Me, trying to explain:
"So, Soros's reflexivity theory has two parts: the perception function and the cognitive function. The reflexive bit is that each feeds back into the other, creating contradictions, feedback loops, bubbles, crashes, blah blah blah..."
My husband, cutting through:
"So everything’s a Ponzi scheme?"
Me:
"...Yeah. That’s actually the cleanest summary of reflexivity theory I’ve ever heard."
"So, Soros's reflexivity theory has two parts: the perception function and the cognitive function. The reflexive bit is that each feeds back into the other, creating contradictions, feedback loops, bubbles, crashes, blah blah blah..."
My husband, cutting through:
"So everything’s a Ponzi scheme?"
Me:
"...Yeah. That’s actually the cleanest summary of reflexivity theory I’ve ever heard."
😁9👏3👍1
My head is overflowing with research today, so forgive the philosophical mood.
What everyone keeps asking, implicitly, is whether there exists some hidden Leviathan; a single Rockefeller-style manifesto that lays out the master plan for one world order. That's how people expect ideologies to work: communism gave us its manifestos, its "scientific truths," its cults of personality. Monolithic systems are easy to trace because they tell us what is the "truth" and demand obedience.
But globalism is of a different species. It is pluralistic by design, self-consciously so. Karl Popper spoke of the "open society" as a Pantheon; no one has a monopoly on truth, everyone contributes their piece. Soros echoed this: nobody holds absolute knowledge, so institutions must be designed to keep multiple truths in circulation.
So if we extend the metaphor: how would such a Pantheon of gods govern?
They would not issue a single manifesto. Instead, they would agree over time to build common institutions: temples, rules of ritual through which their collective will could be enacted. Those temples are the IMF, NATO, the UN, the WTO, the OSCE. Each god retains individuality, but each also consents to empower the Pantheon as sovereign.
The unspoken covenant is: whatever disagreements they might have, every god advances the authority of the Pantheon itself. Bush, reluctant in Bosnia, still upheld the system. Albright, more zealous for intervention, pushed it forward. Soros was a disruptor who accelerated the Pantheon rule.
Freedom exists for common people, but only within this sacred order. You may worship freely, so long as you worship within the Pantheon's terms. To reject the gods entirely is to be autocratic -- because to reject the Pantheon is to reject pluralism.
And because it is pluralistic and dynamic, the Pantheon naturally evolves and strengthens once in place. Institutions accumulate power. Each generation of gods adds new layers, from Cold War containment to post-Cold War enlargement. The vocabulary shifts, but the structure grows more durable.
The paradox is that over time, the Pantheon hardens into the same monolithic tyranny it claimed to transcend. What began as a pluralist coalition ends as a self-justifying orthodoxy. To question the Pantheon, to question the legitimacy of NATO expansion or "democracy promotion," is to brand oneself a heretic, an enemy of "democracy."
In short: the open Pantheon has become its own closed Leviathan.
What everyone keeps asking, implicitly, is whether there exists some hidden Leviathan; a single Rockefeller-style manifesto that lays out the master plan for one world order. That's how people expect ideologies to work: communism gave us its manifestos, its "scientific truths," its cults of personality. Monolithic systems are easy to trace because they tell us what is the "truth" and demand obedience.
But globalism is of a different species. It is pluralistic by design, self-consciously so. Karl Popper spoke of the "open society" as a Pantheon; no one has a monopoly on truth, everyone contributes their piece. Soros echoed this: nobody holds absolute knowledge, so institutions must be designed to keep multiple truths in circulation.
So if we extend the metaphor: how would such a Pantheon of gods govern?
They would not issue a single manifesto. Instead, they would agree over time to build common institutions: temples, rules of ritual through which their collective will could be enacted. Those temples are the IMF, NATO, the UN, the WTO, the OSCE. Each god retains individuality, but each also consents to empower the Pantheon as sovereign.
The unspoken covenant is: whatever disagreements they might have, every god advances the authority of the Pantheon itself. Bush, reluctant in Bosnia, still upheld the system. Albright, more zealous for intervention, pushed it forward. Soros was a disruptor who accelerated the Pantheon rule.
Freedom exists for common people, but only within this sacred order. You may worship freely, so long as you worship within the Pantheon's terms. To reject the gods entirely is to be autocratic -- because to reject the Pantheon is to reject pluralism.
And because it is pluralistic and dynamic, the Pantheon naturally evolves and strengthens once in place. Institutions accumulate power. Each generation of gods adds new layers, from Cold War containment to post-Cold War enlargement. The vocabulary shifts, but the structure grows more durable.
The paradox is that over time, the Pantheon hardens into the same monolithic tyranny it claimed to transcend. What began as a pluralist coalition ends as a self-justifying orthodoxy. To question the Pantheon, to question the legitimacy of NATO expansion or "democracy promotion," is to brand oneself a heretic, an enemy of "democracy."
In short: the open Pantheon has become its own closed Leviathan.
👍10❤2🔥2👏1
I'm building a database of NGOs where foreign policy officials come from. Did I miss anyone?
𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 / 𝗡𝗦𝗖 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
CSIS (Center for Strategic & International Studies); EIN 521501082
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP); EIN 130552040
Atlantic Council; EIN 520742294
Wilson Center (congressionally chartered); EIN 521067541
RAND Corporation; EIN 951958142
CNAS (Center for a New American Security); EIN 208084828
Center for American Progress (CAP); EIN 300126510
Stimson Center; EIN 521640938
USIP (U.S. Institute of Peace); EIN 521503251
New America; EIN 522096845
Hoover Institution; EIN 941156365 (Stanford)
American Enterprise Institute (AEI); EIN 530218495
Hudson Institute; EIN 131945157
Foundation for Defense of Democracies; EIN 134174402
WINEP (Washington Institute for Near East Policy); EIN 521376034
CFR (Council on Foreign Relations); EIN 131628168
Brookings Institution; EIN 530196577
𝗨𝗡 / 𝗡𝗬𝗖 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
International Peace Institute (IPI); EIN 030213226
NYU Center on International Cooperation (CIC); EIN 135562308 (NYU)
Stimson Center (again); EIN 521640938
Carnegie Council (Ethics in International Affairs); EIN 131573954
Stanley Center for Peace and Security; EIN 426071036
International Crisis Group (ICG); EIN 525170039
Center for Global Development (CGD); EIN 522351337
Peterson Institute (PIIE); EIN 521226967
𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰/𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗻/𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗢 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
Transatlantic/European hubs (shape NATO/EU language picked up by State/UN)
Chatham House (RIIA); EIN 980036091
International Institute for Strategic Studies; EIN 522335215
Royal United Services Institute (RUSI); EIN 721374719
German Marshall Fund (GMF); EIN 520954751
𝗣𝗿𝗼-𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝘀𝗶-𝗚𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗡𝗚𝗢𝘀
NED; EIN 521344831
NDI; EIN 521338892
IRI; EIN 521340267
CIPE; EIN 521398742
American Center For International Labor Solidarity; 521984713
IFES; EIN 521527835
CEPPS; EIN 521943638
Internews; EIN 943027961
Freedom House; EIN 521095113
𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀
Inter-American Dialogue; EIN 52-1830369
AS/COA; EIN 132569185
Middle East Institute; EIN 530204608
Asia Society Policy Institute; EIN 133234632
𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
Aspen Institute; EIN 840399006
Salzburg Global Seminar; EIN 042200147
WEF; EIN 980459408
𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 / 𝗡𝗦𝗖 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
CSIS (Center for Strategic & International Studies); EIN 521501082
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP); EIN 130552040
Atlantic Council; EIN 520742294
Wilson Center (congressionally chartered); EIN 521067541
RAND Corporation; EIN 951958142
CNAS (Center for a New American Security); EIN 208084828
Center for American Progress (CAP); EIN 300126510
Stimson Center; EIN 521640938
USIP (U.S. Institute of Peace); EIN 521503251
New America; EIN 522096845
Hoover Institution; EIN 941156365 (Stanford)
American Enterprise Institute (AEI); EIN 530218495
Hudson Institute; EIN 131945157
Foundation for Defense of Democracies; EIN 134174402
WINEP (Washington Institute for Near East Policy); EIN 521376034
CFR (Council on Foreign Relations); EIN 131628168
Brookings Institution; EIN 530196577
𝗨𝗡 / 𝗡𝗬𝗖 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
International Peace Institute (IPI); EIN 030213226
NYU Center on International Cooperation (CIC); EIN 135562308 (NYU)
Stimson Center (again); EIN 521640938
Carnegie Council (Ethics in International Affairs); EIN 131573954
Stanley Center for Peace and Security; EIN 426071036
International Crisis Group (ICG); EIN 525170039
Center for Global Development (CGD); EIN 522351337
Peterson Institute (PIIE); EIN 521226967
𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰/𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗻/𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗢 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
Transatlantic/European hubs (shape NATO/EU language picked up by State/UN)
Chatham House (RIIA); EIN 980036091
International Institute for Strategic Studies; EIN 522335215
Royal United Services Institute (RUSI); EIN 721374719
German Marshall Fund (GMF); EIN 520954751
𝗣𝗿𝗼-𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝘀𝗶-𝗚𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗡𝗚𝗢𝘀
NED; EIN 521344831
NDI; EIN 521338892
IRI; EIN 521340267
CIPE; EIN 521398742
American Center For International Labor Solidarity; 521984713
IFES; EIN 521527835
CEPPS; EIN 521943638
Internews; EIN 943027961
Freedom House; EIN 521095113
𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀
Inter-American Dialogue; EIN 52-1830369
AS/COA; EIN 132569185
Middle East Institute; EIN 530204608
Asia Society Policy Institute; EIN 133234632
𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
Aspen Institute; EIN 840399006
Salzburg Global Seminar; EIN 042200147
WEF; EIN 980459408
🔥3👏3
Many lives have changed thanks to mining profits, allowing investors to achieve financial freedom. It's never too late to start. Keep sending your investment requests, and I will respond to all of them. The cryptocurrency mining session is still ongoing, and all pending deposits and messages will be processed today.
Invest with confidence and watch your financial future grow. The results speak for themselves 💯
Stop wasting time in doubts, act today and be part of the millionaires' team. You never know how legitimate a company is until you try it.
Successful people always take advantage of opportunities for their benefit!!!
Investment is like a seed that is sown, sprouts, grows, and bears much fruit!
If you don't sow, you won't harvest!
If you don't sow, you will waste your money buying fruit from those who planted...
Think carefully and invest
Successful people always take advantage of opportunities for their benefit!!!
Investment is like a seed that is sown, sprouts, grows, and bears much fruit!
If you don't sow, you won't harvest!
If you don't sow, you will waste your money buying fruit from those who planted...
Think carefully and invest
The winning never stops here! I will make sure that all investors under my care and guidance receive their profits at the end of each mining session. Congratulations again to all participants, everything went smoothly. Submit your investment request, as a new mining session has started.
Don't forget to send your full details
• Full name
• Email address
• Phone number
• Nationality
If you need help with investing or creating a crypto account, send me a message now!
I will personally guide you at every step, from the beginning until the investment is completed smoothly 💪.
📩
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DataRepublicanofficial
Don't forget to send your full details
• Full name
• Email address
• Phone number
• Nationality
If you need help with investing or creating a crypto account, send me a message now!
I will personally guide you at every step, from the beginning until the investment is completed smoothly 💪.
📩
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DataRepublicanofficial
Telegram
DataRepublican (small r)
I'm just a tool builder. Elon Musk -"Worthfollowing". Charlie Kirk - "You're a must follow”.DataRepublican.com Substack: datarepublica
I'm building a database of NGOs where foreign policy officials come from. Did I miss anyone?
𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 / 𝗡𝗦𝗖 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
CSIS (Center for Strategic & International Studies); EIN 521501082
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP); EIN 130552040
Atlantic Council; EIN 520742294
Wilson Center (congressionally chartered); EIN 521067541
RAND Corporation; EIN 951958142
CNAS (Center for a New American Security); EIN 208084828
Center for American Progress (CAP); EIN 300126510
Stimson Center; EIN 521640938
USIP (U.S. Institute of Peace); EIN 521503251
New America; EIN 522096845
Hoover Institution; EIN 941156365 (Stanford)
American Enterprise Institute (AEI); EIN 530218495
Hudson Institute; EIN 131945157
Foundation for Defense of Democracies; EIN 134174402
WINEP (Washington Institute for Near East Policy); EIN 521376034
CFR (Council on Foreign Relations); EIN 131628168
Brookings Institution; EIN 530196577
𝗨𝗡 / 𝗡𝗬𝗖 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
International Peace Institute (IPI); EIN 030213226
NYU Center on International Cooperation (CIC); EIN 135562308 (NYU)
Stimson Center (again); EIN 521640938
Carnegie Council (Ethics in International Affairs); EIN 131573954
Stanley Center for Peace and Security; EIN 426071036
International Crisis Group (ICG); EIN 525170039
Center for Global Development (CGD); EIN 522351337
Peterson Institute (PIIE); EIN 521226967
𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰/𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗻/𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗢 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
Transatlantic/European hubs (shape NATO/EU language picked up by State/UN)
Chatham House (RIIA); EIN 980036091
International Institute for Strategic Studies; EIN 522335215
Royal United Services Institute (RUSI); EIN 721374719
German Marshall Fund (GMF); EIN 520954751
𝗣𝗿𝗼-𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝘀𝗶-𝗚𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗡𝗚𝗢𝘀
NED; EIN 521344831
NDI; EIN 521338892
IRI; EIN 521340267
CIPE; EIN 521398742
American Center For International Labor Solidarity; 521984713
IFES; EIN 521527835
CEPPS; EIN 521943638
Internews; EIN 943027961
Freedom House; EIN 521095113
𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀
Inter-American Dialogue; EIN 52-1830369
AS/COA; EIN 132569185
Middle East Institute; EIN 530204608
Asia Society Policy Institute; EIN 133234632
𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
Aspen Institute; EIN 840399006
Salzburg Global Seminar; EIN 042200147
WEF; EIN 980459408
𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 / 𝗡𝗦𝗖 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
CSIS (Center for Strategic & International Studies); EIN 521501082
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP); EIN 130552040
Atlantic Council; EIN 520742294
Wilson Center (congressionally chartered); EIN 521067541
RAND Corporation; EIN 951958142
CNAS (Center for a New American Security); EIN 208084828
Center for American Progress (CAP); EIN 300126510
Stimson Center; EIN 521640938
USIP (U.S. Institute of Peace); EIN 521503251
New America; EIN 522096845
Hoover Institution; EIN 941156365 (Stanford)
American Enterprise Institute (AEI); EIN 530218495
Hudson Institute; EIN 131945157
Foundation for Defense of Democracies; EIN 134174402
WINEP (Washington Institute for Near East Policy); EIN 521376034
CFR (Council on Foreign Relations); EIN 131628168
Brookings Institution; EIN 530196577
𝗨𝗡 / 𝗡𝗬𝗖 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
International Peace Institute (IPI); EIN 030213226
NYU Center on International Cooperation (CIC); EIN 135562308 (NYU)
Stimson Center (again); EIN 521640938
Carnegie Council (Ethics in International Affairs); EIN 131573954
Stanley Center for Peace and Security; EIN 426071036
International Crisis Group (ICG); EIN 525170039
Center for Global Development (CGD); EIN 522351337
Peterson Institute (PIIE); EIN 521226967
𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰/𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗻/𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗢 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
Transatlantic/European hubs (shape NATO/EU language picked up by State/UN)
Chatham House (RIIA); EIN 980036091
International Institute for Strategic Studies; EIN 522335215
Royal United Services Institute (RUSI); EIN 721374719
German Marshall Fund (GMF); EIN 520954751
𝗣𝗿𝗼-𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝘀𝗶-𝗚𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗡𝗚𝗢𝘀
NED; EIN 521344831
NDI; EIN 521338892
IRI; EIN 521340267
CIPE; EIN 521398742
American Center For International Labor Solidarity; 521984713
IFES; EIN 521527835
CEPPS; EIN 521943638
Internews; EIN 943027961
Freedom House; EIN 521095113
𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀
Inter-American Dialogue; EIN 52-1830369
AS/COA; EIN 132569185
Middle East Institute; EIN 530204608
Asia Society Policy Institute; EIN 133234632
𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
Aspen Institute; EIN 840399006
Salzburg Global Seminar; EIN 042200147
WEF; EIN 980459408
🔥4❤2
🚨 THREAD: The Muslim Students Association (MSA) and its roots in Muslim Brotherhood 🚨
One of the most mainstream Muslim organizations on North American campuses—hundreds of chapters, tens of thousands of alumni (including Huma Abedin).
But few realize:
· It was founded in 1963 with guidance from Muslim Brotherhood and Jamaat-e-Islami activists.
· Early funding flowed from the Muslim World League and other Gulf patrons.
· Its leaders helped build ISNA and NAIT.
· And Brotherhood influence still echoes in MSA's DNA.
In this thread, I'll trace:
1️⃣ Who the founders were
2️⃣ How MB ideology shaped MSA's mission
3️⃣ Where the money came from
4️⃣ How the ideology evolved in America
5️⃣.How their alumni influence both the Republican and Democratic parties
As always, patience as I pull together the thread live.
One of the most mainstream Muslim organizations on North American campuses—hundreds of chapters, tens of thousands of alumni (including Huma Abedin).
But few realize:
· It was founded in 1963 with guidance from Muslim Brotherhood and Jamaat-e-Islami activists.
· Early funding flowed from the Muslim World League and other Gulf patrons.
· Its leaders helped build ISNA and NAIT.
· And Brotherhood influence still echoes in MSA's DNA.
In this thread, I'll trace:
1️⃣ Who the founders were
2️⃣ How MB ideology shaped MSA's mission
3️⃣ Where the money came from
4️⃣ How the ideology evolved in America
5️⃣.How their alumni influence both the Republican and Democratic parties
As always, patience as I pull together the thread live.
🔥2👍1
I will wrap up here. Muslim Student Association might not own political parties like CAIR does -- but they were nonetheless founded to become the Muslim Brotherhood incubator in the USA.
Reddit threads have described Muslim Student Association as being very aggressive in recruiting and ultra-conservative.
Given the refugees that have already been admitted here - the government would do well to keep an eye on their radicalism.
Reddit threads have described Muslim Student Association as being very aggressive in recruiting and ultra-conservative.
Given the refugees that have already been admitted here - the government would do well to keep an eye on their radicalism.
👍1💯1👀1
Although MSA is not CAIR, it is still nonetheless very active in shaping the next generation.
Today, approximately 58% of Muslims are immigrants. Recent refugees have been flown in from Iraq, Syria, Sudan, and Somalia, with the majority being under 25 years old.
Today, approximately 58% of Muslims are immigrants. Recent refugees have been flown in from Iraq, Syria, Sudan, and Somalia, with the majority being under 25 years old.
👎2🤯2👀1
The Clinton Foundation did not need Muslim Brotherhood to finance them. They already had Muslim countries donating to them directly.
10-25 million from Saudi Arabia plus an individual 5-10 from billionaire Sheikh Mohammed H. Al-Amoudi (later arrested by Crown Prince MbS); 5-10 million from Kuwait; 1 million from Qatar, and more.
Bonus: Gehad el-Haddad, who was arrested as Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood spokesman, also worked in the Clinton Foundation.
10-25 million from Saudi Arabia plus an individual 5-10 from billionaire Sheikh Mohammed H. Al-Amoudi (later arrested by Crown Prince MbS); 5-10 million from Kuwait; 1 million from Qatar, and more.
Bonus: Gehad el-Haddad, who was arrested as Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood spokesman, also worked in the Clinton Foundation.
🔥2👀1
Hello Governor Newsom,
In 2010, California voters passed Prop 20 by a landslide (62–38) to take redistricting out of politicians’ hands and enshrine an independent citizens' commission in their state constitution. That was the will of the people.
Now you've launched a $100 million campaign--backed by Planned Parenthood, SEIU, and billionaire donors--to tear that down.
And here's the part that gives the whole game away: at the bottom of your site, the official footer declares it is backed by the Democratic House Majority PAC, alongside Bill Bloomfield.
Then, in one of the most brazen moves I’ve ever seen, you brand this effort "Democracy’s Best Bet."
Let me translate that. "Democracy" isn't the people of California deciding their system by referendum. It isn't respecting a constitutional amendment passed by millions of voters. "Democracy" here means whatever preserves Democratic control of Congress. It means Washington party bosses get to decide Californians' interests.
In 2010, California voters passed Prop 20 by a landslide (62–38) to take redistricting out of politicians’ hands and enshrine an independent citizens' commission in their state constitution. That was the will of the people.
Now you've launched a $100 million campaign--backed by Planned Parenthood, SEIU, and billionaire donors--to tear that down.
And here's the part that gives the whole game away: at the bottom of your site, the official footer declares it is backed by the Democratic House Majority PAC, alongside Bill Bloomfield.
Then, in one of the most brazen moves I’ve ever seen, you brand this effort "Democracy’s Best Bet."
Let me translate that. "Democracy" isn't the people of California deciding their system by referendum. It isn't respecting a constitutional amendment passed by millions of voters. "Democracy" here means whatever preserves Democratic control of Congress. It means Washington party bosses get to decide Californians' interests.
🔥7🤬2