This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Malcolm X on Voluntary Racial Separation
Unlike his counterpart, Marxist Lucifer King Jr., Malcolm X did not believe in the total integration of the races. Instead, he believed in voluntary racial separation unto nationhood. He was truly a black nationalist. As a follower of Elijah Muhammad (as was Muhammad Ali, whom we will hear from later), he was also vehemently against miscegenation. In an interview with Louis Lomax, Malcolm stated:
“Only a man who is ashamed of what he is will marry out of his race. There has to be something wrong when a man or a woman leaves his own people and marries somebody of another kind. Men who are proud of being black marry black women; women who are proud of being black marry black men.”
-Lomax, Louis E. “A Summing Up: Louis Lomax Interviews Malcolm X.” When the Word Is Given: a Report on Elijah Muhammad, Malcolm X, and the Black Muslim World, page 170
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Unlike his counterpart, Marxist Lucifer King Jr., Malcolm X did not believe in the total integration of the races. Instead, he believed in voluntary racial separation unto nationhood. He was truly a black nationalist. As a follower of Elijah Muhammad (as was Muhammad Ali, whom we will hear from later), he was also vehemently against miscegenation. In an interview with Louis Lomax, Malcolm stated:
“Only a man who is ashamed of what he is will marry out of his race. There has to be something wrong when a man or a woman leaves his own people and marries somebody of another kind. Men who are proud of being black marry black women; women who are proud of being black marry black men.”
-Lomax, Louis E. “A Summing Up: Louis Lomax Interviews Malcolm X.” When the Word Is Given: a Report on Elijah Muhammad, Malcolm X, and the Black Muslim World, page 170
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
⚡2🔥1
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Malcolm X on Voluntary Racial Separation Unlike his counterpart, Marxist Lucifer King Jr., Malcolm X did not believe in the total integration of the races. Instead, he believed in voluntary racial separation unto nationhood. He was truly a black nationalist.…
It is quite a dismal state of affairs when lost Hamite Muslims have more sense to believe in racial separation and sticking with their own kind in marriage than most Baptist preachers do today! This also dispels the misconception that only white supremacists believe in the separation of the races and the maintaining of racial purity.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
👍3⚡2
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: of one Blood?
Often, opponents of Kinism, the Christian doctrine of ethno-segregation, will state something such as, "Well, if nationhood is defined by ancestral lineage, then we are all of one nation because of Adam anyway". Scripture refutes this notion in Acts 17:26-27, which states,
"And hath made of one blood all nations [Ethnicities] of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:" ¹
In this passage, we learn that God created humanity from a common blood origin, presumably referring to Adam. However, even with this shared ancestry, the intentional division and establishment of distinct ethnic nations, ethnicities, by God, along with the appointment of their respective bounds and habitations, remains unaffected.
@Kinism
Often, opponents of Kinism, the Christian doctrine of ethno-segregation, will state something such as, "Well, if nationhood is defined by ancestral lineage, then we are all of one nation because of Adam anyway". Scripture refutes this notion in Acts 17:26-27, which states,
"And hath made of one blood all nations [Ethnicities] of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:" ¹
In this passage, we learn that God created humanity from a common blood origin, presumably referring to Adam. However, even with this shared ancestry, the intentional division and establishment of distinct ethnic nations, ethnicities, by God, along with the appointment of their respective bounds and habitations, remains unaffected.
@Kinism
⚡2❤1👍1
Forwarded from IFB Independent Fundamental Baptists
We catch a lot of flack here for our biblical stand on the separation of the races - everything from being called self hating whites to hating anyone who isn’t white - both couldn’t be further from the truth. We take the position that every rational person took no more than a century ago, even non believers knew enough.
We are commanded to reach the entire world with the gospel. Shame on anyone who won’t give the gospel to someone based on their skin or culture! You can support biblical separation and still care for the lost and dying world that doesn’t look like you. Was Cassius Clay a white supremacist for his mainline view on the races?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/baptistgreek/1547
We are commanded to reach the entire world with the gospel. Shame on anyone who won’t give the gospel to someone based on their skin or culture! You can support biblical separation and still care for the lost and dying world that doesn’t look like you. Was Cassius Clay a white supremacist for his mainline view on the races?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/baptistgreek/1547
Telegram
Ελευθερία
I’m a Cassius Clay racist! If this is what a black Muslim believed…imagine what Baptist preachers believed back then. We are so removed from the natural order it’s not even funny.
⚡1🔥1
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Bounds of Habitation
Even with the acknowledgment of the reality of ethnic nations, critics of the Christian doctrine of Kinism, which teaches ethnonationalism and ethno-segregation, may argue, "Well, even if nations are defined by ethnicities and indeed exist, why should that dissuade us from mixing, integrating and coexisting?" However, noscripture unequivocally declares that God intended nations, or ethnos, to have distinct, separate, bounds of habitation. If proven true, this would preclude any possibility of integration between ethnicities (nations) because we wouldn't have any ability to mix in the first place due to God-intended, divinely appointed, restrictions.
When looking at the noscriptures, the concept of God intentionally setting bounds of habitation, distinct separations, and restrictions between nations is easily found. Firstly, in Deuteronomy 32:8, which states,
"When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel."
This notion is also later reiterated in the New Testament further emphasising not only the current and ongoing reality of nations but also their divinely appointed intentional separation/segregation. Acts 17:26-27 reads,
"And hath made of one blood all nations [Ethnicities] of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation"
Thus, to mix is to defy God's ordained order for this universe, distorting God's instituted design and intention for His creation.
@Kinism
Even with the acknowledgment of the reality of ethnic nations, critics of the Christian doctrine of Kinism, which teaches ethnonationalism and ethno-segregation, may argue, "Well, even if nations are defined by ethnicities and indeed exist, why should that dissuade us from mixing, integrating and coexisting?" However, noscripture unequivocally declares that God intended nations, or ethnos, to have distinct, separate, bounds of habitation. If proven true, this would preclude any possibility of integration between ethnicities (nations) because we wouldn't have any ability to mix in the first place due to God-intended, divinely appointed, restrictions.
When looking at the noscriptures, the concept of God intentionally setting bounds of habitation, distinct separations, and restrictions between nations is easily found. Firstly, in Deuteronomy 32:8, which states,
"When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel."
This notion is also later reiterated in the New Testament further emphasising not only the current and ongoing reality of nations but also their divinely appointed intentional separation/segregation. Acts 17:26-27 reads,
"And hath made of one blood all nations [Ethnicities] of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation"
Thus, to mix is to defy God's ordained order for this universe, distorting God's instituted design and intention for His creation.
@Kinism
❤1⚡1
Forwarded from Ελευθερία (Γεωργιος)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It’s just a conspiracy bro
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Why Bother?
Critics of Kinism, a Christian belief in ethnic-based segregation, may argue, "Even if God intended nations to be separate, why bother enforcing that?" This statement, as I'll explain, is not just ignorant but also hypocritical.
First, consider how we view homosexual marriage as sinful—not just because of verses against sodomy (homosexual acts) but also because marriage was established to be a covenant exclusively between man and woman. Conservative Christians universally support maintaining this God-established institution.
Therefore, if you concede that Scripture teaches that God Himself instituted and ordered the distinctions and boundaries of nations, shouldn't we also aim to uphold this institution too? It would be inconsistent, if not hypocritical, to support one but not the other, for both are so tied to the ordering of the Lord's creation and instituted ways for how human life should be conducted.
@Kinism
Critics of Kinism, a Christian belief in ethnic-based segregation, may argue, "Even if God intended nations to be separate, why bother enforcing that?" This statement, as I'll explain, is not just ignorant but also hypocritical.
First, consider how we view homosexual marriage as sinful—not just because of verses against sodomy (homosexual acts) but also because marriage was established to be a covenant exclusively between man and woman. Conservative Christians universally support maintaining this God-established institution.
Therefore, if you concede that Scripture teaches that God Himself instituted and ordered the distinctions and boundaries of nations, shouldn't we also aim to uphold this institution too? It would be inconsistent, if not hypocritical, to support one but not the other, for both are so tied to the ordering of the Lord's creation and instituted ways for how human life should be conducted.
@Kinism
💯2❤1
Baptist Evangelist Justin Childers on Genesis 9:27
In the following video, brother Childers proves that Genesis 9:27 was not nullified by the New Testament and that the verse still applies to this very day. Childers speaks about how nearly all Christians for 1900 years had the same view on race relations but it all suddenly changed after 1964 (which is something I have reiterated on this channel numerous times). In the video, the arguments of the race mixers, based on faulty interpretations of Galatians 3:28 and Acts 17:26, are completely dismantled. Thus showing that there is no contradiction whatsoever between Genesis 9 and the aforementioned verses in the New Testament.
https://youtu.be/KDCnF0zGois?
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
In the following video, brother Childers proves that Genesis 9:27 was not nullified by the New Testament and that the verse still applies to this very day. Childers speaks about how nearly all Christians for 1900 years had the same view on race relations but it all suddenly changed after 1964 (which is something I have reiterated on this channel numerous times). In the video, the arguments of the race mixers, based on faulty interpretations of Galatians 3:28 and Acts 17:26, are completely dismantled. Thus showing that there is no contradiction whatsoever between Genesis 9 and the aforementioned verses in the New Testament.
https://youtu.be/KDCnF0zGois?
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
YouTube
Biblical Contradictions - Does the New Testament Cancel Out the Race Relations of Genesis 9?
Genesis 9:27 is one of the most offensive and politically incorrect verses in God’s word. Did God change His mind about it in the New Testament, or is it still valid?
#bibleissues #racerelations #backtothebible #prophecy #kjvonly
If you died tonight,…
#bibleissues #racerelations #backtothebible #prophecy #kjvonly
If you died tonight,…
👍2❤1
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Against Miscegenation
- Pt. 1.
The primary and consistent basis for Christians opposing homosexual marriage lies in the belief that God instituted marriage exclusively between a man and a woman, not in verses against homosexual actions. Likewise, God has also instituted the separation of nations. If nations are to remain distinct, it logically follows that miscegenation, the mixing of races/ethnicities, would be excluded. This is because individuals of different races (nations/ethnicities) would not have the opportunity to interact, mingle, and consequently form marital unions, as it would contradict the intended separation of nations—by forming a single covenant between two distinct nations.
To simplify, noscripture dictates that the condemnation of homosexuality stems from God's established order of creation, where marriage is exclusively instituted for a union between a man and a woman. In the same vein, God's intention for nations is their separation and therefore inability to race mix, reinforcing the idea that consistency in belief supports both the rejection of homosexual unions and inter-national (ethnic/racial) unions—race mixing.
@Kinism
- Pt. 1.
The primary and consistent basis for Christians opposing homosexual marriage lies in the belief that God instituted marriage exclusively between a man and a woman, not in verses against homosexual actions. Likewise, God has also instituted the separation of nations. If nations are to remain distinct, it logically follows that miscegenation, the mixing of races/ethnicities, would be excluded. This is because individuals of different races (nations/ethnicities) would not have the opportunity to interact, mingle, and consequently form marital unions, as it would contradict the intended separation of nations—by forming a single covenant between two distinct nations.
To simplify, noscripture dictates that the condemnation of homosexuality stems from God's established order of creation, where marriage is exclusively instituted for a union between a man and a woman. In the same vein, God's intention for nations is their separation and therefore inability to race mix, reinforcing the idea that consistency in belief supports both the rejection of homosexual unions and inter-national (ethnic/racial) unions—race mixing.
@Kinism
❤2
Forwarded from The One True Faith
Race is a reality. St Augustine, when commenting on Galatians 3:28, teaches that racial differences remain during this life and they should be acknowledged and respected. The Church Father comments, "Difference of race or condition or sex is indeed taken away by the unity of faith, but it remains embedded in our mortal interactions, and in the journey of this life the apostles themselves teach that it is to be respected."
💯1
Mike Schreib - Race.mp4
75.5 MB
Pastor Mike Schreib on Race
Mike Schreib, who was the pastor of Bible Baptist Church International, presents a straightforward Bible study on the topic of race. In the beginning of the study he expounds upon the implications of Deuteronomy 32:8 and Acts 17:26 in regards to God’s desire for true diversity via separation and its relation to salvation. He correctly exposits Galatians 3:28, something the typical race mixer is incapable of doing, and spends the bulk of the rest of his study in Genesis 9. While commenting on the 9th chapter of Genesis brother Schreib covers the origin and history of the races and well as providing an excellent denoscription of different non-physical characteristics of the races. His particular comments on the white man are quite insightful. He also makes some great spiritual applications to the furtherance of the gospel and the paramount importance of the King James Bible throughout.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Mike Schreib, who was the pastor of Bible Baptist Church International, presents a straightforward Bible study on the topic of race. In the beginning of the study he expounds upon the implications of Deuteronomy 32:8 and Acts 17:26 in regards to God’s desire for true diversity via separation and its relation to salvation. He correctly exposits Galatians 3:28, something the typical race mixer is incapable of doing, and spends the bulk of the rest of his study in Genesis 9. While commenting on the 9th chapter of Genesis brother Schreib covers the origin and history of the races and well as providing an excellent denoscription of different non-physical characteristics of the races. His particular comments on the white man are quite insightful. He also makes some great spiritual applications to the furtherance of the gospel and the paramount importance of the King James Bible throughout.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
❤2
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Against Miscegenation
- Pt. 2.
The Biblically prescribed prohibition of miscegenation, or race-mixing, is very easy to prove. Consider the following argument:
Premise 1: God created distinct ethnonations. (Gen. 10:5)
Premise 2: God instituted and defined the boundaries of their habitations, intending for them to remain distinct and separate. (Acts. 17:26-27)
Conclusion: Therefore, intermarriage between these nations goes against God's intended purpose of creation—separation, constituting a deviation from His will and, consequently, a sinful act. (1 Jn. 3:4, Jas. 4:17 )
@Kinism
- Pt. 2.
The Biblically prescribed prohibition of miscegenation, or race-mixing, is very easy to prove. Consider the following argument:
Premise 1: God created distinct ethnonations. (Gen. 10:5)
Premise 2: God instituted and defined the boundaries of their habitations, intending for them to remain distinct and separate. (Acts. 17:26-27)
Conclusion: Therefore, intermarriage between these nations goes against God's intended purpose of creation—separation, constituting a deviation from His will and, consequently, a sinful act. (1 Jn. 3:4, Jas. 4:17 )
@Kinism
❤2
Shem, Ham, and Japheth
Gen 9:18 And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan.
Gen 9:19 These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread.
Gen 10:32 These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Gen 9:18 And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan.
Gen 9:19 These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread.
Gen 10:32 These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
❤1👏1
Dr. Gene Kim on Segregation
Gene Kim¹, who is the pastor of San Jose Bible Baptist Church, writes about segregation in his book: Ruckmanism Ruckus - A Biblical study on Ruckman Exposed and other criticisms against one of the most controversial men in Baptist history: Dr. Peter S. Ruckman
In the book he states the following:
“You do not realize that God is a Discriminator, Who ordained segregation, not integration, for all races. Genesis 11:1-9 talks about the people at the Tower of Babel trying to unite outside the will of God. Thus, God was so displeased that He decided to segregate them by confounding their universal language… It is a noscriptural fact that God originally introduced segregation for all races, so they can live peaceably and seek after God (Acts 17:26-27)… Many people interpret Acts 17:26 as a verse for Integration. In reality, the verse is a text for segregation. Observe the verse. It says mankind is one as blood and different as races.
-Pages 88-89
¹Who is a Korean (descended from Shem).
Gene Kim¹, who is the pastor of San Jose Bible Baptist Church, writes about segregation in his book: Ruckmanism Ruckus - A Biblical study on Ruckman Exposed and other criticisms against one of the most controversial men in Baptist history: Dr. Peter S. Ruckman
In the book he states the following:
“You do not realize that God is a Discriminator, Who ordained segregation, not integration, for all races. Genesis 11:1-9 talks about the people at the Tower of Babel trying to unite outside the will of God. Thus, God was so displeased that He decided to segregate them by confounding their universal language… It is a noscriptural fact that God originally introduced segregation for all races, so they can live peaceably and seek after God (Acts 17:26-27)… Many people interpret Acts 17:26 as a verse for Integration. In reality, the verse is a text for segregation. Observe the verse. It says mankind is one as blood and different as races.
-Pages 88-89
¹Who is a Korean (descended from Shem).
❤4