This clip of Lara Logan comparing Fauci to Nazi Doctor Mengele is aging like fine wine.

The world will soon learn the truth on an uncensored Twitter. Boom.

https://truthsocial.com/users/EmeraldRobinson/statuses/109496063728227188

Pedophiles, you are on notice. #LizCrokinVampireHunter

Elisabet Sena-Martin is the Executive Director of The Evansville Foundation; a not for profit consisting of an unelected board of community members. The current membership is at 31 members due to a merger.

Attached is a zoom meeting of “Ely” espousing the World Economic Forum agenda of inclusion and sensitivity training of others arriving into your community.

Superintendent Smith is publicly soliciting financial support from our community churches for 600 students at EVSC that are from illegal immigrants in VANDERBURGH county?

It’s about the money and Agenda 21. Smith has publicly recorded YouTube videos about embracing the WEF agenda over our own community. We pay to educate OUR children and must demand accountability and a return on our investment, not the agenda that’s undermining our values.

If the local churches say no to Smith’s manipulation; they are dubbed “un-Christian” and racist for not accepting the ILLEGAL ALIENS.

https://leadershipeveryone.org/blog/le-connects-2021-04-13/

Composition of the EVSC Board of Directors and Administration.

"Your leftists here in the United States: all these professors and civil rights defenders and useful idiots. They are instrumental in the process of subversion to destabilize a nation. When their job is completed, they are not needed any more"

- Yuri Bezmenov

Ruthless Truth Teller. https://twitter.com/jgalan707/status/1602483953658642434?s=52&t=XNX4VUENaL96S4cuTCCw1Q

Excellent website with testimonials and Covid resources. Share. https://www.unnecessaryloss.com/covid-information

If you'd like to watch the live stream of today's hearing in Kari Lake v Katie Hobbs, (scheduled for 1 pm eastern), click the link below.

In the name field, enter 'Hobbs.'
Wait until the stream is live.

https://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/calendar/today/

Exposing!

DAYS OF DELIVERANCE FROM THE HANDS OF THE WICKED
Word Received: April 17, 2022

Arizona, more truth will come out of your state. The traitors in your land thought this would stay hidden forever, but it's not. For I, the Lord, am revealing the snake pit of lies in Arizona. Maricopa will be reported on again. More took place there than you were being told. A truth-teller or a major whistleblower will come forward with the truth in this hour that can not be denied. Hold on, Arizona. Your freedom is coming in this hour of judgment, saith the Lord.

December 13, 2022 Listen to audio only from RSBN below.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/judge-orders-kari-lake-katie-hobbs-maricopa-county-elections-officials-appear-emergency-hearing-regarding-election-contest-lawsuit-listen-live-11am-mountain/

Preparing for contesting the 2022 Midterm VANDERBURGH County Indiana election.

The Albert Sensor Systems: How Government and a 501(c)3 Tracks Real-Time Election Data in 98% of the US – Put Into Effect by DHS After Trump Won in 2016. Let’s look at their program created to gain access to local election data.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/alberts-systems/

Exposed: Pete Buttigieg's True Location When US Was on Verge of Disaster from Rail Strike. Hoosier hysteria strikes again. Buttigieg, Pence, or Holcomb. It matters not the political affiliation. https://www.westernjournal.com/exposed-pete-buttigiegs-true-location-us-verge-disaster-rail-strike/

Brunson Case overview. This will affect Senator Mike Braun and Senator Todd Young of Indiana; they are named as defendants. I personally contacted Senator Braun’s office for a statement on the Brunson case. His office was unaware of the pending case. https://frankspeech.com/video/loy-brunson-explains-how-they-were-able-get-case-supreme-court

For those sending letters to Brunson vs. Adams… especially if you’re sending money… I’m going to say this again:

There's "Safe Harbor" dates as written in Laws.

The Supreme Court had 3 options with this case. 

One, extend the time for the respondents to respond. 

Two, take the case.

Three dismiss it.

Well, because this is a Military Operation, as the LAW OF WAR MANUAL and Military Justice Act outlines, 2015 and 2016, and MULTIPLE Executive Orders from CIC Trump amongst other visual evidence backs... the members of Congress CANNOT respond when they're all detained. 

If you haven't been to D.C., I HIGHLY suggest following Nancy Drew ASAP. Plus, I've been there... it's not what everyone thinks bc many are stilllll watching lamestream media. 

They wouldn't dismiss this case since it's a perfect opportunity to keep all the sleepy and drama loving Mericans distracted. Americans love the hell out of some drama. 

There's TWO different scenarios that could apply IF this had NOT been a Military Occupancy:

This is why it's VERY VITAL to understand the manner prescribed to vote via our Constitution:

The Statute of 1845, which is 2 United States Code 7 outlines when, where, and how we vote:

2 US Code 7:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2010-noscript2/html/USCODE-2010-noscript2-chap1-sec7.htm

Article II, Section 1, Clause 3 outlines January 6th, Electoral College Count:
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-2/section-1/clause-3/

If the President is not chosen via January 20th after that process, the Vice President elect becomes President until further notice:

Section 3 of the 20th Amendment specifies:
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-20/#:~:text=Section%203,President%20elect%20shall%20become%20President.

3 US Code Chapter 1 Section 15 specifically says:

"Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors. The Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives at the hour of 1 o'clock in the afternoon on that day, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer".... (read more) 

3 US Code Chapter 1 Section 15
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2014-noscript3/html/USCODE-2014-noscript3-chap1-sec15.htm

3 US Code Chapter 1 outlines Presidential Elections and Vacancies. 
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@noscript3/chapter1&edition=prelim

If there's no Vice President elect by the time of Inauguration, via the Presidential Succession Act of 1947, the Speaker of the House becomes President UNTIL the House selects a President or the Senate selects a Vice President.

Presidential Succession Act:
https://www.congress.gov/event/108th-congress/house-event/LC15233/text?s=1&r=3#:~:text=Under%20the%201947%20act%20any,automatically%20vacates%20his%20Cabinet%20position.

The only way the Supreme Court could challenge the 2020 Election is if it were a Contingent Election.

Sure, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, Virginia, Georgia, Nevada, Pennsylvania could be 'called' Contingent from what happened on January 6th, 2021, from those who do not know about the Law of War Manual, MJA 2016, EO 13848, EO 13912, and Title 10, and the Federalization of 1,000,000 National Guard to Active Status...

January 6th, 2021, proves MORE than anything the Military Occupancy Covert Planned Operation, because at the point Arizona, the SECOND state up to cast their vote, as Alabama was the ONLY state to successfully count their Electors... there were objections in which is when the "insurrection" happened during the Arizona count. 

When the Objection happened, this was supposed to happen:

“Objecting to the Counting of One or More Electoral Votes Provisions in 3 U.S.C. §15 include a procedure for making and acting on objections to the counting of one or more of the electoral votes from a state or the District of Columbia. When the certificate or equivalent paper from each state (or the District of Columbia) is read, “the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any.

” Any such objection must be presented in writing and must be signed by at least one Senator and one Representative. The objection “shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof.... ” During the joint session of January 6, 2001, the presiding officer intervened on several occasions to halt attempts to make speeches under the guise of offering an objection. When an objection, properly made in writing and endorsed by at least one Senator and one Representative, is received, each house is to meet and consider it separately. The statute states that “[n]o votes or papers from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to the votes or papers from any State shall have been finally disposed of.” However, in 1873, before enactment of the law now in force, the joint session agreed, without objection and for reasons of convenience, to entertain objections with regard to two or more states before the houses met separately on any of them.”

Counting Electoral Votes:
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32717/12

That did NOT happen. House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, ignored the Objections and continued counting. All of which broke:

18 US Code 2381
18 US Code 2384
18 US Code 2385
3 US Code 15
52 US Code 20511

This IS and WAS NOT a Contingent Election via the timeline and timestamps and federalization of the National Guard which are still visually active outside of their state militia status every single day since those Orders were placed.

The Contingent Election process is specified in Article Two, Section 1, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution. 

The procedure was modified by the 12th Amendment in 1804, under which the House chooses one of the three candidates who received the most electoral votes, while the Senate chooses one of the two candidates who received the most electoral votes. The phrase "contingent election" is not in the text of the Constitution but has been used to describe this procedure since at least 1823.

Article 1, Section 4, Chapter 1.3 noscript Congress and the Elections Clause specifically outlines the Presidential Voting Process:
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S4-C1-3/ALDE_00013640/

"....Finally, the Court has recognized that because the Elections Clause specifically vests Congress and the states with authority over the “Time, Places and Manner” of congressional elections, the Court’s authority over such matters is limited."

The Court's AUTHORITY over SUCH matters is LIMITED.

The Supreme Court was able to step into the Bush vs. Gore Election in 2000, because the election was too close and manual recounts were required:

"On December 8, 2000, the Florida Supreme Court ordered, inter alia, that manual recounts of ballots for the recent Presidential election were required in all Florida counties where so-called "undervotes" had not been subject to manual tabulation, and that the manual recounts should begin at once. Noting the closeness of the election, the court explained that, on the record before it, there could be no question that there were uncounted "legal votes"-i. e., those in which there was a clear indication of the voter's intent-sufficient to place the results of the election in doubt."

"The court below has said that the legislature intended the State's electors to participate fully in the federal electoral process, as provided in 3 U. S. C. § 5, which requires that any controversy or contest that is designed to lead to a conclusive selection of electors be completed by December 12."

3 US Code Section 5:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-noscript3/html/USCODE-2011-noscript3-chap1-sec5.htm

Bush versus Gore Federal Case:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/531/98/

The December 12th date is called a "safe harbor" as the 3 US Code Chapter 1, Section 7 specifically says: