Deliverance from Pharmakeia spirits that came in through Vaccines, and Vaccine Damage.

@DudeShow

Exposing the Jesuit Order as the true hidden hand behind world politics.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Jesuitocracy

https://youtu.be/CeP-nVy6zng?si=RhSNGRL0iR4Myfsq

Still one of the best. Chew the meat and spit out the SDA bones

The Jewish Scapegoat

“Why would the Jesuits use their implacable enemy, the Jews, to further their designs for world dominion? The Jesuits never do anything out in the open where they can be exposed. If they are recognized as the culprits, they will be blamed and suffer the consequences, but if they can use someone else as the cause of the world's problems, especially an enemy they can destroy in the process, then they have simultaneously accomplished two of their objectives. The Jewish people are the perfect scapegoat. Since the Rothschilds¹ are Jesuit agents operating under a Jewish cover², using them in forming the Illuminati back in 1776 effectively throws the onus of this conspiracy on the Jews. The Rothschilds are certainly not the only Jesuit agents that operate under a Jewish front.”
-The Enemy Unmasked³ (Second Edition) by Bill Hughes page 27-28.

¹Literally translated as “Red Shield.” The Roman army was notoriously known for skillfully utilizing their iconic red shields in combat formations. Which makes one wonder if the Rothschild family really are Jews in any sense of the word.

²The Rothschilds have been the fiscal agents of the Vatican since, at the latest, 1822. See The “Federal” Reserve Conspiracy & Rockefellers: Their “Gold Corner” by Emanuel M. Josephson pages 4-5. Furthermore, the 1901-1906 Jewish Encyclopedia also dubbed the Rothschilds as the guardians of the papal treasure.

³This quote has been falsely attributed to William Josiah Sutton on several occasions online.

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕

1 amendment of the US constitution won't allow for the outright ban of Muslims, Jews, Satanists, so on and so forth.

Thus expect fundamental changes to the 1st amendment. It's goal was tolerance of jesuits/catholics and that goal has been accomplished

Excerpts from Communism, Democracy, and Catholic Power by Paul Blanshard (Part One).

“To understand the driving force behind both the Kremlin and the Vatican systems of power, it is necessary to understand the devices which both systems use to develop and exploit religious devotion. In both systems the will to worship and the will to serve have been coupled with the will to obey. The most exalted altruistic motives have been skillfully woven into a code of subjection to a political-religious machine. Human weakness and human nobility have been combined in two matchless systems of personal loyalty and institutional discipline. A great many writers have pointed out that the ecstasy of religious devotion is not confined to formal religion, and that some of the noblest defenders of faith have never acknowledged a formal creed. Psychologically the men who operate the Communist system of power today fall into this category. They are atheists, but they have frequently been called a Communist priesthood, and the denoscription is deserved… Inside the Soviet Union they have become the established priesthood of the established church, the only church which Communism really recognizes, the Kremlin. They defend its secular altars with the same zeal that characterizes the priest’s defense of the Catholic Church in countries like Spain and Portugal. As Bernard Shaw once remarked: ‘Communism, being the lay form of Catholicism, and indeed meaning the same thing, has never had any lack of chaplains.’ The young Communist who wishes to enter this Soviet priesthood must go through a process of indoctrination and training that is very much like that of a Jesuit. He must give his whole personality to the Faith without reservation. He must, as Ignatius Loyola said to his Jesuits, surrender his will to his religious superior ‘just as if he were a corpse.’ The parallels in the operation of the two priesthoods of the Vatican and the Kremlin are so consistent…”
-Communism, Democracy, and Catholic Power by Paul Blanshard pages 159-160

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕

The Eucharist is BLASPHEMY
@BeastWatch

Excerpts from Communism, Democracy, and Catholic Power by Paul Blanshard (Part Two).

“To begin with, the Vatican and the Kremlin stand for the control of the Catholic and the Communist worlds by special classes of persons. The rulers of the Communist Party rule world Communism; the members of the Catholic priesthood rule the world of Catholicism. Both ruling classes are artificially segregated castes in the communities to which they belong. They are kept distinct in activity and status in order to increase their efficiency and prestige. In both the Communist and Catholic systems of power the small, disciplined inner group of leaders must be chosen from above, screened from above, and directed by the hierarchy of Party or Church. To preserve vitality and prevent decadence in this ruling group, there must be a certain amount of upward mobility. New blood is necessary in any healthful organism. But no new group must ever be permitted to displace either the Communist or the Catholic elite. The priesthood must never surrender to the masses or permit the masses to take the reins of power. The ruling caste must be essentially a self-appointed and a self-perpetuating caste. Sidney and Beatrice Webb, in describing the leadership principle in force in Russia, speak of the ‘vocation of leadership.’ Both the idea and the words are used in exactly the same way in the Catholic system of power in appealing for ‘vocations…’ The oath of devotion in a Catholic religious order parallels that of the Communist Party. Complete submission to institutional superiors and complete surrender of the personal will are accepted as necessary Christian virtues. Ignatius Loyola, whom I have already quoted, set the tone for Catholic religious discipline when he taught his Jesuits the virtue of ‘absolute annihilation of our own judgment.’ ‘We must,’ he said, ‘if anything appears to our eyes white, which the Church declares to be black, also declare it to be black…’ The requirements of community living and group segregation in the Catholic system also form a necessary part of the total discipline. The monastic economic system is essentially a communist system. Monks and nuns may not own anything except personal belongings; if they are given gifts, the favors must be turned over to their religious orders. Even teaching nuns who are placed upon the government payrolls of American states and cities must turn over their salaries to the Church, and live on the meager personal allowance of monastery life…”
-Communism, Democracy, and Catholic Power by Paul Blanshard pages 160-161, 164-165

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕

Excerpts from Communism, Democracy, and Catholic Power by Paul Blanshard (Part Three).

“The first law of Communist discipline is that rebellion against the authority of the Stalinist machine is not merely a mistake but a mortal sin — a mortal sin against the Soviet Fatherland and the Holy Communist Faith… The best evidence of the success of Communist methods in producing a sense of guilt in the minds of all rebels is the Communist ‘confession’ which has been a feature of almost every great Communist heresy trial since 1936. Fallen Communists in these famous purge trials have apparently revealed a positive pleasure in their abasement, and many observers have compared their reactions to those of religious masochists who practice self-flagellation. Whether the comparison is sound or not, it is certain that the Communists use both physical and psychic torture very effectively in producing confessions at their treason trials. They often break a rebel’s body first in order to subdue his spirit, and the will to confess is frequently produced by techniques which bring the victim close to the border of insanity without leaving any mark upon his body… In a sense, the Communist agitator is more like a Jesuit than a Benedictine. Jesuits are not confined to monasteries, and they circulate freely in the world as roving agents of the Faith.”
-Communism, Democracy, and Catholic Power by Paul Blanshard pages 168, 172

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕

Star Wars and Jedi Jesuits

Jesuit priest and consultant to Pope Francis, James Martin S.J. wrote the following in a Facebook post on December 17th, 2015:

“I was amazed, the first time I saw the original 'Star Wars’ (now called, rather clumsily ‘Episode 4: A New Hope') after I had been a Jesuit for a few years, how very Ignatian it all seemed. Themes of discernment (and not just discernment, but the idea that a ‘force’ would help you make good and life-giving decisions); the vicious conflict both within and without of good and evil; the emphasis on long periods of training under the guidance of a spiritual master: that is, a kind of ‘formation’; battle imagery that seemed to spring full blown from the Spiritual Exercises; and even specific Ignatian techniques of recognizing evil (‘the angel of darkness masquerading as the angel of light’) seemed so vivid that I remember looking up whether or not George Lucas had gone to a Jesuit school… Even certain of the costumes (very clerical at times, even with a hint of a collar on Luke at one point) and lingo (Jedi/Jesuits), etc seemed pretty surprising. I'm struck by that every time I see one of the films from the original trilogy.”

Source

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕

Melinda Gates, the Jesuitess

“Melinda Gates was raised as a Roman Catholic, and by her own admission she continued to be a "practicing" one. From a very early age the influence of the Jesuits over her may be detected. She had an aunt who was an Ursuline nun, and an uncle who was a Jesuit priest. She attended a Roman Catholic school, and graduated from the Ursuline Academy of Dallas, a Roman Catholic college-preparatory school for girls. When she married Bill Gates in 1994, a Jesuit priest named William Sullivan presided at their wedding. This man happened to be a former president of Seattle University, a Jesuit university where Melinda had been a student… By her own admission she learned Communist "social justice" (a term coined by Jesuit Priest Luigi Taparelli¹) at the Ursuline Academy… In 2003 the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pledged $18.9 million to create 12 small college-preparatory high schools, to be modelled after the Cristo Rey Jesuit High School in Chicago, Illinois. The investment would promote Roman Catholic education in some of the poorest communities in the United States.”
-The Year They Shut Down The World: The Virus, the Vatican, and the New World Order by Shaun Willcock pages 33-34, parenthesis mine.

¹See chapter four of The Holy See, Social Justice, and International Trade Law: Assessing the Social Mission of the Catholic Church in the Gatt-Wto System by Dr. Alphonsus Ilhuoma

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕

Catholicism and it's daughters hate this fact
@BeastWatch

The Diabolical Chameleon-like Nature of the Jesuits

“The Americans… are beginning to learn that Jesuitism is the same unchanging principle of intrigue and evil in Republics, which it has proved itself for ages to be under Monarchies. To the Jesuit, all forms of government are alike; he is literally all things to all men; he cares not who wears the livery of power, if he himself holds the reins of empire. In Russia, he is, at most, only a devout Catholic—oftener, and apparently, a sincere worshipper of the Greek Church. ‘Draw the character after what the Jesuit seems to be in London, and you will not recognise your portrait in the Jesuit of Rome. The Jesuit is the man of circumstances; despotic in Spain, constitutional in England, republican in Paraguay, bigot in Rome, idolater in India, he acts out— in his own person, with admirable flexibility, all those features by which men are usually to be distinguished from each other. He will accompany the gay women of the world to the theatre, and will share in the excesses of the debauchee. With solemn countenance he will take his place by the side of the religious man at church; and he will revel in the tavern with the glutton and the sot. He dresses in all garbs; speaks all languages; knows all customs; is present everywhere—though nowhere recognised; and all this should seem [oh, monstrous blasphemy!] for the greater glory of God—ad majorem Dei gloriam.¹’ The Jesuit always sides with power; for he always seeks it favour. When he changes parties, it is only to prostrate those whom he cannot make his instruments, and elevate those whom he can… He is a Whig in one state, and a Democrat in another. He is a Secessionist and a Slavery Propagandist at the South of America, and an Abolitionist at the North. He concedes to you, or to me, all things except power.”
-Stanhope Burleigh, or, The Jesuits in our homes, by Helen Dhu pages vi-vii

¹Quoting from G.B. Nicolini’s work The History of the Jesuits: Their Origin, Progress, Doctrines, and Designs.

Source

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕