Interracial Marriages in Light of the Scriptures by Pastor Dennis Anderson
Dennis Anderson is an Independent Fundamental Baptist Pastor from the great state of Texas. Brother Anderson has pastored the Appleby Baptist Church of Nacogdoches, Texas since its establishment in 1994. Due to Pastor Anderson’s hard preaching and firm stand on several issues, he and his Church have been the subject of controversy for quite some time. The topic that has earned his Church a written article by the Southern Poverty Law Center is concerning his Biblical teachings on miscegenation. In April of 1999, Pastor Anderson wrote an article ennoscriptd Interracial Marriages in Light of the Bible from which I will now quote,
“Marriage is God joining a man and a woman in wedlock… Bible boundaries include faith as well as race. Christians are not to be ‘unequally yoked with unbelievers’ 2 Corinthians 6:14. Both testaments show much on the subject… Genesis 9 records the over-spreading of the world by the three sons of Noah… These three sons are races in themselves… Science recognizes three classes as Mongoloid… Caucasian… and Negroid… All other races come from crossbreeding between these three, as well as a mixture of crossbreeds among themselves… It is obvious that God is a separator, not a mixer. It is God who set the boundaries that men might ‘seek the Lord…’ Acts 17:26-27. Satan uses the one world movement to eliminate differences that God has given… Satan wants to eliminate color by interracial marriages… God is a divider. He divided the light from darkness, Genesis 1:4; male from female, Genesis 1:27; Nations, Genesis 10:32; languages Genesis 11:1; the beast after his kind, Genesis 1:25; cattle after their kind and everything that creepeth upon the earth after his kind, Genesis 1:25.
It is God who set the bounds, and man has always tried to move them… God is not a respector of persons in salvation, but He certainly is a respector of races when it comes to service. The curses of Genesis have NOT been done away with in the New Testament… Interracial relationships bring much heartache. Abraham lost thirteen years of fellowship with God over his Hamite relationship. Genesis 16-17.”
-Pages 1-4, 8
Source: https://www.applebybaptistchurch.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/IRM.pdf
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Dennis Anderson is an Independent Fundamental Baptist Pastor from the great state of Texas. Brother Anderson has pastored the Appleby Baptist Church of Nacogdoches, Texas since its establishment in 1994. Due to Pastor Anderson’s hard preaching and firm stand on several issues, he and his Church have been the subject of controversy for quite some time. The topic that has earned his Church a written article by the Southern Poverty Law Center is concerning his Biblical teachings on miscegenation. In April of 1999, Pastor Anderson wrote an article ennoscriptd Interracial Marriages in Light of the Bible from which I will now quote,
“Marriage is God joining a man and a woman in wedlock… Bible boundaries include faith as well as race. Christians are not to be ‘unequally yoked with unbelievers’ 2 Corinthians 6:14. Both testaments show much on the subject… Genesis 9 records the over-spreading of the world by the three sons of Noah… These three sons are races in themselves… Science recognizes three classes as Mongoloid… Caucasian… and Negroid… All other races come from crossbreeding between these three, as well as a mixture of crossbreeds among themselves… It is obvious that God is a separator, not a mixer. It is God who set the boundaries that men might ‘seek the Lord…’ Acts 17:26-27. Satan uses the one world movement to eliminate differences that God has given… Satan wants to eliminate color by interracial marriages… God is a divider. He divided the light from darkness, Genesis 1:4; male from female, Genesis 1:27; Nations, Genesis 10:32; languages Genesis 11:1; the beast after his kind, Genesis 1:25; cattle after their kind and everything that creepeth upon the earth after his kind, Genesis 1:25.
It is God who set the bounds, and man has always tried to move them… God is not a respector of persons in salvation, but He certainly is a respector of races when it comes to service. The curses of Genesis have NOT been done away with in the New Testament… Interracial relationships bring much heartache. Abraham lost thirteen years of fellowship with God over his Hamite relationship. Genesis 16-17.”
-Pages 1-4, 8
Source: https://www.applebybaptistchurch.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/IRM.pdf
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
👍1
Audio
Dr. Robert Hensley on The Races
Robert Hensley is the tenured pastor of the King James Baptist Church of York, South Carolina. He is one of the few Independent Fundamentalist Baptist preachers left that still has enough guts to preach the unadulterated Bible truth about the races.
In this sermon, brother Hensley deals with the origin of the races, the source of racial tension, the accusation of racism, the true meaning of racism, unbiblical teachings regarding the races, affirmative action, the unpardonable sin of “racism” in the eyes of the world, legislation’s failed attempt at solving the race problem, the foundation of race relations, the fact that God almighty is a segregationist, the difference between the races, the voluntary separation of the races, the racial prophecies of Genesis 9, the offspring and settlement of Noah’s three sons, the Tower of Babel and much more.
One of the best and most exhaustive studies on the races published on this channel!
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Robert Hensley is the tenured pastor of the King James Baptist Church of York, South Carolina. He is one of the few Independent Fundamentalist Baptist preachers left that still has enough guts to preach the unadulterated Bible truth about the races.
In this sermon, brother Hensley deals with the origin of the races, the source of racial tension, the accusation of racism, the true meaning of racism, unbiblical teachings regarding the races, affirmative action, the unpardonable sin of “racism” in the eyes of the world, legislation’s failed attempt at solving the race problem, the foundation of race relations, the fact that God almighty is a segregationist, the difference between the races, the voluntary separation of the races, the racial prophecies of Genesis 9, the offspring and settlement of Noah’s three sons, the Tower of Babel and much more.
One of the best and most exhaustive studies on the races published on this channel!
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Isidore’s Map of the Known World
Isidore of Seville, wrote an etymological encyclopedia in 625 A.D. ennoscriptd Etymologiae. The book remained in manunoscript form until the first printed version was published in 1472 A.D. A single map contained in this work has been deemed “arguably the most iconic map ever made¹.” The map in question has been known as Isidore’s mappa mundi (map of the known world)². Found within the map are Noah’s three sons, Sem (Shem), Lafeth (Japheth), and Cham (Ham) along with each of their own continental domains that their progeny settled in. The map precisely matches the Biblical record of the Table of Nations. Above I have included two images of the map. The first is the printed woodcut of Günther Zainer’s 1472 printing of Isidore’s Etymologiae³. The second is from a 9th century manunoscript of the Etymologiae, proving that this map was first drafted by Isidore himself⁴.
¹http://tinyurl.com/yc3h97az
²http://tinyurl.com/mr4by6yp
³http://tinyurl.com/3atrsr86
⁴http://tinyurl.com/2wvjn6cn
Isidore of Seville, wrote an etymological encyclopedia in 625 A.D. ennoscriptd Etymologiae. The book remained in manunoscript form until the first printed version was published in 1472 A.D. A single map contained in this work has been deemed “arguably the most iconic map ever made¹.” The map in question has been known as Isidore’s mappa mundi (map of the known world)². Found within the map are Noah’s three sons, Sem (Shem), Lafeth (Japheth), and Cham (Ham) along with each of their own continental domains that their progeny settled in. The map precisely matches the Biblical record of the Table of Nations. Above I have included two images of the map. The first is the printed woodcut of Günther Zainer’s 1472 printing of Isidore’s Etymologiae³. The second is from a 9th century manunoscript of the Etymologiae, proving that this map was first drafted by Isidore himself⁴.
¹http://tinyurl.com/yc3h97az
²http://tinyurl.com/mr4by6yp
³http://tinyurl.com/3atrsr86
⁴http://tinyurl.com/2wvjn6cn
Painting by the French illustrator James Jacques Joseph Tissot depicting Shem, Ham, and Japheth as separate and distinct races (circa 1896-1902).
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
👏1
Pastel drawing by Abel Pann portraying Shem, Ham, and Japheth as individual and idiosyncratic races.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Tower of Babel
The tower of babel is the account of God dividing the people of the earth by confounding their language. Critics of Kinism often attribute this as the beginning of national distinctions in order to say that said distinctions are not normative, however this is false and deceptive.
The first observation that we must make is that national distinction based upon heredity were already a reality at the time of Babel. We are given a relative time frame reference in the Table of Nations when we read that the division of Babel occurring during the lifetime of Peleg. Peleg is the fourth generation from Shem, and the fifth generation from Noah. Therefore, it seems that national identity was rooted in the sons of Noah and their offspring, and that the division at Babel was not a new or innovative arrangement, but was rather a reaffirmation of a pre-existing social structure which had existed at least since the time of the Flood.
God confused language as an additional tool for maintaining national distinction. This did not create new nations which had theretofore not existed! There had already been several generations of the nations listed in Genesis 10, the chapter prior, by the time that Tower of Babel is formed and God was protecting the unique identity of the nations that already existed. It is certainly true that Babel was a punishment for sin, but it was also an act of mercy from God in order to restrain the evil that typically arises in cosmopolitan societies who have lost sight of their tribal identity. Raceless or tribeless societies become decadent due to anonymity and loss of patriarchal authority, which is inevitable in these regimes. When people forget their ancestors they will not regard their children and future descendants!
@Kinism
The tower of babel is the account of God dividing the people of the earth by confounding their language. Critics of Kinism often attribute this as the beginning of national distinctions in order to say that said distinctions are not normative, however this is false and deceptive.
The first observation that we must make is that national distinction based upon heredity were already a reality at the time of Babel. We are given a relative time frame reference in the Table of Nations when we read that the division of Babel occurring during the lifetime of Peleg. Peleg is the fourth generation from Shem, and the fifth generation from Noah. Therefore, it seems that national identity was rooted in the sons of Noah and their offspring, and that the division at Babel was not a new or innovative arrangement, but was rather a reaffirmation of a pre-existing social structure which had existed at least since the time of the Flood.
God confused language as an additional tool for maintaining national distinction. This did not create new nations which had theretofore not existed! There had already been several generations of the nations listed in Genesis 10, the chapter prior, by the time that Tower of Babel is formed and God was protecting the unique identity of the nations that already existed. It is certainly true that Babel was a punishment for sin, but it was also an act of mercy from God in order to restrain the evil that typically arises in cosmopolitan societies who have lost sight of their tribal identity. Raceless or tribeless societies become decadent due to anonymity and loss of patriarchal authority, which is inevitable in these regimes. When people forget their ancestors they will not regard their children and future descendants!
@Kinism
Mallet’s Map of the Primal Divisions of the World
Alain Manesson Mallet was a French draftsman and military engineer who is most known for his publication, Denoscription de L'Universe. This work, originally published in five volumes in 1683, is an atlas praised for its compendium of accurately drawn maps. Contained in this masterpiece is a map of special significance. That being his map of the primal divisions of the world. The map clearly displays the three different continents that the sons of Noah inhabited after the flood. Europe is given to Japhet (Japheth), Asie (Asia) is given to Sem (Shem), and Afrique is allotted to Chan (Ham). Exhibiting the fact that many throughout the ages were cognizant of the fact that the three major races preceded from the three sons of Noah on their respective separate continents. The first image¹ is a picture of the map from the 1685 edition. The second image² is a photo from the 1719 edition.
¹http://tinyurl.com/4dds6u9s
²http://tinyurl.com/ejx3jxrj
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Alain Manesson Mallet was a French draftsman and military engineer who is most known for his publication, Denoscription de L'Universe. This work, originally published in five volumes in 1683, is an atlas praised for its compendium of accurately drawn maps. Contained in this masterpiece is a map of special significance. That being his map of the primal divisions of the world. The map clearly displays the three different continents that the sons of Noah inhabited after the flood. Europe is given to Japhet (Japheth), Asie (Asia) is given to Sem (Shem), and Afrique is allotted to Chan (Ham). Exhibiting the fact that many throughout the ages were cognizant of the fact that the three major races preceded from the three sons of Noah on their respective separate continents. The first image¹ is a picture of the map from the 1685 edition. The second image² is a photo from the 1719 edition.
¹http://tinyurl.com/4dds6u9s
²http://tinyurl.com/ejx3jxrj
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
William Blake’s Map of the World as Divided Between Noah’s Three Sons.
William Blake was an English poet, printmaker, and engraver. Utilizing his many talents, Blake published a two volume family Bible in 1780, replete with accompanying engravings, known as The Royal Universal Family Bible. Found within volume one is a map of the world divided between the three sons of Noah. According to the map, and the Biblical record, Europe was given to Japheth, Asia was allocated to Shem, and Africa was granted to Ham. Blake is another witness to the truth of the continents being divided to the sons of Noah. The picture¹ I have included is of the fifth plate in the first volume of the 1781 printing of Blake’s Royal Universal Family Bible.
¹http://tinyurl.com/ytnujra9
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
William Blake was an English poet, printmaker, and engraver. Utilizing his many talents, Blake published a two volume family Bible in 1780, replete with accompanying engravings, known as The Royal Universal Family Bible. Found within volume one is a map of the world divided between the three sons of Noah. According to the map, and the Biblical record, Europe was given to Japheth, Asia was allocated to Shem, and Africa was granted to Ham. Blake is another witness to the truth of the continents being divided to the sons of Noah. The picture¹ I have included is of the fifth plate in the first volume of the 1781 printing of Blake’s Royal Universal Family Bible.
¹http://tinyurl.com/ytnujra9
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
🔥1
Beato’s Mappa Mundi
In 776, Beato wrote his work Comentarios al Apocalipsis. 35 manunoscript copies of his tome still exist, dating from between the 9th and 13th centuries. The illustrated codex of Fernando was created for King Ferdinand I in 1047. On the 24th page¹ is a map dividing the main three continents to the progenitors of each of the three races that occupy them, as well as each continent’s respective climate. As seen above, the map labels Asia with “Sem” (Shem) and a temperate climate, “Europa” (Europe) with “Jafec” (Japheth) and a cold climate, while categorizing “Libia²” (Africa) with “Cam” (Ham) and a hot climate.
¹http://tinyurl.com/44mrbdv6
²It was a common practice to label Africa as Libya on ancient maps. “The term Libya, which originally denoted a region in North Africa west of Egypt, expanded to include the whole of the landmass known to the Greeks south of the Mediterranean Sea and west of Arabia.” -The Origin of the Continents & The Display of Countries.
http://tinyurl.com/mafkx3kn
In 776, Beato wrote his work Comentarios al Apocalipsis. 35 manunoscript copies of his tome still exist, dating from between the 9th and 13th centuries. The illustrated codex of Fernando was created for King Ferdinand I in 1047. On the 24th page¹ is a map dividing the main three continents to the progenitors of each of the three races that occupy them, as well as each continent’s respective climate. As seen above, the map labels Asia with “Sem” (Shem) and a temperate climate, “Europa” (Europe) with “Jafec” (Japheth) and a cold climate, while categorizing “Libia²” (Africa) with “Cam” (Ham) and a hot climate.
¹http://tinyurl.com/44mrbdv6
²It was a common practice to label Africa as Libya on ancient maps. “The term Libya, which originally denoted a region in North Africa west of Egypt, expanded to include the whole of the landmass known to the Greeks south of the Mediterranean Sea and west of Arabia.” -The Origin of the Continents & The Display of Countries.
http://tinyurl.com/mafkx3kn
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Is Interracial Marriage Fornication?
In this video, former IFB preacher Bryan Denlinger exposits 1 Corinthians 10:8 and makes the case that Paul is calling the interracial marriages in Numbers 25 “fornication.” In case you thought that this is a little far fetched and need another New Testament witness of miscegenation being deemed “fornication.” See Hebrews 12:15-16 in conjunction with Genesis 26:34-35. Since the naysayers want clear verses in the New Testament that prohibit interracial marriage, these two New Testament passages referencing Old Testament events are as clear as any. And to the integrationist I say, put that in your pipe and smoke it!
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
In this video, former IFB preacher Bryan Denlinger exposits 1 Corinthians 10:8 and makes the case that Paul is calling the interracial marriages in Numbers 25 “fornication.” In case you thought that this is a little far fetched and need another New Testament witness of miscegenation being deemed “fornication.” See Hebrews 12:15-16 in conjunction with Genesis 26:34-35. Since the naysayers want clear verses in the New Testament that prohibit interracial marriage, these two New Testament passages referencing Old Testament events are as clear as any. And to the integrationist I say, put that in your pipe and smoke it!
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
❤1🤣1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Reality of Biracial Twins
Gen 25:23 And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Gen 25:23 And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
The Reality of Biracial Twins Gen 25:23 And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.…
How Shem, Ham, and Japheth became physically distinguishable races.
There are many today who are so far removed from the Biblical teachings concerning the origin of the races that they scoff at the idea that each of the three major races originated from Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Despite many explanations being given, they remain willingly ignorant. There are three main possibilities as to how each son of Noah became the progenitor of a distinct race of mankind:
1. They were racially separate from birth.
There are numerous ways this could have transpired. The first of which this video gives some potential credence to. Some have reasoned based upon Genesis 5:32 that Noah’s three sons were triplets. This is assuming that Noah was not a polygamist, which may have or may have not been the case. Presuming this was so, God could have worked a miracle and had each son come out of the womb as different races. This is not completely out of the realm of possibility. On the other hand, there could have been two different races present before the flood, a red race and a black race (I will get into the specifics about such during a later time). Therefore Noah could have birthed his sons via two wives and that could account for it. Conversely, God could have created Noah with all of the racial characteristics already in his DNA, this is the John R. Rice position.
2. Their physiology changed on the ark due to the atmospheric conditions of the earth changing as a result of the deluge.
Pick up any major creation science book on the flood of Noah for more details about the atmospheric shift due to the flood. See The Genesis Flood by Henry M. Morris or The Biblical Flood and The Ice Age Epoch by Donald Wesley Patten for a good start.
3. They “evolved” over time.
This is a laughable and unbiblical theory which is a complete impossibility. There are several problems with such a belief:
I. There would not have been enough time for such a thing to occur. Mankind has only been on the earth for approximately 6,000 years and clear, physically observed, racial distinctions appear in the narrative of the Bible no later than the time of Abraham. So are you trying to tell me that this kind of “evolution” occurred only during a time period of a couple hundred years?!?! I trow not, the racial distinctions were already there by the time the flood waters assuaged.
II. This is clearly not a practical theory at all. I do not believe for one second that if one were to take, say, 500 Nigerians and place them in northern Sweden, Iceland, or the North Pole to reproduce after their own kind, that they would ever, no matter how much time elapsed, turn white. There is no such thing as racial genetic evolution as a result of climate. Acquiring a tan or burning your skin doesn’t change your DNA (Jeremiah 13:23).
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
There are many today who are so far removed from the Biblical teachings concerning the origin of the races that they scoff at the idea that each of the three major races originated from Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Despite many explanations being given, they remain willingly ignorant. There are three main possibilities as to how each son of Noah became the progenitor of a distinct race of mankind:
1. They were racially separate from birth.
There are numerous ways this could have transpired. The first of which this video gives some potential credence to. Some have reasoned based upon Genesis 5:32 that Noah’s three sons were triplets. This is assuming that Noah was not a polygamist, which may have or may have not been the case. Presuming this was so, God could have worked a miracle and had each son come out of the womb as different races. This is not completely out of the realm of possibility. On the other hand, there could have been two different races present before the flood, a red race and a black race (I will get into the specifics about such during a later time). Therefore Noah could have birthed his sons via two wives and that could account for it. Conversely, God could have created Noah with all of the racial characteristics already in his DNA, this is the John R. Rice position.
2. Their physiology changed on the ark due to the atmospheric conditions of the earth changing as a result of the deluge.
Pick up any major creation science book on the flood of Noah for more details about the atmospheric shift due to the flood. See The Genesis Flood by Henry M. Morris or The Biblical Flood and The Ice Age Epoch by Donald Wesley Patten for a good start.
3. They “evolved” over time.
This is a laughable and unbiblical theory which is a complete impossibility. There are several problems with such a belief:
I. There would not have been enough time for such a thing to occur. Mankind has only been on the earth for approximately 6,000 years and clear, physically observed, racial distinctions appear in the narrative of the Bible no later than the time of Abraham. So are you trying to tell me that this kind of “evolution” occurred only during a time period of a couple hundred years?!?! I trow not, the racial distinctions were already there by the time the flood waters assuaged.
II. This is clearly not a practical theory at all. I do not believe for one second that if one were to take, say, 500 Nigerians and place them in northern Sweden, Iceland, or the North Pole to reproduce after their own kind, that they would ever, no matter how much time elapsed, turn white. There is no such thing as racial genetic evolution as a result of climate. Acquiring a tan or burning your skin doesn’t change your DNA (Jeremiah 13:23).
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
⚡2👍1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Racial Music is in the Blood
Not only do the races differ in their appearance, in the way they talk, in the way they act, in the way they think, and in the talents their typically have etc. They also differ in the types of music they create and listen to. Things that are different are not the same!
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Not only do the races differ in their appearance, in the way they talk, in the way they act, in the way they think, and in the talents their typically have etc. They also differ in the types of music they create and listen to. Things that are different are not the same!
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
The World as Peopled by the Descendants of Noah
The English Cartographer and engraver Robert Wilkinson published his work Atlas Classica - Being A Collection of Maps of the Countries Mentioned By the Ancient Authors, Both Sacred And Profane. With their various Subdivisions at different Periods¹ in 1797. Wilkinson included a map² of how the world was populated by Shem, Ham, and Japheth in his atlas. He correctly assigns the continent of Africa to Ham, the continent of Asia to Shem, and the continent of Europe to Japheth.
¹https://tinyurl.com/yckhbrph
²https://tinyurl.com/y2htvdu9
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
The English Cartographer and engraver Robert Wilkinson published his work Atlas Classica - Being A Collection of Maps of the Countries Mentioned By the Ancient Authors, Both Sacred And Profane. With their various Subdivisions at different Periods¹ in 1797. Wilkinson included a map² of how the world was populated by Shem, Ham, and Japheth in his atlas. He correctly assigns the continent of Africa to Ham, the continent of Asia to Shem, and the continent of Europe to Japheth.
¹https://tinyurl.com/yckhbrph
²https://tinyurl.com/y2htvdu9
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Black Nationalist Expounds on the Connection Between Nation and Race.
Race and nation throughout history have been virtually inseparable. In fact, oftentimes the word “nation” in the Bible is synonymous with race. He says that the British Isles are white territory and that Africa is a black territory. This is in accordance with the Biblical dispersion of the sons of Noah in a segregated manner.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Race and nation throughout history have been virtually inseparable. In fact, oftentimes the word “nation” in the Bible is synonymous with race. He says that the British Isles are white territory and that Africa is a black territory. This is in accordance with the Biblical dispersion of the sons of Noah in a segregated manner.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟