Dr. John R. Rice on Racial Matters - Excerpts from Dr. Rice, Here are More Questions Volume II (part three).

Dr. John R. Rice was a Baptist evangelist who pastored the Fundamentalist Baptist Tabernacle of Dallas, Texas. Rice was a dedicated soulwinner and an acclaimed author, most well known for his newspaper The Sword of the Lord.

Many integrationists and “human-race-onlyists” like to use Numbers 12 as a proof text for God’s blessing upon miscegenation. I personally have heard many sermons that were in favor of interracial marriage open with this very passage. Those who ascribe to this particular line of thought claim that God’s anger was kindled against Aaron and Miriam because they spoke out against Moses’ alleged¹ interracial marriage, which God supposedly approved of. Dr. John R. Rice debunks that notion in the following words:

“Aaron's and Miriam's rebellion was against Moses’ leadership, and so against God. The rebellion of Miriam and Aaron was wrong and God was against it altogether apart from the matter of who Moses married. In Numbers 12, God says nothing in favor of Moses' marriage. It is true that Miriam and Aaron were against the Ethiopian woman Moses married, but their sin was that they sought to displace Moses' leadership and to seize the leadership themselves. ‘And they said, Hath the Lord indeed spoken only by Moses? hath he not spoken also by us?’ (vs. 2). Actually Aaron and Miriam rebelled against God, and God punished them for that sin without making any issue of the Ethiopian woman.

-Pages 406-407

¹I say alleged because it cannot be proven conclusively from Scripture that she was indeed a Negro (which is what many like to claim). In all actuality, Moses’ “Ethiopian wife” was most likely a Shemite, more on that in later posts.

Source: http://tinyurl.com/akewrd4z

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Kinism: why be so Political?

In discussions about Kinism, the Christian doctrine of ethno-nationalism and ethno-segregation, critics often question its political nature, asking, 'Should we really be this political?'

However, this statement of theirs is erroneous and hypocritical, given that many Christians readily engage in political discussions on issues such as abortion, slavery, and homosexuality. So, why the hesitation when it comes to Kinism? In simple terms, just as Christians take political stances on topics like abortion, we are perfectly able and expected to have political views on ethno-nationalism and, consequently, Kinism.

@Kinism

Dr. John R. Rice on Racial Matters - Excerpts from Dr. Rice, Here are More Questions Volume II (part four).

Dr. John R. Rice was a Baptist evangelist who pastored the Fundamentalist Baptist Tabernacle of Dallas, Texas. Rice was a dedicated soulwinner and an acclaimed author, most well known for his newspaper The Sword of the Lord.

Brother Rice writes:

“I think it is a fact that colored people, or Negroes, have through the centuries lagged behind some other races in civilization, culture, and leadership¹... I do not believe there should be forced integration. I do not believe intermarriage with Negroes and whites would be good for either race and good for the nation. I do not believe in intermarriage of other races or others with great differences in religion and customs because such marriages do not turn out happily and thus would not honor the Lord as the general thing... I think there are some elements of the curse² that may remain on colored people... I do think, however, that the bounds of the races are intended for good and that it is not wise to have intermarriage between the races and not happy for them. And we should be good to Negro people... Yet I do not know why one should be compelled to employ a Negro if he wants to hire a white man or why a Negro should be compelled to hire a white man if he wants to hire a Negro. And I do not know why one should be compelled to sell his house to a Negro if he doesn't want to.”

-Pages 409-410

¹Any honest black man will tell you this, in fact, I will be uploading testimonies from some black brethren concerning this in the future.

²Referring to the Curse of Ham in Genesis 9.

Source: http://tinyurl.com/akewrd4z

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Dr. John R. Rice on Racial Matters - Excerpts from Dr. Rice, Here are More Questions Volume II (part five).

Dr. John R. Rice was a Baptist evangelist who pastored the Fundamentalist Baptist Tabernacle of Dallas, Texas. Rice was a dedicated soulwinner and an acclaimed author, most well known for his newspaper The Sword of the Lord.

Brother Rice comments:

“Intermarriage of whites and Negroes is not right; I do not believe it will turn out happily and I do not believe it would be wise to mongrelize the white race by constant mixture with Negroes. That happened in Mexico and in South America with Spanish and Indians and Negroes intermarrying, and see what happened to their civilization.¹ And if whites ought not to marry Negroes, then young people, whites and Negroes, ought not to date each other, and so there ought to be some separation socially. It is proper for Negroes to run with Negroes and to court Negroes and marry Negroes… the civil rights laws interfere with the rights of millions of people, to gain the votes of a minority²… So I think some degree of segregation is right and proper.”

-Pages 410-411

¹There has been several notable works that make the case that miscegenation is one of the factors that leads to a civilization’s collapse (Ezra 9:12).

²Which is exactly what happened. Lyndon B. Johnson, the president who would sign the Civil Rights Act of 1964 into law, remarked concerning it: “I’ll have those niggers voting democratic for 200 years.”

Source: http://tinyurl.com/akewrd4z

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Kinism: What are Bounds?

In Acts 17:26, a pivotal passage for supporting Kinism—the Christian doctrine of ethnonationalism and ethno-segregation—we encounter a profound statement:

"And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;"

This verse highlights God's role in assigning nations, ethnicities, specific "bounds of habitation". But what does this mean precisely? "Bounds" refers to limitations, often synonymous with "boundary", denoting a separating line. This separating line, in reference to nations, can take the form of physical geography or politically drawn barriers—a delineation between habitations, or what we term 'habitational boundaries'. In essence, God has designated specific geographical areas for specific nations to dwell, live, and inhabit separately from one another.

@Kinism

Kinism: Simplified

Kinism is the Christian doctrine that advocates for ethno-nationalism and, consequently, segregation along ethnic lines, suggesting that different ethnic groups, composed of varying ancestral/racial backgrounds, should live separately. This doctrine is derived through simple logical inference from Scripture. Consider the following argument:

Premise 1: The Scriptures inform us about the reality of Nations (Genesis 10).

Premise 2: The Scriptures indicate that Biblical nations are defined by common or shared ancestry, not solely beliefs/ideology — Ethnonations, ethnicities (Genesis 10, 'after their families').

Premise 3: God intentionally instituted and set bounds for where these nations are to dwell or inhabit, purposefully separating them perpetually (Deuteronomy 32:8 & Acts 17:26).

Conclusion: It is God's will and intention that nations/ethnicities remain separate/segregated. Therefore, we must submit to His will and follow this directive (James 4:17).

@Kinism

The Christian Problem of Racial Segregation by Humphrey K. Ezell (part one).

Dr. Ezell pastored Southern Baptist Churches in the states of South Carolina, Louisiana, and Mississippi for over thirty years, including the Old Bethel Baptist Church of Woodruff, South Carolina.

In his 1959 book, The Christian Problem of Racial Segregation, Dr. Ezell writes:

“For more than eighty years the practice of racial segregation between the White and Negro races in the South was accepted as Christian without any protest by any religious group… With the practice of racial segregation in the South there has been a spirit of good will between the races, and, as a result, the Negro race has made remarkable progress. The hope of continued progress for the Negro race is not integration and intermarriage with other races, but in developing a pride in their own race… The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is the organization that is most active in promoting integration of the White and Negro races. There can be little doubt that the ultimate purpose of this organization is intermarriage between the White and Negro races. We believe that such intermarriage is contrary to the teaching of the Scriptures… We will study some of the Old Testament Scripture passages, observing how God has segregated the races… (Gen. 9:20-27). In this account God has segregated the races… a curse is placed upon Ham and his descendants, and they are to be servants to Shem and Japheth. There is no evidence anywhere in the Scriptures that this curse upon the descendants of Ham has been lifted. The encyclopaedias give fair as the meaning of Japheth, dusky as the meaning of Shem, and black as the meaning of Ham. It is not our desire to go into the history of the descendants of these three brothers of whom the whole earth was overspread, but we feel sure that anyone making a careful study of the Genesis account of the descendants of Japheth will conclude that they were to occupy what is now Europe and northern Asia. Africa was given to the descendants of Ham, and southern Asia was given to the descendants of Shem.”

-Pages 9-10, 13-14

Source: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uiug.30112062706814

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

The Christian Problem of Racial Segregation by Humphrey K. Ezell (part two).

Dr. Ezell pastored Southern Baptist Churches in the states of South Carolina, Louisiana, and Mississippi for over thirty years, including the Old Bethel Baptist Church of Woodruff, South Carolina.

In his 1959 book, The Christian Problem of Racial Segregation, Dr. Ezell writes:

“There are some who are saying today that since we are all of one blood we should do away with all racial barriers. It is true that all races and peoples are of the one blood of Adam and Noah, but being of one blood does not destroy the differences in individuals and races. Being of one blood does not make one who is not a Christian a Christian; it does not give culture to an uncultured person; it does not make one innocent who is a criminal; it does not turn a Negro man into a White man. Being of one blood means that the depravity of Adam's sin was upon all of the descendants of Adam before the flood, and since the flood this depravity rests upon all of the descendants of Noah. Being of one blood means that since all are born under the depravity of sin, then it is only through the shed blood of our perfect, sacrificial Saviour, Jesus Christ, God's only Son, that this depravity can be lifted. Thus being of one blood does not take away the curse of racial segregation and servitude placed upon the descendants of Ham because of Ham's sin. Judging by the derivation of the word Ham and also by the geographical location assigned to the sons of Ham there can be no doubt that the Negro race has descended from Ham. The curse that was placed upon the descendants of Ham, that they were to be servants to Shem and Japheth, still rests upon this race… God has clearly segregated the descendants of Ham from the other races, and if we seek to integrate all of the races great harm will be done to the Negro race as well as to the other races… God has made the White and Negro races different in their physical features, in their mental ability, in their emotional nature. These differences in the races forbid intermarriage. Intermarriage between the races will produce a mulatto race. If God had wanted only one race, He would have created only one race… May we repeat that God has segregated the races.”

-Pages 14-15, 24, 30

Source: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uiug.30112062706814

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

The Sin or Evils of Integration by Pastor Louis Ellsworth Dailey (part one)

Towards the end of his life and ministry as a Southern Baptist minister for over 58 years, pastoring various Churches in Virginia and North Carolina, Louis E. Dailey wrote a book ennoscriptd The Sin or Evils of Integration. This book, written in 1962 at the pinnacle of the so-called civil rights movement, is comprised of Biblical, rational, and practical arguments and anecdotes that support the conclusion that integration is a great evil.

In the book Dailey writes:

“Those who read this book with care will discover that I reveal and discuss quite a number of evils connected with the integration of the white and Negro races. High on the list of evils is that integration violates the Will of God. Whatever course anyone may take that violates the Will of God is sin. The Scripture plainly teaches us that it was and still is God's law that all of his subjects multiply and replenish the earth after their kind… Advocates of integration fail to consider the first commandment: ‘to multiply and replenish the earth after their kind.’ In order that this command might be obeyed, God placed instinct within the minds and hearts of all his creatures, which enables them to have a fascination for each other after their kind. Witness the time-honored expression, ‘Birds of a feather flock together.’ Lesser creatures than mankind obey this command of God and fulfill the desire of the Creator to propogate their kind in the sea, on the land, and in the air. Only when interfered with by the evil and ignorance of mankind will there be a deviation from the plan of God. This is the problem. God made mankind in His image and as His masterpiece in creation; therefore, a great obligation falls upon mankind to fulfill God's first commandment… The ultimate result of integration will be an amalgamation of races… Do not believe that integration is a religious movement. It is a mixture of devilism, Communism, and Northern politicalism.”

-Excerpts from the preface and pages 1-2

Source: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015074197966

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

In 1800, people of European descent made up ~20% of the global population.

By 2000, this percentage had fallen by half due to massive population growth in the global south (funded entirely by "aid" from White taxpayers).

By 2150, the White population percentage will halve again, as Third World populations continue to grow at the expense of the White taxpayer.

Bear in mind that UN population predictions are regional, rather than racialized. Non-White immigrants are included in the populations of North America and Europe.

Statistics be racist!

Great reminder that the Bible says demographic replacement is evidence of God’s judgement on a people (2 Kings 17:6-24)

JLP trembles at whites becoming a minority in America.

It is self evident that each race has its own inherent strengths and weaknesses. This is something that God ordained. Not every race is an intelligent as each other, not every race is an innovative as one another, not every race possesses as much physical aptitude as another race. This is just reality, not “racism.” Remember, things that are different are NOT the same! The media and the mainstream scientific community (which are often more interested in pushing a political agenda rather than the truth) are trying to convince people that race doesn’t exist and that the only difference is skin colour. Only an ignoramus would come to that conclusion. There are immense physiological differences between the race outside of skin colour. Few want to admit this truth.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/jlptalk/1427

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Egalitarian integrationist meme debunked.

The moral of the story is that race goes much deeper than the skin. These ecumenical, one world global citizens will continue to make fools out of themselves. God made the sexes and the races very distinct, even to the point that if one were to exhume someone’s skeleton, it could be deduced fairly easily what gender and race the person was.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

The Sin or Evils of Integration by Pastor Louis Ellsworth Dailey (part two)

Towards the end of his life and ministry as a Southern Baptist minister for over 58 years, pastoring various Churches in Virginia and North Carolina, Louis E. Dailey wrote a book ennoscriptd The Sin or Evils of Integration. This book, written in 1962 at the pinnacle of the so-called civil rights movement, is comprised of Biblical, rational, and practical arguments and anecdotes that support the conclusion that integration is a great evil.

In the book Dailey writes:

“There are some ways in which all men are created equal: all men are born with life, helpless and naked, and equal in salvation, "The way of the cross leads home, there is no other way but this." All races are equal in that they must accept the same Savior and the same terms for the redemption of their souls. In some ways all men are created equal but not in the sense a hundred percent integrationist would try to make it appear. As there are chasms of social distinctions in the same race, so there are bound to be chasms to separate those of different races. Especially is this true between the Negro and white races. Besides differences in color and talents, there are thousands of years of customs, refinement, and ancestral background that will forever prevent them from meeting upon an enjoyable social level… When those who favor integration say those who are opposed to it are prejudiced, they are begging the question. When a man begs the questions that means there is not any argument in what he is saying. When an integrationist calls those who oppose integration prejudiced, it means they have no argument or just reason for their position. They fall behind the smoke screen of begging the question by calling those who are opposed to integration prejudiced and bigoted… The cross of calvary is where we meet Jesus for the forgiveness of our sins and the redemption of souls, but it does not change our race. I accepted Christ as my Savior when I was a thirteen-year-old boy. Upon that day of decision the burden of sin rolled away from my heart, but I still remained a white boy, a member of the Caucasian Race. The same is true of those who have black skins; when they leave the cross they are still members of the Negro Race.


-Pages 51, 53, 59

Source: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015074197966

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Kinism: Rightly Understanding

Kinism, the Christian doctrine of ethnonationalism, is straightforward to teach; however, opponents delight in confusing themselves. They relish mixing up their arguments to render genuine conversation impossible, as this tactic of confusion is their only means of advancement. One example of this is how they conflate arguments for the complete unreality of distinct ethnicities on one hand, and then, on the other, acknowledge that different ethnicities are indeed a reality but assert that the distinction simply does not matter. Clear thinking is indispensable when discussing Kinism. Follow an order like this:

Nations are a reality, so the real question is how God has instructed us to act given this information. The question does not revolve around whether nations are a reality or not.

@Kinism

A. E. Wilson on the Sons of Noah (part one)

A. Edwin Wilson was a southern Baptist minister who pastored various Churches in the great state of Texas, as well as, the Daytona Heights Baptist Church in Red Bank, Tennessee. In 1981 a book containing many of Wilson’s thoughts and theology was published under the noscript, The Selected Writings of A. Edwin Wilson from which we will now quote:

“In a recent issue of LIFE magazine, contemporary fundamentalists and conservative religious leaders cast doubt upon the Word of God by the statement that the prophecy Noah uttered in regard to Ham, Shem, and Japheth was not of God but was the mere utterings of a man trying to recover from his drunken stupor. This at once raises the question concerning the inspiration of the Bible, as well as the authority of the Bible. If the Bible, in whole and totality, is not the Word of God, then we have no authority for our Christian faith… If God did not speak through Noah, through whom did He speak…? Recently we received a weekly denominational magazine - possibly their largest publication in circulation - in which a leader of the denomination in that particular state, wrote an article saying that God did not speak through Noah - that what Noah said in Gen. 9:25-27 were the irresponsible ravings of a maddened drunkard, uttered in vengeance. The whole article intimates that Noah was nothing but a drunken bum.
If Noah was just a drunken bum, as some evangelists and denominational leaders intimate, why does it say in Gen. 6:9 that he was a just man and a perfect man in his generations, and that he walked with God? If Noah was nothing but a drunken bum, why do we find his name listed in the ‘Hall of Fame of the Faithful’ (Heb. 11:5)? IF NOAH WAS NOTHING BUT A DRUNKEN BUM, HOW IS IT THAT EVERYTHING HE PROPHESIED IN GENESIS 9:25-27 HAS BEEN AND IS BEING FULFILLED TO THE MINUTEST DETAIL? We do not believe that anyone would contend that Noah pronounced a curse on Canaan and that he himself personally brought it to pass. Actually, it was by the inspiration of the Spirit of God that Noah gave a prophecy concerning the three heads of the human race, according to which the history of mankind has been molded… Integration, of which we hear so much today, is an effort to take two or more parts and fuse them into one, to integrate the colored race and white race through marriage, amalgamation, and assimilation, and to reduce the two groups (colored and white) to one group. Anyone who knows God's plan and purpose concerning the human race can see the hand of Satan behind all this... One may rest assured that God's plans and purposes concerning Shem, Ham, and Japheth are not going to be changed, though efforts are made to the contrary.
WHAT GOD HAS SEPARATED, LET NOT MAN INTEGRATE!”

-pages 254-257

Source: http://tinyurl.com/93rn3pte

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟