The Sin or Evils of Integration by Pastor Louis Ellsworth Dailey (part one)

Towards the end of his life and ministry as a Southern Baptist minister for over 58 years, pastoring various Churches in Virginia and North Carolina, Louis E. Dailey wrote a book ennoscriptd The Sin or Evils of Integration. This book, written in 1962 at the pinnacle of the so-called civil rights movement, is comprised of Biblical, rational, and practical arguments and anecdotes that support the conclusion that integration is a great evil.

In the book Dailey writes:

“Those who read this book with care will discover that I reveal and discuss quite a number of evils connected with the integration of the white and Negro races. High on the list of evils is that integration violates the Will of God. Whatever course anyone may take that violates the Will of God is sin. The Scripture plainly teaches us that it was and still is God's law that all of his subjects multiply and replenish the earth after their kind… Advocates of integration fail to consider the first commandment: ‘to multiply and replenish the earth after their kind.’ In order that this command might be obeyed, God placed instinct within the minds and hearts of all his creatures, which enables them to have a fascination for each other after their kind. Witness the time-honored expression, ‘Birds of a feather flock together.’ Lesser creatures than mankind obey this command of God and fulfill the desire of the Creator to propogate their kind in the sea, on the land, and in the air. Only when interfered with by the evil and ignorance of mankind will there be a deviation from the plan of God. This is the problem. God made mankind in His image and as His masterpiece in creation; therefore, a great obligation falls upon mankind to fulfill God's first commandment… The ultimate result of integration will be an amalgamation of races… Do not believe that integration is a religious movement. It is a mixture of devilism, Communism, and Northern politicalism.”

-Excerpts from the preface and pages 1-2

Source: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015074197966

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

In 1800, people of European descent made up ~20% of the global population.

By 2000, this percentage had fallen by half due to massive population growth in the global south (funded entirely by "aid" from White taxpayers).

By 2150, the White population percentage will halve again, as Third World populations continue to grow at the expense of the White taxpayer.

Bear in mind that UN population predictions are regional, rather than racialized. Non-White immigrants are included in the populations of North America and Europe.

Statistics be racist!

Great reminder that the Bible says demographic replacement is evidence of God’s judgement on a people (2 Kings 17:6-24)

JLP trembles at whites becoming a minority in America.

It is self evident that each race has its own inherent strengths and weaknesses. This is something that God ordained. Not every race is an intelligent as each other, not every race is an innovative as one another, not every race possesses as much physical aptitude as another race. This is just reality, not “racism.” Remember, things that are different are NOT the same! The media and the mainstream scientific community (which are often more interested in pushing a political agenda rather than the truth) are trying to convince people that race doesn’t exist and that the only difference is skin colour. Only an ignoramus would come to that conclusion. There are immense physiological differences between the race outside of skin colour. Few want to admit this truth.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/jlptalk/1427

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Egalitarian integrationist meme debunked.

The moral of the story is that race goes much deeper than the skin. These ecumenical, one world global citizens will continue to make fools out of themselves. God made the sexes and the races very distinct, even to the point that if one were to exhume someone’s skeleton, it could be deduced fairly easily what gender and race the person was.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

The Sin or Evils of Integration by Pastor Louis Ellsworth Dailey (part two)

Towards the end of his life and ministry as a Southern Baptist minister for over 58 years, pastoring various Churches in Virginia and North Carolina, Louis E. Dailey wrote a book ennoscriptd The Sin or Evils of Integration. This book, written in 1962 at the pinnacle of the so-called civil rights movement, is comprised of Biblical, rational, and practical arguments and anecdotes that support the conclusion that integration is a great evil.

In the book Dailey writes:

“There are some ways in which all men are created equal: all men are born with life, helpless and naked, and equal in salvation, "The way of the cross leads home, there is no other way but this." All races are equal in that they must accept the same Savior and the same terms for the redemption of their souls. In some ways all men are created equal but not in the sense a hundred percent integrationist would try to make it appear. As there are chasms of social distinctions in the same race, so there are bound to be chasms to separate those of different races. Especially is this true between the Negro and white races. Besides differences in color and talents, there are thousands of years of customs, refinement, and ancestral background that will forever prevent them from meeting upon an enjoyable social level… When those who favor integration say those who are opposed to it are prejudiced, they are begging the question. When a man begs the questions that means there is not any argument in what he is saying. When an integrationist calls those who oppose integration prejudiced, it means they have no argument or just reason for their position. They fall behind the smoke screen of begging the question by calling those who are opposed to integration prejudiced and bigoted… The cross of calvary is where we meet Jesus for the forgiveness of our sins and the redemption of souls, but it does not change our race. I accepted Christ as my Savior when I was a thirteen-year-old boy. Upon that day of decision the burden of sin rolled away from my heart, but I still remained a white boy, a member of the Caucasian Race. The same is true of those who have black skins; when they leave the cross they are still members of the Negro Race.


-Pages 51, 53, 59

Source: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015074197966

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Kinism: Rightly Understanding

Kinism, the Christian doctrine of ethnonationalism, is straightforward to teach; however, opponents delight in confusing themselves. They relish mixing up their arguments to render genuine conversation impossible, as this tactic of confusion is their only means of advancement. One example of this is how they conflate arguments for the complete unreality of distinct ethnicities on one hand, and then, on the other, acknowledge that different ethnicities are indeed a reality but assert that the distinction simply does not matter. Clear thinking is indispensable when discussing Kinism. Follow an order like this:

Nations are a reality, so the real question is how God has instructed us to act given this information. The question does not revolve around whether nations are a reality or not.

@Kinism

A. E. Wilson on the Sons of Noah (part one)

A. Edwin Wilson was a southern Baptist minister who pastored various Churches in the great state of Texas, as well as, the Daytona Heights Baptist Church in Red Bank, Tennessee. In 1981 a book containing many of Wilson’s thoughts and theology was published under the noscript, The Selected Writings of A. Edwin Wilson from which we will now quote:

“In a recent issue of LIFE magazine, contemporary fundamentalists and conservative religious leaders cast doubt upon the Word of God by the statement that the prophecy Noah uttered in regard to Ham, Shem, and Japheth was not of God but was the mere utterings of a man trying to recover from his drunken stupor. This at once raises the question concerning the inspiration of the Bible, as well as the authority of the Bible. If the Bible, in whole and totality, is not the Word of God, then we have no authority for our Christian faith… If God did not speak through Noah, through whom did He speak…? Recently we received a weekly denominational magazine - possibly their largest publication in circulation - in which a leader of the denomination in that particular state, wrote an article saying that God did not speak through Noah - that what Noah said in Gen. 9:25-27 were the irresponsible ravings of a maddened drunkard, uttered in vengeance. The whole article intimates that Noah was nothing but a drunken bum.
If Noah was just a drunken bum, as some evangelists and denominational leaders intimate, why does it say in Gen. 6:9 that he was a just man and a perfect man in his generations, and that he walked with God? If Noah was nothing but a drunken bum, why do we find his name listed in the ‘Hall of Fame of the Faithful’ (Heb. 11:5)? IF NOAH WAS NOTHING BUT A DRUNKEN BUM, HOW IS IT THAT EVERYTHING HE PROPHESIED IN GENESIS 9:25-27 HAS BEEN AND IS BEING FULFILLED TO THE MINUTEST DETAIL? We do not believe that anyone would contend that Noah pronounced a curse on Canaan and that he himself personally brought it to pass. Actually, it was by the inspiration of the Spirit of God that Noah gave a prophecy concerning the three heads of the human race, according to which the history of mankind has been molded… Integration, of which we hear so much today, is an effort to take two or more parts and fuse them into one, to integrate the colored race and white race through marriage, amalgamation, and assimilation, and to reduce the two groups (colored and white) to one group. Anyone who knows God's plan and purpose concerning the human race can see the hand of Satan behind all this... One may rest assured that God's plans and purposes concerning Shem, Ham, and Japheth are not going to be changed, though efforts are made to the contrary.
WHAT GOD HAS SEPARATED, LET NOT MAN INTEGRATE!”

-pages 254-257

Source: http://tinyurl.com/93rn3pte

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

The Word of God simultaneously destroying CI/Black Hebrew-Israelite Supremacists and the Ethnic Diversity Globalists [The Progressive Left]

Acts 17:26-27 KJV
And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:

A. E. Wilson on the Sons of Noah (part two)

A. Edwin Wilson was a southern Baptist minister who pastored various Churches in the great state of Texas, as well as, the Daytona Heights Baptist Church in Red Bank, Tennessee. In 1981 a book containing many of Wilson’s thoughts and theology was published under the noscript, The Selected Writings of A. Edwin Wilson from which we will now quote:

“Such thinking on the part of integrationists today ultimately leads to the adoption of a religion called Universalism, in which they reason that since God cannot curse Canaan and the race of Ham for the sin against Noah, neither can He curse those who do not accept His Son; and since we are all one big happy family, and will be throughout eternity, God cannot forfeit His right to be called a God of love, mercy, and goodness… The present distraction in our country over segregation and nonsegregation did not originate with Christians nor Bible students. It was spawned in the pits of Communism in Moscow and was first mentioned to the American public in a city-wide meeting in Denver, Colorado, a number of years ago. The primary purpose of such propaganda and action is to produce discord and strife in our country, thereby providing a fertile seed bed for Communism. By way of conclusion, let me call your attention to a law of God: What God has joined together, let not man put asunder; and I believe it follows as the night the day —What God has separated, let not man join together… The programme of Noah presents the future - not of the race of mankind as a whole - as did the Adamic foreview; nor that of individual kingdoms and nations — as do subsequent programmes — but that of the three main races into which mankind has been divided since the flood. The destiny foreseen for each race is sharply defined, and widely distinct from that foreseen for the other two.”

-Pages 257, 259

Source: http://tinyurl.com/93rn3pte

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

A. E. Wilson on the Sons of Noah (part three)

A. Edwin Wilson was a southern Baptist minister who pastored various Churches in the great state of Texas, as well as, the Daytona Heights Baptist Church in Red Bank, Tennessee. In 1981 a book containing many of Wilson’s thoughts and theology was published under the noscript, The Selected Writings of A. Edwin Wilson from which we will now quote:

“In this day of strife, bigotry, misunderstanding, and confusion stemming out of integration, we are amazed at the number of preachers, seminary professors, and Bible teachers who appeal to the Scripture for justification of the integration of the races, thereby breaking or vaulting over barriers established by God. The Scriptures most commonly appealed to are as follows:
‘There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female; for ye are all one in Christ Jesus’ (Gal, 3:28).
‘And hath raised us up together and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ
Jesus’ (Eph. 2:6).
Because the Lord says there is neither Jew nor Greek, bond nor free, male nor female, the supposition is, there is neither black nor white, and we are all one, in Christ. The integrationists fail to distinguish between what we are representatively, in Christ and what we are personally. The purpose, therefore, of this article is to try to enable you to distinguish between ‘representatively’ and ‘personally.’ Note in Eph. 2:6 that we are said to be seated together in heavenly places, IN Christ - not, WITH Christ… Representatively, in Christ, all distinctions of the human race are blotted out. Personally and actually a saved Jew still has Jewish physical and psychological characteristics, which distinguish him from a Gentile; and a Gentile, after being saved, still looks like one and acts like one… Representatively, in Christ, there is neither male nor female, but actually and personally when a male is saved he remains a male, and when a female is saved she is still a female; all those who say there is neither male nor female in Christ, continue to marry those of the opposite sex. We notice in churches and schools a difference is made by separate lounges being maintained; and men and women wear different types of clothing. Read Eph. 5:21-33 and Col. 2:18, 19, and you will see that God Almighty recognizes the difference between male and female and enjoins separate duties upon each… Representatively, in Christ, there is neither slave nor freeman, but actually and personally the Lord God Almighty recognizes bondage and slavery. In the church epistles (Ephesians and Colossians - epistles of highest Christian truth) instructions are brought to the slaves and to the slave owners, or masters (see Eph. 6:5-9; Col. 3:22-4:1)… Representatively, in Christ, there are no color differences, but actually and personally (we speak from personal experience as well as from the Word of God) when a black man becomes a Christian, his color does not change; when a white man becomes a Christian, his color does not change. The same is true of the red man and the yellow man… This general move toward blotting out all national characteristics and fusing all races into one people is Satanic in its origin and has no foundation or basis in the Word of God. Today, not only in this realm but in all realms of personal experience, we are faced with this question: Will we accept the Bible as the Word of God and be conformed to it?”

-pages 260-262

Source: http://tinyurl.com/93rn3pte

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

A. E. Wilson on the Sons of Noah (part four)

A. Edwin Wilson was a southern Baptist minister who pastored various Churches in the great state of Texas, as well as, the Daytona Heights Baptist Church in Red Bank, Tennessee. In 1981 a book containing many of Wilson’s thoughts and theology was published under the noscript, The Selected Writings of A. Edwin Wilson from which we will now quote:

“We have noted in the above Scriptures that racial distinctions and national barriers (color, anguage, oceans, mountains, deserts, and rivers) all proceed from God. God divides and departmentalizes the human race, rather than communizing it. The idea of sinful, fallen man existing as one community or one family of human beings is foreign to the Bible and contrary to the ways of God, either in providence or redemption… There has developed throughout the world a philosophy that the melting, welding, and fusing of all races into one would solve all of the world's ills. If we could but do away with all those things which separate — color, anguages, religions, customs — if all men would become one and we would have a great brotherhood of man and fatherhood of God (nowhere to be found in the Word of God), we would then have a Utopia. We are living in a day in which every effort is being put forth to unify mankind; and these efforts are forerunners of such as will be inaugurated by the Antichrist and will prove as disastrous and futile as those did at the time of the building of the tower of Babel on the plains of Shinar. Why did God divide and separate mankind into various ethnic groups, races, nations, and cultures? Why did God divide them according to the number of the children of Israel? In Acts
17:26, 27, we are told that God separated and divided by race, language, natural boundaries, chronological boundaries in order that they might seek after God, find Him, and be saved… All of the efforts to remove the color, natural, social, and moral barriers, which God has established between the races and nations, originate with Satan and are carried on today by his emissaries in the hope that he, Satan, can hinder and prevent the consummation of God's redemptive plan… ‘There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus’ (Gal. 3:28).
Here is a verse of Scripture that is being used today by Satan and religionists to do away with natural means of division and separation established by God. We are told today that in the light of this Scripture there is neither Jew, neither Gentile, neither are there free men and slaves. Also we are told that no longer is there any difference between male and female… To show the fallacy of the reasoning that we are all one in Christ and that segregation is thus anti-God, anti-Scriptural, and anti-social, I have but to call to your attention the fact that though Gal. 3:28 says there is neither male nor female in Christ, in most civilized and Christian nations you will find male and female segregated. They are segregated by different types of wearing apparel; the churches that are crying the loudest for integration have the male and female segregated in Sunday school classes, not only according to sex but according to age. These same churches also maintain different lounges for the men and women.”

-pages 263-264

Source: http://tinyurl.com/93rn3pte

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

A. E. Wilson on the Sons of Noah (part five)

A. Edwin Wilson was a southern Baptist minister who pastored various Churches in the great state of Texas, as well as, the Daytona Heights Baptist Church in Red Bank, Tennessee. In 1981 a book containing many of Wilson’s thoughts and theology was published under the noscript, The Selected Writings of A. Edwin Wilson from which we will now quote:

“Are all people born equal? According to the Word of God they are not. Some are born kings, and some born slaves; some born male, some female; some born wealthy, some born paupers; some born alive, some stillborn; some born normal physically, some born deformed; some born mentally bright, some born idiots; some born with initiative and ambition, some born absolutely indifferent; some born with five talents, some born with one talent; some born handsome, some born ugly… In the curse (Gen. 9:24-27) pronounced by God through Noah (called by God "a preacher of righteousness," II Pet. 2:5), the descendants of Ham became the servile nations of the world. God pronounced the blessing upon Shem, that he was to be the channel of spiritual blessings to the world, and a blessing upon Japheth, that from him were to come the explorers, colonizers, and developers - those who would possess the whole of the earth. There is no equality on the earth among men, there will be no equality among them during the millennium, neither will there be equality among them during eternity. In the division of animal life into its various and sundry categories, crossbreeding of any type eventually results in either sterility or a reversion to type. The same is true of the human race. Intermarriage between the different races leads to degeneration, rather than progress and development. The revolution being carried on today under the leadership of Satan, aided and abetted by religionists, is Satan's attempt to destroy the human race and thereby hinder and prevent, if possible, the establishment of the kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, in which Christ will reign while Satan is cast into the abyss to be held prisoner for a thousand years, then to be released for a season and cast into the lake of fire forever.”

-pages 264-265

Source: http://tinyurl.com/93rn3pte

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Back when the schools still taught Biblical principles.

Gen 9:27  God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.

Clip from the film Mississippi Burning, circa 1988.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

We break from our regular broadcast to check in on integration and it’s benefits…

Excerpts from Raping Sacred Scripture by Dr. H. Rondel Rumburg (part one)

Dr. Rumburg has been a Baptist minister since 1964, pastoring Churches in West Virginia, Virginia, Alabama, and North Carolina. In addition to being a pastor, he has authored over two dozen books and is the president of the Society for Biblical and Southern Studies. In his work Raping Sacred Scripture, Dr. Rumburg properly exposits Galatians 3:28 and completely demolishes the misinterpretations of the text.

Commenting on the abuse of the text he writes,

“One of the most raped texts of Scripture in the Bible today is,
‘There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus’ (Gal. 3:28). This verse has been forced for years by abolitionists, feminists, sensualists, and others. The verse has been used to endorse the abandonment of race distinctions, it has been used to endorse race mixing, and it has been used to foster a world without nations based on a faulty understanding of the phrase ‘there is neither Jew nor Greek.’ Another misuse of the verse has been to condemn slavery in the South and in the Bible because of the words,
‘there is neither bond (slave) nor free.’ The sacred text has been used to encourage unisex, sodomy, and other perverted sexual habits since the text says, ‘there is neither male nor female.’ For example, the verse was quoted as an endorsement encouraging the acceptance of homosexuals in an Atlanta church. One writer said the meaning of this verse ‘does away with all human distinctions.’ Later the writer said, ‘all human barriers are broken down.’ Another writer said, ‘All class distinctions disappear in the new fraternal life in Christ.’ One feminist gave the following distortion of the text,
‘There is no distinction between heterosexual and homosexual, cleric and lay, white and multicultural.’ These various corruptions of the truth belie unsound thinking and an unregenerate heart. This is equalitarianism (or the often-used French form, egalitarianism), which is a leveling movement that does not have anything to do with justice and is not Biblical. It is the product of humanism and involves the worship of man. The Bible is really the opposite of equalitarianism, for it teaches us to treat our own families, our own fellow believers, and other men differently. For instance, love does not mean equality; a man is not to love his neighbor's wife as his own wife… If all class distinctions disappear, does this mean that we should allow the mentally challenged equal access to operating rooms so they can perform brain surgery? Does this mean that pedophiles should have equal access to our children? Does this mean that heterosexuals are no different than homosexuals? Does this mean that there is no place for the husband to be the head of the home? Does this mean that you cannot be a partisan to your race, your family, your wife or husband, your church, your Bible, your Scriptural convictions, your state, or your friends?”

-Pages 4-5

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟