After the strikes, what then? | The Communists
https://thecommunists.org/2023/03/21/news/after-the-strikes-what-then-tuc-failing/

Corbyn’s Con – Marx Engels Lenin Institute
https://marxengelsinstitute.org/2023/03/29/corbyns-con/

The Communist Party of Britain released a statement on Thursday 30th March which criticised the Scottish Parliament and their ‘handling’ of the Scottish Gender Reform Bill, which was blocked by Rishi Sunak.

The bill would have created a situation whereby a male could have ‘self-identified’ as a female in Scotland, but would have legally reverted to a man if they crossed the border with England.

The ‘left’ went into meltdown yesterday on the Twittersphere, however even they had to desist from their reflexive response of labelling as ‘fascist’ anyone who states openly that they don’t believe that someone can be the opposite sex simply by declaring it.

Instead, ‘Stalinist’ was the label of choice which the predominantly middle class liberal metropolitan set used to denounce these cheeky non-conformists.

The full statement is here:

https://www.communistparty.org.uk/the-gender-recognition-bill-and-equality-law/

As Keir Starmer revisits his favourite past time of "poking the Corbyn to see if it will move", the Cult of Corbyn has gone into complete melt down.

It was not long ago that there was a similar debacle when the Corbynites thought he was going rogue and starting a new party. This ended up being the useless Peace and Justice Project.

This time the NEC has barred him from standing in his safe haven of Islington North.
He is rumoured to be standing as an independent in defiance of his Labour masters.

If that were to happen he would be finally booted from Labour, leaving his defenders to once again salivate over the thought of a Corbyn Party.

Ol' Jezza betraying Labour is very hard to imagine, but if he did then in the immortal words of Month Python.....

"He's not the messiah, he's a very naughty boy!"

"All these unions have their rival executives, their different societies, their conflicting and rival policies, their demarcation disputes, their overhead charges involved by the large bureaucratic staffs they are called upon to carry.
This has resulted in a situation where there is no common policy or understanding, where every union fights for its own ends, where questions are not examined from the point of view of the working-class movement as a whole, but where each union looks upon every question from the point of view of its possible effect upon that union. This, of course, has led not only to sectionalism, but to the development of a leadership that is totally incapable of leading the Trade Union Movement even to the most elementary victories."

https://www.marxists.org/history/international/comintern/sections/britain/subject/minority/played_out.htm