Dr. John Cereghin on the Three Races (Part One).

Dr. John Cereghin is the pastor of the Grace Baptist Church of Smyrna, Delaware. He makes the following statements in his commentary on the book of Genesis:

“‘6:10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.’ After the Flood, these three men would be the fathers of the three races of humanity, European, African and Oriental… ‘9:19 These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread.’ You can trace your lineage back to one of these three men. If you are European, it would be Japheth. If you are black, it would be Ham. If you are Asian, it would be Shem. This includes American/Canadian Indians… Although Shem lives in India, Japheth (Sir Hillary) has to climb his mountains. Although Shem lives in Japan, he must pattern his railways, planes, motorcycles, and ships after Japheth. Although Shem lives in China, he cannot develop his resources until Japheth (Russia) fires the primer for the ‘Reds.’ It is Japheth, not Shem, who discovers both poles, the passage to India, the way to the moon, electricity, the steam engine, the wireless telegraph, the telephone, the radio, the airplane, the tank, and the submarine. Shem plainly does not major in geographical conquests, scientific inventions, and ‘higher standards of living.’ But when it comes to spiritual perception, you can't beat Shem! Shem is the author of every religion on earth (basically two of them—see Gen. 4:4-8). Students of comparative religions have no trouble at all in tracing Rosicrucianism, Theosophy, Unity, Christian Science, and Unitarianism back to India-Shem. Zen Buddhism did not begin in Germany. Shintoism is not the state religion of Spain. Confucianism was not invented in France, and the Vatican State had nothing to do with Brahmanism or Hinduism. Shem is the author of these religions. Shem is an introvert; he is a ‘meditator’ and a fatalist—he is a thinker. Every author in the Bible can trace his descent to Shem; the Saviour of the world confessed He was ‘of the Jews’ (not ‘Hebrews’ —see John 4:22), and every branch of Orthodox Christianity can trace its descent to Romans 11, where the ‘Gentiles’ were grafted into the good olive tree—Shem again. The California yogas and gurus of today are imitations of the ‘holy men of India’ and the Himalayas-Shem again. And everything found in the Catholic Church, whether it be stolen from Bible Christianity (the Nicene Creed) or extorted from Israel (the literal promises of the Old Testament) or borrowed from Babylon (Easter bunnies, X-mass, Mary) or adopted from pagan Roman and Greek mysteries (sprinkling babies, sacraments, holy water, etc.) can be traced to the Jewish Old Testament (Shem!), the Jewish New Testament (Shem, again!), or ancient Babylon (Shem and Ham). But when Japheth tries to hatch a religion, the best he can do are blanks like Jehovah Witnesses or Mormonism. Since God will enlarge Japheth, it seems He will do so at the expense of Shem's territory, or tents. Shem can keep Japheth out for a while but eventually, Japheth will spread out so much that he will ‘horn in’ on Shem's territory. China and Japan could keep America out for only so long. England had India over a barrel early. Didn't the European settlers take Shem's tents (in the person of the American Indians and Eskimos) when he came to the New World? Shem is a thinker. He is a fatalist and considers death with honor better than life without honor. He is found laughing at American colonels (who laughed at him for flying Kamakazi divers). Shem will ride into a ring of Custer's soldiers (1876) to plant a spear and will ride in and out without killing a man at the risk of his own neck. An enemy who has lost face can be tortured, lied to, or tricked in any way possible, but a man of honor, who keeps his word, is to be trusted without question.”
-The Pilgrim Way Commentary on the Book of Genesis by Dr. John Cereghin, pages 132, 170, 172-173.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Dr. John Cereghin on the Three Races (Part Two).

Dr. John Cereghin is the pastor of the Grace Baptist Church of Smyrna, Delaware. He makes the following statements in his commentary on the book of Genesis:

“In Zen and Hinduism, nature is not an antagonist against whom man must throw himself in a lifelong battle to ‘conquer.’ Nature is one with man (Pantheism), and attainment of release from Karma and rebirth is by meditation and grasping the ‘oneness’ of all things. Shem likes music with an irregular beat—which Ham can't stand! Shem calls Japheth's music (symphonies included) ‘march music,’ because it has a steady rhythm. Shem is a family man, where the male is ruler supreme with no questions asked. He has the lowest criminal record of any of the races, and with opium, hashish, and saki included, has fewer delinquents in jail per population than Ham or Japheth....Shem is an introvert. He can take orders and he can follow. Where he respects his leaders, he will go to the death for them, and where he loses respect for his leaders, they are in danger of dying (suddenly) themselves! "Paris Peace Talks" are a joke to a real Shemite. He doesn't think that way at all. He thinks simply and straight— right to the point. While Japheth jockeys for "position," Shem sits back and laughs at him. Shem will respect an atom bomb, but not the smiles and handshakes of a "foreign devil" trying to use Catholics to run his country. Shem is about three times smarter than you give him credit for being, and to him nothing could be more ludicrous than "bargaining at a peace table." His plans are already made 10 years ahead of time, and nothing short of an A-bomb would change them or stop them. You don't mess with Shem. You whip him or you leave him alone. Rudyard Kipling's "Ballad of the East and West" shows a clearer grasp of Shem's thinking processes than any paper delivered (or speech made) by any Secretary of State in the last thirty years. MacArthur knew Shem; General Stillwell knew Shem...A pure-blooded Shemite is tough to fight. He can run three days on a bowl of rice and put up with fighting conditions that would drive Japheth out of his mind. In America, it took the white man 200 years to whip him, when Shem was out armed and outnumbered for half that length of time. If you kill him five to one in Asia. you will lose all your men, and he will still have 4,000,000 left when the slaughter is through. You don't mess with Shem. You can talk "turkey" and get "squared away" sitting around a table with Dutchmen, Swedes, Irishmen, and Englishmen, but you won't buffalo Shem. Shem reads you before you figure out about what to bargain with him. Shem honors his ancestors, reverences their spirits, and practices self-denial. In an environment of sudden death, tidal waves, earthquakes, fires, famines, and floods, he is prone to suicide and has the highest mortality rate of the three races. He is a hard worker and has a strong back. His staple diet is rice and fish, and he is an excellent cook of vegetables. If he respects you and honors you, you can trust him with your wallet and your car, and if he does not respect you, you are not safe turning your back on him. He can copy anything that a German invents—which an American will buy! He can make anything cheaper than a European can make it, and he lives frugally, no matter what his income is. In the Book, the descendants of Ham are to be ‘servant of servants’; if any saved descendant of Ham is a Bible believer, he will accept this lot cheerfully, thankfully, and optimistically and will make the most of it. Hamites who let Caucasians direct their affairs—Joe Louis, Bubba Smith, Jackie Robinson, G. W. Carver, B. T. Washington, Lena Horne, Paul Robeson, Sammy Davis, et al.—usually come out fairly well financially. Hamites who follow Representative Powell do not make out quite so well, and those who followed Father Divine came out bankrupt."
-The Pilgrim Way Commentary on the Book of Genesis by Dr. John Cereghin, pages 173-174.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Dr. John Cereghin on the Three Races (Part Three).

Dr. John Cereghin is the pastor of the Grace Baptist Church of Smyrna, Delaware. He makes the following statements in his commentary on the book of Genesis:

“The followers of Michael (alias ‘Martin’) Luther King Jr. built quite an estate for him and kept him in Cadillacs and $200.00 suits most of his life —but not half a dozen that obeyed his orders made a living wage. The worst oppressor of the Negro is the Negro, and this is not the prejudiced statement of a ‘white supremacist.’ It is the reason why the Negroes in America will never return to Africa—not even if they are paid to do it. The ‘ghettos’ (another Associated Press word for purposes of distorting truth) of Harlem and Philadelphia are never quite as bad as living conditions in the Congo and French Equatorial Africa; in Ham's original homeland there was neither social security, welfare, nor government pensions, and certainly not free TV time for airing grievances! A successful Hamite is the one who receives the Lord Jesus as Saviour (Acts 8) and serves in the capacity where God placed him (Acts 8). The last statement is not a racist's definition. It is the opinion of the Holy Spirit recorded in Acts 8:39. Disgruntled, frustrated, and bitter Hamites who have devoted a lifetime to overthrowing Genesis 9:25 in the interests of ‘their fellow sufferers,’ etc., may rage and grind their teeth against the ordinances of heaven, but they will remain inflexible and unmovable. The same ordinances dictate that the Jews (another race!) will be restored to Palestine and will rule the world for 1,000 years (Jer. 31, 33). Singing ‘we shall overcome’ does not impress the born-again child of God who has already overcome (1 John 4:4, 5:4), without the aid of Congress, demonstrations, or publicity. John Knox, chained to the galley, was ‘the Lord's freeman’ (1 Cor. 7:22) while John Brown (1800-1859) and Abe Lincoln were ‘the servants of sin’ even while ‘emancipating’ the ‘servant of servants’ (see John 8:34-36). 9:27 ‘God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.’ Japheth would dwell in the tents of Shem, showing that Japheth would be taking land away from the Shemites, which is what Europeans did with the American Indians from 1500-1900. The Europeans are destined to take the American Indians' ‘tents’ away from them, which they do.. I am sitting now in territory that belonged to the Seminoles I am in ‘their’ tents. Japheth was more interested in Negro slavery than Shem ever was. Ham sold his own kind to Japheth as slaves. They usually sold prisoners of war in their tribal disputes and Japheth happily bought them, but it was Ham who sold them. Japheth did not go into the African jungles and drag out innocent natives as slaves. Even after Emancipation, crooked Japheth kept Ham under his thumb, usually through Democratic social and welfare programs. When Ham does run his own affairs (in most American large cities and African countries), you get crime, drugs and cast corruption.”
-The Pilgrim Way Commentary on the Book of Genesis by Dr. John Cereghin, pages 174-175.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Noah’s Three Sons Providentially Correspond to the Three Synoptic Gospels by Arthur Custance

Arthur C. Custance was a man of many talents and has been described as a Christian anthropologist, an Anglican theologian and an apologist. He is widely known for his vast writings on Science and the Scripture, particularly their relation between each other. Custance pens the following in his work Noah’s Three Sons:

“It may be pointed out that in Genesis 10 the sons of Noah when grouped together are habitually put in the same order — Shem, Ham, and Japheth —although it is not absolutely certain that this is the order in which they were born… The Three Synoptic Gospels. The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are termed synoptic because they deal with the events of our Lord’s life in a way quite distinct from the Gospel of John… It has been observed from the time of the earliest commentaries that Matthew presents a picture of the Lord Jesus Christ as King, and wrote his Gospel primarily with the Jewish people in mind. The opening genealogy traces this King, appropriately, back to David and to Abraham. His Gospel is full of references to the Old Testament and continually points out how this or that event was a fulfillment of prophecy. This was a message directed primarily to the children of Shem. Remembering the order in which the sons of Noah are always given, one might logically expect that the second Gospel, Mark’s, was directed to the children of Ham. We believe that it is… For Mark wrote his Gospel with the clear intent of portraying our Lord as a Servant of mankind… This is a wonderful truth. That the children of Ham have been servants par excellence to mankind —have in fact habitually served mankind better than they served themselves… That Mark wrote from this point of view seems clear. There is no genealogy of the Lord. A servant is known by his service, not by his pedigree. Mark is full of such phrases as immediately, straightway, forthwith, etc. This Man commanded power. It is a striking thing that the gods of Hamitic people on the whole were gods of power, whereas the God of Shem was preeminently moral, and the gods of Japheth were gods of illumination. Mark’s Gospel is a Gospel of doing, ceaseless activity; and there are some references to the sublime position of a servant which are not found in the other Gospels. Here and there Mark refers to people as servants where the other Gospels omit the fact, and Mark himself is singled out elsewhere as of particular service to Paul. Luke’s Gospel was clearly written for the Gentiles. It appears traditionally that the term Gentile was reserved for the children of Japheth. This is reflected in Genesis 10:5. It is further probably reflected in a passage which we shall examine a little more fully subsequently… Luke wrote for these people… In his Gospel, the genealogy of the Lord quite properly goes back to Adam, and the characteristic delineation of the Lord is as the ‘Son of Man.’ It is also worthy of note that the name Japheth means ‘fair’ or ‘light,’ as the word Ham means ‘dark…’ The word Luke also means ‘fair’ or ‘light.’ So we have three synoptic Gospels which, by many internal evidences far too numerous to enter into here, seem clearly to have been written under divine direction specifically for Shem, Ham, and Japheth, in this order. It is not certain of course that the actual text of each Gospel was completed in this chronological order, but the fact remains that God has seen to it that they should be preserved for us from the earliest times in the order in which we find them today.” 
-Noah’s Three Sons: Human History in Three Dimensions by Arthur C. Custance, pages 16-18.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

The Gospel was Preached to Shem, Ham and Japheth, in that Order by Arthur Custance

Continuing along the lines of my previous post, Custance notes the particular order Noah’s sons are listed in Scripture. With this in mind, he observes how God often operates according to that pattern. Regarding the gospel being preached to the nations Custance writes,

“The First Preaching of the Gospel. The Gospel was preached first to Shem, then to Ham, and finally to Japheth. Once again there is no doubt about the first and the last of the two branches to receive the Gospel. The message was first to ‘ye men of Israel’ (Acts 2:22) and subsequently to the Centurion Cornelius of the Italian Band, a Roman and a child of Japheth (Acts 10:34). Between these two we have that incident of Philip telling the Gospel to an Ethiopian who gladly heard the message and believed (Acts 8:35).”
-Noah’s Three Sons: Human History in Three Dimensions by Arthur C. Custance, page 22.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

All Three Races Played a Role in the Crucifixion of the Lord Jesus Christ by Arthur C. Custance

“Those Playing an Official Role in the Crucifixion. Each branch of the race took a specific part in the Crucifixion. The moral responsibility was accepted by Israel (Matt. 27: 25); the physical burden of carrying the Cross was placed upon a Cyrenian, a child of Ham (Luke 23:26); the responsibility for execution was assumed by Japheth, who in the soldiers completed the sentence which only the Roman authorities could perform (Matt. 27:26). As far as Semitic responsibility is concerned, the issue was clear. They said, ‘His blood be upon us and our children,’ though afterwards they sought to unburden themselves of this responsibility (Acts 5:28). It should be stated here that Japheth also shared in this moral responsibility, though it seems that Pilate would have released Jesus if he could have found a way to do it without endangering his own position. Washing his hands did not relieve him of the moral responsibility, yet there is a sense in which he did not have the same kind of moral responsibility as that borne by the Jewish authorities. They set the stage and engineered the course of events, and Pilate found himself trapped… An article appearing in His Magazine by Steven Trapnell dealing with Simeon of Cyrene makes the following observations... this Cyrenian who carried the Cross of Christ was a Negro, coming as he did from North Africa....Such an honour and privilege, initially granted to only one man, was given not to a Jew but to a Gentile; not to a Judean but to a Cyrenian; not to a white man but to a Negro… My own impression is that Scripture is designed to teach this important truth, that God has never lost sight of Shem, Ham, and Japheth, nor ceased to work out His purposes using certain unique qualities which can be shown have, by and large, characterized their descendants.”
-Noah’s Three Sons: Human History in Three Dimensions by Arthur C. Custance, pages 22-24.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

The Curse of Ham or the Curse of Canaan? by Arthur C. Custance

“It has always been a matter of controversy as to why Canaan rather than Ham should have been cursed. Canaan was Ham’s son, and was therefore grandson to Noah. Some people have supposed that the name Canaan was substituted for Ham by Jewish scribes who had particularly strong feelings against this branch of Ham’s family… There is another explanation which seems to me more probable, and which if it is true, means that Noah really was cursing Ham. It is a common social custom among many primitive people to attribute the greatness of a son to the father, who then receives the honor for having raised such a worthy child. This is clearly reflected in Scripture where Saul seeks to honor David after the slaying of Goliath. He asks his general whose son the lad is (I Sam. 17:55). This has always seemed to mean that he did not recognize David, which would seem very strange in view of David’s close associations with him. Undoubtedly Saul knew David well enough, but evidently he did not know who his father was. It was his father he was seeking to honor according to social custom. Also, a woman could not bless a worthy son’s father, but she could bless his mother thereby giving personal witness to his worthiness. This seems to be the background of the woman’s observation in Luke 11:27. A man in blessing his own son was in fact blessing himself. This was true when Noah blessed Shem and Japheth. By the same token, however, if he had cursed Ham, the real offender, he would at the same time have been cursing himself. Quite logically, he could only pass judgment upon Ham by cursing Ham’s own son, which is what he therefore did… In the case of Ham and his descendants history shows that they have rendered an extraordinary service to mankind.”
-Noah’s Three Sons: Human History in Three Dimensions by Arthur C. Custance, pages 25-26.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Interracial Marriages between Japhetian Loyola/Borgia bloodlines and Shemite Incaic Nobility

As I have noted in my two previous posts: The Jesuit Pioneers of Anti-Whiteism and The Founding Fathers of Race Denialism, the Jesuits favor the annihilation rather than the preservation of the three Biblical, Noahic races. To the end that the Pope of their making can unite the world under a one world government.

The above painting which hangs in the Pedro de Osma Museum and the Church of la Compañía de Jesús, depicts the Marriages of Martín García Óñez de Loyola (nephew of Ignatius Loyola) with the Inca princess Nũsta Beatriz Clara Coya and of Juan de Enríquez de Borja (grandson of Francis Borgia) with Ana María Lorenza de Loyola y Coya, the daughter of the previous couple. Thus the Jesuits were united with Incan nobility through marriages in successive generations. Between the couples are the two most important Jesuits Ignatius Loyola and Francis Borja. Above them is the Jesuit monogram.

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕

Kalergi was a race mixed Catholic, but nobody cares to mention that.

He’s literally us.

Bible verses that condemn interracial marriage.

Whether you agree or disagree with Kirk’s politics, to place him on the same level as Michael King is to minimize the wickedness and heresies of “MLK”

Catholic Church seems to be a major player in pushing refugees because they want more Catholic Latinos in America.

The folly of putting religion before race!

@MartinezPolitix