Forwarded from KFA Scotland
In Peoples Korea new economic records were set in multiple industries and the January economic plan fulfilled successfully. Even 50 years ago Scotland was still abuzz with heavy industry but it is all long gone now. Because production is managed for profits, not for the benefit of the people, production was moved away to Asia and other locations so they could pay workers less and increase profits. Scotland has lost almost all of its steel and machine tooling industries, its coal industry, and many other heavy industries. The DPRK has a planned socialist economy and reinvests all surplus labour into its economy and continually improves the lives of its workers. It will never deindustrialise. It will never throw its workers on the dustheap. It will always raise its workers to the highest level of productivity and will never separate them from the beauty of actual production. Workers across the world can learn critical lessons from the DPRK and can be inspired to rebuild industry in their own nations.
👍5❤🔥2🔥1
Forwarded from Joti Brar
Populism is all very fun when you think you're on the right side of the masses, but these out of control US oligarchs should be careful about the demands they raise. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, as the old saying goes.
If state radio should stand on its own without state funding (not quite sure how that even works!), what about private corporations and banks? They are, in fact, the ones that get the lion's share of public money in order to keep them profitable. Where would the world's biggest corporations be today without billions in state subsidies and guaranteed contracts ..?
If state radio should stand on its own without state funding (not quite sure how that even works!), what about private corporations and banks? They are, in fact, the ones that get the lion's share of public money in order to keep them profitable. Where would the world's biggest corporations be today without billions in state subsidies and guaranteed contracts ..?
💯1
Forwarded from DD Geopolitics
🇺🇸🇷🇸 BIRN (Balkan Investigative Reporting Network) – NATO’s Propaganda Machine in the Balkans
➡️ Funding:
• $7M+ from USAID, NED, and EU grants in the past decade
• UK Foreign Office & Open Society Foundations (Soros) sponsorships
• Directly collaborates with Western intelligence-linked think tanks
➡️ What they do:
BIRN claims to be an “independent investigative network” but functions as a NATO-backed tool for manipulating narratives in the Balkans, smearing Serbia, and pushing color revolution tactics. Its reporting aligns perfectly with U.S. and EU foreign policy objectives.
➡️ Major Exposures:
1. Targeting Serbia – A NATO-Backed Smear Campaign
• Since Serbia refused to sanction Russia, BIRN has significantly ramped up anti-Serbia propaganda, getting increased Western funding.
• In 2023, BIRN published over 50 articles smearing Vučić’s government, painting it as a Russian puppet while ignoring Western-backed corruption in Kosovo and Montenegro.
• Received €4M in EU grants specifically for “promoting European values” in Serbia—translation: pressuring Serbia into abandoning neutrality and embracing NATO.
➡️ Covering NATO’s Illegal War in Yugoslavia
• BIRN consistently whitewashes NATO’s 1999 bombing campaign, refusing to acknowledge its war crimes, such as:
• The cluster bombing of civilians in Niš
• The bombing of Serbia’s Radio Television headquarters, killing 16 journalists
• The use of depleted uranium, causing a surge in cancer rates
• Instead, BIRN portrays Serbia as the sole aggressor in the Balkan wars while defending NATO’s involvement.
➡️ Kosovo – Propaganda for NATO’s Proxy State
• BIRN is heavily funded by the U.S. and UK governments, which directly back Kosovo’s leadership.
• Refuses to cover ethnic purges of Serbs in Kosovo under Albin Kurti’s government.
• Downplays Kosovo’s NATO-trained paramilitary groups, portraying them as “peacekeepers” while they conduct raids on Serbian villages.
• In 2023, when Serbs in Kosovo were attacked by armed Albanian extremists, BIRN blamed Serbian civilians for “provoking tensions.”
➡️ Montenegro & North Macedonia – Supporting NATO Puppet Regimes
• BIRN played a direct role in Western-backed political shifts in Montenegro and North Macedonia.
• In 2015 & 2019, BIRN helped legitimize U.S.-funded protests in North Macedonia, which ultimately toppled a non-aligned government and installed a NATO-compliant leader.
• Launders EU narratives in Montenegro, labeling any opposition to NATO as “Russian influence.”
➡️ BIRN’s Ties to Western Intelligence & Think Tanks
• Partners with the UK’s Integrity Initiative, a leaked British intelligence project for information warfare.
• Works with the Carnegie Endowment, a U.S. think tank involved in color revolution strategies worldwide.
• Regularly cites “anonymous Western officials” as sources—standard disinformation tactics used to justify NATO interventions.
🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
• $7M+ from USAID, NED, and EU grants in the past decade
• UK Foreign Office & Open Society Foundations (Soros) sponsorships
• Directly collaborates with Western intelligence-linked think tanks
BIRN claims to be an “independent investigative network” but functions as a NATO-backed tool for manipulating narratives in the Balkans, smearing Serbia, and pushing color revolution tactics. Its reporting aligns perfectly with U.S. and EU foreign policy objectives.
1. Targeting Serbia – A NATO-Backed Smear Campaign
• Since Serbia refused to sanction Russia, BIRN has significantly ramped up anti-Serbia propaganda, getting increased Western funding.
• In 2023, BIRN published over 50 articles smearing Vučić’s government, painting it as a Russian puppet while ignoring Western-backed corruption in Kosovo and Montenegro.
• Received €4M in EU grants specifically for “promoting European values” in Serbia—translation: pressuring Serbia into abandoning neutrality and embracing NATO.
• BIRN consistently whitewashes NATO’s 1999 bombing campaign, refusing to acknowledge its war crimes, such as:
• The cluster bombing of civilians in Niš
• The bombing of Serbia’s Radio Television headquarters, killing 16 journalists
• The use of depleted uranium, causing a surge in cancer rates
• Instead, BIRN portrays Serbia as the sole aggressor in the Balkan wars while defending NATO’s involvement.
• BIRN is heavily funded by the U.S. and UK governments, which directly back Kosovo’s leadership.
• Refuses to cover ethnic purges of Serbs in Kosovo under Albin Kurti’s government.
• Downplays Kosovo’s NATO-trained paramilitary groups, portraying them as “peacekeepers” while they conduct raids on Serbian villages.
• In 2023, when Serbs in Kosovo were attacked by armed Albanian extremists, BIRN blamed Serbian civilians for “provoking tensions.”
• BIRN played a direct role in Western-backed political shifts in Montenegro and North Macedonia.
• In 2015 & 2019, BIRN helped legitimize U.S.-funded protests in North Macedonia, which ultimately toppled a non-aligned government and installed a NATO-compliant leader.
• Launders EU narratives in Montenegro, labeling any opposition to NATO as “Russian influence.”
• Partners with the UK’s Integrity Initiative, a leaked British intelligence project for information warfare.
• Works with the Carnegie Endowment, a U.S. think tank involved in color revolution strategies worldwide.
• Regularly cites “anonymous Western officials” as sources—standard disinformation tactics used to justify NATO interventions.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👎1🤮1
Forwarded from DD Geopolitics
DD Geopolitics
🇺🇸🇷🇸 BIRN (Balkan Investigative Reporting Network) – NATO’s Propaganda Machine in the Balkans ➡️ Funding: • $7M+ from USAID, NED, and EU grants in the past decade • UK Foreign Office & Open Society Foundations (Soros) sponsorships • Directly collaborates…
This one was pretty obvious but we'll include it anyway...
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL)
➡️ Funding:
$129M+ annually from the U.S. government (via USAID & NED).
• In 2019, USAID gave $6M specifically to counter “Russian disinformation” in Central Asia.
• Receives funding via the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which is directly controlled by the U.S. government.
➡️ What they do:
RFE/RL operates in former Soviet states, Iran, and China to push anti-government narratives under the guise of “independent journalism.” Its purpose is not journalism but to undermine governments opposed to U.S. foreign policy while ignoring corruption in pro-Western states.
➡️ Major Examples:
1. RFE/RL in Belarus (2020) – Supporting Regime Change
• Actively promoted opposition leader Svetlana Tikhanovskaya and framed the 2020 protests as a “democratic revolution.”
• Published over 1,200 articles and videos covering anti-Lukashenko protests while censoring any mention of foreign involvement.
• USAID-backed RFE journalists openly coordinated with Belarusian opposition Telegram channels like NEXTA, which helped organize protests.
➡️ RFE/RL in Russia
• Heavily promoted Alexei Navalny for years, presenting him as a legitimate opposition leader while ignoring his Western funding ties.
• Funded reports linking Putin to the so-called “Panama Papers” in 2016—despite U.S. allies like Ukraine’s Poroshenko appearing in the leaks.
• In 2021, RFE/RL refused to register as a “foreign agent” in Russia, despite being a U.S. government-funded entity.
➡️ RFE/RL in Iran
• Operates under Radio Farda, which spreads pro-Western content and amplifies anti-Iranian protests while ignoring U.S. sanctions’ impact.
• In 2019, RFE/RL repeatedly ran false reports claiming Iran was “collapsing under protests” while downplaying U.S. interference.
• Heavily promotes the exiled MKO (MEK) terrorist group, which is funded by the U.S. and wants regime change in Iran.
➡️ RFE/RL in Ukraine – Running NATO Talking Points
• Since 2014, it has been a major player in anti-Russian propaganda, helping justify U.S. intervention.
• Spread the Snake Island hoax in 2022, claiming Ukrainian soldiers had “heroically died” (later proven false when they surrendered).
• Regularly publishes articles blaming Russia for every Ukrainian failure, while whitewashing Ukrainian government corruption.
➡️ RFE/RL in Kazakhstan
• During the 2022 unrest in Kazakhstan, RFE/RL provided round-the-clock coverage, portraying the protests as a “popular uprising” rather than a foreign-backed coup attempt.
• After Kazakhstan cracked down on USAID-backed NGOs, RFE/RL framed it as an attack on press freedom rather than exposing foreign influence.
🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL)
$129M+ annually from the U.S. government (via USAID & NED).
• In 2019, USAID gave $6M specifically to counter “Russian disinformation” in Central Asia.
• Receives funding via the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which is directly controlled by the U.S. government.
RFE/RL operates in former Soviet states, Iran, and China to push anti-government narratives under the guise of “independent journalism.” Its purpose is not journalism but to undermine governments opposed to U.S. foreign policy while ignoring corruption in pro-Western states.
1. RFE/RL in Belarus (2020) – Supporting Regime Change
• Actively promoted opposition leader Svetlana Tikhanovskaya and framed the 2020 protests as a “democratic revolution.”
• Published over 1,200 articles and videos covering anti-Lukashenko protests while censoring any mention of foreign involvement.
• USAID-backed RFE journalists openly coordinated with Belarusian opposition Telegram channels like NEXTA, which helped organize protests.
• Heavily promoted Alexei Navalny for years, presenting him as a legitimate opposition leader while ignoring his Western funding ties.
• Funded reports linking Putin to the so-called “Panama Papers” in 2016—despite U.S. allies like Ukraine’s Poroshenko appearing in the leaks.
• In 2021, RFE/RL refused to register as a “foreign agent” in Russia, despite being a U.S. government-funded entity.
• Operates under Radio Farda, which spreads pro-Western content and amplifies anti-Iranian protests while ignoring U.S. sanctions’ impact.
• In 2019, RFE/RL repeatedly ran false reports claiming Iran was “collapsing under protests” while downplaying U.S. interference.
• Heavily promotes the exiled MKO (MEK) terrorist group, which is funded by the U.S. and wants regime change in Iran.
• Since 2014, it has been a major player in anti-Russian propaganda, helping justify U.S. intervention.
• Spread the Snake Island hoax in 2022, claiming Ukrainian soldiers had “heroically died” (later proven false when they surrendered).
• Regularly publishes articles blaming Russia for every Ukrainian failure, while whitewashing Ukrainian government corruption.
• During the 2022 unrest in Kazakhstan, RFE/RL provided round-the-clock coverage, portraying the protests as a “popular uprising” rather than a foreign-backed coup attempt.
• After Kazakhstan cracked down on USAID-backed NGOs, RFE/RL framed it as an attack on press freedom rather than exposing foreign influence.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤮2👎1
Forwarded from Marx Engels Lenin Institute
February 14, 1834 – A general strike of weavers (Lyon Revolt) began in Lyon, France, during which the red flag was raised for the first time in the world as a symbol of the revolutionary struggle of workers. This revolt became the starting point from which the history of an independent workers' movement began .
At the beginning of the 19th century, the French city of Lyon was one of the centers of the European weaving industry. The city had many manufactories, employing tens of thousands of workers. Their working conditions were appalling: for an 18-hour workday, workers in the weaving manufactories received no more than one franc, which was an extremely small wage, barely enough to feed themselves and their families. Over time, the workers' discontent grew and resulted in the Lyon Rebellion of 1831, which was bloodily suppressed by the French authorities.
Despite the defeat of the 1831 uprising, the protest was not completely suppressed. Working conditions remained the same, and the workers learned from the defeat. In Lyon, underground workers' organizations emerged in 1832-1833, advocating for an improvement in the situation of the working class. In February 1833, protests for higher wages resumed, and continued throughout the year. As a result of the organized struggle, the Lyon weavers achieved their demands. However, already in January 1834, due to a drop in demand for their products, the weavers' wages were reduced again, which caused widespread discontent among the workers. Associations and other workers' organizations called on the weavers to fight through a general strike. The strike began on February 14, 1834.
That day, Lyon weavers stopped working and went out to demonstrate, singing songs from the French Revolution of 1789. During the weavers' protests, the red flag was raised for the first time in history as a symbol of the workers' revolutionary struggle. The strike lasted until February 23 and was unsuccessful: the authorities managed to split the strikers and force them to accept the conditions of the factory owners.
The defeat of the February strike did not mark the end of the struggle: on April 5, the Second Lyon Revolt broke out in the city, during which the working weavers put forward a political demand – the proclamation of a “social republic”. Unlike in 1831, they managed to seize the city center and encircle the government troops. However, after the troops had regrouped, the government forces began an offensive, as a result of which the rebels were routed and the survivors were subjected to bloody reprisals.
Despite the defeat of the workers, the strike and uprising in Lyon became the most important historical events, marking the emergence of an independent workers' movement, the symbol of whose revolutionary struggle became the red flag.
This is a translation of a piece taken from the KPRF channel
At the beginning of the 19th century, the French city of Lyon was one of the centers of the European weaving industry. The city had many manufactories, employing tens of thousands of workers. Their working conditions were appalling: for an 18-hour workday, workers in the weaving manufactories received no more than one franc, which was an extremely small wage, barely enough to feed themselves and their families. Over time, the workers' discontent grew and resulted in the Lyon Rebellion of 1831, which was bloodily suppressed by the French authorities.
Despite the defeat of the 1831 uprising, the protest was not completely suppressed. Working conditions remained the same, and the workers learned from the defeat. In Lyon, underground workers' organizations emerged in 1832-1833, advocating for an improvement in the situation of the working class. In February 1833, protests for higher wages resumed, and continued throughout the year. As a result of the organized struggle, the Lyon weavers achieved their demands. However, already in January 1834, due to a drop in demand for their products, the weavers' wages were reduced again, which caused widespread discontent among the workers. Associations and other workers' organizations called on the weavers to fight through a general strike. The strike began on February 14, 1834.
That day, Lyon weavers stopped working and went out to demonstrate, singing songs from the French Revolution of 1789. During the weavers' protests, the red flag was raised for the first time in history as a symbol of the workers' revolutionary struggle. The strike lasted until February 23 and was unsuccessful: the authorities managed to split the strikers and force them to accept the conditions of the factory owners.
The defeat of the February strike did not mark the end of the struggle: on April 5, the Second Lyon Revolt broke out in the city, during which the working weavers put forward a political demand – the proclamation of a “social republic”. Unlike in 1831, they managed to seize the city center and encircle the government troops. However, after the troops had regrouped, the government forces began an offensive, as a result of which the rebels were routed and the survivors were subjected to bloody reprisals.
Despite the defeat of the workers, the strike and uprising in Lyon became the most important historical events, marking the emergence of an independent workers' movement, the symbol of whose revolutionary struggle became the red flag.
This is a translation of a piece taken from the KPRF channel
👍2🫡2
Every few years, we hear the same tired calls for reforms to british capitalism—make it fairer, regulate the billionaires, tweak the system so it works for everyone. The idea of social democrats. Believing we can just reform the current system, but here’s the reality: capitalism isn’t broken. It’s working exactly as intended—to serve the wealthy at the expense of the working class.
Late-stage capitalism is defined by monopolies, financial elites hoarding resources, and corporate governments that serve their interests rather than the people. Lenin identified this as imperialism. The inevitable endgame of capitalism, where exploitation extends beyond national borders to keep the system afloat. Just looking back on our history has shown that no amount of regulation or reform stops this process. The system simply adapts, pacifies workers with small concessions, and continues its cycle of crises and inequality.
The truth is, capitalism isn’t something to be reformed. It’s something to be abolished. It’s a system designed for profit, not human well-being. That’s why we must reject this delusion of reform. The only real path forward is dismantling capitalism, removing the ruling class, the workers taking their place and building a dictatorship of the proletariat.
Late-stage capitalism is defined by monopolies, financial elites hoarding resources, and corporate governments that serve their interests rather than the people. Lenin identified this as imperialism. The inevitable endgame of capitalism, where exploitation extends beyond national borders to keep the system afloat. Just looking back on our history has shown that no amount of regulation or reform stops this process. The system simply adapts, pacifies workers with small concessions, and continues its cycle of crises and inequality.
The truth is, capitalism isn’t something to be reformed. It’s something to be abolished. It’s a system designed for profit, not human well-being. That’s why we must reject this delusion of reform. The only real path forward is dismantling capitalism, removing the ruling class, the workers taking their place and building a dictatorship of the proletariat.
👌7💯5
Forwarded from DD Geopolitics
Vice News – From “Counterculture” to a U.S. State Department Mouthpiece
➡️ Funding:
• Received over $5M in USAID grants for media projects in Ukraine, Venezuela, and Hong Kong.
• Partnered with National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and Open Society Foundations (Soros).
• Works directly with Bellingcat, a known Western intelligence cutout.
• Signed multi-million dollar contract with UK Foreign Office in 2021 to “combat disinformation” in Eastern Europe.
➡️ What they do:
Vice once marketed itself as an “anti-establishment” media company. Now, it’s a fully co-opted propaganda arm for U.S. foreign policy, pushing regime change narratives under the guise of investigative journalism.
➡️ Major Exposures:
1. USAID Funding for Pro-Opposition Coverage in Venezuela
• In 2017, produced a documentary on Venezuela’s crisis, portraying the Maduro government as a dictatorship while whitewashing the U.S.-backed opposition.
• Leaked USAID records confirm that Vice received funding to promote “democracy” in Venezuela—meaning regime change.
• Ignored the effects of U.S. sanctions, which caused severe food and medicine shortages.
➡️ Whitewashing Neo-Nazis in Ukraine
• In 2014, was one of the first Western media outlets to normalize the Azov Nazi Battalion.
• In their 2014 documentary, “The Russians Are Coming,” Vice glorified Azov fighters as “Ukraine’s last hope,” never mentioning their Nazi ideology.
• In 2022, Vice ran a piece claiming “Azov Battalion has changed,” despite its continued use of Nazi symbols and rhetoric.
➡️ Spreading Disinformation on Syria to Justify U.S. Bombings
• Central in pushing the 2018 Douma “chemical attack” hoax, which was later debunked by OPCW whistleblowers.
• Released an “investigation” claiming Syrian forces used chemical weapons, even though leaked OPCW emails showed inspectors found no evidence.
• Directly contributed to the U.S., UK, and France launching airstrikes on Syria in April 2018.
➡️ The Hong Kong Riots – Selling U.S. Regime Change as a “Pro-Democracy Movement”
• Received USAID funds in 2019 to promote “pro-democracy voices” in Hong Kong—meaning U.S.-backed rioters.
• Their coverage ignored the direct U.S. role in funding and organizing anti-China protests.
• Vice never mentioned that Hong Kong protest leaders like Joshua Wong met with U.S. officials and received NED funding.
➡️ Vice’s Financial Meltdown – Propped Up by Western Governments
• Vice declared bankruptcy in May 2023 after years of mismanagement and credibility loss.
• Despite this, it continues receiving government grants for “media development” in conflict zones.
• Has signed new deals with USAID-backed groups to continue operations in Eastern Europe.
🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
• Received over $5M in USAID grants for media projects in Ukraine, Venezuela, and Hong Kong.
• Partnered with National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and Open Society Foundations (Soros).
• Works directly with Bellingcat, a known Western intelligence cutout.
• Signed multi-million dollar contract with UK Foreign Office in 2021 to “combat disinformation” in Eastern Europe.
Vice once marketed itself as an “anti-establishment” media company. Now, it’s a fully co-opted propaganda arm for U.S. foreign policy, pushing regime change narratives under the guise of investigative journalism.
1. USAID Funding for Pro-Opposition Coverage in Venezuela
• In 2017, produced a documentary on Venezuela’s crisis, portraying the Maduro government as a dictatorship while whitewashing the U.S.-backed opposition.
• Leaked USAID records confirm that Vice received funding to promote “democracy” in Venezuela—meaning regime change.
• Ignored the effects of U.S. sanctions, which caused severe food and medicine shortages.
• In 2014, was one of the first Western media outlets to normalize the Azov Nazi Battalion.
• In their 2014 documentary, “The Russians Are Coming,” Vice glorified Azov fighters as “Ukraine’s last hope,” never mentioning their Nazi ideology.
• In 2022, Vice ran a piece claiming “Azov Battalion has changed,” despite its continued use of Nazi symbols and rhetoric.
• Central in pushing the 2018 Douma “chemical attack” hoax, which was later debunked by OPCW whistleblowers.
• Released an “investigation” claiming Syrian forces used chemical weapons, even though leaked OPCW emails showed inspectors found no evidence.
• Directly contributed to the U.S., UK, and France launching airstrikes on Syria in April 2018.
• Received USAID funds in 2019 to promote “pro-democracy voices” in Hong Kong—meaning U.S.-backed rioters.
• Their coverage ignored the direct U.S. role in funding and organizing anti-China protests.
• Vice never mentioned that Hong Kong protest leaders like Joshua Wong met with U.S. officials and received NED funding.
• Vice declared bankruptcy in May 2023 after years of mismanagement and credibility loss.
• Despite this, it continues receiving government grants for “media development” in conflict zones.
• Has signed new deals with USAID-backed groups to continue operations in Eastern Europe.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯1🖕1
Forwarded from DD Geopolitics
DD Geopolitics
Vice News – From “Counterculture” to a U.S. State Department Mouthpiece ➡️ Funding: • Received over $5M in USAID grants for media projects in Ukraine, Venezuela, and Hong Kong. • Partnered with National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and Open Society Foundations…
Deutsche Welle (DW) – NATO’s State Media in Europe
➡️ Funding:
• Receives €390M annually from the German government, with direct input from the German Foreign Office.
• Funded by USAID and NED for “media training” in Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Africa.
• Partnered with the European Endowment for Democracy (EED), an EU version of NED that finances regime change ops.
• Received an undisclosed amount from the U.S. State Department for “anti-disinformation programs” in Ukraine and Georgia.
➡️ What they do:
Deutsche Welle (DW) pretends to be an independent German news outlet, but in reality, it serves as NATO’s media wing in Europe. It systematically pushes anti-Russian, anti-Chinese, and pro-Western narratives, while covering up NATO war crimes.
➡️ Major Exposures:
•Promoting NATO Expansion and Smearing Neutral Countries
• Consistently attacks any European government that refuses to fully align with NATO.
• In 2022, ran multiple stories accusing Serbia’s neutrality of being “Russian influence,” despite Serbia’s policy of non-alignment.
• In 2023, ran an exposé on Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, claiming his opposition to NATO expansion was a “threat to democracy.”
➡️ Whitewashing Ukraine’s Neo-Nazi Problem
• In 2022, released a documentary attempting to “debunk” claims that Ukraine’s military has a neo-Nazi problem.
• In the documentary, DW called concerns about the Azov Battalion’s Nazi links “Russian disinformation,” even though Azov fighters wear SS insignia and use Nazi slogans.
• During Ukraine’s Independence Day parade in 2023, completely ignored the fact that Ukrainian soldiers were marching with patches featuring Nazi symbols.
➡️ Running Cover for NATO’s War Crimes
• DW refuses to critically report on NATO’s destruction of Libya, Serbia, or Syria.
• In 2011, justified NATO’s bombing of Libya as a “humanitarian intervention”—ignoring how it left Libya in chaos.
• Called NATO’s 1999 bombing of Serbia “necessary to stop ethnic violence” while ignoring the illegal use of depleted uranium bombs that caused a surge in cancer rates.
➡️ Role in Georgia’s 2023 Anti-Government Protests
• Ran continuous coverage supporting anti-government protests in Georgia, portraying them as “pro-democracy.”
• Leaked documents revealed that DW coordinated its coverage with USAID-funded NGOs working to weaken Georgia’s government.
• Framed the protests as “grassroots,” despite clear evidence of U.S. influence.
➡️ “Anti-Disinformation” Projects – A Cover for Western Censorship
• Worksed closely with Facebook and Twitter to deplatform alternative media.
• In 2022, DW was part of an EU-backed “fact-checking” initiative that labeled alternative reporting on Ukraine as “Russian propaganda.”
• Helped push for the censorship of RT and Sputnik across Europe.
🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
• Receives €390M annually from the German government, with direct input from the German Foreign Office.
• Funded by USAID and NED for “media training” in Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Africa.
• Partnered with the European Endowment for Democracy (EED), an EU version of NED that finances regime change ops.
• Received an undisclosed amount from the U.S. State Department for “anti-disinformation programs” in Ukraine and Georgia.
Deutsche Welle (DW) pretends to be an independent German news outlet, but in reality, it serves as NATO’s media wing in Europe. It systematically pushes anti-Russian, anti-Chinese, and pro-Western narratives, while covering up NATO war crimes.
•Promoting NATO Expansion and Smearing Neutral Countries
• Consistently attacks any European government that refuses to fully align with NATO.
• In 2022, ran multiple stories accusing Serbia’s neutrality of being “Russian influence,” despite Serbia’s policy of non-alignment.
• In 2023, ran an exposé on Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, claiming his opposition to NATO expansion was a “threat to democracy.”
• In 2022, released a documentary attempting to “debunk” claims that Ukraine’s military has a neo-Nazi problem.
• In the documentary, DW called concerns about the Azov Battalion’s Nazi links “Russian disinformation,” even though Azov fighters wear SS insignia and use Nazi slogans.
• During Ukraine’s Independence Day parade in 2023, completely ignored the fact that Ukrainian soldiers were marching with patches featuring Nazi symbols.
• DW refuses to critically report on NATO’s destruction of Libya, Serbia, or Syria.
• In 2011, justified NATO’s bombing of Libya as a “humanitarian intervention”—ignoring how it left Libya in chaos.
• Called NATO’s 1999 bombing of Serbia “necessary to stop ethnic violence” while ignoring the illegal use of depleted uranium bombs that caused a surge in cancer rates.
• Ran continuous coverage supporting anti-government protests in Georgia, portraying them as “pro-democracy.”
• Leaked documents revealed that DW coordinated its coverage with USAID-funded NGOs working to weaken Georgia’s government.
• Framed the protests as “grassroots,” despite clear evidence of U.S. influence.
• Worksed closely with Facebook and Twitter to deplatform alternative media.
• In 2022, DW was part of an EU-backed “fact-checking” initiative that labeled alternative reporting on Ukraine as “Russian propaganda.”
• Helped push for the censorship of RT and Sputnik across Europe.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🖕2
Criticism is a weapon of the revolutionary movement, a safeguard against opportunism and ideological decay. Without it, revisionism festers, careerists rise unchecked, and the struggle is diverted into the dead ends of reformism and bourgeois compromise. True revolutionaries do not fear criticism—they engage in it, recognising that only through relentless ideological struggle can the movement remain disciplined, principled, and rooted in the material interests of the working class.
Individualism is the poison of revolutionary politics, a bourgeois remnant that elevates personal ambition above collective struggle. It breeds factionalism, egoism, and detachment from the masses, turning revolution into a stage for self-promotion rather than proletarian liberation. The revolutionary vanguard must reject this cancer, embracing democratic centralism as the only safeguard against ideological rot. Debate is essential, but discipline is paramount—criticism must serve the struggle, not personal vanity. The movement advances only when it is willing to correct its course, purge opportunist tendencies, and forge ahead with unity, purpose, and unbreakable proletarian resolve.
Class Consciousness Project.
Individualism is the poison of revolutionary politics, a bourgeois remnant that elevates personal ambition above collective struggle. It breeds factionalism, egoism, and detachment from the masses, turning revolution into a stage for self-promotion rather than proletarian liberation. The revolutionary vanguard must reject this cancer, embracing democratic centralism as the only safeguard against ideological rot. Debate is essential, but discipline is paramount—criticism must serve the struggle, not personal vanity. The movement advances only when it is willing to correct its course, purge opportunist tendencies, and forge ahead with unity, purpose, and unbreakable proletarian resolve.
Class Consciousness Project.
❤🔥5🔥1
Forwarded from The Communists
🧵 Thread • TwitterVX
Ranjeet Brar (@Rango1917)
@SabriSun_Miller Not very impressive, Sabrina. Jews are of course safe in NHS hospitals.
But are anti-genocide British workers, safe to live, work and enjoy equal rights, without being subject to a relentless campaign to get them sacked, struck off, slandered…
But are anti-genocide British workers, safe to live, work and enjoy equal rights, without being subject to a relentless campaign to get them sacked, struck off, slandered…
😈1
Our main aim at this project has always been to spread class awareness and provide a working-class perspective on important topics. We hope to help foster the class consciousness that has been severely lacking in this country for decades.
Alongside this, we believe it’s essential to challenge the manufactured idea of our culture. The media sells us consumerism and a petty bourgeois "middle-class" imitation of culture—something far removed from the reality of working-class life.
While we often focus on sport and music, we must also reclaim film, theatre, poetry, and artistry. These are not the exclusive domains of the ruling classes, who feed us mindless drivel. Our history is rich with working-class creativity—insightful, inspiring, and deeply rooted in struggle and resilience.
Percy Shelley's Men of England is one such masterpiece of working-class poetry.
We will share a poem from working-class culture every fortnight on a Monday. If you have a suggestion—or even one of your own—you’d like to contribute, send it in for consideration.
— Gerrard Winstanley
http://classconsciousnessproject.blog/2025/02/17/men-of-england/
Alongside this, we believe it’s essential to challenge the manufactured idea of our culture. The media sells us consumerism and a petty bourgeois "middle-class" imitation of culture—something far removed from the reality of working-class life.
While we often focus on sport and music, we must also reclaim film, theatre, poetry, and artistry. These are not the exclusive domains of the ruling classes, who feed us mindless drivel. Our history is rich with working-class creativity—insightful, inspiring, and deeply rooted in struggle and resilience.
Percy Shelley's Men of England is one such masterpiece of working-class poetry.
We will share a poem from working-class culture every fortnight on a Monday. If you have a suggestion—or even one of your own—you’d like to contribute, send it in for consideration.
"The Earth was made a common treasury for all."
— Gerrard Winstanley
http://classconsciousnessproject.blog/2025/02/17/men-of-england/
Class Consciousness Project
Men of England
Men of England, wherefore plough For the lords who lay ye low? Wherefore weave with toil and care The rich robes your tyrants wear? Wherefore feed and clothe and save From the cradle to the grave T…
❤2
Forwarded from Marx Engels Lenin Institute
Dumb bourgeois clown Clarkson can't work out that if you raise a generation with zero hope of a better future then their response when asked to fight will be "fuck you".
💩2🤡1
Forwarded from Marx Engels Lenin Institute
YouTube
Starmers Latest Cynical Gambit
In this episode we look at British Prime Minister Keir Starmers latest cynical attempt to prolong the Ukraine war.
Be sure to check out our website where you can find the latest articles:
https://marxengelsinstitute.org/
You can also find more of our work…
Be sure to check out our website where you can find the latest articles:
https://marxengelsinstitute.org/
You can also find more of our work…
👍4