A figure from a museum in Peru📜

While most of the figures can be explained by abstract representations of animals, in this particular case it is much more complicated.

Here we clearly see a man holding nothing more than a steering wheel in front of him, and there is an incomprehensible thing in front of him.

Surprisingly, scientists do not try to explain this artifact in any way and for the most part simply ignore it.

The opening of a Chinese tomb in Taiyuan city has given people a find in the form of a gold sarcophagus from the Tang dynasty. The official position of scientists is that the gold coffin has not been opened until now because scientists fear that the contents will react with the air, oxidize and turn to ashes.

Sounds reasonable, in contrast to the second part of the denoscription of the precious sarcophagus - a red silk bow is still wrapped around the coffin. So the metal sarcophagus has oxidized over 12-15 centuries in the ground, but the silk ribbon has not? Silk is known for its durability, unlike metals!

In Rome, not a few doors remain for "big" and "small" people. They can easily be distinguished by door handles of different sizes and door hammers at a level greater than human height.

If they did, it means there was someone to use them and this despite the data that the average height of the Romans was 155-160cm.

William Camden lived in Britain from 1551 to 1623 and was a famous English historian, topographer, and expert in antiquities. In 1586 he published the first edition of Britannia, in which he
claimed that the stones of Stonehenge were not hewn from the rocks of discovered quarries, but from sand and some kind of binder.

"And is it so strange? After all, we read in Pliny that the sand or ashes of Puteol, when filled with water, turns into true stone"-concrete as it is. Camden is right, there is nothing to be surprised about. Except that our contemporaries do not take the author's words into account📜

"The Kiev Synopsis of 1823 by Innokenty Gizel, Archimandrite of the Kiev-Pechersk Monastery and Rector of the Kiev-Mohyla Academy, is interesting because it briefly and clearly sets forth the historical postulates that then formed the basis of Lyzlov, Lomonosov and Tatishchev's Histories as well as other, later national Russian historians📜

Gizel begins with the origin of the Slavs and Russians, noting that originally they are one people, like related Sarmatians, Roxolans and some other peoples of Eastern Europe.

The distant antiquity of the Slavic-Russian people is also spoken of. "The Kiev Synopsis" reports that they fought the Romans and Greeks in antiquity and received a charter from Alexander the Great as far back as 300 years before Christ's birth, claiming Slavic lands in Europe for them. Of the other reports of the Synopsis, it is worth noting the statement that "the Slavic-Russian prince Odonacer" seized Rome and ruled it for 30 years🤔

If the pyramids of Egypt, Mesoamerica and Nubia can be toured, the pyramids of China can be forgotten for the moment. The policy of the Chinese party is simple - to ignore hundreds of pyramids throughout the country, to prohibit visiting, studying and even approaching the pyramids.

Why such strict secrecy all of a sudden? The pyramids could be a good source of tourist income, and studying the artifacts buried in them could add to history... or destroy it. Because in the official history of China there was no place for pyramids, who and for what purpose built them is not mentioned, even approximate dates are not preserved. The scientific community decided to take the simplest route: "Smile and wave, gentlemen!"😆

There are enough underground tunnels, passages, and even entire cities in the world. It is difficult to imagine how many of them are still unopened and buried📜

However, the main question remains unanswered - why were kilometers and hundreds of tons of rock cut into the stone? What were people to flee from under the ground, without light, without the ability to grow and replenish food, without the ability to leave? And it was not just one people who distinguished themselves, but different peoples all over the planet.

Is it possible that at some point it was impossible to live on earth and had to hide underground?🤔

A modern falsification of history for those who like to argue whether the Americans were on the Moon.

The lunar soil fragment brought by the Apollo 11 astronauts and presented to the Dutch prime minister turned out to be a piece of fossilized wood. The scandal was officially reported by BBC News in 2009.

"Experts doubted the authenticity of the stone back in 2006, and the suspicion was confirmed by analysis. The U.S. government has not yet commented on the situation."

It is a bit embarrassing when in 50 years science has easily learned how to determine the composition of a substance and your moonstone turns out to be a common fake. At least the progress in technology is encouraging!

Google Earth maps in Antarctica found a number of strange identical objects🤔

If you enter the following coordinates 75°0'46.98S 0°4'52.71E into Google Earth, you will see on the territory of Antarctica absolutely incredible objects, which are very difficult to call natural formations.

All these objects are in a row on one straight line, almost 2 km long, in the middle of a completely bare and clean space without rocks and stones and look like some structure with an exit to the surface. You can notice that each of the objects in something is not similar to the other, it is 100% not a technical failure of the map, when one - a single object was accidentally copied and multiplied🗺

Mozart's contemporaries thought he was a dwarf, not a child😁

When Mozart was eight years old, the Royal Society of London sent Daines Barrington to check whether Mozart was a child or not. The little pianist's virtuoso playing led many to suspect that he was in fact a dwarfed adult pretending to be a child. Barrington dispelled all doubts: Mozart was an eight-year-old little boy who was rocking a wooden horse when he met him📜

Isaac Newton had his own Bible, with pictures, which I suggest you look at more closely.

In 1731, this physicist-mathematician-mechanic-astronomer sketched the globe and its continents very accurately. He especially accurately sketched Antarctica, which was just under a century away from discovery. Either the brilliant scientist was a visionary, or it is time to reconsider the dates of Antarctica's discovery.