And that’s the King James Bible, mind you. If it ain’t King James, it ain’t Bible.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
❤3🔥2👍1
Former President Harry S. Truman on Interracial Marriage
Recently we heard from a secular Virginia state judge about the matter, citing God’s original intention of racial separation as support for his judicial ruling. Now we have a former U.S. President (who was raised a Baptist by the way) weighing in on the matter stating that the Bible’s teaching was against miscegenation, which has been demonstrated on this channel countless times already.
If a secular judge and an American President could get it right, you would think Baptist preachers could get it right. Nevertheless, Satan has managed to convince most Christians in the west of the communist ideologies of “race is a social construct” and “there’s only one race, the human race.”
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Recently we heard from a secular Virginia state judge about the matter, citing God’s original intention of racial separation as support for his judicial ruling. Now we have a former U.S. President (who was raised a Baptist by the way) weighing in on the matter stating that the Bible’s teaching was against miscegenation, which has been demonstrated on this channel countless times already.
If a secular judge and an American President could get it right, you would think Baptist preachers could get it right. Nevertheless, Satan has managed to convince most Christians in the west of the communist ideologies of “race is a social construct” and “there’s only one race, the human race.”
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
👍1
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: What is a Nation?
Kinism, the Christian doctrine advocating the maintenance of national segregation along ethnic lines, is built upon the concept of nationhood. Therefore, it is imperative to correctly understand what a nation is in the first place. In today's modern world, the term "nation" is often equated with a civic nation—a nation formed through shared values, legal rights, and citizenship. Due to this contemporary understanding of nationhood, segregation is often viewed with disgust.
However, for Christians, we acknowledge that word usage can change and that we are to rely upon the unchanging standard, which is noscripture. Scripture rejects the idea of civic nationalism and instead embraces and advocates for ethnonationalism, where nationhood and ethnicity are synonymous. Genesis 10:5 states,
"By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations."
This strongly emphasises and defines a nation as pertaining to a distinct familial ancestry or kindred. Thus, a nation is a kin, an ethnicity. Furthermore, it shouldn't surprise us that the word "ethnicity" is a translation of "ethnos," the Greek word for nation.¹
@Kinism
Kinism, the Christian doctrine advocating the maintenance of national segregation along ethnic lines, is built upon the concept of nationhood. Therefore, it is imperative to correctly understand what a nation is in the first place. In today's modern world, the term "nation" is often equated with a civic nation—a nation formed through shared values, legal rights, and citizenship. Due to this contemporary understanding of nationhood, segregation is often viewed with disgust.
However, for Christians, we acknowledge that word usage can change and that we are to rely upon the unchanging standard, which is noscripture. Scripture rejects the idea of civic nationalism and instead embraces and advocates for ethnonationalism, where nationhood and ethnicity are synonymous. Genesis 10:5 states,
"By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations."
This strongly emphasises and defines a nation as pertaining to a distinct familial ancestry or kindred. Thus, a nation is a kin, an ethnicity. Furthermore, it shouldn't surprise us that the word "ethnicity" is a translation of "ethnos," the Greek word for nation.¹
@Kinism
❤1👍1
Anti-Miscegenation Laws, Sodomite Marriage, And The Jesuits.mp4
176.2 MB
Bryan Denlinger on Anti-Miscegenation Laws, Sodomite Marriage, and The Jesuits
Former IFB preacher Bryan Denlinger speaks on the effect interracial marriage had on normalizing sodomite “marriages.” Denlinger conclusively shows that the overturning of the anti-miscegenation laws in America directly paved the way for the overthrow of anti-sodomy laws. Furthermore, he demonstrates how Jesuit trained men, among whom was a papal court Jew, were instrumental in this endeavor. On top of that, he also displays how the Catholic hierarchy has seemingly been supportive of interracial marriage ever since the 17th century ¹ and how Protestants were against it as opposed to Catholics.
¹Though from my research, most Catholic laymen and some outlying priests were in opposition to interracial unions up until the Civil Rights Act of 1964
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Former IFB preacher Bryan Denlinger speaks on the effect interracial marriage had on normalizing sodomite “marriages.” Denlinger conclusively shows that the overturning of the anti-miscegenation laws in America directly paved the way for the overthrow of anti-sodomy laws. Furthermore, he demonstrates how Jesuit trained men, among whom was a papal court Jew, were instrumental in this endeavor. On top of that, he also displays how the Catholic hierarchy has seemingly been supportive of interracial marriage ever since the 17th century ¹ and how Protestants were against it as opposed to Catholics.
¹Though from my research, most Catholic laymen and some outlying priests were in opposition to interracial unions up until the Civil Rights Act of 1964
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
⚡1
Identifying Cain’s Mark - An Excerpt from Jeffrey Mardis’ Book: The Amazing Prophecy of Job (Part One)
“My skin is black upon me, and my bones are burned with heat.” Job 30:30
The mention of “black” skin in this verse has nothing to do with racial differences. It has to do with DEATH. And, more specifically, it concerns the physical corruption of a body after death. According to the Encyclopedia of Death and Dying:
“First the body turns green, then purple, and then eventually BLACK.”
From a scientific standpoint, skin color changing at death is initiated by poisonous gasses and liquids, which eventually infiltrate the circulatory system and tissues. After the body passes its most prominent decay stage, BONES and BLACKENED SKIN are the only things left behind. In standard cases, for a body left to itself in the open-air, the sun-baked bones become dry and bleach-white, the skin dark and leathery. This state can often be seen in those who happen to mummify naturally.
The Southeast Applied Forensic Science Facility is a research organization owned by Sam Houston State University. Here, researchers study the human body after death to learn more about it. This research is located outdoors, where dozens of donated human corpses are on display in various states of decomposition. One reporter who visited this lab reported seeing a “...fully skeletonized [human], with its BLACK, HARDENED SKIN clinging to the bones...”
The prophet Jeremiah echoed such a state when he wrote:
“Their visage is BLACKER THAN COAL; they are not known in the streets: their SKIN CLEAVETH TO THEIR BONES; IT IS WITHERED, it is become like a stick.” Lam. 4:8
Specifically, Jeremiah is speaking of Nazarites in this verse that were once pure, but were later punished by the Lord for their iniquity, and starved to death. Their faces then turned black as coal (Lam. 4:7-9, see also Lam 5:10).
THE MARK OF DEATH
The acquiring of black skin at death would’ve first been evident in Abel, the first man who ever died physically (Gen. 4:8). However, the unique thing about this death is that Abel didn’t die of natural causes; he was murdered. After this heinous crime, the Bible reports that God cursed the killer, Cain, and “set a mark upon” him (Gen. 4:15). The question then arises: WHAT KIND OF MARK DID GOD GIVE THIS MAN? Whatever it was, it had to be something immediately noticeable. Otherwise, people couldn’t have avoided him. Perhaps, like the now decomposed body of his dead brother, Cain’s entire body was turned black? Or, maybe he was simply given a tattoo-like mark, not with ink, but something similar to a birthmark – like a BLACK SPOT? Notice the parallels in the following verse and how the Ethiopian skin is analogous to a mark, or “spot,” and how such a spot is linked with doing “evil.” All of which are requirements for Cain’s mark:
“Can the ETHIOPIAN change his SKIN, or the leopard his SPOTS? then may ye also do GOOD, that are accustomed to do EVIL.” Jer. 13:23
Since noscripture doesn’t give specifics in this case, the giving of black skin to mark Cain may not necessarily be what happened. But it’s certainly a possibility. It would’ve been a very good way to show that Cain was responsible for his brother’s death. Because the marking of a murderer in this manner, by black skin or black spot, would’ve been CONSISTENT WITH THE REALITY OF PHYSICAL DEATH WHEN THE SKIN OF ALL MEN TURNS BLACK. Understand? We’re speaking of consistency. Thus, in an act of ironic justice, the Creator may have marked Cain by giving him something that Cain inadvertently gave to his brother when he murdered him – BLACK SKIN. But whatever the fact, Cain had a mark. And regardless of what it was, all people physically acquire black skin after death. Not only does science support this fact, so does the Bible.
In today’s politically-correct society, it can be difficult to address such things without someone getting the wrong idea or being offended.
-Pages 71-74
Source: https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/product/the-amazing-prophecy-of-job/
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
“My skin is black upon me, and my bones are burned with heat.” Job 30:30
The mention of “black” skin in this verse has nothing to do with racial differences. It has to do with DEATH. And, more specifically, it concerns the physical corruption of a body after death. According to the Encyclopedia of Death and Dying:
“First the body turns green, then purple, and then eventually BLACK.”
From a scientific standpoint, skin color changing at death is initiated by poisonous gasses and liquids, which eventually infiltrate the circulatory system and tissues. After the body passes its most prominent decay stage, BONES and BLACKENED SKIN are the only things left behind. In standard cases, for a body left to itself in the open-air, the sun-baked bones become dry and bleach-white, the skin dark and leathery. This state can often be seen in those who happen to mummify naturally.
The Southeast Applied Forensic Science Facility is a research organization owned by Sam Houston State University. Here, researchers study the human body after death to learn more about it. This research is located outdoors, where dozens of donated human corpses are on display in various states of decomposition. One reporter who visited this lab reported seeing a “...fully skeletonized [human], with its BLACK, HARDENED SKIN clinging to the bones...”
The prophet Jeremiah echoed such a state when he wrote:
“Their visage is BLACKER THAN COAL; they are not known in the streets: their SKIN CLEAVETH TO THEIR BONES; IT IS WITHERED, it is become like a stick.” Lam. 4:8
Specifically, Jeremiah is speaking of Nazarites in this verse that were once pure, but were later punished by the Lord for their iniquity, and starved to death. Their faces then turned black as coal (Lam. 4:7-9, see also Lam 5:10).
THE MARK OF DEATH
The acquiring of black skin at death would’ve first been evident in Abel, the first man who ever died physically (Gen. 4:8). However, the unique thing about this death is that Abel didn’t die of natural causes; he was murdered. After this heinous crime, the Bible reports that God cursed the killer, Cain, and “set a mark upon” him (Gen. 4:15). The question then arises: WHAT KIND OF MARK DID GOD GIVE THIS MAN? Whatever it was, it had to be something immediately noticeable. Otherwise, people couldn’t have avoided him. Perhaps, like the now decomposed body of his dead brother, Cain’s entire body was turned black? Or, maybe he was simply given a tattoo-like mark, not with ink, but something similar to a birthmark – like a BLACK SPOT? Notice the parallels in the following verse and how the Ethiopian skin is analogous to a mark, or “spot,” and how such a spot is linked with doing “evil.” All of which are requirements for Cain’s mark:
“Can the ETHIOPIAN change his SKIN, or the leopard his SPOTS? then may ye also do GOOD, that are accustomed to do EVIL.” Jer. 13:23
Since noscripture doesn’t give specifics in this case, the giving of black skin to mark Cain may not necessarily be what happened. But it’s certainly a possibility. It would’ve been a very good way to show that Cain was responsible for his brother’s death. Because the marking of a murderer in this manner, by black skin or black spot, would’ve been CONSISTENT WITH THE REALITY OF PHYSICAL DEATH WHEN THE SKIN OF ALL MEN TURNS BLACK. Understand? We’re speaking of consistency. Thus, in an act of ironic justice, the Creator may have marked Cain by giving him something that Cain inadvertently gave to his brother when he murdered him – BLACK SKIN. But whatever the fact, Cain had a mark. And regardless of what it was, all people physically acquire black skin after death. Not only does science support this fact, so does the Bible.
In today’s politically-correct society, it can be difficult to address such things without someone getting the wrong idea or being offended.
-Pages 71-74
Source: https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/product/the-amazing-prophecy-of-job/
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Now The End Begins
The Amazing Prophecy of Job - Jeffrey Mardis
In The Amazing Prophecy of Job, author Jeffrey Mardis shows you amazing biblical insights from the oldest book of the Bible.
❤1
Identifying Cain’s Mark - An Excerpt from Jeffrey Mardis’ Book: The Amazing Prophecy of Job (Part Two)
So please know that we’re not talking about an indictment against anyone. We’re talking about the BIBLE and SCIENCE. And the fact is, at death, our skin turns black, regardless of our ethnicity. Now, if that offends the reader, I’m sorry, there’s nothing I can do about it. Facts are stubborn things. And to be fair, in case you missed it, it’s also mentioned that this stage of decay brings with it sun-bleached “white” bones. So, “black” is not the only color named. No one is knocking anyone’s race. But, since a living person’s skeleton is hidden beneath the skin, a sun-bleached, white kind of mark upon Cain’s bones would’ve hardly been practical. Skin is part of man’s OUTWARD appearance, while bones are not. Thus, a death-like, black skin color would be the more practical sign. But regardless of how God marked Cain, the mark wasn’t given so that others would KILL HIM, but so that others would know NOT TO KILL HIM. What!? Yes:
“And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, LEST any finding him should kill him.” Gen. 4:15
The word “lest” means “to avoid the risk of” (see also Gen. 3:3, 11:4, 19:15, Eph. 2:8-9, etc.). Cain’s mark was for his protection because he, in turn, typified the Jew. Just as Cain killed his brother (Abel), so too did the Jews kill theirs (the Lord Jesus Christ). And just as Israel is a protected people, despite their heinous crime (Rom. 11:1-5), so was Cain.
If this is so, that black skin was Cain’s mark (Gen. 4:15), it in no way means that “white people are better than black people.” Nor does it mean that those of African descent are “demons” or are “unable to be saved” or any such wicked, heretical, nonsense that some on occasion have espoused (like the Mormon/LDS cult, Nazism, white supremacists, etc.).
-Pages 74-75
Source: https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/product/the-amazing-prophecy-of-job/
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
So please know that we’re not talking about an indictment against anyone. We’re talking about the BIBLE and SCIENCE. And the fact is, at death, our skin turns black, regardless of our ethnicity. Now, if that offends the reader, I’m sorry, there’s nothing I can do about it. Facts are stubborn things. And to be fair, in case you missed it, it’s also mentioned that this stage of decay brings with it sun-bleached “white” bones. So, “black” is not the only color named. No one is knocking anyone’s race. But, since a living person’s skeleton is hidden beneath the skin, a sun-bleached, white kind of mark upon Cain’s bones would’ve hardly been practical. Skin is part of man’s OUTWARD appearance, while bones are not. Thus, a death-like, black skin color would be the more practical sign. But regardless of how God marked Cain, the mark wasn’t given so that others would KILL HIM, but so that others would know NOT TO KILL HIM. What!? Yes:
“And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, LEST any finding him should kill him.” Gen. 4:15
The word “lest” means “to avoid the risk of” (see also Gen. 3:3, 11:4, 19:15, Eph. 2:8-9, etc.). Cain’s mark was for his protection because he, in turn, typified the Jew. Just as Cain killed his brother (Abel), so too did the Jews kill theirs (the Lord Jesus Christ). And just as Israel is a protected people, despite their heinous crime (Rom. 11:1-5), so was Cain.
If this is so, that black skin was Cain’s mark (Gen. 4:15), it in no way means that “white people are better than black people.” Nor does it mean that those of African descent are “demons” or are “unable to be saved” or any such wicked, heretical, nonsense that some on occasion have espoused (like the Mormon/LDS cult, Nazism, white supremacists, etc.).
-Pages 74-75
Source: https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/product/the-amazing-prophecy-of-job/
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Now The End Begins
The Amazing Prophecy of Job - Jeffrey Mardis
In The Amazing Prophecy of Job, author Jeffrey Mardis shows you amazing biblical insights from the oldest book of the Bible.
👍1
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Neither Jew nor Greek?
Opponents of the Christian doctrine of Kinism, which advocates ethnonationalism and ethno-segregation, often argue, "There are no distinctions between nations anymore; don't you know that there is no longer Jew nor Greek?" The verse they reference is Galatians 3:28, which states,
"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."
However, when read in context, the opponents' argument quickly falls apart. If applied consistently, the opponent would also have to affirm transgenderism or non-binary identities, as the verse also states that there is neither male nor female. Simply put, this verse is merely emphasising that God shows no partiality in regard to the gospel (Rom. 2:11). Just as distinctions between male and female still exist, so too do distinctions between Jew and Greek.
@Kinism
Opponents of the Christian doctrine of Kinism, which advocates ethnonationalism and ethno-segregation, often argue, "There are no distinctions between nations anymore; don't you know that there is no longer Jew nor Greek?" The verse they reference is Galatians 3:28, which states,
"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."
However, when read in context, the opponents' argument quickly falls apart. If applied consistently, the opponent would also have to affirm transgenderism or non-binary identities, as the verse also states that there is neither male nor female. Simply put, this verse is merely emphasising that God shows no partiality in regard to the gospel (Rom. 2:11). Just as distinctions between male and female still exist, so too do distinctions between Jew and Greek.
@Kinism
Telegram
Kinism
Upholding Natural Affection
⚡2❤1
Modern_Integration_Founded_By_A_Jesuit_Priest_Bryan_Denlinger.mp4
70.8 MB
Modern Integration Founded by a Jesuit Priest by Bryan Denlinger
There are so many people who persistently proclaim that it is the Jews who are behind the race mixing agenda. Though, no doubt there are Jews involved in promoting it¹, I have yet to hear these same people point the finger at the malevolent and damnable Jesuit Order as having any involvement, much less being the root of it. In many cases it seems to be a convenient omission of details in order to cover up for Rome.
¹See the previous video I posted by Bryan Denlinger which exposes some of the papal court Jews who were involved in the disgraceful overthrow of Virginia state law in the Loving v. Virginia case.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
There are so many people who persistently proclaim that it is the Jews who are behind the race mixing agenda. Though, no doubt there are Jews involved in promoting it¹, I have yet to hear these same people point the finger at the malevolent and damnable Jesuit Order as having any involvement, much less being the root of it. In many cases it seems to be a convenient omission of details in order to cover up for Rome.
¹See the previous video I posted by Bryan Denlinger which exposes some of the papal court Jews who were involved in the disgraceful overthrow of Virginia state law in the Loving v. Virginia case.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
❤2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Malcolm X on Voluntary Racial Separation
Unlike his counterpart, Marxist Lucifer King Jr., Malcolm X did not believe in the total integration of the races. Instead, he believed in voluntary racial separation unto nationhood. He was truly a black nationalist. As a follower of Elijah Muhammad (as was Muhammad Ali, whom we will hear from later), he was also vehemently against miscegenation. In an interview with Louis Lomax, Malcolm stated:
“Only a man who is ashamed of what he is will marry out of his race. There has to be something wrong when a man or a woman leaves his own people and marries somebody of another kind. Men who are proud of being black marry black women; women who are proud of being black marry black men.”
-Lomax, Louis E. “A Summing Up: Louis Lomax Interviews Malcolm X.” When the Word Is Given: a Report on Elijah Muhammad, Malcolm X, and the Black Muslim World, page 170
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Unlike his counterpart, Marxist Lucifer King Jr., Malcolm X did not believe in the total integration of the races. Instead, he believed in voluntary racial separation unto nationhood. He was truly a black nationalist. As a follower of Elijah Muhammad (as was Muhammad Ali, whom we will hear from later), he was also vehemently against miscegenation. In an interview with Louis Lomax, Malcolm stated:
“Only a man who is ashamed of what he is will marry out of his race. There has to be something wrong when a man or a woman leaves his own people and marries somebody of another kind. Men who are proud of being black marry black women; women who are proud of being black marry black men.”
-Lomax, Louis E. “A Summing Up: Louis Lomax Interviews Malcolm X.” When the Word Is Given: a Report on Elijah Muhammad, Malcolm X, and the Black Muslim World, page 170
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
⚡2🔥1
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Malcolm X on Voluntary Racial Separation Unlike his counterpart, Marxist Lucifer King Jr., Malcolm X did not believe in the total integration of the races. Instead, he believed in voluntary racial separation unto nationhood. He was truly a black nationalist.…
It is quite a dismal state of affairs when lost Hamite Muslims have more sense to believe in racial separation and sticking with their own kind in marriage than most Baptist preachers do today! This also dispels the misconception that only white supremacists believe in the separation of the races and the maintaining of racial purity.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
👍3⚡2
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: of one Blood?
Often, opponents of Kinism, the Christian doctrine of ethno-segregation, will state something such as, "Well, if nationhood is defined by ancestral lineage, then we are all of one nation because of Adam anyway". Scripture refutes this notion in Acts 17:26-27, which states,
"And hath made of one blood all nations [Ethnicities] of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:" ¹
In this passage, we learn that God created humanity from a common blood origin, presumably referring to Adam. However, even with this shared ancestry, the intentional division and establishment of distinct ethnic nations, ethnicities, by God, along with the appointment of their respective bounds and habitations, remains unaffected.
@Kinism
Often, opponents of Kinism, the Christian doctrine of ethno-segregation, will state something such as, "Well, if nationhood is defined by ancestral lineage, then we are all of one nation because of Adam anyway". Scripture refutes this notion in Acts 17:26-27, which states,
"And hath made of one blood all nations [Ethnicities] of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:" ¹
In this passage, we learn that God created humanity from a common blood origin, presumably referring to Adam. However, even with this shared ancestry, the intentional division and establishment of distinct ethnic nations, ethnicities, by God, along with the appointment of their respective bounds and habitations, remains unaffected.
@Kinism
⚡2❤1👍1
Forwarded from IFB Independent Fundamental Baptists
We catch a lot of flack here for our biblical stand on the separation of the races - everything from being called self hating whites to hating anyone who isn’t white - both couldn’t be further from the truth. We take the position that every rational person took no more than a century ago, even non believers knew enough.
We are commanded to reach the entire world with the gospel. Shame on anyone who won’t give the gospel to someone based on their skin or culture! You can support biblical separation and still care for the lost and dying world that doesn’t look like you. Was Cassius Clay a white supremacist for his mainline view on the races?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/baptistgreek/1547
We are commanded to reach the entire world with the gospel. Shame on anyone who won’t give the gospel to someone based on their skin or culture! You can support biblical separation and still care for the lost and dying world that doesn’t look like you. Was Cassius Clay a white supremacist for his mainline view on the races?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/baptistgreek/1547
Telegram
Ελευθερία
I’m a Cassius Clay racist! If this is what a black Muslim believed…imagine what Baptist preachers believed back then. We are so removed from the natural order it’s not even funny.
⚡1🔥1
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Bounds of Habitation
Even with the acknowledgment of the reality of ethnic nations, critics of the Christian doctrine of Kinism, which teaches ethnonationalism and ethno-segregation, may argue, "Well, even if nations are defined by ethnicities and indeed exist, why should that dissuade us from mixing, integrating and coexisting?" However, noscripture unequivocally declares that God intended nations, or ethnos, to have distinct, separate, bounds of habitation. If proven true, this would preclude any possibility of integration between ethnicities (nations) because we wouldn't have any ability to mix in the first place due to God-intended, divinely appointed, restrictions.
When looking at the noscriptures, the concept of God intentionally setting bounds of habitation, distinct separations, and restrictions between nations is easily found. Firstly, in Deuteronomy 32:8, which states,
"When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel."
This notion is also later reiterated in the New Testament further emphasising not only the current and ongoing reality of nations but also their divinely appointed intentional separation/segregation. Acts 17:26-27 reads,
"And hath made of one blood all nations [Ethnicities] of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation"
Thus, to mix is to defy God's ordained order for this universe, distorting God's instituted design and intention for His creation.
@Kinism
Even with the acknowledgment of the reality of ethnic nations, critics of the Christian doctrine of Kinism, which teaches ethnonationalism and ethno-segregation, may argue, "Well, even if nations are defined by ethnicities and indeed exist, why should that dissuade us from mixing, integrating and coexisting?" However, noscripture unequivocally declares that God intended nations, or ethnos, to have distinct, separate, bounds of habitation. If proven true, this would preclude any possibility of integration between ethnicities (nations) because we wouldn't have any ability to mix in the first place due to God-intended, divinely appointed, restrictions.
When looking at the noscriptures, the concept of God intentionally setting bounds of habitation, distinct separations, and restrictions between nations is easily found. Firstly, in Deuteronomy 32:8, which states,
"When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel."
This notion is also later reiterated in the New Testament further emphasising not only the current and ongoing reality of nations but also their divinely appointed intentional separation/segregation. Acts 17:26-27 reads,
"And hath made of one blood all nations [Ethnicities] of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation"
Thus, to mix is to defy God's ordained order for this universe, distorting God's instituted design and intention for His creation.
@Kinism
❤1⚡1
Forwarded from Ελευθερία (Γεωργιος)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It’s just a conspiracy bro
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Why Bother?
Critics of Kinism, a Christian belief in ethnic-based segregation, may argue, "Even if God intended nations to be separate, why bother enforcing that?" This statement, as I'll explain, is not just ignorant but also hypocritical.
First, consider how we view homosexual marriage as sinful—not just because of verses against sodomy (homosexual acts) but also because marriage was established to be a covenant exclusively between man and woman. Conservative Christians universally support maintaining this God-established institution.
Therefore, if you concede that Scripture teaches that God Himself instituted and ordered the distinctions and boundaries of nations, shouldn't we also aim to uphold this institution too? It would be inconsistent, if not hypocritical, to support one but not the other, for both are so tied to the ordering of the Lord's creation and instituted ways for how human life should be conducted.
@Kinism
Critics of Kinism, a Christian belief in ethnic-based segregation, may argue, "Even if God intended nations to be separate, why bother enforcing that?" This statement, as I'll explain, is not just ignorant but also hypocritical.
First, consider how we view homosexual marriage as sinful—not just because of verses against sodomy (homosexual acts) but also because marriage was established to be a covenant exclusively between man and woman. Conservative Christians universally support maintaining this God-established institution.
Therefore, if you concede that Scripture teaches that God Himself instituted and ordered the distinctions and boundaries of nations, shouldn't we also aim to uphold this institution too? It would be inconsistent, if not hypocritical, to support one but not the other, for both are so tied to the ordering of the Lord's creation and instituted ways for how human life should be conducted.
@Kinism
💯2❤1
Baptist Evangelist Justin Childers on Genesis 9:27
In the following video, brother Childers proves that Genesis 9:27 was not nullified by the New Testament and that the verse still applies to this very day. Childers speaks about how nearly all Christians for 1900 years had the same view on race relations but it all suddenly changed after 1964 (which is something I have reiterated on this channel numerous times). In the video, the arguments of the race mixers, based on faulty interpretations of Galatians 3:28 and Acts 17:26, are completely dismantled. Thus showing that there is no contradiction whatsoever between Genesis 9 and the aforementioned verses in the New Testament.
https://youtu.be/KDCnF0zGois?
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
In the following video, brother Childers proves that Genesis 9:27 was not nullified by the New Testament and that the verse still applies to this very day. Childers speaks about how nearly all Christians for 1900 years had the same view on race relations but it all suddenly changed after 1964 (which is something I have reiterated on this channel numerous times). In the video, the arguments of the race mixers, based on faulty interpretations of Galatians 3:28 and Acts 17:26, are completely dismantled. Thus showing that there is no contradiction whatsoever between Genesis 9 and the aforementioned verses in the New Testament.
https://youtu.be/KDCnF0zGois?
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
YouTube
Biblical Contradictions - Does the New Testament Cancel Out the Race Relations of Genesis 9?
Genesis 9:27 is one of the most offensive and politically incorrect verses in God’s word. Did God change His mind about it in the New Testament, or is it still valid?
#bibleissues #racerelations #backtothebible #prophecy #kjvonly
If you died tonight,…
#bibleissues #racerelations #backtothebible #prophecy #kjvonly
If you died tonight,…
👍2❤1
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Against Miscegenation
- Pt. 1.
The primary and consistent basis for Christians opposing homosexual marriage lies in the belief that God instituted marriage exclusively between a man and a woman, not in verses against homosexual actions. Likewise, God has also instituted the separation of nations. If nations are to remain distinct, it logically follows that miscegenation, the mixing of races/ethnicities, would be excluded. This is because individuals of different races (nations/ethnicities) would not have the opportunity to interact, mingle, and consequently form marital unions, as it would contradict the intended separation of nations—by forming a single covenant between two distinct nations.
To simplify, noscripture dictates that the condemnation of homosexuality stems from God's established order of creation, where marriage is exclusively instituted for a union between a man and a woman. In the same vein, God's intention for nations is their separation and therefore inability to race mix, reinforcing the idea that consistency in belief supports both the rejection of homosexual unions and inter-national (ethnic/racial) unions—race mixing.
@Kinism
- Pt. 1.
The primary and consistent basis for Christians opposing homosexual marriage lies in the belief that God instituted marriage exclusively between a man and a woman, not in verses against homosexual actions. Likewise, God has also instituted the separation of nations. If nations are to remain distinct, it logically follows that miscegenation, the mixing of races/ethnicities, would be excluded. This is because individuals of different races (nations/ethnicities) would not have the opportunity to interact, mingle, and consequently form marital unions, as it would contradict the intended separation of nations—by forming a single covenant between two distinct nations.
To simplify, noscripture dictates that the condemnation of homosexuality stems from God's established order of creation, where marriage is exclusively instituted for a union between a man and a woman. In the same vein, God's intention for nations is their separation and therefore inability to race mix, reinforcing the idea that consistency in belief supports both the rejection of homosexual unions and inter-national (ethnic/racial) unions—race mixing.
@Kinism
❤2