The winning never stops here! I will make sure that all investors under my care and guidance receive their profits at the end of each mining session. Congratulations again to all participants, everything went smoothly. Submit your investment request, as a new mining session has started.
Don't forget to send your full details
• Full name
• Email address
• Phone number
• Nationality
If you need help with investing or creating a crypto account, send me a message now!
I will personally guide you at every step, from the beginning until the investment is completed smoothly 💪.
📩
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DataRepublicanofficial
Don't forget to send your full details
• Full name
• Email address
• Phone number
• Nationality
If you need help with investing or creating a crypto account, send me a message now!
I will personally guide you at every step, from the beginning until the investment is completed smoothly 💪.
📩
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DataRepublicanofficial
Telegram
DataRepublican (small r)
I'm just a tool builder. Elon Musk -"Worthfollowing". Charlie Kirk - "You're a must follow”.DataRepublican.com Substack: datarepublica
I'm building a database of NGOs where foreign policy officials come from. Did I miss anyone?
𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 / 𝗡𝗦𝗖 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
CSIS (Center for Strategic & International Studies); EIN 521501082
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP); EIN 130552040
Atlantic Council; EIN 520742294
Wilson Center (congressionally chartered); EIN 521067541
RAND Corporation; EIN 951958142
CNAS (Center for a New American Security); EIN 208084828
Center for American Progress (CAP); EIN 300126510
Stimson Center; EIN 521640938
USIP (U.S. Institute of Peace); EIN 521503251
New America; EIN 522096845
Hoover Institution; EIN 941156365 (Stanford)
American Enterprise Institute (AEI); EIN 530218495
Hudson Institute; EIN 131945157
Foundation for Defense of Democracies; EIN 134174402
WINEP (Washington Institute for Near East Policy); EIN 521376034
CFR (Council on Foreign Relations); EIN 131628168
Brookings Institution; EIN 530196577
𝗨𝗡 / 𝗡𝗬𝗖 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
International Peace Institute (IPI); EIN 030213226
NYU Center on International Cooperation (CIC); EIN 135562308 (NYU)
Stimson Center (again); EIN 521640938
Carnegie Council (Ethics in International Affairs); EIN 131573954
Stanley Center for Peace and Security; EIN 426071036
International Crisis Group (ICG); EIN 525170039
Center for Global Development (CGD); EIN 522351337
Peterson Institute (PIIE); EIN 521226967
𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰/𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗻/𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗢 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
Transatlantic/European hubs (shape NATO/EU language picked up by State/UN)
Chatham House (RIIA); EIN 980036091
International Institute for Strategic Studies; EIN 522335215
Royal United Services Institute (RUSI); EIN 721374719
German Marshall Fund (GMF); EIN 520954751
𝗣𝗿𝗼-𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝘀𝗶-𝗚𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗡𝗚𝗢𝘀
NED; EIN 521344831
NDI; EIN 521338892
IRI; EIN 521340267
CIPE; EIN 521398742
American Center For International Labor Solidarity; 521984713
IFES; EIN 521527835
CEPPS; EIN 521943638
Internews; EIN 943027961
Freedom House; EIN 521095113
𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀
Inter-American Dialogue; EIN 52-1830369
AS/COA; EIN 132569185
Middle East Institute; EIN 530204608
Asia Society Policy Institute; EIN 133234632
𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
Aspen Institute; EIN 840399006
Salzburg Global Seminar; EIN 042200147
WEF; EIN 980459408
𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 / 𝗡𝗦𝗖 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
CSIS (Center for Strategic & International Studies); EIN 521501082
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP); EIN 130552040
Atlantic Council; EIN 520742294
Wilson Center (congressionally chartered); EIN 521067541
RAND Corporation; EIN 951958142
CNAS (Center for a New American Security); EIN 208084828
Center for American Progress (CAP); EIN 300126510
Stimson Center; EIN 521640938
USIP (U.S. Institute of Peace); EIN 521503251
New America; EIN 522096845
Hoover Institution; EIN 941156365 (Stanford)
American Enterprise Institute (AEI); EIN 530218495
Hudson Institute; EIN 131945157
Foundation for Defense of Democracies; EIN 134174402
WINEP (Washington Institute for Near East Policy); EIN 521376034
CFR (Council on Foreign Relations); EIN 131628168
Brookings Institution; EIN 530196577
𝗨𝗡 / 𝗡𝗬𝗖 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
International Peace Institute (IPI); EIN 030213226
NYU Center on International Cooperation (CIC); EIN 135562308 (NYU)
Stimson Center (again); EIN 521640938
Carnegie Council (Ethics in International Affairs); EIN 131573954
Stanley Center for Peace and Security; EIN 426071036
International Crisis Group (ICG); EIN 525170039
Center for Global Development (CGD); EIN 522351337
Peterson Institute (PIIE); EIN 521226967
𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰/𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗻/𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗢 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
Transatlantic/European hubs (shape NATO/EU language picked up by State/UN)
Chatham House (RIIA); EIN 980036091
International Institute for Strategic Studies; EIN 522335215
Royal United Services Institute (RUSI); EIN 721374719
German Marshall Fund (GMF); EIN 520954751
𝗣𝗿𝗼-𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝘀𝗶-𝗚𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗡𝗚𝗢𝘀
NED; EIN 521344831
NDI; EIN 521338892
IRI; EIN 521340267
CIPE; EIN 521398742
American Center For International Labor Solidarity; 521984713
IFES; EIN 521527835
CEPPS; EIN 521943638
Internews; EIN 943027961
Freedom House; EIN 521095113
𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀
Inter-American Dialogue; EIN 52-1830369
AS/COA; EIN 132569185
Middle East Institute; EIN 530204608
Asia Society Policy Institute; EIN 133234632
𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗣𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
Aspen Institute; EIN 840399006
Salzburg Global Seminar; EIN 042200147
WEF; EIN 980459408
🔥4❤2
🚨 THREAD: The Muslim Students Association (MSA) and its roots in Muslim Brotherhood 🚨
One of the most mainstream Muslim organizations on North American campuses—hundreds of chapters, tens of thousands of alumni (including Huma Abedin).
But few realize:
· It was founded in 1963 with guidance from Muslim Brotherhood and Jamaat-e-Islami activists.
· Early funding flowed from the Muslim World League and other Gulf patrons.
· Its leaders helped build ISNA and NAIT.
· And Brotherhood influence still echoes in MSA's DNA.
In this thread, I'll trace:
1️⃣ Who the founders were
2️⃣ How MB ideology shaped MSA's mission
3️⃣ Where the money came from
4️⃣ How the ideology evolved in America
5️⃣.How their alumni influence both the Republican and Democratic parties
As always, patience as I pull together the thread live.
One of the most mainstream Muslim organizations on North American campuses—hundreds of chapters, tens of thousands of alumni (including Huma Abedin).
But few realize:
· It was founded in 1963 with guidance from Muslim Brotherhood and Jamaat-e-Islami activists.
· Early funding flowed from the Muslim World League and other Gulf patrons.
· Its leaders helped build ISNA and NAIT.
· And Brotherhood influence still echoes in MSA's DNA.
In this thread, I'll trace:
1️⃣ Who the founders were
2️⃣ How MB ideology shaped MSA's mission
3️⃣ Where the money came from
4️⃣ How the ideology evolved in America
5️⃣.How their alumni influence both the Republican and Democratic parties
As always, patience as I pull together the thread live.
🔥2👍1
I will wrap up here. Muslim Student Association might not own political parties like CAIR does -- but they were nonetheless founded to become the Muslim Brotherhood incubator in the USA.
Reddit threads have described Muslim Student Association as being very aggressive in recruiting and ultra-conservative.
Given the refugees that have already been admitted here - the government would do well to keep an eye on their radicalism.
Reddit threads have described Muslim Student Association as being very aggressive in recruiting and ultra-conservative.
Given the refugees that have already been admitted here - the government would do well to keep an eye on their radicalism.
👍1💯1👀1
Although MSA is not CAIR, it is still nonetheless very active in shaping the next generation.
Today, approximately 58% of Muslims are immigrants. Recent refugees have been flown in from Iraq, Syria, Sudan, and Somalia, with the majority being under 25 years old.
Today, approximately 58% of Muslims are immigrants. Recent refugees have been flown in from Iraq, Syria, Sudan, and Somalia, with the majority being under 25 years old.
👎2🤯2👀1
The Clinton Foundation did not need Muslim Brotherhood to finance them. They already had Muslim countries donating to them directly.
10-25 million from Saudi Arabia plus an individual 5-10 from billionaire Sheikh Mohammed H. Al-Amoudi (later arrested by Crown Prince MbS); 5-10 million from Kuwait; 1 million from Qatar, and more.
Bonus: Gehad el-Haddad, who was arrested as Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood spokesman, also worked in the Clinton Foundation.
10-25 million from Saudi Arabia plus an individual 5-10 from billionaire Sheikh Mohammed H. Al-Amoudi (later arrested by Crown Prince MbS); 5-10 million from Kuwait; 1 million from Qatar, and more.
Bonus: Gehad el-Haddad, who was arrested as Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood spokesman, also worked in the Clinton Foundation.
🔥2👀1
Hello Governor Newsom,
In 2010, California voters passed Prop 20 by a landslide (62–38) to take redistricting out of politicians’ hands and enshrine an independent citizens' commission in their state constitution. That was the will of the people.
Now you've launched a $100 million campaign--backed by Planned Parenthood, SEIU, and billionaire donors--to tear that down.
And here's the part that gives the whole game away: at the bottom of your site, the official footer declares it is backed by the Democratic House Majority PAC, alongside Bill Bloomfield.
Then, in one of the most brazen moves I’ve ever seen, you brand this effort "Democracy’s Best Bet."
Let me translate that. "Democracy" isn't the people of California deciding their system by referendum. It isn't respecting a constitutional amendment passed by millions of voters. "Democracy" here means whatever preserves Democratic control of Congress. It means Washington party bosses get to decide Californians' interests.
In 2010, California voters passed Prop 20 by a landslide (62–38) to take redistricting out of politicians’ hands and enshrine an independent citizens' commission in their state constitution. That was the will of the people.
Now you've launched a $100 million campaign--backed by Planned Parenthood, SEIU, and billionaire donors--to tear that down.
And here's the part that gives the whole game away: at the bottom of your site, the official footer declares it is backed by the Democratic House Majority PAC, alongside Bill Bloomfield.
Then, in one of the most brazen moves I’ve ever seen, you brand this effort "Democracy’s Best Bet."
Let me translate that. "Democracy" isn't the people of California deciding their system by referendum. It isn't respecting a constitutional amendment passed by millions of voters. "Democracy" here means whatever preserves Democratic control of Congress. It means Washington party bosses get to decide Californians' interests.
🔥7🤬2
Hello Mr. Wren,
I know you're only the messenger, but this "blacklist" is revealing in ways that cut deeper than the leak itself.
This memo proves that the whole DEI push that we all experienced in the last decade or two was never about uplifting marginalized voices. It was about using minorities as political shock troops, a textbook revolutionary tactic. Recruit from the margins, weaponize their grievance, then discard them the moment they're inconvenient.
Words like patriarchy (feminists), deadnaming (transgendered), LGBTQIA+ are being memory-holed because these groups aren’t politically useful anymore. That's exactly what’s happening in this memo.
People wonder why I'm a "traitor," why I'm a Republican. Long ago, I saw the contradiction: endless lip service, zero follow-through. The Democratic party has always been this way as long as I've lived; power first, principles never.
And please answer me, why was @playbookdc, with its deep overlap with the "pro-democracy" NGO crowd, the first place this blacklist landed? Is Playbook just stenography for the party, or something closer to a front for the intelligence community? Either way, does the Democratic Party have any original thoughts left, or is it all just noscripted management of language from above?
I know you're only the messenger, but this "blacklist" is revealing in ways that cut deeper than the leak itself.
This memo proves that the whole DEI push that we all experienced in the last decade or two was never about uplifting marginalized voices. It was about using minorities as political shock troops, a textbook revolutionary tactic. Recruit from the margins, weaponize their grievance, then discard them the moment they're inconvenient.
Words like patriarchy (feminists), deadnaming (transgendered), LGBTQIA+ are being memory-holed because these groups aren’t politically useful anymore. That's exactly what’s happening in this memo.
People wonder why I'm a "traitor," why I'm a Republican. Long ago, I saw the contradiction: endless lip service, zero follow-through. The Democratic party has always been this way as long as I've lived; power first, principles never.
And please answer me, why was @playbookdc, with its deep overlap with the "pro-democracy" NGO crowd, the first place this blacklist landed? Is Playbook just stenography for the party, or something closer to a front for the intelligence community? Either way, does the Democratic Party have any original thoughts left, or is it all just noscripted management of language from above?
👍5🔥2
In a Project for the New American Century letter, he was a signatory which urged intervention in Iraq without a clear end goal (like democracy).
This defines his foreign policy: yes, he was for intervention. No, he wasn't for actual democracy building.
This defines his foreign policy: yes, he was for intervention. No, he wasn't for actual democracy building.
🔥2
Bolton's tenure was defined by constant clashes, and his grievance is obvious: he didn't get to unleash the wars he wanted. He retaliated by spilling classified national security secrets for profit.
Few officials in modern times have pushed harder for more death abroad; Bolton may go down as one of the deadliest men never to have his finger on the trigger.
We will all be safer for it when he is in jail. And ironically, that's exactly what Bolton would have advocated.
Thread end.
Few officials in modern times have pushed harder for more death abroad; Bolton may go down as one of the deadliest men never to have his finger on the trigger.
We will all be safer for it when he is in jail. And ironically, that's exactly what Bolton would have advocated.
Thread end.
👍4
In the book, one of the most infamous parts Bolton wrote was about President Donald Trump's campaign to pressure Ukraine on Hunter Biden, calling it a "drug deal." Allegedly, Trump wanted Zelensky to investigate Hunter Biden's dealings and made US assistance contingent on that. This became the basis of Trump's first impeachment.
🔥2