Kinism: Bounds of Habitation

Even with the acknowledgment of the reality of ethnic nations, critics of the Christian doctrine of Kinism, which teaches ethnonationalism and ethno-segregation, may argue, "Well, even if nations are defined by ethnicities and indeed exist, why should that dissuade us from mixing, integrating and coexisting?" However, noscripture unequivocally declares that God intended nations, or ethnos, to have distinct, separate, bounds of habitation. If proven true, this would preclude any possibility of integration between ethnicities (nations) because we wouldn't have any ability to mix in the first place due to God-intended, divinely appointed, restrictions.

When looking at the noscriptures, the concept of God intentionally setting bounds of habitation, distinct separations, and restrictions between nations is easily found. Firstly, in Deuteronomy 32:8, which states,

"When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel."

This notion is also later reiterated in the New Testament further emphasising not only the current and ongoing reality of nations but also their divinely appointed intentional separation/segregation. Acts 17:26-27 reads,

"And hath made of one blood all nations [Ethnicities] of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation"

Thus, to mix is to defy God's ordained order for this universe, distorting God's instituted design and intention for His creation.

@Kinism

It’s just a conspiracy bro

Kinism: Why Bother?

Critics of Kinism, a Christian belief in ethnic-based segregation, may argue, "Even if God intended nations to be separate, why bother enforcing that?" This statement, as I'll explain, is not just ignorant but also hypocritical.

First, consider how we view homosexual marriage as sinful—not just because of verses against sodomy (homosexual acts) but also because marriage was established to be a covenant exclusively between man and woman. Conservative Christians universally support maintaining this God-established institution.

Therefore, if you concede that Scripture teaches that God Himself instituted and ordered the distinctions and boundaries of nations, shouldn't we also aim to uphold this institution too? It would be inconsistent, if not hypocritical, to support one but not the other, for both are so tied to the ordering of the Lord's creation and instituted ways for how human life should be conducted.

@Kinism

Baptist Evangelist Justin Childers on Genesis 9:27

In the following video, brother Childers proves that Genesis 9:27 was not nullified by the New Testament and that the verse still applies to this very day. Childers speaks about how nearly all Christians for 1900 years had the same view on race relations but it all suddenly changed after 1964 (which is something I have reiterated on this channel numerous times). In the video, the arguments of the race mixers, based on faulty interpretations of Galatians 3:28 and Acts 17:26, are completely dismantled. Thus showing that there is no contradiction whatsoever between Genesis 9 and the aforementioned verses in the New Testament.

https://youtu.be/KDCnF0zGois?

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Kinism: Against Miscegenation
- Pt. 1.

The primary and consistent basis for Christians opposing homosexual marriage lies in the belief that God instituted marriage exclusively between a man and a woman, not in verses against homosexual actions. Likewise, God has also instituted the separation of nations. If nations are to remain distinct, it logically follows that miscegenation, the mixing of races/ethnicities, would be excluded. This is because individuals of different races (nations/ethnicities) would not have the opportunity to interact, mingle, and consequently form marital unions, as it would contradict the intended separation of nations—by forming a single covenant between two distinct nations.

To simplify, noscripture dictates that the condemnation of homosexuality stems from God's established order of creation, where marriage is exclusively instituted for a union between a man and a woman. In the same vein, God's intention for nations is their separation and therefore inability to race mix, reinforcing the idea that consistency in belief supports both the rejection of homosexual unions and inter-national (ethnic/racial) unions—race mixing.

@Kinism

"Race is only skin deep!"

Race is a reality. St Augustine, when commenting on Galatians 3:28, teaches that racial differences remain during this life and they should be acknowledged and respected. The Church Father comments, "Difference of race or condition or sex is indeed taken away by the unity of faith, but it remains embedded in our mortal interactions, and in the journey of this life the apostles themselves teach that it is to be respected."

Pastor Mike Schreib on Race

Mike Schreib, who was the pastor of Bible Baptist Church International, presents a straightforward Bible study on the topic of race. In the beginning of the study he expounds upon the implications of Deuteronomy 32:8 and Acts 17:26 in regards to God’s desire for true diversity via separation and its relation to salvation. He correctly exposits Galatians 3:28, something the typical race mixer is incapable of doing, and spends the bulk of the rest of his study in Genesis 9. While commenting on the 9th chapter of Genesis brother Schreib covers the origin and history of the races and well as providing an excellent denoscription of different non-physical characteristics of the races. His particular comments on the white man are quite insightful. He also makes some great spiritual applications to the furtherance of the gospel and the paramount importance of the King James Bible throughout.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Kinism: Against Miscegenation
- Pt. 2.

The Biblically prescribed prohibition of miscegenation, or race-mixing, is very easy to prove. Consider the following argument:

Premise 1: God created distinct ethnonations. (Gen. 10:5)

Premise 2: God instituted and defined the boundaries of their habitations, intending for them to remain distinct and separate. (Acts. 17:26-27)

Conclusion: Therefore, intermarriage between these nations goes against God's intended purpose of creation—separation, constituting a deviation from His will and, consequently, a sinful act. (1 Jn. 3:4, Jas. 4:17 )

@Kinism

Shem, Ham, and Japheth

Gen 9:18  And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan.
Gen 9:19  These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread.

Gen 10:32  These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Dr. Gene Kim on Segregation

Gene Kim¹, who is the pastor of San Jose Bible Baptist Church, writes about segregation in his book: Ruckmanism Ruckus - A Biblical study on Ruckman Exposed and other criticisms against one of the most controversial men in Baptist history: Dr. Peter S. Ruckman

In the book he states the following:

“You do not realize that God is a Discriminator, Who ordained segregation, not integration, for all races. Genesis 11:1-9 talks about the people at the Tower of Babel trying to unite outside the will of God. Thus, God was so displeased that He decided to segregate them by confounding their universal language… It is a noscriptural fact that God originally introduced segregation for all races, so they can live peaceably and seek after God (Acts 17:26-27)… Many people interpret Acts 17:26 as a verse for Integration. In reality, the verse is a text for segregation. Observe the verse. It says mankind is one as blood and different as races.

-Pages 88-89

¹Who is a Korean (descended from Shem).

Gerardus D. Bouw on Acts 17:26

Gerardus Bouw, an independent Baptist, has run a ministry for years called The Biblical Astronomer. A ministry dedicated to promoting the true science (as opposed to science falsely so-called, see 1 Timothy 6:20) of the Biblical cosmological model, mainly in relation to geocentricity. Among writing and co-authoring several books on the subject of geocentrism, Bouw has also written short, unpublished commentaries on every book of the King James Bible.

In his notes on the book of Acts he pens:

“Now the human-race-onlyists take this verse and the verse in Galatians out of context. From this one they take ‘[God] hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth.’ From Galatians, they take ‘There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female.' The idea in both of these noscriptures is that God has put no distinctions between groups of people. To him, everyone is the same. But this verse goes on to say that the Lord determined the bounds of the nations. That they were all humans meant nothing to the Lord, they were all sinners who would defy God more effectively together than they could apart, so he split them up (Gen. 11), to give them a better chance to seek him (v. 27). The point of this verse is not to bring men together as one race but to show why God took all humanity and divided them up. It says that all men came from one man, Adam, and it is not saying that Caucasians, Mongoloids, and Negroids are all the same.

Source: https://www.geocentricity.com/

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Looks like my kinsmen according to the flesh have been sticking with their own kind:

https://news.1rj.ru/str/racialmaps/73

M. L. Moser Jr. on Segregation

M. L. Moser Jr. was the pastor of the Central Baptist Church of Little Rock, Arkansas. In addition to pastoring, Moser authored several books ranging from exposing the modern perversions of the Bible to composing independent Baptist handbooks. In 1974 he authored a book which is arguably his most controversial work, that being The Case Against Integration, from which I will now quote:

“First of all, I want to say that God Himself is the first and great segregationist. This divine principle can be clearly seen at every point in the government of God. In Genesis chapters four and five, God divided the Cain-ites from the Seth-ites . In Genesis chapters six and seven, God divided the family of Noah from the rest of the world. Then in chapters nine and ten, God divided the sons of Noah, and from this division we have the first and true ethnological table of nations of the world. It is here in chapter nine we find that God went so far as to draw a color line between the sons of Noah by making Ham black. (The word ‘Ham’ means ‘burnt’ or ‘black.’) The white man did not make the Negro black nor did he make himself white. Man cannot change race by chemistry, nor by climate, nor with cosmetics. God must have wanted men of different colors, else He wouldn't have made the different races. Furthermore, God also drew a social and economic barrier between Noah's sons, brothers if you please, by declaring that the black line of Ham through his son Canaan should be ‘a servant of servants unto his brethren’ (Gen. 9:25). This decree has far reaching implications, and the Bible has no record that God has ever repealed this action.

It is during these days that we read of two men, Peleg and Nimrod. These two names stand out prominently in the history of this period which deals with the building of the tower of Babel, the confusion of tongues and the dispersion by the command of God. This was the darkest day thus far in human history subsequent to Adam's fall for the human race was about to become fully integrated. God Himself had to come down and deal directly with the situation. Nimrod was a grandson of Ham and Peleg was a great grandson of Shem. Of Nimrod the Bible speaks thus: ‘And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth. He was a mighty hunter before the Lord: Wherefore it is said, - Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the Lord. And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel (Babylon - Confusion)’ (Gen. 10:8-10).

Now, in addition to this segregation in Noah's sons, we find in this chapter, that when Nimrod and other Hamites, rebelled against God’s segregation orders and sought to integrate themselves at Babel, God confounded their languages so they could not understand one another. Then God scattered them abroad upon the face of the whole earth which was then one body of land. Furthermore, in order to keep them seregated, God divided to each group his portion and fixed the boundaries of their habitation, then He used the drastic measures of dividing the earth into continents and islands by means of an earthquake, as we are told in Genesis 10:25 (the word ‘Peleg’ means ‘earthquake.’) Segregation was born at Babel and God was the creator of it.”

-Pages 13-14

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟