God is a Discriminator (Part Two) - An Excerpt from Jeffrey Mardis’ Book: Aliens, Angels, & Outer Space:

5.) The Land of God - When God declared a piece of earthly real estate as His own, that tract of land was nowhere to be found on the North American continent. Africa, Antarctica, Europe, Australia, and South America were never candidates either. God chose ONLY ONE piece of literal dirt as His own – the land of Israel. Note these verses of Scripture showing God literally speaking to a piece of ground:

“Also, thou son of man, PROPHESY UNTO THE MOUNTAINS of Israel, and say, YE MOUNTAINS OF ISRAEL, HEAR THE WORD OF THE LORD: ...Thus saith the Lord God to the mountains, and to the hills, to the rivers, and to the valleys, to the desolate wastes, and to the cities that are forsaken... Therefore thus saith the Lord God; Surely in the fire of my jealousy have I spoken against the heathen, and against all Idumea, which have appointed MY LAND into their possession...” Ezekiel 36:1-5

6.) One Saviour - God chose ONLY ONE man to be the Saviour of mankind. Billions of people have walked this earth, and many counterfeit “saviors” have been offered by man, but God chose only one man to be the true Saviour of the world – Lord Jesus Christ – God manifest in the flesh. Mary, Mohammed, Allah, Joseph Smith, Buddha, Krishna, the Pope and all the other fakers don’t win, place, or show.

“Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” Acts 4:12

“For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.” 1 Timothy 2:5

“Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the Glory of God the Father.” Phillippians 2:9-11

These six outstanding examples clearly illustrate that God discriminates. It shows that God will often PICK ONLY ONE to the exclusion of the vast majority. And many times, the majority being left out can number into the billions, trillions, or sextillions. Not only that, the cases in which God selects only one are highly important, crucial events, such as: (1.) Populating a planet; (2.) Saving an inhabited world from total destruction; (3.) Creating a nation; and (4) providing a Saviour. None of these situations are trivial. All play a major role, and have a profound impact on the history of mankind. In the following examples of godly discrimination, take into consideration the large number of those being excluded:

• God started the human race with only ONE MAN.
• God saved only ONE MAN’S FAMILY from a global flood
• God chose only ONE MAN from which to raise up a nation.
• God picked only ONE NATION to be his chosen people.
• God chose only ONE PIECE OF LAND as His own.
• God chose only ONE MAN as the Saviour of the world.

Contrary to both popular belief and wishful thinking, God does not treat everyone and everything the same. God separates, divides, differentiates, draws distinctions, and discriminates in many cases.

-Pages 31-33

Source: https://store.kjv1611.org/aliens-angels-outer-space/

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

A Statement From Judge Leon M. Bazile (the judge of the famous Loving v. Virginia case).

Bazile, upholding Virginia state law, found the Lovings (an interracial couple) to be guilty of violating the statues against miscegenation and stated the words recorded above.

There was a time in this country, not too long ago in all actuality, in which the legislation drafted and the judges’ rulings were primarily dictated by the Bible.

It is a shame that a secular judge has more sense than many Baptist preachers of today, and I say that as a steadfast and unashamed Baptist!

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

GOD IS A RACIAL ¹ DISCRIMINATOR

Exodus 11:7 KJV “But against any of the children of Israel shall not a dog move his tongue... that ye may know how that the Lord doth put a difference between the Egyptians and Israel."

The Lord who created the world and all that in them is (Exodus 20:11), also created the races (Genesis 9-11). He created them with distinctions and differences that can easily be observed. This dissimilitude cannot only be perceived through sight but also through experience when dealing with those that are a different kindred than oneself. Anyone who has spent any extended period of time in a foreign country (perhaps on the mission field) can clearly see that the races have different ways of thinking and distinguishable temperaments, not only just certain physical characteristics. This is how God created us and no matter what race you are, you should be content with how God made you (Psalm 139:14). It is absolutely preposterous to say that racial distinctions do not exist and that “there’s only one race, the human race” (which is something I will refute in my book). Does anyone really believe that? I think people who say that are either ignorant, indoctrinated, or just plain mendacious. I challenge anyone who subscribes to that maxim to spend a year in Barcelona, Spain, then a year in Tokyo, Japan, then a year in Lagos, Nigeria and see if you really still believe that. When reading the Scriptures it is abundantly perspicuous that God distinguishes between and observes differences between the races, thus making God a racial discriminator. Here, in the above passage, almighty God differentiated between the Egyptians (a race of people descended from Ham) and Israel (a race of people descended from Shem through Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob). Such a thing would be deemed “racist” and “bigoted” in today’s day and age in which everyone in the west professes to be colorblind to race and pretends that everyone is exactly the same.

¹ Noah Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language defines discrimination as:

Discrimination

DISCRIMINATION, n.

1. The act of distinguishing; the act of making or observing a difference; distinction; as the discrimination between right and wrong.

2. The state of being distinguished.

3. Mark of distinction.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

And that’s the King James Bible, mind you. If it ain’t King James, it ain’t Bible.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Former President Harry S. Truman on Interracial Marriage

Recently we heard from a secular Virginia state judge about the matter, citing God’s original intention of racial separation as support for his judicial ruling. Now we have a former U.S. President (who was raised a Baptist by the way) weighing in on the matter stating that the Bible’s teaching was against miscegenation, which has been demonstrated on this channel countless times already.

If a secular judge and an American President could get it right, you would think Baptist preachers could get it right. Nevertheless, Satan has managed to convince most Christians in the west of the communist ideologies of “race is a social construct” and “there’s only one race, the human race.”

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Kinism: What is a Nation?

Kinism, the Christian doctrine advocating the maintenance of national segregation along ethnic lines, is built upon the concept of nationhood. Therefore, it is imperative to correctly understand what a nation is in the first place. In today's modern world, the term "nation" is often equated with a civic nation—a nation formed through shared values, legal rights, and citizenship. Due to this contemporary understanding of nationhood, segregation is often viewed with disgust.

However, for Christians, we acknowledge that word usage can change and that we are to rely upon the unchanging standard, which is noscripture. Scripture rejects the idea of civic nationalism and instead embraces and advocates for ethnonationalism, where nationhood and ethnicity are synonymous. Genesis 10:5 states,

"By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations."

This strongly emphasises and defines a nation as pertaining to a distinct familial ancestry or kindred. Thus, a nation is a kin, an ethnicity. Furthermore, it shouldn't surprise us that the word "ethnicity" is a translation of "ethnos," the Greek word for nation.¹

@Kinism

Bryan Denlinger on Anti-Miscegenation Laws, Sodomite Marriage, and The Jesuits

Former IFB preacher Bryan Denlinger speaks on the effect interracial marriage had on normalizing sodomite “marriages.” Denlinger conclusively shows that the overturning of the anti-miscegenation laws in America directly paved the way for the overthrow of anti-sodomy laws. Furthermore, he demonstrates how Jesuit trained men, among whom was a papal court Jew, were instrumental in this endeavor. On top of that, he also displays how the Catholic hierarchy has seemingly been supportive of interracial marriage ever since the 17th century ¹ and how Protestants were against it as opposed to Catholics.

¹Though from my research, most Catholic laymen and some outlying priests were in opposition to interracial unions up until the Civil Rights Act of 1964

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Identifying Cain’s Mark - An Excerpt from Jeffrey Mardis’ Book: The Amazing Prophecy of Job (Part One)

“My skin is black upon me, and my bones are burned with heat.” Job 30:30

The mention of “black” skin in this verse has nothing to do with racial differences. It has to do with DEATH. And, more specifically, it concerns the physical corruption of a body after death. According to the Encyclopedia of Death and Dying:

“First the body turns green, then purple, and then eventually BLACK.”

From a scientific standpoint, skin color changing at death is initiated by poisonous gasses and liquids, which eventually infiltrate the circulatory system and tissues. After the body passes its most prominent decay stage, BONES and BLACKENED SKIN are the only things left behind. In standard cases, for a body left to itself in the open-air, the sun-baked bones become dry and bleach-white, the skin dark and leathery. This state can often be seen in those who happen to mummify naturally.

The Southeast Applied Forensic Science Facility is a research organization owned by Sam Houston State University. Here, researchers study the human body after death to learn more about it. This research is located outdoors, where dozens of donated human corpses are on display in various states of decomposition. One reporter who visited this lab reported seeing a “...fully skeletonized [human], with its BLACK, HARDENED SKIN clinging to the bones...”

The prophet Jeremiah echoed such a state when he wrote:

“Their visage is BLACKER THAN COAL; they are not known in the streets: their SKIN CLEAVETH TO THEIR BONES; IT IS WITHERED, it is become like a stick.” Lam. 4:8

Specifically, Jeremiah is speaking of Nazarites in this verse that were once pure, but were later punished by the Lord for their iniquity, and starved to death. Their faces then turned black as coal (Lam. 4:7-9, see also Lam 5:10).

THE MARK OF DEATH

The acquiring of black skin at death would’ve first been evident in Abel, the first man who ever died physically (Gen. 4:8). However, the unique thing about this death is that Abel didn’t die of natural causes; he was murdered. After this heinous crime, the Bible reports that God cursed the killer, Cain, and “set a mark upon” him (Gen. 4:15). The question then arises: WHAT KIND OF MARK DID GOD GIVE THIS MAN? Whatever it was, it had to be something immediately noticeable. Otherwise, people couldn’t have avoided him. Perhaps, like the now decomposed body of his dead brother, Cain’s entire body was turned black? Or, maybe he was simply given a tattoo-like mark, not with ink, but something similar to a birthmark – like a BLACK SPOT? Notice the parallels in the following verse and how the Ethiopian skin is analogous to a mark, or “spot,” and how such a spot is linked with doing “evil.” All of which are requirements for Cain’s mark:

“Can the ETHIOPIAN change his SKIN, or the leopard his SPOTS? then may ye also do GOOD, that are accustomed to do EVIL.” Jer. 13:23

Since noscripture doesn’t give specifics in this case, the giving of black skin to mark Cain may not necessarily be what happened. But it’s certainly a possibility. It would’ve been a very good way to show that Cain was responsible for his brother’s death. Because the marking of a murderer in this manner, by black skin or black spot, would’ve been CONSISTENT WITH THE REALITY OF PHYSICAL DEATH WHEN THE SKIN OF ALL MEN TURNS BLACK. Understand? We’re speaking of consistency. Thus, in an act of ironic justice, the Creator may have marked Cain by giving him something that Cain inadvertently gave to his brother when he murdered him – BLACK SKIN. But whatever the fact, Cain had a mark. And regardless of what it was, all people physically acquire black skin after death. Not only does science support this fact, so does the Bible.

In today’s politically-correct society, it can be difficult to address such things without someone getting the wrong idea or being offended.

-Pages 71-74

Source: https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/product/the-amazing-prophecy-of-job/

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Identifying Cain’s Mark - An Excerpt from Jeffrey Mardis’ Book: The Amazing Prophecy of Job (Part Two)

So please know that we’re not talking about an indictment against anyone. We’re talking about the BIBLE and SCIENCE. And the fact is, at death, our skin turns black, regardless of our ethnicity. Now, if that offends the reader, I’m sorry, there’s nothing I can do about it. Facts are stubborn things. And to be fair, in case you missed it, it’s also mentioned that this stage of decay brings with it sun-bleached “white” bones. So, “black” is not the only color named. No one is knocking anyone’s race. But, since a living person’s skeleton is hidden beneath the skin, a sun-bleached, white kind of mark upon Cain’s bones would’ve hardly been practical. Skin is part of man’s OUTWARD appearance, while bones are not. Thus, a death-like, black skin color would be the more practical sign. But regardless of how God marked Cain, the mark wasn’t given so that others would KILL HIM, but so that others would know NOT TO KILL HIM. What!? Yes:

“And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, LEST any finding him should kill him.” Gen. 4:15

The word “lest” means “to avoid the risk of” (see also Gen. 3:3, 11:4, 19:15, Eph. 2:8-9, etc.). Cain’s mark was for his protection because he, in turn, typified the Jew. Just as Cain killed his brother (Abel), so too did the Jews kill theirs (the Lord Jesus Christ). And just as Israel is a protected people, despite their heinous crime (Rom. 11:1-5), so was Cain.

If this is so, that black skin was Cain’s mark (Gen. 4:15), it in no way means that “white people are better than black people.” Nor does it mean that those of African descent are “demons” or are “unable to be saved” or any such wicked, heretical, nonsense that some on occasion have espoused (like the Mormon/LDS cult, Nazism, white supremacists, etc.).

-Pages 74-75

Source: https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/product/the-amazing-prophecy-of-job/

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Kinism: Neither Jew nor Greek?

Opponents of the Christian doctrine of Kinism, which advocates ethnonationalism and ethno-segregation, often argue, "There are no distinctions between nations anymore; don't you know that there is no longer Jew nor Greek?" The verse they reference is Galatians 3:28, which states,

"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."

However, when read in context, the opponents' argument quickly falls apart. If applied consistently, the opponent would also have to affirm transgenderism or non-binary identities, as the verse also states that there is neither male nor female. Simply put, this verse is merely emphasising that God shows no partiality in regard to the gospel (Rom. 2:11). Just as distinctions between male and female still exist, so too do distinctions between Jew and Greek.

@Kinism

Modern Integration Founded by a Jesuit Priest by Bryan Denlinger

There are so many people who persistently proclaim that it is the Jews who are behind the race mixing agenda. Though, no doubt there are Jews involved in promoting it¹, I have yet to hear these same people point the finger at the malevolent and damnable Jesuit Order as having any involvement, much less being the root of it. In many cases it seems to be a convenient omission of details in order to cover up for Rome.

¹See the previous video I posted by Bryan Denlinger which exposes some of the papal court Jews who were involved in the disgraceful overthrow of Virginia state law in the Loving v. Virginia case.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Malcolm X on Voluntary Racial Separation

Unlike his counterpart, Marxist Lucifer King Jr., Malcolm X did not believe in the total integration of the races. Instead, he believed in voluntary racial separation unto nationhood. He was truly a black nationalist. As a follower of Elijah Muhammad (as was Muhammad Ali, whom we will hear from later), he was also vehemently against miscegenation. In an interview with Louis Lomax, Malcolm stated:

“Only a man who is ashamed of what he is will marry out of his race. There has to be something wrong when a man or a woman leaves his own people and marries somebody of another kind. Men who are proud of being black marry black women; women who are proud of being black marry black men.”

-Lomax, Louis E. “A Summing Up: Louis Lomax Interviews Malcolm X.” When the Word Is Given: a Report on Elijah Muhammad, Malcolm X, and the Black Muslim World, page 170

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

It is quite a dismal state of affairs when lost Hamite Muslims have more sense to believe in racial separation and sticking with their own kind in marriage than most Baptist preachers do today! This also dispels the misconception that only white supremacists believe in the separation of the races and the maintaining of racial purity.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Kinism: of one Blood?

Often, opponents of Kinism, the Christian doctrine of ethno-segregation, will state something such as, "Well, if nationhood is defined by ancestral lineage, then we are all of one nation because of Adam anyway". Scripture refutes this notion in Acts 17:26-27, which states,

"And hath made of one blood all nations [Ethnicities] of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:" ¹

In this passage, we learn that God created humanity from a common blood origin, presumably referring to Adam. However, even with this shared ancestry, the intentional division and establishment of distinct ethnic nations, ethnicities, by God, along with the appointment of their respective bounds and habitations, remains unaffected.

@Kinism

We catch a lot of flack here for our biblical stand on the separation of the races - everything from being called self hating whites to hating anyone who isn’t white - both couldn’t be further from the truth. We take the position that every rational person took no more than a century ago, even non believers knew enough.

We are commanded to reach the entire world with the gospel. Shame on anyone who won’t give the gospel to someone based on their skin or culture! You can support biblical separation and still care for the lost and dying world that doesn’t look like you. Was Cassius Clay a white supremacist for his mainline view on the races?


https://news.1rj.ru/str/baptistgreek/1547

Kinism: Bounds of Habitation

Even with the acknowledgment of the reality of ethnic nations, critics of the Christian doctrine of Kinism, which teaches ethnonationalism and ethno-segregation, may argue, "Well, even if nations are defined by ethnicities and indeed exist, why should that dissuade us from mixing, integrating and coexisting?" However, noscripture unequivocally declares that God intended nations, or ethnos, to have distinct, separate, bounds of habitation. If proven true, this would preclude any possibility of integration between ethnicities (nations) because we wouldn't have any ability to mix in the first place due to God-intended, divinely appointed, restrictions.

When looking at the noscriptures, the concept of God intentionally setting bounds of habitation, distinct separations, and restrictions between nations is easily found. Firstly, in Deuteronomy 32:8, which states,

"When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel."

This notion is also later reiterated in the New Testament further emphasising not only the current and ongoing reality of nations but also their divinely appointed intentional separation/segregation. Acts 17:26-27 reads,

"And hath made of one blood all nations [Ethnicities] of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation"

Thus, to mix is to defy God's ordained order for this universe, distorting God's instituted design and intention for His creation.

@Kinism

It’s just a conspiracy bro

Kinism: Why Bother?

Critics of Kinism, a Christian belief in ethnic-based segregation, may argue, "Even if God intended nations to be separate, why bother enforcing that?" This statement, as I'll explain, is not just ignorant but also hypocritical.

First, consider how we view homosexual marriage as sinful—not just because of verses against sodomy (homosexual acts) but also because marriage was established to be a covenant exclusively between man and woman. Conservative Christians universally support maintaining this God-established institution.

Therefore, if you concede that Scripture teaches that God Himself instituted and ordered the distinctions and boundaries of nations, shouldn't we also aim to uphold this institution too? It would be inconsistent, if not hypocritical, to support one but not the other, for both are so tied to the ordering of the Lord's creation and instituted ways for how human life should be conducted.

@Kinism

Baptist Evangelist Justin Childers on Genesis 9:27

In the following video, brother Childers proves that Genesis 9:27 was not nullified by the New Testament and that the verse still applies to this very day. Childers speaks about how nearly all Christians for 1900 years had the same view on race relations but it all suddenly changed after 1964 (which is something I have reiterated on this channel numerous times). In the video, the arguments of the race mixers, based on faulty interpretations of Galatians 3:28 and Acts 17:26, are completely dismantled. Thus showing that there is no contradiction whatsoever between Genesis 9 and the aforementioned verses in the New Testament.

https://youtu.be/KDCnF0zGois?

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Kinism: Against Miscegenation
- Pt. 1.

The primary and consistent basis for Christians opposing homosexual marriage lies in the belief that God instituted marriage exclusively between a man and a woman, not in verses against homosexual actions. Likewise, God has also instituted the separation of nations. If nations are to remain distinct, it logically follows that miscegenation, the mixing of races/ethnicities, would be excluded. This is because individuals of different races (nations/ethnicities) would not have the opportunity to interact, mingle, and consequently form marital unions, as it would contradict the intended separation of nations—by forming a single covenant between two distinct nations.

To simplify, noscripture dictates that the condemnation of homosexuality stems from God's established order of creation, where marriage is exclusively instituted for a union between a man and a woman. In the same vein, God's intention for nations is their separation and therefore inability to race mix, reinforcing the idea that consistency in belief supports both the rejection of homosexual unions and inter-national (ethnic/racial) unions—race mixing.

@Kinism