Composition of the EVSC Board of Directors and Administration.

"Your leftists here in the United States: all these professors and civil rights defenders and useful idiots. They are instrumental in the process of subversion to destabilize a nation. When their job is completed, they are not needed any more"

- Yuri Bezmenov

Ruthless Truth Teller. https://twitter.com/jgalan707/status/1602483953658642434?s=52&t=XNX4VUENaL96S4cuTCCw1Q

Excellent website with testimonials and Covid resources. Share. https://www.unnecessaryloss.com/covid-information

If you'd like to watch the live stream of today's hearing in Kari Lake v Katie Hobbs, (scheduled for 1 pm eastern), click the link below.

In the name field, enter 'Hobbs.'
Wait until the stream is live.

https://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/calendar/today/

Exposing!

DAYS OF DELIVERANCE FROM THE HANDS OF THE WICKED
Word Received: April 17, 2022

Arizona, more truth will come out of your state. The traitors in your land thought this would stay hidden forever, but it's not. For I, the Lord, am revealing the snake pit of lies in Arizona. Maricopa will be reported on again. More took place there than you were being told. A truth-teller or a major whistleblower will come forward with the truth in this hour that can not be denied. Hold on, Arizona. Your freedom is coming in this hour of judgment, saith the Lord.

December 13, 2022 Listen to audio only from RSBN below.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/judge-orders-kari-lake-katie-hobbs-maricopa-county-elections-officials-appear-emergency-hearing-regarding-election-contest-lawsuit-listen-live-11am-mountain/

Preparing for contesting the 2022 Midterm VANDERBURGH County Indiana election.

The Albert Sensor Systems: How Government and a 501(c)3 Tracks Real-Time Election Data in 98% of the US – Put Into Effect by DHS After Trump Won in 2016. Let’s look at their program created to gain access to local election data.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/alberts-systems/

Exposed: Pete Buttigieg's True Location When US Was on Verge of Disaster from Rail Strike. Hoosier hysteria strikes again. Buttigieg, Pence, or Holcomb. It matters not the political affiliation. https://www.westernjournal.com/exposed-pete-buttigiegs-true-location-us-verge-disaster-rail-strike/

Brunson Case overview. This will affect Senator Mike Braun and Senator Todd Young of Indiana; they are named as defendants. I personally contacted Senator Braun’s office for a statement on the Brunson case. His office was unaware of the pending case. https://frankspeech.com/video/loy-brunson-explains-how-they-were-able-get-case-supreme-court

For those sending letters to Brunson vs. Adams… especially if you’re sending money… I’m going to say this again:

There's "Safe Harbor" dates as written in Laws.

The Supreme Court had 3 options with this case. 

One, extend the time for the respondents to respond. 

Two, take the case.

Three dismiss it.

Well, because this is a Military Operation, as the LAW OF WAR MANUAL and Military Justice Act outlines, 2015 and 2016, and MULTIPLE Executive Orders from CIC Trump amongst other visual evidence backs... the members of Congress CANNOT respond when they're all detained. 

If you haven't been to D.C., I HIGHLY suggest following Nancy Drew ASAP. Plus, I've been there... it's not what everyone thinks bc many are stilllll watching lamestream media. 

They wouldn't dismiss this case since it's a perfect opportunity to keep all the sleepy and drama loving Mericans distracted. Americans love the hell out of some drama. 

There's TWO different scenarios that could apply IF this had NOT been a Military Occupancy:

This is why it's VERY VITAL to understand the manner prescribed to vote via our Constitution:

The Statute of 1845, which is 2 United States Code 7 outlines when, where, and how we vote:

2 US Code 7:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2010-noscript2/html/USCODE-2010-noscript2-chap1-sec7.htm

Article II, Section 1, Clause 3 outlines January 6th, Electoral College Count:
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-2/section-1/clause-3/

If the President is not chosen via January 20th after that process, the Vice President elect becomes President until further notice:

Section 3 of the 20th Amendment specifies:
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-20/#:~:text=Section%203,President%20elect%20shall%20become%20President.

3 US Code Chapter 1 Section 15 specifically says:

"Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors. The Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives at the hour of 1 o'clock in the afternoon on that day, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer".... (read more) 

3 US Code Chapter 1 Section 15
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2014-noscript3/html/USCODE-2014-noscript3-chap1-sec15.htm

3 US Code Chapter 1 outlines Presidential Elections and Vacancies. 
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@noscript3/chapter1&edition=prelim

If there's no Vice President elect by the time of Inauguration, via the Presidential Succession Act of 1947, the Speaker of the House becomes President UNTIL the House selects a President or the Senate selects a Vice President.

Presidential Succession Act:
https://www.congress.gov/event/108th-congress/house-event/LC15233/text?s=1&r=3#:~:text=Under%20the%201947%20act%20any,automatically%20vacates%20his%20Cabinet%20position.

The only way the Supreme Court could challenge the 2020 Election is if it were a Contingent Election.

Sure, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, Virginia, Georgia, Nevada, Pennsylvania could be 'called' Contingent from what happened on January 6th, 2021, from those who do not know about the Law of War Manual, MJA 2016, EO 13848, EO 13912, and Title 10, and the Federalization of 1,000,000 National Guard to Active Status...

January 6th, 2021, proves MORE than anything the Military Occupancy Covert Planned Operation, because at the point Arizona, the SECOND state up to cast their vote, as Alabama was the ONLY state to successfully count their Electors... there were objections in which is when the "insurrection" happened during the Arizona count. 

When the Objection happened, this was supposed to happen:

“Objecting to the Counting of One or More Electoral Votes Provisions in 3 U.S.C. §15 include a procedure for making and acting on objections to the counting of one or more of the electoral votes from a state or the District of Columbia. When the certificate or equivalent paper from each state (or the District of Columbia) is read, “the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any.

” Any such objection must be presented in writing and must be signed by at least one Senator and one Representative. The objection “shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof.... ” During the joint session of January 6, 2001, the presiding officer intervened on several occasions to halt attempts to make speeches under the guise of offering an objection. When an objection, properly made in writing and endorsed by at least one Senator and one Representative, is received, each house is to meet and consider it separately. The statute states that “[n]o votes or papers from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to the votes or papers from any State shall have been finally disposed of.” However, in 1873, before enactment of the law now in force, the joint session agreed, without objection and for reasons of convenience, to entertain objections with regard to two or more states before the houses met separately on any of them.”

Counting Electoral Votes:
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32717/12

That did NOT happen. House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, ignored the Objections and continued counting. All of which broke:

18 US Code 2381
18 US Code 2384
18 US Code 2385
3 US Code 15
52 US Code 20511

This IS and WAS NOT a Contingent Election via the timeline and timestamps and federalization of the National Guard which are still visually active outside of their state militia status every single day since those Orders were placed.

The Contingent Election process is specified in Article Two, Section 1, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution. 

The procedure was modified by the 12th Amendment in 1804, under which the House chooses one of the three candidates who received the most electoral votes, while the Senate chooses one of the two candidates who received the most electoral votes. The phrase "contingent election" is not in the text of the Constitution but has been used to describe this procedure since at least 1823.

Article 1, Section 4, Chapter 1.3 noscript Congress and the Elections Clause specifically outlines the Presidential Voting Process:
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S4-C1-3/ALDE_00013640/

"....Finally, the Court has recognized that because the Elections Clause specifically vests Congress and the states with authority over the “Time, Places and Manner” of congressional elections, the Court’s authority over such matters is limited."

The Court's AUTHORITY over SUCH matters is LIMITED.

The Supreme Court was able to step into the Bush vs. Gore Election in 2000, because the election was too close and manual recounts were required:

"On December 8, 2000, the Florida Supreme Court ordered, inter alia, that manual recounts of ballots for the recent Presidential election were required in all Florida counties where so-called "undervotes" had not been subject to manual tabulation, and that the manual recounts should begin at once. Noting the closeness of the election, the court explained that, on the record before it, there could be no question that there were uncounted "legal votes"-i. e., those in which there was a clear indication of the voter's intent-sufficient to place the results of the election in doubt."

"The court below has said that the legislature intended the State's electors to participate fully in the federal electoral process, as provided in 3 U. S. C. § 5, which requires that any controversy or contest that is designed to lead to a conclusive selection of electors be completed by December 12."

3 US Code Section 5:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-noscript3/html/USCODE-2011-noscript3-chap1-sec5.htm

Bush versus Gore Federal Case:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/531/98/

The December 12th date is called a "safe harbor" as the 3 US Code Chapter 1, Section 7 specifically says:

"The electors of President and Vice President of each State shall meet and give their votes on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December next following their appointment at such place in each State as the legislature of such State shall direct."

3 US Code Section 7:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-noscript3/html/USCODE-2011-noscript3-chap1-sec7.htm

Electoral Count Act of 1887:
https://govtrackus.s3.amazonaws.com/legislink/pdf/stat/24/STATUTE-24-Pg373.pdf 

28 US Code 1257 says:

(a) Final judgments or decrees rendered by the highest court of a State in which a decision could be had, may be reviewed by the Supreme Court by writ of certiorari where the validity of a treaty or statute of the United States is drawn in question or where the validity of a statute of any State is drawn in question on the ground of its being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, or where any noscript, right, privilege, or immunity is specially set up or claimed under the Constitution or the treaties or statutes of, or any commission held or authority exercised under, the United States.

28 US Code 1257:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-noscript28/html/USCODE-2011-noscript28-partIV-chap81-sec1257.htm

However, in the same case with Bush versus Gore, the timeline of the Electors of the President and Vice President on the first Wednesday in December is very key... 

Since the electors were set to meet December 18, the discretional "safe harbor" deadline was December 12, just one day after the Court heard oral arguments in this case...

On December 3, 2020, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito set a deadline of December 8 (the safe-harbor date for 2020) for Pennsylvania officials to respond to a request to throw out the state's mail-in voting results, or possibly the entire Pennsylvania election in Representative Mike Kelly's suit at the Supreme Court. 

On December 8, the Supreme Court denied the application for a writ of injunction.

On December 27, 2020, Texas Representative Louis Gohmert filed a suit in US District Court seeking to give Vice President Mike Pence full authority to declare which slate of electors would be accepted by Congress. 

According to the National Review, even at the time the bill was enacted, some in Congress doubted whether the Act can bind a future Congress. The district court dismissed the suit for lack of standing on January 1, 2021. The dismissal was upheld by an appeals court panel the next day.

Keep in mind, this is the Supreme Court which has two of Donald Trump's Justice nominations in 2020... FOUR years after the Law of War Manual and the Military Justice Act of 2016.

Had this been about Election Fraud from the Voter or State side... those Electors had full authority to submit before the Safe-Harbor date their cases.

The Law of War Manual (December 2016) and the Military Justice Act of 2016 are what's 'governing' our Country right now in a Military Occupancy along with our Allies as outlined in the manual.

Law of War Manual:
https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190 

Military Justice Act of 2016:
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46503#:~:text=A%20number%20of%20concerns%20relating,to%20trial%20by%20court%2Dmartial.

All one needs to do is apply the TIMELINES and TIMESTAMPS of the Blueprint.

1. The Alliance of Generals present to you 2016 candidate Donald John Trump; a Military Plug for Federal Corporation terms: a COG.
2. November 2016 "Election"
3. Law of War Manual (June 2015; amended December 2016)
4. Military Justice Act (2016)
5. Executive Order 13848 (September 12, 2018)

Which poses my question for the umpteenth time... 

How did Donald John Trump know to write Executive Order 13848 and to DECLARE a National Emergency to deal with the "Threat" of Election Fraud, a year and 10 months after the 2016 Election...

TWO months before the November 2018 midterm and TWO Years before Covid and the November 2020 Presidential Election???

Timelines matter. So does terminology. Inside the Executive Order 13848 specifically says this:

"Although there has been no evidence of a foreign power altering the outcome or vote tabulation in any United States election..."

Does NOT mention Domestic.

And also says in ‘ANY’ US Election.

It also says:

Section 1. (a) Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election,

Keyword: 👉🏻a👈🏻. 

Conclusion of 👉🏻A👈🏻 United States Election. Not one, not a specific one. 

All of which outlines the Military Operations of each Election via the Congressional, Governors, and Legal sides. 

The very first paragraph says:

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of noscript 3, United States Code,  

50 US Code 1701: Unusual and Extraordinary Threat; declaration of National Emergency; exercise of Presidential authorities:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-noscript50/html/USCODE-2011-noscript50-chap35-sec1701.htm

50 US Code 1601: War and National Defense:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2020-noscript50/pdf/USCODE-2020-noscript50-chap34-subchapI-sec1601.pdf

8 US Code 1182: Excludable Aliens
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(noscript:8%20section:1182

3 US Code Section 301:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2020-noscript3/pdf/USCODE-2020-noscript3-chap4-sec301.pdf

Executive Order 13848:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/09/14/2018-20203/imposing-certain-sanctions-in-the-event-of-foreign-interference-in-a-united-states-election

The Military Occupancy plugged Trump where the people could see a visual President (which is a Continuation of Government) in Presidential Form to use and reverse all of the fraudulent laws, codes, and statutes, of the Federal Corporation of the District of Columbia that violates the Constitution of the United States of America (the highest Law in the Land) and to dismantle the RINOS of the Federal Corporation. 

CIC Trump as visual President took all of the Laws, Codes, Orders, Acts, and Statutes and applied them as they legally read, not how they were abused by the Corporate RINOS. Doing so, allows the American people who care to know and are awake to see the RINOS implode from within from top to bottom without being able to point any fingers about abuse of power or laws without lying or being two-faced. 

Americans, with the integrity of our Foundation, Government for the People, Laws and Orders, had to see every single Operation upheld in full accordance with the Law. 

Americans also had to visually see the Laws being broken in full accordance with the Law as was done with the RINOS:

18 US Code 2381
18 US Code 2384
18 US Code 2385
3 US Code 15
52 US Code 20511

"We have it all."
"We've caught them all."
"All evidence and crimes will be displayed to the public in full accordance with the law."

Once again, this IS and NEVER was about 'Election Fraud' from the Voter or State standpoint.

Remember the timeline... The timelines and timestamps of Military Actions supersedes everything else. The Military was founded first in our Nation's History. The Articles of War, June 30, 1775, was the first Military Law:

Articles of War:
https://media.defense.gov/2002/Mar/19/2001711742/-1/-1/1/LibertyDay111904.pdf 

The Supreme Court has called military justice a system of justice separate from jurisprudence in the civilian courts. 

Members of the Armed Forces are subject to rules, orders, proceedings, and consequences different from the rights and obligations of their civilian counterparts. 

That's the same Military Justice Act of 2016, that modified the Uniform Code of Military Justice (Military Law) which accompanies the Law of War Manual in this Military Occupancy.

If the Military set up this MASSIVE Operation from 2016 to present day... putting MILLIONS of lives at danger by Federalizing 1,000,000 to Active-Duty on TOP of Active Duty...

Only to need this guy from a random state to file WELL AFTER the Safe Harbor date saying Congress violated the Law….

And now the same Supreme Court who rejected Texas and Pennsylvania cases WITHIN the Safe Harbor date.... is supposed to overturn the one election when that's out of their jurisdiction as they INTERPRET the Law…

What an atrocity and travesty and waste that would be.

Donald Trump is still Commander-in-Chief due to LAWS and ORDERS. Not because "I want him to be" or "that's my President!" 

And everyone of you should want things to be done by honesty and integrity by our Laws and Orders... not to get him back "anyway possible." 💯🇺🇸

This is a great read about Executive Order 13912 😎

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-11-01/html/2021-23639.htm