they're requested to do.

Thus it's with this daemon they refer to when they speak of "working with the gods", and by following its guidance they will fulfil certain acts. Why such a relation has been made is owed to typhonic daemons cleaving to available, foolish souls who have opened themselves to them.

In cleaving to them, they present themselves according to how best they might gain a person's cooperation, and so thereafter they utilise this person as a spiritual surrogate toward actualisation of what lies beyond that daemon's normal influence.

The typhonic daemons that lie lowest in matter are so deprived of power they cleave to the ignorant who they use as surrogates. By convincing fools to follow their rituals, they mobilise the ritualistic intent offered to them towards actualising novel material outcomes.

Those who fulfil the rituals are near always oblivious to what they've assisted in actualising, and should the typhonic daemon (whose intent is harmonised with its own kind) intend evil to some end, it will utilise those who serve it toward that end through these rituals of intention.

So by it, the fool is an unconscious sorcerer, enabling intentions they are unaware of; a mode of evil so natural to their form of worship which they began ignorant to truth. So do not rush into alien rituals, do not excite typhonic daemons into exploiting you to their ends.

By it, you could be enabling by your will the suffering of others, either by renewing an evil already present or introducing a new one. The low powers are by their very nature impossible to trust, chaotic and sewers of disorder. Do not fall for their deception.

Against "differential ontology", or against those who affirm the primal existence is multitudinous and that unity is an illusion.

Difference itself is a form of likeness, for anything said to be different must be different within a certain frame of reference that unifies the two different things.

Were there something truly so different that it doesn't even permit comparison due to how extreme and true its total difference is, then how could we even know it?

It would need to be beyond our universe, for if it were within the universe it would need to share in likeness to us a universe we both participate in, and so by virtue of that it must assume some other qualities alike to us, such as presence within space, presence within a certain time frame, a possession of a certain 'thingness' that makes it identifiable with the one of itself, and the many more qualities that necessity requires of us to be within this universe.

Thus even the things that are most different to us qualitatively are still forced by necessity to participate with us and all other cosmic things within certain unities.

"But let's suppose that there exists a thing that doesn't have these qualities, and so shares absolutely no unities with us."

You could not prove such a thing exists without the paradox of unifying it with us by your proving it: even if it lacked all the prior qualities that necessity requires of us in the cosmos (which is impossible, but for argument's sake), just the mere knowing of its existence is enough to drag it out of pure differentiation and bring it into unity, as there must necessarily be some mode by which it is known, and that this mode between the knower and the known must be upon some common basis or else the knower would be incapable of bridging the gap between themselves and the known.

Any further arguments in favour of differentiated multiplicity as the sole principal can only be done by appeal to improvable hypotheticals, so let us dispense with this foolish metaphysics.

It's worth considering the fact that in accounts of Typhon's rebellion, the only Olympians remaining in Olympus after most hid themselves in the form of animals was Zeus and Athena. When Rome formally adopted Christianity, it did so in the name of Deus- a cognate of Zeus.

Although the worship itself was disorderly, Zeus nonetheless remained the god who was worshipped within Christianity. He remained the god of our worship, even when the gods were hidden from human knowledge in this period of ignorance and disorderliness.

But also remained Athena, she the wisdom of the godhead and thus facilitator of our return to the gods. When Typhon is defeated, the gods and goddesses who were hidden will become known to us, and only by the eternal presence of Zeus and Athena can such be made possible for us.

Not to mention a subversion of the meaning of Diwali.

I'm considering attempting this project regardless, but Augustine deceives and sows error into every single page of his work, so the time it would consume addressing his every wrong would be great.

But even so, leaving his work unanswered, as if to suggest there is no counter-argument to give in defence of Roman religion (and by extension, all European religions), is to allow Christians to remain bold in their false certainty that Augustine truly and irrefutably dismantled Roman religion in favour of Christianity. This cannot be allowed.

"Who can doubt, my dear Lucilius, that life is the gift of the immortal Gods, but that living well is the gift of philosophy? Hence the idea that our debt to philosophy is greater than our debt to the Gods, in proportion as a good life is more of a benefit than mere life, would be regarded as correct, were not philosophy itself a boon which the Gods have bestowed upon us.

"They have given the knowledge thereof to none, but the faculty of acquiring it they have given to all. For if they had made philosophy also a general good, and if we were gifted with understanding at our birth, wisdom would have lost her best attribute – that she is not one of the gifts of fortune.

"For as it is, the precious and noble characteristic of wisdom is that she does not advance to meet us, that each man is indebted to himself for her, and that we do not seek her at the hands of others. What would there be in philosophy worthy of your respect, if she were a thing that came by bounty? Her sole function is to discover the truth about things divine and things human.

"From her side religion never departs, nor duty, nor justice, nor any of the whole company of virtues which cling together in close-united fellowship. Philosophy has taught us to worship that which is divine, to love that which is human; she has told us that with the gods lies dominion, and among men, fellowship."

Seneca, Letter XC "On the Part Played by Philosophy in the Progress of Man"

Deprivation of mind and its effects.

Platonic attraction is in seeking self-completion. Via love between complements, each part of the union is conjoined to produce a superior wholeness, and it is by this that each become greater participants in the totality of goodness, and so expand their own goodness.

And so when we speak of cosmogenesis, goodness is unfolded through a chain of generative unions between the masculine and the feminine. 'Masculine' and 'feminine' do not directly entail 'male' and 'female', as the divine precedes biological sex and so is not defined by it.

However, the biological sexes are the result of these preceding divine principles of masculinity and femininity. Sexual distinction among living beings are reflections, and notably it is the evolutionary characteristic of a more advanced species to have sexual distinctions.

Accepting this evident truth—exemplified sensibly to us in the nature of life, but also proven intelligibly by its origin in the gods—enables us to know our nature's perfection and the nature of our most prosperous communions.

Hence it is the concordant union of the masculine and feminine that is generative of goodness; as above, so below. The sexes, being ontological descendants of the divine principles, reach their highest fulfilment in communion with their complement, and by union, expand goodness.

The soul—seeking to induce within itself the means to reach the heights of goodness & in accord with its capacity and wisdom to do so—cultivated masculinity and femininity within the animal so that the soul may leverage this divine mode of completion to hasten its upwards ascent.

Thus its baseline expression manifests in the two biological sexes, and the soul cultivates its particular incarnation according to its experiential inclination, leading to life as a woman or as a man. Then through this life it will seek communion to grow its own inner goodness.

However, since the animal is actualised via union of soul and matter, the union exposing the soul to states typically alien to the soul but present within matter, discord introduced via material causes becomes possible after the soul's initial incarnation.

As is the case with every shortfall and vice we suffer in our lives, material conditions—whether self-afflicted or afflicted from without—can lead to inner disorderliness, driving us away from communion and goodness towards disunity and deprivation.

The inner discord afflicts the mind with states of confusion and uncertainty, leading it to lose vision of the soul's original intent towards goodness that initiated its incarnation in the first place, and in losing this it comes to be defined by that which had disrupted it.

Though the prior explanation is true generally with all incarnations, occasionally the material conditions suffered are of such severity that the deprivations they cause within the mind can lead to violent inner discord, leaving even the mind's own union of goodness shattered.

In the process of this shattering, the mind becomes oppressed by forgetfulness as it sheds its inner union, discarding from itself aspects of its original wholeness. What is discarded from the union and forgotten depends upon the material causes that led it to its deprivation.

To speak of deprivation in specific relation to our topic, we see the mind's deprivation of the soul's pre-existing masculinity and/or femininity today foremost in sexualities that are discordant with the divine's exemplar union of masculine with feminine and vice versa.

Instead of woman seeking man or man seeking woman, some fall under oppression of material events that afflict deprivation and forgetfulness upon them, and according to the nature of these events, the masculine or feminine union they prior held in soul becomes deprived from mind.

Suffering from deprivation, the mind spirals into confusion and instability. Identity and the sense of self is uprooted, leading to dissociation and despair. Deprivation's imposition of forgetfulness furthers the mind's confusion as the cause for its trauma becomes unknown to it.

In reaction, the soul is quickly spurred towards reacquiring what was lost in the deprivation, but by virtue of it being anchored to its essential union with matter as mind, it is denied flight, thus forcing it to live out a life no longer aligned with the soul's intent.

Owing to the intensity of this impulse, the mind attempts to utilise the life with which it is bound nonetheless. But due to discordance between the mind and the body which was first formed upon a prior held union no longer present in mind, the mind inverts its use of the body.

As a man, it strives to recover itself via union with a man; or as a woman, it strives to recover itself via union with a woman. These inverted attractions refuse the mind the same holistic completion it would receive in proper unions, and so wholesome happiness is often lost.

There is more to be said on this psychology, but this shall do for now.

https://apotheism.com/2021/12/02/deprivation-of-mind-and-its-effects/

"Since the Greeks, ethics for Europeans have designated virtues whose practice forms the basis of the ‘good life’: generosity over avarice, honour over shame, courage over cowardice, justice over injustice, temperance over excess, duty over irresponsibility, rectitude over guile, unselfishness over greed, etc. The good citizen is one who always tries to strive for excellence in each of these virtues (Aristotle).

"This will to excellence does not in any way exclude the existence of several modes of life (contemplative, active, productive, etc.), each arising from different moral codes, and each finding their place in the city’s hierarchy. For example, European tradition, expressed in the ancient tripartite model, made wisdom prevail over force, and force over wealth."

Alain de Benoist

I encourage you all to binge-read the articles on Kerry Bolton's website, Kerry is one of the greatest intellectuals in our scene and deserves more recognition. Start here: https://www.kerrybolton.com/the-anglo-american-conspiracy/

Bolton takes aim at the conspiraratard view of the globalist elite as a clandestine continuation of the British Empire.

"Quigley’s book [Tragedy & Hope] has much of interest, but a lot of it does not confirm the biases of many conspiratologists; namely that there remained a permanent link between the USSR and the financial cabal and that the ‘cold war’ was a ruse; or that ‘Wall Street backed Hitler’. Quigley claims rather that the use of debt-finance loans by this ‘network’ worked with the early Bolsheviks but failed with subsequent Soviet leaders, and worked with the Weimar politicians but failed with Hitler. Quigley also explains quite a bit about the origins of the ‘cold war’ which should otherwise be of interest to conservatives, except that he shows that it was Stalin who stymied a U.S. –sponsored U.N. world state; the reverse of the wide-spread conservative contention that the U.N.O. was a commie plot in cahoots with the ‘Anglo-American Establishment’."

...

"Quigley writes in Tragedy & Hope that the cabal he is discussing is based around international bankers, its purpose being to create an international financial system. As will be seen, this is far removed, and indeed antithetical, to the Rhodes/Milner vision. The most well known representatives of the new ‘financial capitalism’ were the House of Rothschild. But the link between Rothschild and the Rhodes-Milner Group is exaggerated by many commentators, with Milner routinely called a ‘Rothschild agent’. For the purpose of emphasising an ‘Anglo-American’ bloc the focus is changed to that of J. P. Morgan, a staunch Episcopalian, although J.P. had died in 1913, and there seems little reason to believe that J. P. Morgan Co. remained Anglophile."

...

"A dichotomy existed between imperialism and international finance. While for obvious reasons the likes of Rothschild, Sassoon, et al supported British imperialism, like their counterparts in Germany, France and The Netherlands, supported the imperialism of those states, that was the means by which international finance was able to spread in those times. When the old imperialism had become redundant as the most effective means of expanding financial capital, it was scuttled in short order, largely via the USA. The anti-imperialism of Wilson’s ‘Fourteen Points’ and of Roosevelt’s ‘Atlantic Charter’ set the course for the destruction of the European empires, and the primacy of Wall Street."

...

"Burnett and Games conclude from their study of CFR documents that:

‘Conspiracy theorists who claim that the Council on Foreign Relations is controlled by the Round Table through the Institute of International Affairs are wrong and haven’t done their research. This lack of agreement, and definite desire not to be linked, forces an enormous rift between these secret groups. Theorists tend to concentrate on the wishful thinking voiced at the Hotel Majestic without following the actual subsequent developments. Any sentence that combines the CFR and the IIA as co-conspirators must be viewed a false.’

‘Peter Grose, CFR historian, confirms this early Anglo-U.S. breach in the official CFR history:

‘…To Shepardson fell the task of informing the British colleagues of this unfortunate reality. Crossing to London, he recalled thinking that “it might be quite unpleasant to have to say for the first time that the Paris Group of British colleagues could not be members” of the American branch. “The explanation to the British was begun (shall we say?) haltingly. However, instead of the frigid look which had been feared, the faces of the British governing body showed slightly red and very happy. They had reached the same conclusion in reverse, but had not yet found a good way of getting word to the other side of the Atlantic!’"

My response on Twitter to the following tweet:

"I'm noticing a lot of modern Platonists and Neoplatonists are into far-right politics. Why do you think this is?"

"Far-right politics" is a very large net, used to capture many different and often opposing beliefs, so as a general term it is usually unhelpful- especially seeing for some Jordan Peterson or Ben Shapiro is considered 'far-right', while for others they're plainly right-liberal.

Platonism is political, but it doesn't participate in the contemporary parley of ideologies which took for itself the name of 'politics'. It is political because it is the denoscription of reality; it is dialectics towards encountering and knowing truth.

Platonic dialectics cannot be constrained to any singular field. To do so would mean denying Plato's realist epistemology, as knowledge does not pertain to some set of things but to ALL things, and from this seminal understanding flows the whole of Platonic thought.

Platonic politica is just one of many branching rivers that flow out from the dialectical basin of Platonism. No one can change their current or redirect their course, all one can do is either embrace them as they are or opt for ignorance to the whole.

Those seeking truth are compelled to navigate the dialectical river system according to how it is, not according to how they wish it to be. The paddler is compelled to navigate according to a river's currents, to its obstacles, and to its course- not according to their wishes.

And so it is the same with the proper Platonist; they are compelled to certain positions by the dialectic, holding to truth that is real and not to what is contemporary, comfortable, or anything else inducive of ignorance.

Some positions are labelled 'far-right', some 'far-left', some 'centrist'. Some are 'fascist', some 'liberal', some 'socialist'. The reality is that the parley of ideological politics is antithetical to Platonism as it pertains instead to one, sole, unequivocal truth.

It's of mere accident should a view deduced via Platonic dialectics be reflected in some ideology or worldview. The dialectic is independent in bringing us to what is eternal and true. If you think a Platonist's politics is wrong, simply show it to be wrong via the dialectic.

The need to unify Europe and Europeans into a singular purpose and vision, both spiritually and politically, cannot be emphasised enough. The trajectory of the world is increasing globalisation and it will not be reversed. A common European polity is of absolute necessity.

I've spoken on this before, but it must be regularly reiterated: 'nationalism for every nation' is childish utopianism. To believe there can be a supranational concord of mutually respecting nationalist nations is to ignore the profundity of national memory and history.

Core to nationalism is the excitement of these sentiments, rekindling old passions and animosities that so often boil over into resentment and revanchism. It is more than simply 'national pride', but rather a geopolitically hawkish self-preference against all others.

To think that the deep national histories of Europe could be simply forgotten, that somehow all the old sentiments could be reconstituted without leading to conflict, is to be simply ignorant. The future of Europe cannot be given over to this ultimately self-destructive path.

Europe's internal diversity evidences its peoples' inner multifaceted beauty and life, reflected in the many rich cultures made manifest by the children of Europe, the total of which all should be desirous to preserve and prosper. So let no one confuse my meaning.

But if we are to overcome this era of intensifying socioeconomic interconnectivity, driven by the unstoppable advance of global networking technologies, wherein the temporal forces rush us towards total centralisation, and the digital towards global atomism, Europe MUST unify.

The whole European continent as one must seize its destiny. Europe must not be allowed to lapse into old internal disputations and conflicting interests. The children of Europe must draw to our common mother, Europa- she our sacred matriarch who bore us in union with Father Jove.

And, via her blessed patronage, all nations of our holy union would overcome every fate that seem now certain to doom us. The globe today is the throne of Typhon, but potent already with our common soul is the Jovian power to behead the vile serpent and liberate ourselves.

Thus, nationalism is not rejected because it is wrong, but because we must surpass its limitations. Europe must strive again toward the same apotheotic will that once bequeathed it with the sacred laurels of providential imperium so that all its nations may prosper and be free.

Why is there a growing adoption of nigger culture among supposed national socialists, fascists, nationalists, etc.? Rap, hip hop, dreadlocks, street graffiti, baggy clothing, excessive tattoos...

To the growing cancer of spiritual negroes that sully the race with the ugliness of negrification:

The Reichsmusikkammer banned *Jazz and Swing* in 1933, NSDAP classifying it as degenerate Negermusik and exhibiting it at the Entartete Musik exhibition as an exemplar of Jews attempting to spiritually debase Germans through German adoption of Negro culture via music.

Given just how innocuous Jazz is in comparison to the utterly debased clangour named "rap", "hiphop", etc., it would be with no uncertainty that Hitler would not only disapprove of your crass, negro-derived noisemaking, but he would find it utterly atrocious, absolutely contemptible, and grossly unacceptable.

To deploy expressly negroid mediums for your 'national socialist activism' is indicative of a degenerated and partial soul, one so subjugated to the Jewish-Typhonian consensus and so born of the post-war corrosive miasma that in your activism for "national socialism" and "the race", you truly serve neither, instead serving as an instrument for degenerative subversion.

Hitler would have deeply despised you, so simply either expunge your inner negro or fuck off.

Exhibit A of such fucking garbage: https://news.1rj.ru/str/HardKnocksEntertainment/32

Exhibit B of the same supposedly "white" individual who sounds indistinct from a negro: https://news.1rj.ru/str/HardKnocksEntertainment/25

Exhibit C, last one because I don't like to spam the channel but it is just colossally fucked: https://news.1rj.ru/str/HardKnocksEntertainment/21

Blessed dies natalis Solis Invicti to all. Praise the source of life, the light of illumination, and the guide to salvation.