Burning of Tehran’s Abu Zar Mosque by Mossad–backed Terrorists
😡13
Real Arsonists: Who’s Fueling Unrest in Iran
Abbas Araghchi, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iran, posted on X:
According to the US Government, Iran is "delusional" for assessing that Israel and the US are fueling violent riots in our country.
There is only one problem: President Trump's own former CIA Director has openly and unashamedly highlighted what Mossad and its American enablers are really up to.
The only "delusional" aspect of the current situation is the belief that arson does not ultimately arsonists.
Abbas Araghchi, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iran, posted on X:
According to the US Government, Iran is "delusional" for assessing that Israel and the US are fueling violent riots in our country.
There is only one problem: President Trump's own former CIA Director has openly and unashamedly highlighted what Mossad and its American enablers are really up to.
The only "delusional" aspect of the current situation is the belief that arson does not ultimately arsonists.
Those surprised that Trump overlooks the Shah’s son should know this story:
In the 1980s, the CIA devised a plan to move the Shah’s son to Kish Island, aiming to have him rally the Iranian army to overthrow the Islamic Republic.
Initially, the Shah’s son agreed—but with one condition: he needed money.
The U.S. asked Saudi Arabia to provide $5 million to fund his coordination of forces.
He received the money, but spent $700,000 on a private nightclub in Virginia.
When the time for the mission arrived—and after he had collected the full amount—he turned to the CIA officers and said,
“But what if your plan fails? I have no escape route.”
He then refused to proceed.
A former CIA officer recounts this episode in his book Countdown to Crisis, noting that from that point on, he was nicknamed the “Shah’s Kid.”
In the 1980s, the CIA devised a plan to move the Shah’s son to Kish Island, aiming to have him rally the Iranian army to overthrow the Islamic Republic.
Initially, the Shah’s son agreed—but with one condition: he needed money.
The U.S. asked Saudi Arabia to provide $5 million to fund his coordination of forces.
He received the money, but spent $700,000 on a private nightclub in Virginia.
When the time for the mission arrived—and after he had collected the full amount—he turned to the CIA officers and said,
“But what if your plan fails? I have no escape route.”
He then refused to proceed.
A former CIA officer recounts this episode in his book Countdown to Crisis, noting that from that point on, he was nicknamed the “Shah’s Kid.”
❤4
Basira Press
Those surprised that Trump overlooks the Shah’s son should know this story: In the 1980s, the CIA devised a plan to move the Shah’s son to Kish Island, aiming to have him rally the Iranian army to overthrow the Islamic Republic. Initially, the Shah’s son…
Behold the legacy of the Islamic Revolution: a generation of nuclear scientists, rocket engineers, space explorers, and fearless youth capable of humiliating U.S. fleets and standing up to the genocidal Israeli fake entity.
A society that chose intellect, courage, and sovereignty over submission, and produced achievers who turn dreams into reality.
Now, let’s entertain the fantasy of what the Shah’s Iran would have delivered!!!
Picture youth stumbling through endless nights of neon-lit discos, eyes glazed over by Western trinkets, equating “freedom” with twirling on a dance floor.
Imagine idolizing Netanyahu as an ally, applauding decadence, and mistaking shallow entertainment for enlightenment.
How… ambitious!!
The contrast is almost comical if it weren’t tragic.
One path forged warriors of the mind and soul; the other promised… Instagram selfies and cocktail-induced epiphanies.
Truly, who needs sovereignty or scientific achievement when you have the intoxicating glow of a foreign pop star and the fleeting thrill of shallow pleasure?
History isn’t kind to lost potential!!
The Islamic Revolution didn’t just depose a king—it nurtured a generation that dares, builds, and defends.
Meanwhile, the alternative—decadent, distracted, and dazzled—remains a cautionary spectacle: a society perfectly engineered for irrelevance, mesmerized by the illusion of progress while its soul rots in the glitter of the West.
A society that chose intellect, courage, and sovereignty over submission, and produced achievers who turn dreams into reality.
Now, let’s entertain the fantasy of what the Shah’s Iran would have delivered!!!
Picture youth stumbling through endless nights of neon-lit discos, eyes glazed over by Western trinkets, equating “freedom” with twirling on a dance floor.
Imagine idolizing Netanyahu as an ally, applauding decadence, and mistaking shallow entertainment for enlightenment.
How… ambitious!!
The contrast is almost comical if it weren’t tragic.
One path forged warriors of the mind and soul; the other promised… Instagram selfies and cocktail-induced epiphanies.
Truly, who needs sovereignty or scientific achievement when you have the intoxicating glow of a foreign pop star and the fleeting thrill of shallow pleasure?
History isn’t kind to lost potential!!
The Islamic Revolution didn’t just depose a king—it nurtured a generation that dares, builds, and defends.
Meanwhile, the alternative—decadent, distracted, and dazzled—remains a cautionary spectacle: a society perfectly engineered for irrelevance, mesmerized by the illusion of progress while its soul rots in the glitter of the West.
❤3
Hebrew Channel 12:
Argentina halts the process of moving its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem due to disagreements between Argentine President Alberto Fernández and the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Argentina halts the process of moving its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem due to disagreements between Argentine President Alberto Fernández and the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Iran’s Cyber Space Command extends the internet shutdown for 48 hours.
❤3
Reports from Mehr News journalists nationwide indicate that, owing to the timely deployment and alertness of the military, Basij, and security forces, the activities of rioters tonight remained extremely limited, despite persistent calls from counter-revolutionary elements.
Reza Pahlavi’s post reportedly racked up 5.2 million views—but Iran is under a nationwide internet blackout, with connectivity plunging to around 1%.
So when his content supposedly “went viral,” nearly 99% of Iranians couldn’t even see it.
In other words, the overwhelming majority of those views came from outside the country, exposing the emptiness of his claimed domestic influence.
So when his content supposedly “went viral,” nearly 99% of Iranians couldn’t even see it.
In other words, the overwhelming majority of those views came from outside the country, exposing the emptiness of his claimed domestic influence.
❤5💯4👍1👀1
The Davos of Triviality: How a Billion Followers Transmute Power into Submission and Silence
By Mona Hawwa
The Billionaire Summit in Dubai—or, as it might more aptly be called, the Davos of Triviality—represents the largest congregation of numerical elites and “attention-rich” tycoons, wielding influence over public perception and consumer behavior far beyond the reach of traditional political power.
Just as Switzerland’s Davos unites the elite of money and politics, Dubai’s variant gathers the titans of algorithms in an extravaganza defined by opulent spending, million-dollar sponsorships, and meticulously choreographed protocol.
Its aim: to elevate triviality into a universal language. Entry to this exclusive club requires only one qualification: numbers.
A billion followers serve as currency. It matters little whether one earned them elucidating the brain’s complexities or perfecting a viral dance or prank.
The danger lies not in triviality itself, but in institutionalizing mediocrity, exalting the supremacy of algorithms over human judgment, and glorifying fast, consumable content that entrenches passive consumption while erasing effort.
Today, the UAE treats attention as a new form of oil, striving to be both its refinery and principal port.
Golden visas, regional headquarters, and logistical hubs for giants such as Meta, TikTok, and Snapchat have transformed Dubai into a global capital of content creation.
Yet this strategy conceals a subtle trap: Arab influencers seeking prominence must either curry favor with the UAE politically or remain silent, lest they forfeit their place in this glittering paradise.
Digital reputation laundering has become a high-velocity, heavyweight industry. Picture a global influencer, millions of followers in tow, enthralled by Dubai’s concrete jungle, broadcasting their contrived admiration.
Meanwhile, any human rights report exposing the state’s darker realities is reduced to ink on paper—or ephemeral noise obliterated by the glare of a story.
The UAE has mastered the lesson: sovereignty today resides not in facts but impressions; influence is no longer anchored in Reuters but in TikTok.
State legitimacy is cultivated among the generation of Zaid, not through political achievement, but by presenting itself as the Kaaba of effortless success and the official purveyor of illusions.
To avoid accusations of blatant triviality, the summit promotes slogans such as “purposeful content” and places token educational creators as cosmetic legitimizers, while the true engines of spectacle—and profit—remain the showbiz celebrities of the dancing generation.
The moral collapse amid all this glamour is profound. Yet the deepest wound is the absence of ethical accountability.
While the UAE engages in bloody interventions in Sudan, Yemen, Gaza, and beyond, and plays controversial roles in the Palestinian struggle, the Arab influencer—armed with billions of followers—remains incapable of taking a principled, rejecting stance toward this pitiful carnival.
It is profoundly lamentable to witness the so-called “Arab digital elite”—if such a term even applies—rush headlong into the Davos of triviality, blind to the fact that the cost of entry may be silence over the blood spilled in their neighborhood.
By Mona Hawwa
The Billionaire Summit in Dubai—or, as it might more aptly be called, the Davos of Triviality—represents the largest congregation of numerical elites and “attention-rich” tycoons, wielding influence over public perception and consumer behavior far beyond the reach of traditional political power.
Just as Switzerland’s Davos unites the elite of money and politics, Dubai’s variant gathers the titans of algorithms in an extravaganza defined by opulent spending, million-dollar sponsorships, and meticulously choreographed protocol.
Its aim: to elevate triviality into a universal language. Entry to this exclusive club requires only one qualification: numbers.
A billion followers serve as currency. It matters little whether one earned them elucidating the brain’s complexities or perfecting a viral dance or prank.
The danger lies not in triviality itself, but in institutionalizing mediocrity, exalting the supremacy of algorithms over human judgment, and glorifying fast, consumable content that entrenches passive consumption while erasing effort.
Today, the UAE treats attention as a new form of oil, striving to be both its refinery and principal port.
Golden visas, regional headquarters, and logistical hubs for giants such as Meta, TikTok, and Snapchat have transformed Dubai into a global capital of content creation.
Yet this strategy conceals a subtle trap: Arab influencers seeking prominence must either curry favor with the UAE politically or remain silent, lest they forfeit their place in this glittering paradise.
Digital reputation laundering has become a high-velocity, heavyweight industry. Picture a global influencer, millions of followers in tow, enthralled by Dubai’s concrete jungle, broadcasting their contrived admiration.
Meanwhile, any human rights report exposing the state’s darker realities is reduced to ink on paper—or ephemeral noise obliterated by the glare of a story.
The UAE has mastered the lesson: sovereignty today resides not in facts but impressions; influence is no longer anchored in Reuters but in TikTok.
State legitimacy is cultivated among the generation of Zaid, not through political achievement, but by presenting itself as the Kaaba of effortless success and the official purveyor of illusions.
To avoid accusations of blatant triviality, the summit promotes slogans such as “purposeful content” and places token educational creators as cosmetic legitimizers, while the true engines of spectacle—and profit—remain the showbiz celebrities of the dancing generation.
The moral collapse amid all this glamour is profound. Yet the deepest wound is the absence of ethical accountability.
While the UAE engages in bloody interventions in Sudan, Yemen, Gaza, and beyond, and plays controversial roles in the Palestinian struggle, the Arab influencer—armed with billions of followers—remains incapable of taking a principled, rejecting stance toward this pitiful carnival.
It is profoundly lamentable to witness the so-called “Arab digital elite”—if such a term even applies—rush headlong into the Davos of triviality, blind to the fact that the cost of entry may be silence over the blood spilled in their neighborhood.
Why Netanyahu Keeps the Fronts Open and Volatile
Israeli analysts say Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is deliberately keeping multiple fronts open and volatile, while ensuring the backing of the Israeli military leadership.
An Israeli official told Yedioth Ahronoth that there is concern over a large-scale military operation against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Any major confrontation now could allow Iran to divert global attention from the ongoing protests in its own streets. The official added that the unrest in Iran could topple the regime—or it might not—but any broad Israeli action in Lebanon at this moment would harm the Iranian protesters. The situation in Iran, in turn, has an impact on Lebanon as well.
Military analyst Amos Harel noted that following Netanyahu’s recent meeting with President Donald Trump in Florida, both leaders are keeping matters deliberately vague—particularly regarding Netanyahu’s concessions on advancing the U.S. plan in Gaza. However, there appears to be no clash between them on Iran or Hezbollah. Harel added that if Netanyahu needs to make concessions in Gaza, such as sending a delegation this week to negotiate with the Syrians in Paris, it is a cost he can absorb without difficulty.
The surge of protests coincided with Netanyahu’s deliberate escalation against Iran, emphasizing the threat posed by Iran’s ballistic missile program. Israel has pressured the United States for a green light to resume strikes on missile sites—and possibly nuclear facilities—but so far, no conclusive evidence has emerged justifying renewed operations on Iran’s second program.
Harel suggests that U.S. attention on the protests effectively freezes any new Israeli attack. Washington is not interested in military exchanges that could benefit the Iranian regime by diverting attention from economic hardship and infrastructure failures. For Israel, he warns, false illusions about the ability to dictate regime change in a large, resilient country would be dangerous; Iran will remain a formidable adversary for years to come.
He adds that an Iranian preemptive strike on Israel is not supported by current intelligence and is unlikely in the near term. Despite strategic weaknesses, Netanyahu appears intent on keeping the fronts volatile. The Israeli military supports this stance, blending lessons from the October 7 conflict with a strategy of force projection and a belief that no challenge cannot be overcome by overwhelming military power.
Israel is providing the U.S. with intelligence on close coordination between Lebanese army officers and Hezbollah operatives, including agreed-upon evacuations of weapons depots whenever an Israeli strike is anticipated. While attention is on Iran, a critical question remains: will Trump accept Netanyahu’s claim that the Lebanese government cannot fulfill its commitments to disarm Hezbollah, justifying a broad Israeli operation?
Harel points out that even an air-only strike in Lebanon would face difficulties. In the Galilee, residents are still returning to their homes more than a year after the official end of the war against Hezbollah.
The only front where Netanyahu seems compelled to follow Trump’s directives is Gaza. Trump is expected to announce further international measures there, including deploying a stabilization force and establishing a peace council in the coming weeks.
Israeli analysts say Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is deliberately keeping multiple fronts open and volatile, while ensuring the backing of the Israeli military leadership.
An Israeli official told Yedioth Ahronoth that there is concern over a large-scale military operation against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Any major confrontation now could allow Iran to divert global attention from the ongoing protests in its own streets. The official added that the unrest in Iran could topple the regime—or it might not—but any broad Israeli action in Lebanon at this moment would harm the Iranian protesters. The situation in Iran, in turn, has an impact on Lebanon as well.
Military analyst Amos Harel noted that following Netanyahu’s recent meeting with President Donald Trump in Florida, both leaders are keeping matters deliberately vague—particularly regarding Netanyahu’s concessions on advancing the U.S. plan in Gaza. However, there appears to be no clash between them on Iran or Hezbollah. Harel added that if Netanyahu needs to make concessions in Gaza, such as sending a delegation this week to negotiate with the Syrians in Paris, it is a cost he can absorb without difficulty.
The surge of protests coincided with Netanyahu’s deliberate escalation against Iran, emphasizing the threat posed by Iran’s ballistic missile program. Israel has pressured the United States for a green light to resume strikes on missile sites—and possibly nuclear facilities—but so far, no conclusive evidence has emerged justifying renewed operations on Iran’s second program.
Harel suggests that U.S. attention on the protests effectively freezes any new Israeli attack. Washington is not interested in military exchanges that could benefit the Iranian regime by diverting attention from economic hardship and infrastructure failures. For Israel, he warns, false illusions about the ability to dictate regime change in a large, resilient country would be dangerous; Iran will remain a formidable adversary for years to come.
He adds that an Iranian preemptive strike on Israel is not supported by current intelligence and is unlikely in the near term. Despite strategic weaknesses, Netanyahu appears intent on keeping the fronts volatile. The Israeli military supports this stance, blending lessons from the October 7 conflict with a strategy of force projection and a belief that no challenge cannot be overcome by overwhelming military power.
Israel is providing the U.S. with intelligence on close coordination between Lebanese army officers and Hezbollah operatives, including agreed-upon evacuations of weapons depots whenever an Israeli strike is anticipated. While attention is on Iran, a critical question remains: will Trump accept Netanyahu’s claim that the Lebanese government cannot fulfill its commitments to disarm Hezbollah, justifying a broad Israeli operation?
Harel points out that even an air-only strike in Lebanon would face difficulties. In the Galilee, residents are still returning to their homes more than a year after the official end of the war against Hezbollah.
The only front where Netanyahu seems compelled to follow Trump’s directives is Gaza. Trump is expected to announce further international measures there, including deploying a stabilization force and establishing a peace council in the coming weeks.
Israel’s Multi-Layered Threat Matrix Against Yemen
The spectrum of Israeli threats against Yemen is neither episodic nor accidental. It represents a comprehensive, multi-level strategy designed to constrain Yemen’s strategic space, exhaust its capacities, and reshape the balance of power around the Red Sea. What emerges is not a single frontline, but an integrated threat map combining geography, military pressure, intelligence warfare, and political manipulation.
At the strategic and geographic level, Israel’s expanding footprint in the Horn of Africa constitutes a central pillar of this approach.
Presence and coordination in Eritrea enable surveillance over the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, intelligence gathering, and indirect deterrence.
Meanwhile, engagement with Somaliland—an unrecognized and fragile entity—serves to geographically encircle Yemen, establish low-cost pressure platforms, and manage a prolonged conflict without overt escalation.
Control and monitoring of maritime routes in the Red Sea further amplify this pressure, turning global trade lanes into leverage tools against Sana’a.
Militarily, Israel appears to favor indirect engagement. This includes the potential for limited airstrikes, targeted operations against sensitive Yemeni sites or figures, and intelligence support for regional actors willing to confront Yemen on Israel’s behalf.
Naval operations also form part of this posture, whether by threatening shipping, disrupting logistics, or using African coastal bases as quiet support points. The objective is attrition rather than decisive confrontation.
Cyber and intelligence warfare add another dimension. Penetration of communication networks, surveillance of military movements, and cyber operations aimed at decision-making and readiness illustrate a modern battlefield where disruption can be as effective as firepower.
Politically and diplomatically, Israel works to isolate Yemen by pressuring its supporters, undermining Sana’a’s international standing, and exploiting agreements with weak or contested entities to manufacture legal and political cover for hostile actions.
Parallel to this runs an intense media and psychological campaign, seeking to distort Yemen’s image, weaken public morale, and shape regional and international opinion.
Economically, the threat extends to ports, trade activity, financial flows, and sanctions mechanisms, all intended to erode sustainability over time.
Strategically, the pattern is clear: Israel prefers indirect, low-cost, long-term pressure, with the Horn of Africa as a key axis.
The conflict is trending toward managed, low-intensity confrontation—one that demands constant vigilance, adaptive balance, and strategic patience in the face of an increasingly complex regional environment.
The spectrum of Israeli threats against Yemen is neither episodic nor accidental. It represents a comprehensive, multi-level strategy designed to constrain Yemen’s strategic space, exhaust its capacities, and reshape the balance of power around the Red Sea. What emerges is not a single frontline, but an integrated threat map combining geography, military pressure, intelligence warfare, and political manipulation.
At the strategic and geographic level, Israel’s expanding footprint in the Horn of Africa constitutes a central pillar of this approach.
Presence and coordination in Eritrea enable surveillance over the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, intelligence gathering, and indirect deterrence.
Meanwhile, engagement with Somaliland—an unrecognized and fragile entity—serves to geographically encircle Yemen, establish low-cost pressure platforms, and manage a prolonged conflict without overt escalation.
Control and monitoring of maritime routes in the Red Sea further amplify this pressure, turning global trade lanes into leverage tools against Sana’a.
Militarily, Israel appears to favor indirect engagement. This includes the potential for limited airstrikes, targeted operations against sensitive Yemeni sites or figures, and intelligence support for regional actors willing to confront Yemen on Israel’s behalf.
Naval operations also form part of this posture, whether by threatening shipping, disrupting logistics, or using African coastal bases as quiet support points. The objective is attrition rather than decisive confrontation.
Cyber and intelligence warfare add another dimension. Penetration of communication networks, surveillance of military movements, and cyber operations aimed at decision-making and readiness illustrate a modern battlefield where disruption can be as effective as firepower.
Politically and diplomatically, Israel works to isolate Yemen by pressuring its supporters, undermining Sana’a’s international standing, and exploiting agreements with weak or contested entities to manufacture legal and political cover for hostile actions.
Parallel to this runs an intense media and psychological campaign, seeking to distort Yemen’s image, weaken public morale, and shape regional and international opinion.
Economically, the threat extends to ports, trade activity, financial flows, and sanctions mechanisms, all intended to erode sustainability over time.
Strategically, the pattern is clear: Israel prefers indirect, low-cost, long-term pressure, with the Horn of Africa as a key axis.
The conflict is trending toward managed, low-intensity confrontation—one that demands constant vigilance, adaptive balance, and strategic patience in the face of an increasingly complex regional environment.
❤4🤯1
The Nightmare of Tyranny and the Illusion of Power
In days like these, history demands reflection—not as a tale of the past, but as a mirror of the present.
When Mu‘awiya died, Imam Hussain (peace be upon him) announced the event before the news had spread, guided by a vision that exposed the fragility of tyranny.
Ibn Namā narrates in Muthīr al-Aḥzān that Imam Hussain said:
“I believe their tyrant has perished. Last night, I saw Mu‘awiya’s pulpit overturned and his house engulfed in flames.”
This vision was not symbolic alone; it was a declaration that oppression, no matter how entrenched, carries the certainty of collapse.
Tyrants are not gods!!
They are mortals who unravel long before death claims them.
Even while alive, they are punished by fear, memory, and guilt.
Accounts of Mu‘awiya’s final days reveal a man tormented by his own crimes. It is narrated that during his illness, he saw disturbing visions and cried out deliriously, pleading,
“Give me water! Give me water!” Yet no amount of water could quench his thirst. He would lose consciousness for days, and when he awoke, he would scream at the top of his voice: “What do I have to do with you, Hujr ibn ‘Adi? What do I have to do with you, ‘Amr ibn al-Hamq? What do I have to do with you, son of Abu Talib?”
Power could not shield him from the reckoning of conscience.
What is unfolding today against Iran reflects this enduring truth.
The American–Israeli campaign of sanctions, psychological warfare, and internal destabilization is driven by the same illusion—that pressure can bend principles and fear can erase conviction.
History teaches otherwise.
Oppression corrodes from within, while nations grounded in sacrifice, faith, and Resistance endure.
Tyranny collapses under its own weight; steadfast peoples outlive empires!!
In days like these, history demands reflection—not as a tale of the past, but as a mirror of the present.
When Mu‘awiya died, Imam Hussain (peace be upon him) announced the event before the news had spread, guided by a vision that exposed the fragility of tyranny.
Ibn Namā narrates in Muthīr al-Aḥzān that Imam Hussain said:
“I believe their tyrant has perished. Last night, I saw Mu‘awiya’s pulpit overturned and his house engulfed in flames.”
This vision was not symbolic alone; it was a declaration that oppression, no matter how entrenched, carries the certainty of collapse.
Tyrants are not gods!!
They are mortals who unravel long before death claims them.
Even while alive, they are punished by fear, memory, and guilt.
Accounts of Mu‘awiya’s final days reveal a man tormented by his own crimes. It is narrated that during his illness, he saw disturbing visions and cried out deliriously, pleading,
“Give me water! Give me water!” Yet no amount of water could quench his thirst. He would lose consciousness for days, and when he awoke, he would scream at the top of his voice: “What do I have to do with you, Hujr ibn ‘Adi? What do I have to do with you, ‘Amr ibn al-Hamq? What do I have to do with you, son of Abu Talib?”
Power could not shield him from the reckoning of conscience.
What is unfolding today against Iran reflects this enduring truth.
The American–Israeli campaign of sanctions, psychological warfare, and internal destabilization is driven by the same illusion—that pressure can bend principles and fear can erase conviction.
History teaches otherwise.
Oppression corrodes from within, while nations grounded in sacrifice, faith, and Resistance endure.
Tyranny collapses under its own weight; steadfast peoples outlive empires!!
🥰5
Basira Press
The Nightmare of Tyranny and the Illusion of Power In days like these, history demands reflection—not as a tale of the past, but as a mirror of the present. When Mu‘awiya died, Imam Hussain (peace be upon him) announced the event before the news had spread…
Note:
12 Rajab, 60 AH marks the anniversary of the demise of Mu‘awiya ibn Abi Sufyan (may Allah curse him) in al-Sham, at the age of 78.
It is a day of joy for the believers and a day of sorrow for the hypocrites.
Cause of his death:
— He fell ill while traveling from Mecca to al-Sham.
— He was struck by severe chills, and his mouth could no longer close due to intense trembling, until he perished.
Some of his crimes—too numerous to be fully enumerated—include:
— Usurping Imam ‘Ali’s rightful claim to the caliphate, and ordering that he be cursed and reviled for decades from the pulpits of al-Sham.
— The killing of Imam al-Hassan.
— The killing of the noble Companion Hujr ibn ‘Adi.
— Appointing his son Yazid—the immoral and corrupt—as his successor to rule the Muslims.
“Far be it from me to say that I am better than you, O Mu‘awiya—there is no goodness in you. Allah has absolved me of vices just as He has absolved you of virtues.”
—Imam al-Hasan (peace be upon him), addressing Mu‘awiya
12 Rajab, 60 AH marks the anniversary of the demise of Mu‘awiya ibn Abi Sufyan (may Allah curse him) in al-Sham, at the age of 78.
It is a day of joy for the believers and a day of sorrow for the hypocrites.
Cause of his death:
— He fell ill while traveling from Mecca to al-Sham.
— He was struck by severe chills, and his mouth could no longer close due to intense trembling, until he perished.
Some of his crimes—too numerous to be fully enumerated—include:
— Usurping Imam ‘Ali’s rightful claim to the caliphate, and ordering that he be cursed and reviled for decades from the pulpits of al-Sham.
— The killing of Imam al-Hassan.
— The killing of the noble Companion Hujr ibn ‘Adi.
— Appointing his son Yazid—the immoral and corrupt—as his successor to rule the Muslims.
“Far be it from me to say that I am better than you, O Mu‘awiya—there is no goodness in you. Allah has absolved me of vices just as He has absolved you of virtues.”
—Imam al-Hasan (peace be upon him), addressing Mu‘awiya
❤4
Happening now:
Decoding Trump's 'Am First': How Israeli Lobby Influences U.S. Policy
https://x.com/i/spaces/1RDGlAPEwrgJL
Decoding Trump's 'Am First': How Israeli Lobby Influences U.S. Policy
https://x.com/i/spaces/1RDGlAPEwrgJL
Basira Press
Note: 12 Rajab, 60 AH marks the anniversary of the demise of Mu‘awiya ibn Abi Sufyan (may Allah curse him) in al-Sham, at the age of 78. It is a day of joy for the believers and a day of sorrow for the hypocrites. Cause of his death: — He fell ill while…
Imam Hussain inherited a revolution ignited by his grandfather, Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him and his family).
This revolution had shattered the chains of ignorance, tribalism, and idolatry, liberating the oppressed and championing justice.
His father, Imam Ali, and his brother Imam Hassan carried this legacy forward, but by 60 AH, the Umayyad rulers sought to crush it entirely.
The societal structures built on faith, justice, and equality were systematically subverted: Qur’anic principles were twisted to serve tyrants, wealth intended for the needy was diverted to corrupt elites, and those who once wielded the sword for justice found it turned against the innocent.
In this context, Yazid ibn Mu‘awiya demanded allegiance.
Unlike his father Mu‘awiya, whose cunning concealed his ambitions, Yazid’s impetuosity left no room for subtlety. He sought to bind Imam Hussain and other prominent companions to his rule, even instructing governors to extract their pledge by force.
When officials summoned Hussain, he refused to comply privately or under duress.
With unwavering clarity, he declared that he could not pledge allegiance to a ruler whose conduct violated divine principles, saying:
“I am from the household of prophecy and guardianship of faith, and I do not pledge allegiance to one like him.”
Imam.Hussain’s stance was not mere defiance; it was the conscious fulfillment of his historical and moral responsibility.
Retreating into private worship or surrendering to fear would have been easier, yet it would have abandoned the principles his grandfather had fought to establish. He recognized that the ultimate path to God was the path of truth, justice, and resistance to oppression, even at the cost of his life and the lives of his family.
Thus, Imam Hussain left Medina for Mecca and eventually Karbala, deliberately positioning himself and his companions at the forefront of a moral confrontation against tyranny.
His refusal to bow to Yazid was a luminous declaration that justice cannot coexist with submission to corruption and oppression.
His martyrdom became a timeless symbol of courage, a moral compass for the oppressed, and a blueprint for resistance against injustice.
In standing against Yazid, Imam Hussain demonstrated that true leadership is measured not by wealth, armies, or political leverage, but by adherence to principles, courage in the face of tyranny, and unwavering commitment to justice.
His legacy endures as a beacon for all who fight for the dignity of the oppressed and the triumph of righteousness over corruption.
This revolution had shattered the chains of ignorance, tribalism, and idolatry, liberating the oppressed and championing justice.
His father, Imam Ali, and his brother Imam Hassan carried this legacy forward, but by 60 AH, the Umayyad rulers sought to crush it entirely.
The societal structures built on faith, justice, and equality were systematically subverted: Qur’anic principles were twisted to serve tyrants, wealth intended for the needy was diverted to corrupt elites, and those who once wielded the sword for justice found it turned against the innocent.
In this context, Yazid ibn Mu‘awiya demanded allegiance.
Unlike his father Mu‘awiya, whose cunning concealed his ambitions, Yazid’s impetuosity left no room for subtlety. He sought to bind Imam Hussain and other prominent companions to his rule, even instructing governors to extract their pledge by force.
When officials summoned Hussain, he refused to comply privately or under duress.
With unwavering clarity, he declared that he could not pledge allegiance to a ruler whose conduct violated divine principles, saying:
“I am from the household of prophecy and guardianship of faith, and I do not pledge allegiance to one like him.”
Imam.Hussain’s stance was not mere defiance; it was the conscious fulfillment of his historical and moral responsibility.
Retreating into private worship or surrendering to fear would have been easier, yet it would have abandoned the principles his grandfather had fought to establish. He recognized that the ultimate path to God was the path of truth, justice, and resistance to oppression, even at the cost of his life and the lives of his family.
Thus, Imam Hussain left Medina for Mecca and eventually Karbala, deliberately positioning himself and his companions at the forefront of a moral confrontation against tyranny.
His refusal to bow to Yazid was a luminous declaration that justice cannot coexist with submission to corruption and oppression.
His martyrdom became a timeless symbol of courage, a moral compass for the oppressed, and a blueprint for resistance against injustice.
In standing against Yazid, Imam Hussain demonstrated that true leadership is measured not by wealth, armies, or political leverage, but by adherence to principles, courage in the face of tyranny, and unwavering commitment to justice.
His legacy endures as a beacon for all who fight for the dignity of the oppressed and the triumph of righteousness over corruption.
💯7
Channel 12 correspondent Amit Segal:
We are witnessing a historic event. The empire of evil that has threatened us for nearly fifty years is shaking strongly. It is also shaking thanks to the actions of many brave Israelis who have worked openly and secretly against Iran. May God protect the courageous protesters who take to the streets. In my opinion, Trump will help them very soon.
We are witnessing a historic event. The empire of evil that has threatened us for nearly fifty years is shaking strongly. It is also shaking thanks to the actions of many brave Israelis who have worked openly and secretly against Iran. May God protect the courageous protesters who take to the streets. In my opinion, Trump will help them very soon.
😡3
Following the U.S. brutal invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 succeeded at minimal cost, Washington immediately launched the catastrophic war in Iraq, claiming nonexistent weapons while plunging the country into chaos.
Pentagon hawks dreamed of seven more conquests, but the war machine bogged down painfully in both Afghanistan and Iraq, bleeding resources and credibility before eventual withdrawal.
Now, emboldened by the controversial U.S. operation that captured Venezuelan President Maduro, Tyrant Trump escalates threats toward Cuba, Colombia, Mexico, Iran, and even Greenland.
This reckless swagger flirts with fresh imperial adventures that could extract a grave price..
Pentagon hawks dreamed of seven more conquests, but the war machine bogged down painfully in both Afghanistan and Iraq, bleeding resources and credibility before eventual withdrawal.
Now, emboldened by the controversial U.S. operation that captured Venezuelan President Maduro, Tyrant Trump escalates threats toward Cuba, Colombia, Mexico, Iran, and even Greenland.
This reckless swagger flirts with fresh imperial adventures that could extract a grave price..
Basira Press
Following the U.S. brutal invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 succeeded at minimal cost, Washington immediately launched the catastrophic war in Iraq, claiming nonexistent weapons while plunging the country into chaos. Pentagon hawks dreamed of seven more conquests…
“Even if the earth were adorned and its people thought themselves capable of mastering it, Our command would come to it by night or by day, and We would make it a barren harvest, as if it had never flourished yesterday.”
— Surah Yunus (10:24)
This Qur’anic verse warns that human arrogance is powerless before Divine authority!!
Tyrant Trump, emboldened by fleeting military successes and reckless threats toward Iran, embodies this arrogance.
He imagines he can bend the world to his will, yet history and noscripture alike remind us that hubris leads to ruin, and no force on earth can escape God’s decree.
— Surah Yunus (10:24)
This Qur’anic verse warns that human arrogance is powerless before Divine authority!!
Tyrant Trump, emboldened by fleeting military successes and reckless threats toward Iran, embodies this arrogance.
He imagines he can bend the world to his will, yet history and noscripture alike remind us that hubris leads to ruin, and no force on earth can escape God’s decree.
❤2💯1