Pastel drawing by Abel Pann portraying Shem, Ham, and Japheth as individual and idiosyncratic races.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Tower of Babel
The tower of babel is the account of God dividing the people of the earth by confounding their language. Critics of Kinism often attribute this as the beginning of national distinctions in order to say that said distinctions are not normative, however this is false and deceptive.
The first observation that we must make is that national distinction based upon heredity were already a reality at the time of Babel. We are given a relative time frame reference in the Table of Nations when we read that the division of Babel occurring during the lifetime of Peleg. Peleg is the fourth generation from Shem, and the fifth generation from Noah. Therefore, it seems that national identity was rooted in the sons of Noah and their offspring, and that the division at Babel was not a new or innovative arrangement, but was rather a reaffirmation of a pre-existing social structure which had existed at least since the time of the Flood.
God confused language as an additional tool for maintaining national distinction. This did not create new nations which had theretofore not existed! There had already been several generations of the nations listed in Genesis 10, the chapter prior, by the time that Tower of Babel is formed and God was protecting the unique identity of the nations that already existed. It is certainly true that Babel was a punishment for sin, but it was also an act of mercy from God in order to restrain the evil that typically arises in cosmopolitan societies who have lost sight of their tribal identity. Raceless or tribeless societies become decadent due to anonymity and loss of patriarchal authority, which is inevitable in these regimes. When people forget their ancestors they will not regard their children and future descendants!
@Kinism
The tower of babel is the account of God dividing the people of the earth by confounding their language. Critics of Kinism often attribute this as the beginning of national distinctions in order to say that said distinctions are not normative, however this is false and deceptive.
The first observation that we must make is that national distinction based upon heredity were already a reality at the time of Babel. We are given a relative time frame reference in the Table of Nations when we read that the division of Babel occurring during the lifetime of Peleg. Peleg is the fourth generation from Shem, and the fifth generation from Noah. Therefore, it seems that national identity was rooted in the sons of Noah and their offspring, and that the division at Babel was not a new or innovative arrangement, but was rather a reaffirmation of a pre-existing social structure which had existed at least since the time of the Flood.
God confused language as an additional tool for maintaining national distinction. This did not create new nations which had theretofore not existed! There had already been several generations of the nations listed in Genesis 10, the chapter prior, by the time that Tower of Babel is formed and God was protecting the unique identity of the nations that already existed. It is certainly true that Babel was a punishment for sin, but it was also an act of mercy from God in order to restrain the evil that typically arises in cosmopolitan societies who have lost sight of their tribal identity. Raceless or tribeless societies become decadent due to anonymity and loss of patriarchal authority, which is inevitable in these regimes. When people forget their ancestors they will not regard their children and future descendants!
@Kinism
Mallet’s Map of the Primal Divisions of the World
Alain Manesson Mallet was a French draftsman and military engineer who is most known for his publication, Denoscription de L'Universe. This work, originally published in five volumes in 1683, is an atlas praised for its compendium of accurately drawn maps. Contained in this masterpiece is a map of special significance. That being his map of the primal divisions of the world. The map clearly displays the three different continents that the sons of Noah inhabited after the flood. Europe is given to Japhet (Japheth), Asie (Asia) is given to Sem (Shem), and Afrique is allotted to Chan (Ham). Exhibiting the fact that many throughout the ages were cognizant of the fact that the three major races preceded from the three sons of Noah on their respective separate continents. The first image¹ is a picture of the map from the 1685 edition. The second image² is a photo from the 1719 edition.
¹http://tinyurl.com/4dds6u9s
²http://tinyurl.com/ejx3jxrj
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Alain Manesson Mallet was a French draftsman and military engineer who is most known for his publication, Denoscription de L'Universe. This work, originally published in five volumes in 1683, is an atlas praised for its compendium of accurately drawn maps. Contained in this masterpiece is a map of special significance. That being his map of the primal divisions of the world. The map clearly displays the three different continents that the sons of Noah inhabited after the flood. Europe is given to Japhet (Japheth), Asie (Asia) is given to Sem (Shem), and Afrique is allotted to Chan (Ham). Exhibiting the fact that many throughout the ages were cognizant of the fact that the three major races preceded from the three sons of Noah on their respective separate continents. The first image¹ is a picture of the map from the 1685 edition. The second image² is a photo from the 1719 edition.
¹http://tinyurl.com/4dds6u9s
²http://tinyurl.com/ejx3jxrj
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
William Blake’s Map of the World as Divided Between Noah’s Three Sons.
William Blake was an English poet, printmaker, and engraver. Utilizing his many talents, Blake published a two volume family Bible in 1780, replete with accompanying engravings, known as The Royal Universal Family Bible. Found within volume one is a map of the world divided between the three sons of Noah. According to the map, and the Biblical record, Europe was given to Japheth, Asia was allocated to Shem, and Africa was granted to Ham. Blake is another witness to the truth of the continents being divided to the sons of Noah. The picture¹ I have included is of the fifth plate in the first volume of the 1781 printing of Blake’s Royal Universal Family Bible.
¹http://tinyurl.com/ytnujra9
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
William Blake was an English poet, printmaker, and engraver. Utilizing his many talents, Blake published a two volume family Bible in 1780, replete with accompanying engravings, known as The Royal Universal Family Bible. Found within volume one is a map of the world divided between the three sons of Noah. According to the map, and the Biblical record, Europe was given to Japheth, Asia was allocated to Shem, and Africa was granted to Ham. Blake is another witness to the truth of the continents being divided to the sons of Noah. The picture¹ I have included is of the fifth plate in the first volume of the 1781 printing of Blake’s Royal Universal Family Bible.
¹http://tinyurl.com/ytnujra9
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
🔥1
Beato’s Mappa Mundi
In 776, Beato wrote his work Comentarios al Apocalipsis. 35 manunoscript copies of his tome still exist, dating from between the 9th and 13th centuries. The illustrated codex of Fernando was created for King Ferdinand I in 1047. On the 24th page¹ is a map dividing the main three continents to the progenitors of each of the three races that occupy them, as well as each continent’s respective climate. As seen above, the map labels Asia with “Sem” (Shem) and a temperate climate, “Europa” (Europe) with “Jafec” (Japheth) and a cold climate, while categorizing “Libia²” (Africa) with “Cam” (Ham) and a hot climate.
¹http://tinyurl.com/44mrbdv6
²It was a common practice to label Africa as Libya on ancient maps. “The term Libya, which originally denoted a region in North Africa west of Egypt, expanded to include the whole of the landmass known to the Greeks south of the Mediterranean Sea and west of Arabia.” -The Origin of the Continents & The Display of Countries.
http://tinyurl.com/mafkx3kn
In 776, Beato wrote his work Comentarios al Apocalipsis. 35 manunoscript copies of his tome still exist, dating from between the 9th and 13th centuries. The illustrated codex of Fernando was created for King Ferdinand I in 1047. On the 24th page¹ is a map dividing the main three continents to the progenitors of each of the three races that occupy them, as well as each continent’s respective climate. As seen above, the map labels Asia with “Sem” (Shem) and a temperate climate, “Europa” (Europe) with “Jafec” (Japheth) and a cold climate, while categorizing “Libia²” (Africa) with “Cam” (Ham) and a hot climate.
¹http://tinyurl.com/44mrbdv6
²It was a common practice to label Africa as Libya on ancient maps. “The term Libya, which originally denoted a region in North Africa west of Egypt, expanded to include the whole of the landmass known to the Greeks south of the Mediterranean Sea and west of Arabia.” -The Origin of the Continents & The Display of Countries.
http://tinyurl.com/mafkx3kn
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Is Interracial Marriage Fornication?
In this video, former IFB preacher Bryan Denlinger exposits 1 Corinthians 10:8 and makes the case that Paul is calling the interracial marriages in Numbers 25 “fornication.” In case you thought that this is a little far fetched and need another New Testament witness of miscegenation being deemed “fornication.” See Hebrews 12:15-16 in conjunction with Genesis 26:34-35. Since the naysayers want clear verses in the New Testament that prohibit interracial marriage, these two New Testament passages referencing Old Testament events are as clear as any. And to the integrationist I say, put that in your pipe and smoke it!
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
In this video, former IFB preacher Bryan Denlinger exposits 1 Corinthians 10:8 and makes the case that Paul is calling the interracial marriages in Numbers 25 “fornication.” In case you thought that this is a little far fetched and need another New Testament witness of miscegenation being deemed “fornication.” See Hebrews 12:15-16 in conjunction with Genesis 26:34-35. Since the naysayers want clear verses in the New Testament that prohibit interracial marriage, these two New Testament passages referencing Old Testament events are as clear as any. And to the integrationist I say, put that in your pipe and smoke it!
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
❤1🤣1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Reality of Biracial Twins
Gen 25:23 And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Gen 25:23 And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
The Reality of Biracial Twins Gen 25:23 And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.…
How Shem, Ham, and Japheth became physically distinguishable races.
There are many today who are so far removed from the Biblical teachings concerning the origin of the races that they scoff at the idea that each of the three major races originated from Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Despite many explanations being given, they remain willingly ignorant. There are three main possibilities as to how each son of Noah became the progenitor of a distinct race of mankind:
1. They were racially separate from birth.
There are numerous ways this could have transpired. The first of which this video gives some potential credence to. Some have reasoned based upon Genesis 5:32 that Noah’s three sons were triplets. This is assuming that Noah was not a polygamist, which may have or may have not been the case. Presuming this was so, God could have worked a miracle and had each son come out of the womb as different races. This is not completely out of the realm of possibility. On the other hand, there could have been two different races present before the flood, a red race and a black race (I will get into the specifics about such during a later time). Therefore Noah could have birthed his sons via two wives and that could account for it. Conversely, God could have created Noah with all of the racial characteristics already in his DNA, this is the John R. Rice position.
2. Their physiology changed on the ark due to the atmospheric conditions of the earth changing as a result of the deluge.
Pick up any major creation science book on the flood of Noah for more details about the atmospheric shift due to the flood. See The Genesis Flood by Henry M. Morris or The Biblical Flood and The Ice Age Epoch by Donald Wesley Patten for a good start.
3. They “evolved” over time.
This is a laughable and unbiblical theory which is a complete impossibility. There are several problems with such a belief:
I. There would not have been enough time for such a thing to occur. Mankind has only been on the earth for approximately 6,000 years and clear, physically observed, racial distinctions appear in the narrative of the Bible no later than the time of Abraham. So are you trying to tell me that this kind of “evolution” occurred only during a time period of a couple hundred years?!?! I trow not, the racial distinctions were already there by the time the flood waters assuaged.
II. This is clearly not a practical theory at all. I do not believe for one second that if one were to take, say, 500 Nigerians and place them in northern Sweden, Iceland, or the North Pole to reproduce after their own kind, that they would ever, no matter how much time elapsed, turn white. There is no such thing as racial genetic evolution as a result of climate. Acquiring a tan or burning your skin doesn’t change your DNA (Jeremiah 13:23).
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
There are many today who are so far removed from the Biblical teachings concerning the origin of the races that they scoff at the idea that each of the three major races originated from Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Despite many explanations being given, they remain willingly ignorant. There are three main possibilities as to how each son of Noah became the progenitor of a distinct race of mankind:
1. They were racially separate from birth.
There are numerous ways this could have transpired. The first of which this video gives some potential credence to. Some have reasoned based upon Genesis 5:32 that Noah’s three sons were triplets. This is assuming that Noah was not a polygamist, which may have or may have not been the case. Presuming this was so, God could have worked a miracle and had each son come out of the womb as different races. This is not completely out of the realm of possibility. On the other hand, there could have been two different races present before the flood, a red race and a black race (I will get into the specifics about such during a later time). Therefore Noah could have birthed his sons via two wives and that could account for it. Conversely, God could have created Noah with all of the racial characteristics already in his DNA, this is the John R. Rice position.
2. Their physiology changed on the ark due to the atmospheric conditions of the earth changing as a result of the deluge.
Pick up any major creation science book on the flood of Noah for more details about the atmospheric shift due to the flood. See The Genesis Flood by Henry M. Morris or The Biblical Flood and The Ice Age Epoch by Donald Wesley Patten for a good start.
3. They “evolved” over time.
This is a laughable and unbiblical theory which is a complete impossibility. There are several problems with such a belief:
I. There would not have been enough time for such a thing to occur. Mankind has only been on the earth for approximately 6,000 years and clear, physically observed, racial distinctions appear in the narrative of the Bible no later than the time of Abraham. So are you trying to tell me that this kind of “evolution” occurred only during a time period of a couple hundred years?!?! I trow not, the racial distinctions were already there by the time the flood waters assuaged.
II. This is clearly not a practical theory at all. I do not believe for one second that if one were to take, say, 500 Nigerians and place them in northern Sweden, Iceland, or the North Pole to reproduce after their own kind, that they would ever, no matter how much time elapsed, turn white. There is no such thing as racial genetic evolution as a result of climate. Acquiring a tan or burning your skin doesn’t change your DNA (Jeremiah 13:23).
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
⚡2👍1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Racial Music is in the Blood
Not only do the races differ in their appearance, in the way they talk, in the way they act, in the way they think, and in the talents their typically have etc. They also differ in the types of music they create and listen to. Things that are different are not the same!
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Not only do the races differ in their appearance, in the way they talk, in the way they act, in the way they think, and in the talents their typically have etc. They also differ in the types of music they create and listen to. Things that are different are not the same!
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
The World as Peopled by the Descendants of Noah
The English Cartographer and engraver Robert Wilkinson published his work Atlas Classica - Being A Collection of Maps of the Countries Mentioned By the Ancient Authors, Both Sacred And Profane. With their various Subdivisions at different Periods¹ in 1797. Wilkinson included a map² of how the world was populated by Shem, Ham, and Japheth in his atlas. He correctly assigns the continent of Africa to Ham, the continent of Asia to Shem, and the continent of Europe to Japheth.
¹https://tinyurl.com/yckhbrph
²https://tinyurl.com/y2htvdu9
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
The English Cartographer and engraver Robert Wilkinson published his work Atlas Classica - Being A Collection of Maps of the Countries Mentioned By the Ancient Authors, Both Sacred And Profane. With their various Subdivisions at different Periods¹ in 1797. Wilkinson included a map² of how the world was populated by Shem, Ham, and Japheth in his atlas. He correctly assigns the continent of Africa to Ham, the continent of Asia to Shem, and the continent of Europe to Japheth.
¹https://tinyurl.com/yckhbrph
²https://tinyurl.com/y2htvdu9
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Black Nationalist Expounds on the Connection Between Nation and Race.
Race and nation throughout history have been virtually inseparable. In fact, oftentimes the word “nation” in the Bible is synonymous with race. He says that the British Isles are white territory and that Africa is a black territory. This is in accordance with the Biblical dispersion of the sons of Noah in a segregated manner.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Race and nation throughout history have been virtually inseparable. In fact, oftentimes the word “nation” in the Bible is synonymous with race. He says that the British Isles are white territory and that Africa is a black territory. This is in accordance with the Biblical dispersion of the sons of Noah in a segregated manner.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
The Countries of the Ancient World Exhibiting the Probable Settlement of the Descendants of Noah
Thomas Gamaliel Bradford was a 19th century American cartographer who was as an assistant editor for the America Encyclopedia. In 1835, Bradford published his work, A Comprehensive Atlas: Geographical, Historical & Commercial¹. Included in his atlas was map² illustrating where the Sons of Noah settled. He rightly shows that Ham’s descendants inhabited Africa, Japheth’s posterity peopled Europe, and Shem’s progeny populated Asia.
¹https://tinyurl.com/2rt6yuwy
²https://tinyurl.com/3xtjxudv
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Thomas Gamaliel Bradford was a 19th century American cartographer who was as an assistant editor for the America Encyclopedia. In 1835, Bradford published his work, A Comprehensive Atlas: Geographical, Historical & Commercial¹. Included in his atlas was map² illustrating where the Sons of Noah settled. He rightly shows that Ham’s descendants inhabited Africa, Japheth’s posterity peopled Europe, and Shem’s progeny populated Asia.
¹https://tinyurl.com/2rt6yuwy
²https://tinyurl.com/3xtjxudv
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
30 Reasons for Segregation of Races by Finis Dake (Prefatory Information)
Finis Jennings Dake was a Pentecostal minister and evangelist who pastored several Churches in the states of Texas, Oklahoma, and Illinois. Dake was ordained by the Assemblies of God in 1927 and is most well known for his reference Bible containing an impressive 35,000 notes. The aforementioned Dake Annotated Reference Bible was initially published in 1963, a year before the infamous Civil Rights Act of 1964. In his reference Bible, Dake included a few notes on racial segregation, the most comprehensive of which is his note on Acts 17:26 ennoscriptd “30 reasons for segregation of races.” In the 1990’s the Dake family, after Dake’s death in 1987, started receiving complaints about the “racist” notes in his reference Bible. In 1996, in the act of bowing down to the “politically correct” mob (Proverbs 29:25; 1 Timothy 6:10), the Dake family made a unanimous decision to remove the note on Acts 17:26 and edit other notes on the subject, substituting the clear original terminology with more “politically correct” phrases. “Segregation” was changed to “separation,” “race” was changed to “nation,” “integrate” was changed to “mix” etc. Finis Dake did not advocate for “white supremacy” neither did he hold any animosity for those of other races. In fact, Dake got baptized in a black Church, preached in black Churches, and had blacks attend his Church services. However, these facts were not enough to prevent the Dake family from posthumously changing Dake’s life’s work in order to acquire more book sales and maintain their worldly “reputation” (Luke 16:15).
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Finis Jennings Dake was a Pentecostal minister and evangelist who pastored several Churches in the states of Texas, Oklahoma, and Illinois. Dake was ordained by the Assemblies of God in 1927 and is most well known for his reference Bible containing an impressive 35,000 notes. The aforementioned Dake Annotated Reference Bible was initially published in 1963, a year before the infamous Civil Rights Act of 1964. In his reference Bible, Dake included a few notes on racial segregation, the most comprehensive of which is his note on Acts 17:26 ennoscriptd “30 reasons for segregation of races.” In the 1990’s the Dake family, after Dake’s death in 1987, started receiving complaints about the “racist” notes in his reference Bible. In 1996, in the act of bowing down to the “politically correct” mob (Proverbs 29:25; 1 Timothy 6:10), the Dake family made a unanimous decision to remove the note on Acts 17:26 and edit other notes on the subject, substituting the clear original terminology with more “politically correct” phrases. “Segregation” was changed to “separation,” “race” was changed to “nation,” “integrate” was changed to “mix” etc. Finis Dake did not advocate for “white supremacy” neither did he hold any animosity for those of other races. In fact, Dake got baptized in a black Church, preached in black Churches, and had blacks attend his Church services. However, these facts were not enough to prevent the Dake family from posthumously changing Dake’s life’s work in order to acquire more book sales and maintain their worldly “reputation” (Luke 16:15).
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
30 Reasons for Segregation of Races by Finis Dake
This note can still be found in any edition of the Dake Annotated Reference Bible printed prior to 1996. The note reads as follows:
30 reasons for segregation of races
(Acts 17:26)
1. God wills all races to be as He made them. Any violation of God’s original purpose manifests insubordination to Him (Acts 17:26; Romans 9:19-24).
2. God made everything to reproduce “After his own kind” (Genesis 1:11-12, 21-25; 6:20; 7:14). Kind means type and color or He would have kept them all alike to begin with.
3. God originally determined the bounds of the habitations of nations (Acts 17:26; Genesis 10:5, 32; 11:8; Deuteronomy 32:8).
4. Miscegenation means the mixture of races, especially the black and white races, or those of outstanding type or color. The Bible even goes farther than opposing this. It is against different branches of the same stock intermarrying such as Jews marrying other descendants of Abraham (Ezra 9-10; Nehemiah 9-13; Jeremiah 50:37; Ezekiel 30:5).
5. Abraham forbad Eliezer to take a wife for Isaac of Canaanites (Genesis 24:1-4). God was so pleased with this that He directed whom to get (Genesis 24:7, 12-27).
6. Isaac forbad Jacob to take a wife of the Canaanites (Genesis 27:46-28:7).
7. Abraham sent all his sons of the concubines, and even of his second wife, far away from Isaac so their descendants would not mix (Genesis 25:1-6).
8. Esau disobeying this law brought the final break between him and his father after lifelong companionship with him (Genesis 25:28; 26:34-35, 27:46; 28:8-9).
9. The two branches of Isaac remained segregated forever (Genesis 30; 46:8-26).
10. Ishmael and Isaac’s descendants remained segregated forever (Genesis 25:12-23; 1 Chronicles 1:29).
11. Jacob’s sons destroyed a whole city to maintain segregation (Genesis 34).
12. God forbad intermarriage between Israel and all other nations (Exodus 34:12-16; Deuteronomy 7:5-6).
13. Joshua forbad the same thing on sentence of death (Joshua 22:12-13).
14. God cursed angels for leaving their own “first estate” and “their own habitation” to marry the daughters of men (Genesis 6:1-4; 2 Peter 2:4; Jude 6-7).
15. Miscegenation caused Israel to be cursed (Judges 3:6-7; Numbers 25:1-8).
16. This was Solomon’s sin (I Kings 11).
17. This was the sin of Jews returning from Babylon (Ezra 9:1-10:2,10-18,44; 13:1-30).
18. God commanded Israel to be segregated (Leviticus 20:24; Numbers 23:9; 1 Kings 8:53).
19. Jews recognized as a separate people in all ages because of Gods choice and command (Matthew 10:6; John 1:11). Equal rights in the gospel gives no right to break this eternal law.
20. Segregation between Jews and all other nations to remain in all eternity (Isaiah 2:2-4; Ezekiel 37; 47:13-48,55; Zechariah 14:16-21; Matthew 19:28; Luke 1:32-33; Revelation 7:1-8; 14:1-5).
21. All nations will remain segregated from one another in their own parts of the earth forever (Acts 17:26; Genesis 10:5,32; 11:8-9; Deuteronomy 32:8; Daniel 7:13-14; Zechariah 14; Revelation 11:15; 21:24).
22. Certain people in Israel were not even to worship with others (Deuteronomy 23:1-5; Ezra 10:8; Nehemiah 9:2 10:28; 13:3).
23. Even in heaven certain groups will not be allowed to worship together (Revelation 7:7-17; 14:1-5; 15:2-5).
24. Segregation was so strong in the O.T. that an ox and an ass could not work together (Deuteronomy 22:10).
25. Miscegenation caused disunity among God’s people (Numbers 12).
26. Stock was forbidden to be bred with other kinds (Leviticus 19:19).
27. Sowing mixed seed in the same field was unlawful (Leviticus 19:19).
28. Different seeds were forbidden to be planted in vineyards (Deuteronomy 22:9).
29. Wearing garments of mixed fabrics forbidden (Deuteronomy 22:11; Leviticus 19:19).
30. Christians and certain other people of a like race are to be segregated (Matthew 18:15-17; 1 Corinthians 5:9-13; 6:15; 2 Corinthians 6:14-15; Ephesians 5:11; 2 Thessalonians 3:6-16; 1 Timothy 6:5; 2 Timothy 3:5).
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
This note can still be found in any edition of the Dake Annotated Reference Bible printed prior to 1996. The note reads as follows:
30 reasons for segregation of races
(Acts 17:26)
1. God wills all races to be as He made them. Any violation of God’s original purpose manifests insubordination to Him (Acts 17:26; Romans 9:19-24).
2. God made everything to reproduce “After his own kind” (Genesis 1:11-12, 21-25; 6:20; 7:14). Kind means type and color or He would have kept them all alike to begin with.
3. God originally determined the bounds of the habitations of nations (Acts 17:26; Genesis 10:5, 32; 11:8; Deuteronomy 32:8).
4. Miscegenation means the mixture of races, especially the black and white races, or those of outstanding type or color. The Bible even goes farther than opposing this. It is against different branches of the same stock intermarrying such as Jews marrying other descendants of Abraham (Ezra 9-10; Nehemiah 9-13; Jeremiah 50:37; Ezekiel 30:5).
5. Abraham forbad Eliezer to take a wife for Isaac of Canaanites (Genesis 24:1-4). God was so pleased with this that He directed whom to get (Genesis 24:7, 12-27).
6. Isaac forbad Jacob to take a wife of the Canaanites (Genesis 27:46-28:7).
7. Abraham sent all his sons of the concubines, and even of his second wife, far away from Isaac so their descendants would not mix (Genesis 25:1-6).
8. Esau disobeying this law brought the final break between him and his father after lifelong companionship with him (Genesis 25:28; 26:34-35, 27:46; 28:8-9).
9. The two branches of Isaac remained segregated forever (Genesis 30; 46:8-26).
10. Ishmael and Isaac’s descendants remained segregated forever (Genesis 25:12-23; 1 Chronicles 1:29).
11. Jacob’s sons destroyed a whole city to maintain segregation (Genesis 34).
12. God forbad intermarriage between Israel and all other nations (Exodus 34:12-16; Deuteronomy 7:5-6).
13. Joshua forbad the same thing on sentence of death (Joshua 22:12-13).
14. God cursed angels for leaving their own “first estate” and “their own habitation” to marry the daughters of men (Genesis 6:1-4; 2 Peter 2:4; Jude 6-7).
15. Miscegenation caused Israel to be cursed (Judges 3:6-7; Numbers 25:1-8).
16. This was Solomon’s sin (I Kings 11).
17. This was the sin of Jews returning from Babylon (Ezra 9:1-10:2,10-18,44; 13:1-30).
18. God commanded Israel to be segregated (Leviticus 20:24; Numbers 23:9; 1 Kings 8:53).
19. Jews recognized as a separate people in all ages because of Gods choice and command (Matthew 10:6; John 1:11). Equal rights in the gospel gives no right to break this eternal law.
20. Segregation between Jews and all other nations to remain in all eternity (Isaiah 2:2-4; Ezekiel 37; 47:13-48,55; Zechariah 14:16-21; Matthew 19:28; Luke 1:32-33; Revelation 7:1-8; 14:1-5).
21. All nations will remain segregated from one another in their own parts of the earth forever (Acts 17:26; Genesis 10:5,32; 11:8-9; Deuteronomy 32:8; Daniel 7:13-14; Zechariah 14; Revelation 11:15; 21:24).
22. Certain people in Israel were not even to worship with others (Deuteronomy 23:1-5; Ezra 10:8; Nehemiah 9:2 10:28; 13:3).
23. Even in heaven certain groups will not be allowed to worship together (Revelation 7:7-17; 14:1-5; 15:2-5).
24. Segregation was so strong in the O.T. that an ox and an ass could not work together (Deuteronomy 22:10).
25. Miscegenation caused disunity among God’s people (Numbers 12).
26. Stock was forbidden to be bred with other kinds (Leviticus 19:19).
27. Sowing mixed seed in the same field was unlawful (Leviticus 19:19).
28. Different seeds were forbidden to be planted in vineyards (Deuteronomy 22:9).
29. Wearing garments of mixed fabrics forbidden (Deuteronomy 22:11; Leviticus 19:19).
30. Christians and certain other people of a like race are to be segregated (Matthew 18:15-17; 1 Corinthians 5:9-13; 6:15; 2 Corinthians 6:14-15; Ephesians 5:11; 2 Thessalonians 3:6-16; 1 Timothy 6:5; 2 Timothy 3:5).
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
⚡4
Disclaimer: this should go without saying but common sense is seldomly possessed nowadays, I do not fully endorse all of the views of the men I quote. In fact, many of the men I have previously quoted from are enemies of each other. I am posting these sermons, videos, maps, and quotations for your benefit. I believe the material I am presenting on this channel has been censored or long forgotten as a result of the communistic onslaught on the true Biblical teachings concerning race. Up until this point, I have mainly posted material from men who are either Independent Fundamental Baptists, Southern Baptists, or former IFBs, with the exception of utilizing the testimonies of Cassius Clay and Malcolm X. From henceforth, I will be branching out and will be posting documentation from professing Christians of other denominations. This is to demonstrate that these sorts of teachings have not been peculiar to Baptists but have been the historic views of Christians from nearly every denomination.
❤3